Add a Review

  • Warning: Spoilers
    It's funny how there are so many apparently individual IMDb users who are rating this film as something that deserves to be up there with The Godfather and The Empire Strikes Back whereas users on other sites overwhelmingly rate it with the lowest numbers possible.

    Comedies should either make you laugh or at least be satisfyingly witty. Not this one. 

    The script was definitely a one-pass with no adult supervision, random scenes were thrown in for no reason, the "twist" was pointless, the resolution was unsatisfying as it had no prelude and none of the characters were consistent - only Craig Conway managed to be the same person from beginning to end.

    The cinematography was unimaginative, the sound was regularly at whisper level and the director and editor seemed to be working on two different projects.

    It's also important to highlight that the vast majority of celebrity appearances were so fleeting that it is PAINFULLY obvious that they are only there to slap on the poster in order to con an audience into picking up the DVD. Producers - if you're going to do that, at least give us a decent story to watch!

    I'm not a basher of independent film. I love decent low-budget stuff but it is important to balance out all these rave reviews with the truth.

    Oh, and whichever critic allowed themselves to be quoted on the poster as claiming this was "laugh out loud clever" needs a career change. There were two or three smile-worthy moments at best.
  • Jnoirnoir10329 January 2012
    Warning: Spoilers
    Pretty rubbish. That's about the easiest way i can sum this up. James (a loser) hires Ampersand (a pick up artist) to help him snare the girl of his dreams, who then turns out to be selfish and mean. With that, he realises that his best friend (a hot girl) was there for him all along and liked him just the way he was. Not the most original story. Comparisons with the plot of Hitch and Crazy Stupid Love are obvious. But to put this film in the same category as those two would be a grave mistake indeed. I love Independent British films. I love finding hidden gems, or spotting new talent in smaller films, and then watching their careers grow. However, this is not a hidden gem. There are no new talents to be discovered here. The faces we recognise (Richard E. Grant, Martin Compston, Neil Maskell, Colin Salmon, Sheridan Smith, Jill Halfpenny, Craig Conway) can all chalk this one down to 'keeping busy.' They will all undoubtedly continue onwards in their careers and see this as a mere blip. Not sure anyone who was trying to make a name for themselves with this one will be as lucky. Gemma Atkinson, who would have seen this as a chance to put the lad mags behind her and get some credibility comes up short. Here she plays the object of the central character James' desires, but as said, she is revealed to be shallow and selfish. Atkinson doesn't really show any range or charisma, and on the evidence of this wont be working in anything of a higher quality anytime soon. Simon Phillips who plays the loser in the title, James, is quite honestly appalling. He seems to spend most of the film playing a severe caricature of what I assume he thinks is a geek. Every Cliché is present and accounted for. Fat, check, glasses, check etc, etc. He seems to have only two emotions, and both of them appear to involve an OTT gurning facial expression. Although Im sure everyone can relate to the difficulty of finding a partner - the real big problem was that I just didn't like James. Maybe it's because of the way he was written, but I think Phillips performance took me out of what was already a bad film and left me with very little to enjoy from watching it. He over played every scene. The Director, Dominic Burns must be commended for managing to attract the solid supporting cast mentioned earlier, but then immediately berated for wasting their talents with this guff. Any subtlety to be found in the jokes was wringed out of it and replaced with BIG bravado and hammy,contrived delivery. He cant seem to make up his mind as to what this film is? Is it a romantic comedy. (No. It's not romantic. Or very funny.) Is it a balls out gross sex comedy. (No. It's crass, but again, not funny.) Is it an office/Curb awkward embarrassing type chuckle? (No. It's embarrassing, but only because it's not funny.) I feel like I am being harsh, but it's just that I cant think of many positives in this film. It's utterly charmless and quite boring.
  • Finally thought i'd give this a watch last night, despite the critics terrible reviews of his movie, and oh dear oh dear oh dear... How right they were. Simon's character James was far too 'done to death' with 'cameos' being very few and far between of Actors i'd actually heard of! The girl who played Patch in the movie (Stephanie Leondis) was quite sweet to watch, her chemistry with James on screen was believable, but that of her bumbling friends were most certainly not. Hannah (Gemma Atkinson from Hollyoaks 'fame') was uncharismatic, wooden and dull as James's lifelong crush, along with Simon himself sometimes falling into the same lower league. I felt throughout casting could have gone to an array of more talented, realistic actors out there, although Ampersands character had his moments of greatness. All that said the end has a very funny twist with a psychiatrist, which did make me laugh. One movie though, I'd never watch again or recommend, and want that 90 mins of my life back! 3/10
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Most of the reviews here seem to be one extreme or the other – either that it was amazingly good, or awfully bad. I'd have to say it falls somewhere in the middle. I will agree, however, that the term "romantic comedy" is a bit liberally applied as it more closely follows the conventions of a sex comedy.

    Not being from the UK, I had no idea who most of the actors were (save for Richard Grant and Colin Salmon whom I've seen here and there), so I didn't walk into this with any preconceived notions of their reputations or general bodies of work. That may have helped, since a couple of the reviewers seem disappointed at the level of screen time from the supporting cast. I wanted to watch the film purely based on the vibe of the trailer, which reminded me a lot of the teen comedies that exploded out of the late 90s/early 2000s.

    James (Simon Phillips) is your run-of-the-mill "loser" whose best friend Ian (Richard Grant) commits suicide after succumbing to the depression of his status as a "dateless wonder." In a delayed video message, Ian pleads for James not to end up like him. Motivated by this, James enlists the tutelage of local pick-up artist Ampersand (Craig Conway) to teach him the elusive skills of attracting and seducing women. James has a few setbacks using Ampersand's techniques – which rely on trickery, shameless schmoozing, and insults – but he eventually manages to succeed in catching the attention of his gorgeous high school crush, Hannah (Gemma Atkinson). Things go awry when his friends challenge his new priorities, and James struggles to reconcile between being himself or changing his life to keep the girl of his dreams.

    So there you have it: your standard tale of morality served on a platter of comedy. The film's message is simple: be yourself, because anything else is not worth it. It also takes a humorous look at the "douchebags get all the girls" angle and cautiously points out that you get what you give. As to whether or not the material is funny, that is entirely subjective. Personally, I found myself laughing out loud on a few occasions at the hopelessly awkward social interactions. The movie itself is presented as a narrative recounted by James in a visit to a psychologist (Colin Salmon), who doubles as both an audience surrogate by unprofessionally voicing his third-party commentary on the story and as an added source of humor for cutaway bits.

    As far as the characters, you've got your usual fare: the stereotypical geek, the nerdy-but-attractive female friend, the hot crush that every guy wants, and the well-intentioned purveyor of misguided wisdom. Phillips and Simon play their parts as caricatures – which many forget is a completely normal convention of funny genres – whilst Stephanie Leonidas (best friend Patch) hits it perfectly in the middle and Atkinson (purposefully) alternates between subdued and caricature. The over-exaggeration of James and Ampersand is most certainly intentional, and if you don't understand why, then you don't understand the basic principles of comedy characterization. When comparing, it's easy to dismiss one bunch as too hammy and the other bunch as too flat, but it's simply the large contrast in energy level that gives it that appearance. Hannah is the perfect example of that concept as she goes from one to the other to best display both aspects of her as a person. No, they don't give award-winning performances, but they're not blocks of wood on screen, either.

    ***SPOILER***

    The romantic twist ending wasn't exactly a surprise, but then again, the "Hot Crush" only ever comes in two flavors. In both scenarios, she is always objectified and of a high social standing, but she is either a.) secretly unhappy with her life, or b.) secretly a total bitch. If she's not one then she's always the other. There was a red flag in just about every single one of Hannah's scenes, but they did at least mix in a few Type A behaviors to try and throw you off. However, hooking up with Patch dances dangerously between being contrived and being foreshadowed. She remembers James doesn't like cheese, but then casually tries to hook him up with her single friend. James almost confesses to deeper feelings towards the very end, but never displayed anything more than platonic friendship up until that point.

    ***END SPOILER***

    Is the plot cliché? Absolutely. Does it come complete with stock characters? Absolutely. I went into the movie expecting a certain kind of dynamic, and that's exactly what I got. At nearly two hours in run time they had plenty of room to polish the script a little more, but I was entertained, and that is always what I want to walk away with when watching these kinds of genres. If you like this type of movie, give it a try, and if not, you are better off on some other page.
  • The point of a comedy is for it to be comical and this simply was not. To be honest I found most of the humour childish and in poor taste. None of the stars are comical actors, they are the usual bunch of British b-movie actors who all seem to be in the same films with the same themes.

    The only thing that made me laugh was how bad the acting was. I was surprised to Richard E Grant in there but I suppose its proof that the reason has hit us all as I'm guessing he was only in this movie for the cash or as a bet.

    There were a few hot chicks in it but overall it was a weak film. No idea why its rated as high as 4.5
  • catslovedogs128 February 2012
    I actually got bought this film as a joke! (my flatmate thinking he was funny - think about the title) so I went into it without knowing a thing. I thought it was MAD funny and I actually found myself caring about the lead, James, in his plight to win over the girl of his dreams. (maybe I am a loser after all!) By far my favourite character was the physiatrist who pops up throughout which leads to a BRILLIANT twist at the end I genuinely didn't see coming. The funniest scene is one I can't really describe on here, but look out for a drunken sexual encounter that left me giggling so hard I had to rewind the DVD! Great fun, highly recommended.

    9/10
  • So Loser vs Twilight! So the film makers are nothing if not brave. I'm guessing the general audience who go and see romantic comedies are teenage girls, no? So why release against Twilight whose main audience is... Teenage girls, right? It's a shame because I loved this film, I thought it was so sweet and yes it had some laugh out loud moments but the love story was great and as embarrassing as it is to admit, I didn't see the end coming. I believed it was going in the direction they were taking me, that's all I'll say without risking spoilers. Martin Kemp was brilliant as the love God, he's a movie star and I'd love to see him in more movies, although his IMDb says he's now directing. A shame, too beautiful not to be on screen more. My favourite part was the outtakes at the end and that's not a back handed compliment, I really enjoyed the film but the outtakes were a riot!
  • cB39122 February 2012
    This movie is well worth the watch. It has some entertaining moments, and does draw you into the story. You can connect with a variety of characters, regardless of your personal story. Just watch it and try to connect it to your life, and this movie will help illustrate what is wrong in the world in many ways, but also shows how some things that have been devalued by the media and society are the most important. Don't look past your friends, and seek solely money or personal fame. There are many funny scenes in this movie, though for the most part there aren't many known actors, shows how on a lower budget a good movie can be made. It takes the basic love-interest storyline a step further as well.
  • Just picked this up on DVD and was really pleasantly surprised by how imaginative and funny it was. I really liked all the characters and their relationships with each other and the way human story really shone through the humour.

    I especially loved how the large cast really melded well together and bounced off each other. This was aided by some hilarious cameos that I did not expect but really liked. As a lover of comedies in a similar vein i really thinks it stands up with films like Hitch and The Hangover.

    All in all i really enjoyed the film and felt it was one of my favourite comedies of 2011. i think it is a great example of tight streamlined filmmaking and i look forward to seeing more of the cast in the future. 9/10
  • I have an idea how difficult it is to make an independent film but at the same time you always have to remember that the general people who go to the cinema don't care, all they're interested in is being entertained. After all they pay the same for a movie ticket to a tiny Brit film as they do for a ticket to Transformers! So when I went into an insider screening of HTSBAL at Showcase I tried very hard to see through they eyes of someone who doesn't know the work that goes into these projects. I'm not sure if I managed that but what I am certain of is that I thought this film was quite brilliant, hilarious as it is heartfelt, the humour balancing perfectly with the character development and the story exposition. The performances were all round strong with no exception and the chemistry between our principals Phillips, Conway, Atkinson and Leonidas was great, I know three of them have worked together again and this comes as no surprise to me. Plus the outtakes at the end had me rolling, I love it when films do outtakes. I think I may actually have to check it out one more time.
  • OK, so I'm going to hold my hands up and admit that I was actually in attendance at the premiere of this film, it was ram packed (people sitting in the aisle's!) and I assume the audience must have at least leaned friendly. However the one thing about a comedy is that if no one laughs, the film isn't working... Well Loser brought the house down! ! It's a long, long time since I was in a cinema with such an incredible atmosphere and I go to the cinema a lot, including many premiere's. The film is packed full of great cameos and all the performances are pitch perfect, everyone seems to be having an absolute ball from Richard E Grant right through and the outtakes over the end credits seem to confirm this. OK the script hardly reinvents the wheel but it isn't short of a couple twists and turns and the end is belting, I came out with a huge grin, what more can you ask for from a British romcom?! HIGHLY recommend.
  • lovesall719 February 2012
    This film is different and I seriously doubt it had anything like the million pound budget it claims to have on here but don't let it's relatively low budget put you off. Right from the genius opening scene with Richard E Grant, who I so wish would do more edgy comedy which for me is when he's at his best, the film takes you on a twisty journey that is tricky to predict because it doesn't actually follow the typical romantic comedy well trodden plot, it almost does, which for me is what makes it so clever. It remains a step ahead of you the whole time while drawing you to believe it's taking you on a journey you already know the destination of. The blonde is pretty spectacular but for me, the actress who plays Patch is just drop dead gorgeous, major crush! Some major laugh out loud set pieces and a couple of moments where the proverbial envelope is most certainly pushed! For me worth a second watch but this time with my mates rather than my girl.
  • James_conroy8 February 2012
    Really loved this film when I saw it at the cinema and loved it even more having watched it on DVD! For me it did everything that a film like this needed to do and more. It was funny, gripping and had really well rounded characters who did a great job at really bringing the whole thing together!

    I love the ensemble cast too who although large really made it feel like the film was covering a large demographic of people. Im not sure what the budget for the film was but it seemed as if the filmmakers were really getting a lot out of what i would imagine would not have been a massive budget for an independent British feature film.

    All in all a great watch with a lovable cast and slick direction. for the film deserves a 10/10
  • thistleplant19 November 2011
    What better way to warm yourself during an ever worsening English winter than this lil gem? Haha They should put that on the poster!!! I LOVED it! Made me cry! Couldn't believe it! Haven't cried at a film in absolutely ages!!! Haha Craig Conway who plays Ampersand is sooooo funny, I remember finding him funny in Doomsday, I'm not sure if I was supposed to find him funny in that film but my days was he funny in this one. And Gemma Atkinson, I would actually marry her, seriously, she is soooooo sexy, and there's no way on planet earth that Simon Phillips would get near her in real life but in this film they manage to sell it.
  • Just for once, every so often, it's nice to walk away from razzle dazzle high-tech wizardry and enjoy a straightforward, hugely entertaining film that can stand up on its own merits, without a gargantuan budget, and without several studios working day and night on CG or other effects. If, like me, you find British comedies films normally fit neatly into one of two camps..very good or genuinely terrible, you'll be pleasantly surprised by this little gem. The acting is superb throughout, the storyline is plausible, and the movie rolls along at a steady pace without seeming bloated or skimping on details. The comedy is very much in the detail here, not always in the spoken word or action - which is refreshing to see, and typically British. I'd imagine that this film would appeal to those of us that feel slightly disenchanted with increasingly formulaic Hollywood churn-outs, and those that like a feel-good flick, but can't seem to find one under the groaning mountain of horror films. I realize its 'uncool' to admit to enjoying films of this nature these days. I fully understand that I'd earn far more cool-points by enthusing over the latest cheap zero-storyline hack-and-slash part 8 movie, but I've seen enough of these to honestly say I never want to see another ever again. These days, when life seems increasingly short of laughs, and even escapism isn't catered for, films like this are a welcome relief and a breath of fresh air. Avoid those who'll over-analyse, over-criticize, and otherwise dissect this slice of romantic comedy, and just buy/ rent it. I think you'll be glad you did!