User Reviews (164)

Add a Review

  • EragonOrigins1 November 2014
    Warning: Spoilers
    The movie is a good movie but thought I should mention this for the people who has made the trailer for this movie.

    well, first you should put a spoiler alert at the beginning of the trailer because the whole movie is in this trailer. First of all the trailer shouldn't reveal who is the real villain here. I was watching the trailer and I felt sorry for watching it because after watching it I knew what's going on in the movie. This is not the first movie to use this concept, so it wasn't so hard for someone to figure it out after watching this trailer. I really wish if I didn't watch the trailer. :( so, that;s pretty much it and thought worth mentioning anyway...
  • pjr23530 October 2014
    Had a great time watching this movie. I'm not a fan of 'old time-y' films but this was a good watch. The story was so that it kept my interest as I kept wondering where it was going to go with all this and I felt at one point it would turn out a bit cliché. I was wrong, and never bored getting from one scene to the next. I recommend it but I can't say much more other than I liked the cast (Don't want to spoil it). Great actors/actresses.

    I wondered what Kate Beckinsale was doing in such a film but then it all became clear, she did great, looked great. Micheal Caine, Brendan Gleeson, Ben Kingsley and even David Thewlis were all wonderful. It was my first time encountering Jim Sturgess in any film but he did a great job too, I mean, everyone was right at the top of their game.

    The movie is not fast on its feet and contains little action but it makes up for it all with a well told and engaging story. Plenty of suspense.

    Overall: I highly recommend it. Maybe not a 'must watch' but after you see it, you'll be glad you didn't miss it. Great ending too.
  • Reviewed by: Dare Devil Kid (DDK)

    Rating: 3.6/5 stars

    If you like period pieces, psychopathic characters, excellent actors, and plenty of atmospherics, then "Stonehearst Asylum" should be right up your alley. Between its distinctly modern intelligence and razor-sharp plotting, Director, Brad Anderson's clever contraption almost matches the heights of Gothic grandeur that keep Poe held in high esteem even today.

    Anderson clearly takes delight in all the proceedings, which is one of the reasons the film feels fresh. While the film might lack some the macabre drama and dark humor of the original Edgar Allan Poe tale, it still does a fine job of conveying a creepy, engaging thriller with a brilliant Gothic atmosphere and fine performances from its terrific ensemble cast.

    There's probably a brilliant, award-worthy film to be made about the inhumane way the medical practice dealt with the mentally ill in the past. This one isn't it, but it is nonetheless a solid, sturdy piece of entertainment. "Stonehearst Asylum" is an insane, Gothic thriller with a lot of chills, thrills, and fun to be had along the way.
  • Great acting from an impressive cast.

    Yes the story is based on a Poe story, but instead of finding it eerie I found myself laughing out loud at some parts,(maybe that's just me).

    If you haven't seen the trailer then all the better, a few twists and turns become apparent about 30mins into the film. But there is more to it so don't feel disappointed.

    In general an entertaining film about lunatics and an asylum, set in a Gothic era, the cast really do bring a lot to this film.

    Ben Kingsley imparticular brings so much to his character.

    I give it a good 7.5 out of 10
  • I'd forgotten how much pop scares got on my tits until I watched Stonehearst Asylum. Because it doesn't have a single one. And it's a fine film.

    I think it's somewhat miss-sold as a horror, though it's hard to know how else it should have been marketed. There's plenty of jeopardy but scarcely any gore. I guess its most accurately described as a Gothic romance.

    It's a loose riff off Poe's "The System of Doctor Tarr and Professor Fether" with a few canny twists.

    The cast is stellar: Ben Kingsley, Michael Caine, Kate Beckinsale, Sinead Cusak.

    I tend to define films in terms of whether or not I would enjoy watching them with my undoubtedly better half. in this case, yes. It's a cracking film with a rattling storyline, The odd proto- feminist moment and no horror cheap shots. What's not to like?
  • The young doctor Newgate, stumbling in from the cold, introduces himself outside the gates of the isolated and ominous towering buildings of the Stonehearst Asylum, eager to observe and learn.

    And receives much more than he bargained for.

    The good doctor quickly discovers the central secret of Stonehearst early in the plot, and must then painfully confront a complicated question: Are the patients better off at the hands of doctors who are attempting to 'cure' through sadistic means, or would their world be a better place if ruled by one of their own compassionate (and thoroughly mad) unfortunates?

    Silas Lamb, the storys' antagonist, is brought to life as only Ben Kingsly can do it. Silas is confident and driven, and has the specter of a man filled with seething anger that rages just under the surface. When he looks at you, you freeze. When he talks, you listen. When he yells, you shake.

    The story all by itself would have made an exceptional book. For me, experiencing the same in a movie stunts some of that imagination that can only be provided in print. For a couple examples, I found Dr. Newgates' character annoyingly wimpy. In most scenes, he looks as if he might break down and cry at any moment. Just not quite enough machismo to qualify as the hero with adequate taste.

    The sets inside the asylum rubbed me wrong, too. While historically accurate (as far as I know), they are visually over-the-top and a bit cartoonish looking. I got the feeling I was experiencing a multi-million dollar ride at Disney Land, not an actual place as it would genuinely appear and feel with gas-lighting and coal-fired heat in the middle of a brutal winter season.

    All in all a good bet, great character developments and a final twist at the end that left me satisfied.
  • I only watched this movie because it had the word "Asylum" in the title (Honestly - I just hoped it would have some Arkham Asylum type crazies in it). I did not have high expectations when I started watching this movie...

    Was I pleasantly surprised - it was a GREAT movie and I almost wanted to watch it again. I liked the characters and their stories, the setting as well as well as the plot twist at the end.

    I must however point out that the fact that the movie description/summary I read contained a key spoiler - this did not spoil the movie for me, but I would have enjoyed the film even more had I not known certain details.

    I thoroughly enjoyed this fantastic movie and I was a little bit sad when it ended.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I found this movie on Netflix streaming movies. Filled with accomplished actors, it is an entertaining tale with a twist at the end.

    Stonehearst Asylum was built in 1802 and seems be be out in the middle of nowhere. It seems back in that era a person could be committed, usually for life, with little actual proof that they in fact were insane. Indeed as we get to know the inmates few of them seem like they really belong there.

    Enter Jim Sturgess as Edward Newgate, he shows up at the asylum in December 1899 during the Christmastime, declaring that he had just finished medical school at Oxford and is prepared for his training as a doctor who specializes in treating the insane.

    He isn't there long when he seems to take a great affection for inmate Kate Beckinsale as Eliza Graves, committed there by her husband. Edward is distressed at what he sees, inmates being treated very badly and the head doctor, Ben Kingsley as Dr Silas Lamb , not seeming to care if any of them could be made better. "Everybody has to die sometime."

    Other interesting characters are David Thewlis as Mickey Finn, who spikes drinks before the "mickey finn" ever was invented. And Michael Caine as Benjamin Salt, one of the inmates he finds in a filthy prison in the basement of the old building.

    Overall a very worthwhile and entertaining movie.

    SPOILERS: There were a number of deceptions going on. First, the inmates had overpowered the staff and taken over the asylum not long before Edward arrived there. Those locked up in jail cells down below were the legitimate staff and Salt was the head doctor. Edward with the assistance of Eliza manages to facilitate an escape, but in the process Edward and Eliza also disappear. Then the real Edward Newgate, a doctor at Oxford, shows up. The young man who took off with Eliza had also been a patient, he had seen Eliza at a demonstration at Oxford, he went to Stonehearst to find her and save her. At the end we see them enjoying Italy together.
  • "Believe nothing of what you hear and only half of what you see." Edward Newgate (Sturgess) has just graduated medical school and takes a job at a mental institution. When he gets to know his fellow doctors he isn't sure what to think. Little by little he begins to uncover secrets about the asylum and the more he finds out the stranger things seem. This was a good movie but at the same time it was also disappointing. I liked the idea of this and the twists were perfect and placed at the right time. None of them seemed too far fetched, but that also could have been because the movies was about an insane asylum. With a cast like this however I was expecting something a little bit better. Kate Beckinsale, Jim Sturgess, David Thewlis, Brendan Gleeson, Ben Kingsly and Michael Caine are all big name actors but the movie never rose to their level. This is a movie that is worth watching but it's best to temper your expectations when you see the cast. Overall, a movie that is good and worth seeing but with this cast I feel it could have been better. I can see why it wasn't a big theater release. I give this a disappointing B-.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I did enjoy this film. Its a nice piece of Gothic melodrama rather than a Gothic horror (as it's made out to be) not least because its concern is to humanise rather than exploit its subject matter. 19th (and 20th) century mental asylums were fascinating and terrifying places, and fortunately or unfortunately depending on your opinion the film doesn't really explore the worst horrors that took place in those institutions. Etc is one of the 'abuses' that used to be forced on people, but since its still in some circumstances used today (as it can be effective for treating depression amongst other things) its got a slightly ambiguous status as an 'horror' treatment (although I've met people who were profoundly angry at being forced to undergo it). Despite this - the film works very well, not least because we never know quite what to expect from Ben Kingsley and the always top notch David Thewlis as the villains of the piece, and to go with the melodrama there's some genuine villainy & tragedy to keep the narrative going not to mention a few twists and turns.

    I've no idea how this relates to the tale by Edgar Allen Poe, but the director / writers have managed to balance the sense you get when reading a Wilkie Collins novel or other 19th century melodrama with the (slightly) more critical perspective we have today, although having said that the idea of a therapeutic community - an idea implicit in much of the film - remains quite controversial even today, where drug treatments as a first line of intervention remain the norm rather than the exception. Combined with this is the equally perhaps more controversial idea that sanity is a function of the society we live in - something which is definitely true to some extent - as in the example of hysteria the film addresses - but to what extent is far more controversial? The solution conjured at the end may or may not be if you like a psychotic departure from reality depending on your opinion on the nature of mental illness.

    Overall then a very nice little film, with a great cast, and good pacing.
  • The story presents many points of plot twists and major revelations. But for me the ending seems to be way over done particularly when compared to the story's starting point. The movie is nicely done for me. It keeps the mystery aura very thick. The flash backs and role reversals between the characters captures the audience in a very curious position. But then for me the surprise at the ending makes the finale feel way over done. The acting overall is a nice job for me. Kate Beckinsale actually loses some of her appeal but she is still quite beautiful. Jim Sturgess did quite alright as a doctor in this movie. But the main attraction is indeed Michael Caine and Ben Kingsley who did a great acting job in giving vivid live to their roles.
  • Surprisingly smart movie. My eyes were glued to the screen. I wanted to watch it again right after I saw it. It has a bit of a "Shutter Island" feel to it, however the only things similar are Ben Kingsley, a Mental institution, suspense, spoilers, a script and story that keeps you pleasantly confused, and solid acting. I was unsure whether or not I wanted to watch this movie because of middle-of-the-road reviews. I'm a serious film freak, and maybe I disagree with critics on movies with style and substance that are THIS original. I gave movies like "Cloud Atlas," "Snowpiercer," "Inception," 9 of 10 ☆s. If you love unique films with plot twists, you'll like "Stonehearst Asylum!"
  • When you've made an absolute masterpiece like 'SESSION 9' (and not everyone necessarily agrees) it is a pretty difficult thing to follow. ('SESSION 9' happens to be one of my ALL TIME favourite Horror films) So, you can imagine that my expectations were quite high, probably higher than they should have been. But, I REALLY do like a nice Classic Period Gothic Chiller (HAMMER anyone...?) and coincidentally I frigg'n LOVE Horror films about Asylums, so I was very much looking forward to seeing this.

    I will say this though: 'Thank GOD that it was absolutely NOTHING like 'THE CALL', which in my lowly and wretched opinion, was just about THE most hideous piece of steaming $hit I have ever seen. I remember painfully TRYING to watch that, thinking, 'THIS is the guy who did 'SESSION 9' and 'TRANSSIBERIA'...???

    Clearly, MOST of the time the director is indeed very talented and knows what he is doing (perhaps 'THE CALL' was the result of studio meddling) In this film, the acting was excellent all around. The story kept one's interest, especially when fairly early on you begin to realize that everything is not exactly as it seems. There really is nothing at all 'Wrong' with the film in any way, but probably just for me personally, I would have liked the story to be a bit more intense and the plot points and/or twists to have a little more 'Oomph' behind them. I guess I just found the story, although good and entertaining, to be somewhat on the laid-back and light side. I think that if the director could have possibly infused a bit more of an undercurrent of intensity and palpable 'Mood' (like in 'SESSION 9') I feel that that would have added a lot more to the film.

    But, with that said, the movie is very competently done and it is engaging and all of the characters are interesting. I just REALLY would have liked the 'twists' and atmosphere to pack more of a punch. I was kind of generous giving it a '7', but going by what I feel objectively the general appeal of the film would be to others, rather than just my personal, snotty preference, that seems about right.

    So, I would say that if the look and premise of this film appeals to you, you should find it pretty entertaining. BUT... if you REALLY want to have your B@lls locked in a Psychological vise and smacked around for a couple of hours, make SURE that you catch 'SESSION 9' when you have a dark, quiet, and completely undistracted moment...
  • anaisoropezaj19 August 2021
    I felt like nothing was Happening until the end of the movie. Long and boring that's how I would describe it.
  • I like the cast, setting and general idea of the movie, but I think the direction does not go far enough to build tension. The movie is thus only OK, when it had all the ingredients necessary to make it thrilling. The script gives away too much too early to then focus on a less interesting plot. If it were co keep to the original premise of the E. A. Poe short story with a more suspensfull direction it might have been better. As is, it is a sort of OK, but forgetable film.
  • Stonehearst Asylum (AKA: Eliza Graves) is directed by Brad Anderson and adapted to screenplay by Joe Gangemi. It's loosely based on an Edgar Allan Poe short story. It stars Kate Beckinsale, Jim Sturgess, David Thewlis, Ben Kingsley, Michael Caine, Jason Flemyng and Brendan Gleeson. Music is by John Debney and cinematography by Thomas Yatsko.

    Stonehearst Asylum - Is nothing as it seems?

    For his latest foray into the horror mystery realm, director Anderson provides a film that is away from conventionality's. The horror here is the blurry lines between sanity and insanity, and it has plenty of tricks and dark humour up its sleeves as well. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out quite early on what is going on at Stonehearst, the makers leave enough clues, but as the ungodly treatments show their hands, and the caustic observations on mental health and the treatment of such are made, there's a strong mystery element booming out of the screen.

    Naturally this is a tale full of weird, wonderful and scary characters, and with that comes equal helpings of brutality and tenderness. The key characters are very Poesque, all magnificently framed by the Gothic surroundings (where the design department have worked wonders), while Yatsko's photography is gorgeous or chilly as required. Cast come up trumps, the right blend of Gothic ham and emotionally driven portrayals. Savaged by many critics upon release, it has risen above that to gain a deserved fan base, the word of mouth on the street crucially preparing newcomers for the tone of the play. 7/10
  • A thriller film that's not quite as insane as its premise. This film has some big name stars in it and their performances really pay off and make the movie more entertaining and interesting to watch. Even though there might be some irritating moments with the main character at first but it did wrap up quite well in its twist ending with some humorous moments along the way as well. There are one or two GORY scenes but the film itself is not trying to be gory so don't expect any of that as well as the SCARE. Overall, this is an entertaining thriller flick with great cast and nice twisted concept and ending that will leave you satisfy enough if you didn't go in with high expectation in the first place. >>B-<<
  • m_gh_gh31 October 2014
    I guess the IMDb rating is not anymore relevant for the quality of the movies nowadays. back then, prior to 2005, it was a good sign of distinguishing good movies from the crap, but not anymore. I guess IMDb authorities have to find ways to prevent organised efforts leading to high/low rating of the movies in their website. I have been already a victim of false ratings ,i.e. Chef, but now I read only the reviews before I watch a movie.

    Having this movie below 7, I thought I should double think about watching it. but after reading some reviews here I gave it a go and can't regret a single minute of it. the movie theme is strong, characters are well-cooked and beautifully directed. I would have normally given it 7/10, cause I gave 10/10 only to very brilliant movies like "Edge of tomorrow", "Minority report", "Forest Gump", "Brave heart", etc. however, after seeing the rating of this movie in par or lower than some recent craps, I decided to give it 9/10.

    It is a good movie which makes you feel good about spending 2 hours of your life for watching it.
  • "The satisfaction of helping those in hell. See, of all the afflictions, I can think of none more, more cruel than madness, sir. See, it robs a man of his reason, his dignity, his very soul. And it does so, so slowly, without the remorse of death."

    Can you remember Ben Kingsley in "Shutter Island" as head of a psychiatric institution dressed up in a white overcoat ? In "Stone Hearst Asylum" he took that white overcoat back out of the closet and while smoking a pipe with a pensive look, he's extensively lecturing about the revolutionary method he applies at psychiatric patients. It's a movie based on the short story "The System of Doctor Tarr and Professor Fether" from 1845, written by the supreme master of horror stories, Edgar Allan Poe. This master of the sinister and macabre, who used the dark depths of the human soul and primal fears as a foundation, situated this story in the south of France in those days. An institution used an unconventional way to treat internees. Instead of locking them up, they allowed patients to empathize with their delusions and their madness.

    The whole story is relocated to Britain in the Victorian era. In that time psychiatry still used inhumane methods such as bloodletting, rotational therapies and outright torture by use of electrocution or near-drowning. It's in this period that Dr. Edward Newgate (Jim Sturgess) arrives at the quite spooky looking and secluded Stone Hearst Asylum. A Victorian building that easily could be used as background for an old horror movie and resembles Count Dracula's castle in Transylvania. Newgate wants to gain clinical experience in this institution. A tour of Dr. Lamb shows that the psychiatric treatments used look pretty bizarre. Soon however, he's warned by Eliza Graves (Kate Beckinsale), a gifted pianist who looks absolutely beautiful and immediately arouses Newgate's curiosity. She urges him to leave Stonehearst as soon as possible.

    And then we're off for an old-fashioned detective thriller where Newgate is trying to figure out what hidden secrets there are within the walls. A costume film with lots of candlelight and draughty corridors and dungeons. A sad fact is that very early in the film the greatest secret is revealed, so the tension actually gets badly mauled. It's not a real nail-biter anymore afterwards and eventually it evolves into a dated suspense film with a touch of romance, a spark of excitement and a bit of comedy. Nicely designed though, but at the same time as gruesome as an episode of Sesame Street. However, the final denouement was still Poe worthy and fairly surprising.

    Brad Anderson can be highly thankful for getting together such a star cast for this movie. Celebrities like Ben Kingsley and Michael Caine are not just any actors. Unfortunately Caine's contribution is fairly limited. That's because of the circumstances in which he finds himself and afterwards because of his mental state. Kingsley can indulge himself in his role as the fairly unstable and unpredictable Dr.Lamb. A role with emotions swinging back and forth like an old fashioned pendulum clock. But the most I enjoyed the character Mickey Finn, played by David Thewlis (Better known as Remus Lupin from Harry Potter). A fairly disturbed figure with murderous thoughts. Kate Beckinsale provides the visual delight with her beautiful appearance. Although she's actually the most normal looking person among all the other crazy characters, I always felt like watching at Keira Knightley in "A dangerous method". An expressive facial expression accompanied by a lot of sighs and groans. Jim Sturgess was predominantly in the picture, but actually didn't make an overwhelming impression.

    In the end it wasn't an earth-shattering movie. Amusing yes. And there are worse ways to spend your time. What stays with you are the odd personages who roam through the corridors of this institution: the man who thinks he's a horse and only meekly follows orders when he's being threatened that his next comb-over will be skipped, the nymphomaniac nurse and the Frankenstein-like wild man locked in a dungeon. The wise words told to aspiring psychologists at the beginning "Believe nothing of what you hear, and only half of what you see.", is indeed applicable to this film, because there are some whoppers of story twists in the end. Final tip : don't watch any trailer, because they give away too much !

    More reviews at http://opinion-as-a-moviefreak.blogspot.be
  • I loved "Stonehearst Asylum" and consider it among the best films I've seen recently. However, I'll be honest with you--why I like it probably isn't the reason you'd like the film. As a retired therapist and psychology teacher, I love films that talk about the history of mental health treatment--and this film is set during the bad old days of mental health treatment, when asylums were practically houses of horror. Add to this that the film is based loosely (very loosely) on an Edgar Allen Poe story and you've got most of what you'd need to capture my interest. Fortunately, the film also works when it comes to the acting--and there are some really terrific performances.

    The film is set at Stonehearst--a mental hospital in the middle of nowhere. The place is a fancy asylum for folks with lots of money and a new doctor (Jim Sturgess) has just arrived there. However, it soon becomes painfully clear that the man who runs the place (Ben Kingsley) just ain't right. Exactly what the problem is...well, you'll have to find that out for yourself as I would really hate to spoil the film. There are many dark secrets and twists that should catch you by surprise. Add to the equation the nice acting of Kate Beckinsale and a nice cameo by Michael Caine and you have a rather strong cast.

    This movie is a terrific horror film--but not the sort of horror film you might expect. There are no supernatural or inexplicable scary people--just a lot of malevolence, menace and a complete loss of control. I'd say more...but as I mentioned above, I really don't want to spoil your viewing experience. Suffice to say that this is a very well made film--with a very strong story that would really appeal to adults. Well worth your time.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The written works of Edgar Allan Poe have made for some fine movie adaptations over the years, like the ones Roger Corman made during the 1960s. However, this particular adaptation, while not really a BAD movie, is all the same a disappointment. The biggest problem with this movie is that it is too long and drawn out. While the opening and closing of the movie aren't too bad, the middle portion fails to hide the fact that next to NOTHING important to the plot is happening. While there may have been enough material here to make for one of the entries in a horror anthology movie, there simply isn't enough for a feature film, especially one that is almost two hours long. Also, Michael Caine fans may be disappointed that their idol doesn't have that many scenes. Caine is good, and so is the rest of the cast for that matter. The movie also has an acceptable look and good period detail. And if you really patient and manage to sit through the long slog of the middle of the movie, you will be rewarded with an unexpected twist at the end. So the movie's not really bad, though all the same it's enough of a disappointment that doesn't really warrant sitting through to see the good things about it.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    First of all this film has a great cast. With actors such as Ben Kingsley, Michael Caine, Kate Beckinsale and Jason Flemyng, you know that you are in for a film that will exceed your expectations, and I for one was quite impressed.

    Without giving the game away on this one (you can watch it for yourself), the film starts out in 1899. Sturgess plays the role of Edward Newgate. Ed has just graduated medical school and takes a job at a mental institution. From there, things go from the average to downright freaky.

    There are plenty of twists and turns in this film to keep you guessing until the end, and one spoiler I won't give away :)

    The acting, scenery, and characters were well developed in every aspect. A must watch film for November!
  • dutu-cornelia27 October 2014
    I just saw this movie last night...I loved it.

    I was a little skeptical at first, I'm not into this kind of movies, but I'm glad I watched it. It was never what I expected of it, I was sure that I know what will happens only to be blown away every single time.

    As for the end, lol, it was funny and more than good.

    I do not understand why it says that it will come out in November...because I've seen it last night and it's still October.

    I gave it a 10, because it's been a long time since I've seen a movie where I can't figure it out what will happen in the next scene or how it will end.
  • A most enjoyable and entertaining film with a quality cast of actors and actresses who do an excellent job to develop the story and the suspense which stems from it from beginning to the end.

    This is certainly a film on DVD you will be tempted to watch more than once to catch up on the little bits you might have missed along the way.

    Might even suggest and recommend the movie makes excellent viewing for Christmas Day but it certainly offers an intriguing insight to an Asylum at the turn of the nineteenth century into the twentieth.

    I understood Lunacy to mean from 'luna' the moon in Latin and a Lunatic as someone who went mad from looking at the full moon or something like that. Lunacy was not in fact the main feature of the film but rather other reasons why people were kept locked up in an asylum (rather than say for a petty crime in Jail). It might also have been an alternative to the Victorian workhouse but that aspect is also not focus of the film.

    I doubt the story of Mr Poe bears any semblance to the story acted out in the film but that does not matter.

    There is nothing pretentious or offensive about the film, it seeks to entertain on a sensitive topic and I believe that it verily succeeds.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Most of the reviews including those from IMDb members will emphasize how you don't see these sort of films anymore, they hark back to the Vincent Price or Hammer Films of the 60s.

    That's true, but the REAL STORY is that WHAT YOU REALLY DON'T SEE ANYMORE are films that polarize the audience as much as this one does.

    Brad Anderson, who has a spotted career with moments of sheer brilliance, appears to have made the most dangerous error a director can make -- he fell in love with a story based on setting and mood (a Poe tale) simply because of the aforesaid setting and mood, and COMPLETELY FORGOT this was a film medium, where setting and mood are just not enough.

    To be clear the setting and mood are brilliantly done but that is all this film offers. The story proceeds as slowly as a fly crawling up a drape, a great cast is wasted, and the trope where "the inmates are running the asylum" is so overdone it has become a cliché.
An error has occured. Please try again.