User Reviews (137)

Add a Review

  • Getting older is an odd business. We know it happens to us, every day, every month, every year. And yet, it also sneaks up on us. Suddenly, we're the oldest people in the room, with the most out-of-date vocabulary, squinting and fussing when once we used to laugh and shrug it all off. Our zest for life is rapidly depleting, and time is running out. Writer-director Noah Baumbach's While We're Young is a wise, witty look at a couple caught in between generations - they're middle- aged, by any and all measures, but are still young enough to hear the siren call of reckless adventure and self-exploration. It's a shame that Baumbach's film winds up making a far less successful segue into the realm of a psychological semi-thriller.

    Filmmaker Josh (Ben Stiller) has been in a state of arrested development for years. As his friends settle down with babies and careers, he's been making the same dense, complicated documentary for close to a decade, whilst his happy marriage to Cornelia (Naomi Watts) remains in the same gear as it has for ages. But Josh gains a new lease on life when he meets Jamie (Adam Driver) and his wife Darby (Amanda Seyfried), a free-spirited pair of twenty-something-year-olds who still sparkle with the possibilities of life, hope and renewal.

    While We're Young is at its best when it makes thoughtful, sharp observations about aging. In the first half of the film, Josh rushes to keep up with his new young friends, dragging Cornelia along for the ride. Suddenly, they're shaken out of the rut of their lives, wearing jaunty hats, participating in mass spiritual retreats, and forcing their less flexible bodies into hip-hop classes. Baumbach skilfully juxtaposes this with Josh and Cornelia's increasing disenchantment with their old friends, Marina (Maria Dizzia) and Fletcher (Adam Horovitz), who are caught up in a frenzy of new baby worship. Baumbach's insights are nestled within his scenes and characters - tiny lines or moments will strike home for anyone who's felt out of place for age-related reasons.

    What works less well is the moody semi-thriller (possibly titled Not Quite Single White Male) that Baumbach tries to graft onto his comedy about life and aging. It plays very well at first, as Jamie reveals himself to be - just like Josh - a documentarian, and one who - unlike Josh - seems to have everything work out perfectly at every step of the filmmaking process. It's a nice contrast, because it prompts Josh to keep questioning himself about whether he has, after all, squandered away his youth on something that was never meant to be.

    However, Jamie's relationship with Josh takes on a more sinister tone as the film progresses. His intentions are called into question, with the shortcuts he takes and the friends he makes bordering on the questionable. It's good character work, to be sure, but ends up confusing rather than deepening the overall narrative. By the time Josh barrels toward an awkward showdown with Jamie, Baumbach seems to have forgotten the point he was making with the film in the first place.

    Nonetheless, the film is a worthy vehicle for Stiller and Watts to really dig into their characters and relationship. It's nice to see Stiller really embrace a darker, deeper role that's not quite in his wheelhouse. He pulls it off very well indeed, lending great weight and an unexpected vulnerability to Josh's insecurities. Watts, too, relishes the part of Cornelia, one of the best-written roles in recent memory for a woman in her forties. The film may ultimately belong to Josh, but Watts' Cornelia isn't merely set dressing meant to evoke a life. She's a full-fledged person in her own right, tough and tender, with her own personal heartbreaks that make her the person we see in the film.

    You wouldn't think it, given their wildly divergent career paths to date, but Stiller and Watts also share plenty of chemistry. He may be better known for comedy and she for drama, but it's evident here that they can each handle both with plenty of intelligence and polish. It's a delight, therefore, to watch them navigate the tapestry of their relationship, as Josh - fired by jealousy and paranoia - starts worrying at threads of it such that it begins to unravel before Cornelia's eyes. And yet, the fact that these two characters truly love and respect each other through it all is never in doubt.

    Although While We're Young may not completely come together as a coherent whole, that doesn't detract from the quiet wonders of this smart, whimsical, bitingly real film. It's a pleasure to spend time with characters this real and rounded, to recognise in them the abandon of youth and the relative stability of age. In his offbeat way, Baumbach is warning us that trade-offs between the two may be less rigid than we have been taught to expect. Like the film itself, it's a welcome insight, one that's filled with both hope and maturity.
  • 5/10 might not seem like a good rating, but it's a strong 5. This movie is definitely worth seeing, but only if you're okay with mild disappointments and outdated "we can't be happy without having kids" Disney-like thinking.

    Movie does indeed have a good start - Ben Stiller & Naomi Watts play their roles well and make lots of good points of how we can sometimes be unhappy with our past decisions and our lives. Movie also captures well how people change when they grow up; one ends up having kids, another focuses on his/her career or other things.

    Sadly "While We're Young" doesn't grasp all that there could've been. The ending leaves you kinda sad/disappointed/with mixed feelings. To put it plainly; it doesn't deliver.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Noah Baumbach's film concerning a documentary filmmaker and his wife who have lost their friends to the baby track is disappointing. The couple, Ben Stiller and Naomi Watts, meet up with a younger couple played by Adam Driver and Amanda Seyfried, re-spark their lives but questions creep in about what the younger couple is really after, and what is the right path in life.

    To be honest the film is enjoyable on its own terms. It has laughs and is occasionally strangely moving.

    The problem with the film is that the terms of the film are kind of messed up. The film has a big subtext concerning honesty in documentary films and a quest by Stiller's character to uncover what the Adam Driver character is doing- the problem is the film subverts it and throws it aside in the final minutes. The collapse begins when the Charles Grodin character, a respected documentary filmmaker makes a speech about integrity and then two minutes later says that everything he had just said (and said pretty much in the film up to that point) doesn't matter. Its a wtf moment that had myself and more than a few people in the audience at The New York Film Festival scratching our heads. The film's the collapse is kind of complete at the end of the film which is a kind of out of left field turn for the Watts and Stiller character. The ending kind of throws numerous plot lines aside and is a feel good moment that feels contrived.

    When the film ended I was left confused. What was Baumbach going for?

    After the NYFF screening someone in the audience asked Baumbach the questions I wanted to. He said that all that mattered was the final bit of the film. That was what he was going for and everything he was doing was for that. He also added that we shouldn't have paid any attention to the integrity/making a documentary stuff since he only put it in so that the Stiller character had something to do. We weren't suppose to have paid attention to that since that isn't what the film was about.

    Really?

    Without that the film really isn't about anything. Without it the film doesn't have a reason to be seen.

    Truthfully I don't hate the film, I hate its construction. The film has moments and characters but its as morally bankrupt as the Adam Driver character.

    A disappointing film
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This is an obvious story. When you are middle aged, i.e. in your 40s, you can get into a routine, a rut of sorts, with almost no excitement in your life. If you don't watch out. And when you do, and realize it, you need to do something.

    The script demonstrates this cleverly near the beginning, the couple are settling into bed for the night, she turns on the bedside lamp to read, he squints a bit and muses that the light seems bright. "What is the wattage of that bulb." She looks, squints, "I think it is 75 watts but it is bright and I'm not sure." Only a long-term couple that has settled into a boring routine would have that exchange as if it mattered.

    The couple are both 40-something actors Naomi Watts as Cornelia and Ben Stiller as Josh. They live in New York, naturally, have no children, he is a filmmaker working on his second documentary but seems stuck. He has hours of film, some good interviews, but is having trouble pulling it all together.

    He is just finishing a lecture and at the end meets a younger couple, Adam Driver as Jamie and Amanda Seyfried as Darby. They are just the opposite, they are spontaneous, they seem to see life and the world around them as one big playground. And he is also working on a documentary.

    As it turns out Jamie and Darby didn't meet Josh by accident, he was targeted. It raises some ethical issues, especially when it is discovered that much of Jamie's "documentary" was actually arranged. But through it all Josh and Cornelia learn some things about themselves and some ways to look at their lives in different ways.

    A pretty entertaining movie, I always like Watts and I like Stiller when he is NOT playing some slapstick role, he is actually a very effective actor.

    As an aside it was nice seeing Peter Yarrow as the oldtimer being interviewed, as Ira Mandelstam. Most are probably too young to remember the singing group "Peter, Paul and Mary", which rose to the top in the 1960s, but he is the "Peter" of the group. I saw them live in Houston in the 1980s, it is nice to see him still finding new things to do.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This could have been a lot better but just had to go the road more traveled. In the end they make it out like it's wrong for people in their 40s to even try to be remotely different than all the breeders around them. Well here's news for you: older people without children often have infinitely more interesting lives than those saddled with kids.

    Why does every couple have to reproduce…at least according to Hollywood? This is rather ironic seeing that Hollywood folks quite often lead disastrous personal lives with three and four separate families in their wake.

    The story was of the young couple meeting up with the middle aged couple was fun. Just because I'm an old man doesn't mean that I can't be cool, and cool has nothing to do with appearances like some retarded hat or a beard. Cool definitely isn't hip hop. Cool is having an original thought.

    Once again another move closes with the creators not having the slightest idea of an ending so they go for the done-to-death finale of the couple deciding that, yes, what they really want is a baby. How about if they just went off to Paris together liked they talked about earlier? Or would than make them selfish?
  • Josh (Ben Stiller) is a documentary filmmaker at a crossroads in his career after having made a good debut feature. His wife Cornelia (Naomi Watts) is a producer with a famous father as a documentary filmmaker (Charles Grodin). Now crawling towards middle age, the couple seem unfulfilled somewhat, as they are unable to have a child, unlike most of their close friends.

    Enter tyro filmmaker Jamie Fletcher (Adam Driver) and his girlfriend Darby (Amanda Seyfried), two twentysomethings who not only appear full of life, but seem willing to look up to Josh as an example of a competent filmmaker. Jamie embarks on his career, and never looks back.

    Noah Baumbach's film has strong echoes of ALL ABOUT EVE, with the scheming Jamie trying every trick in the book to advance himself at Josh's expense, while pretending to be friendly. Yet WHILE WE'RE YOUNG manages to make some important points about the angst associated with middle age: Josh wants to be young once more, and is prepared to ape Jamie's mode of dress, as well as trying to enjoy the youngsters' leisure pursuits. Neither prove very satisfying for the older filmmaker, and in the end he comes to acknowledge the fact of growing old.

    Yet Baumbach also has some trenchant points to make about the documentary filmmaker's art. Do they exist to record life around them - as Leslie (Grodin) claims in a climactic speech, or do they cut corners and fabricate life in search of a good story? What is a "good" story anyway? The film has great fun skewering some of Josh's more pretentious flights of fancy as he struggles to finish a six and a half hour documentary that has already taken him ten years. He has written something far too long and boring (it's clear that Baumbach would never be a fan of the work of Claude Lanzmann, whose SHOAH lasts almost the same length of time).

    Yet Baumbach never lets the action get too serious. The script is full of witty lines, and the performances are cleverly drawn. The New York locations also provide an effective backdrop to the action, with the seedy filmmakers' studios contrasting with the opulence of Lincoln Center.
  • Watching people realizing they're no longer young and hip naturally lends itself well to humor, drama, and self-examination, but the subject matter alone doesn't always naturally lend itself to a neatly formed story. The writer/director has to handle that part. Good thing this movie has Noah Baumbach.

    Baumbach brings a knowing touch to this film, always seeming to strike a fitting balance between humor, drama, and analysis, all without ever feeling heavy handed or condescending. He allows his characters to show viewers the dichotomy of a young, idealistic (Adam Driver and Amanda Seyfried) juxtaposed against the aging couple (Ben Stiller and Naomi Watt) who have lost a bit of luster but are a bit in denial about their quasi-happiness.

    After the couples meet and become fast friends, it's the older couple who draws inspiration from the young. They slip right back into their own youthful beliefs about the world and how they should exist in it. Some of their thoughts are meaningful, while others are sappy and, well, juvenile. Despite recognizing the silliness of the young couple's lifestyle, like watching VHS tapes and listening to records just because, it's easy as a viewer to fall under their spell. Driver and Seyfried are effortlessly charming, and their exuberance and self-certainty make them appealing role models.

    The epiphany about how to live life that the young couple gives to the older one is a little too easy and convenient. Something must be off. Baumbach was simply reeling us in, making us listen more closely as he continues his story.

    This is where the most crucial part of the movie arrives, and it's the one Baumbach handles with less success. Just as the salient message of the movie should be coming into focus, the story instead veers swiftly towards a grumpy take on the ethics of documentary filmmaking.

    The third act is a little unsatisfying, but it is certainly not enough to erase what is on the whole an intelligent, humorous and enjoyable movie.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Josh and Cornelia, in their early forties, find themselves becoming estranged from their best friends with their new baby, become drawn to twenty-somethings Jamie and Darby, especially when Jamie is complimentary about Josh's past documentary work (Josh is currently bogged down in a documentary he has been working on for 10 years). Jamie and Darby begin to exercise influence over Josh and Cornelia, especially when Jamie's ideas on documentary-making come to the fore.

    This Noah Baumbach film, with Ben Stiller, Naomi Watts, Adam Driver, and Amanda Seyfried as the four main characters, is getting a lot of good, positive comments. I'm here to add a little lemon juice to take the edge off the overriding sweetness.

    Billed and trailered as a comedy, this is another case of false advertising. I don't deny that there are some amusing moments, but this is mostly a fairly acidic drama, centering around the bromance between the principled but naive (and also driven but not naturally co-operative) Josh, and Jamie – much more aware, socially capable, but also duplicitous and self-serving while pretending not to be. Neither are particularly pleasant characters.

    When the film has something to say about the difficulties associated with accepting that one is ageing, there are some decent truths on show, entertainingly delivered with some amusing social commentary.

    Then there is the documentary making aspect – subplot, if you will - of the film. Baumbach is apparently on record as saying that this doesn't really matter – if so, he shouldn't have let it overpower two thirds of his movie, because one is left with the impression that it does matter. And it is not a (sub)plot which fills the viewer – this one, at any rate – with much satisfaction.

    The performances are good (especially Watts), albeit Stiller gives us yet another variation on his mildly uptight, overwrought persona. But I came away feeling that this film probably delivered much more for those in front of the camera than for those in the audience.
  • After seeing the trailer for While We're Young last week I was reminded what a wonderful and smart comedy this is. It was my favorite movie from TIFF last year, and one of Baumbach's best.

    Anyone over 40 will relate to Josh (Ben Stiller) and Cornelia (Naomi Watts), a married couple in a rut. It's that painful experience of realizing that you've grown up without even trying to, and it's hard to see what's still possible when your body is reminding you that half of your life is already behind you. Baumbach is able to turn this experience into a hilarious and heartwarming story, and that is no small feat. It's serious stuff.

    I remember his debut feature Kicking and Screaming as a seminal movie of my 20s. If you've seen it, you might have the same feeling watching While We're Young that I did. It was like I'd watched Noah Baumbach grow up through his films and characters. I suspect if you watched all his movies in sequence it would be quite powerful. Maybe Noah Baumbach is due for a retrospective titled "Manhood" ??

    Highly recommend seeing this. Performances are excellent across the board. Charles Grodin is a living legend!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    WHILE WE'RE YOUNG (2015) **1/2 Ben Stiller, Naomi Watts, Adam Driver, Amanda Seyfried, Maria Dizzia, Adam Horovitz, Charles Grodin, Brady Corbet, Peter Bogdanovich (cameo). Hit-and-miss domestic comedy about Generation X and Generation WTF from filmmaker Noah Baumbach with Stiller and Watts as a forty something NYC couple who meet twenty somethings Driver and Seyfried and see their carefree spirits as possible rekindling their stilted relationship, and even lighting a creative fire to their collaborative careers. While Stiller continues his put-upon misanthrope to a T, Watts is miscast not finding a comedic footing and Driver is a cottage industry of someone you want to repeatedly throat punch until he's dead. The film attempts to show the similarities and differences in various ways and while it has echoes of Albert Brooks/Woody Allen it becomes a flattened soufflé of angst thru humor.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The film has a good start and seems promising but as we go further and we understand that Jamie (Driver's character) is morally ambiguous ,things start to get confusing. What the 40 year old couple was seeing in the young, creative and passionate couple doesn't exist, as we discover that they are faking everything. Driver's character could be the perfect example of a person affected by a narcissistic personality disorder, manipulating his benefactors and friends to obtain personal profit, with no sense of guilt for his lying even when caught, and no care for anyone (including his spouse) but for himself ("Jamie cares only for Jamie" says his wife). Everyone around him is just a tool for his success. But what is upsetting is that this ,in the end, doesn't really seem to care anyone! Naomi's father ,the great film maker who had a public speech about the meaning of integrity in documentaries, now says it's ok, Driver's act isn't a crime ...! Even to Ben's character (who is surprisingly so immature that fails to make his point on why is wrong to deceive people and enforce this opinion) seem to care less in the end when he admits that (referring to Driver's character) "you 're right. He's not a bad person. He's just young!" This way he buries his dignity even deeper and he accepts both the role of a victim and a failure. This film teaches us that youth = being a narcissist and it is ok to lie and deceive if you are young...Plus ,people in their forties are totally naive and useless and the fact that a person keeps his integrity is not of much value but even worst: is actually a weakness similar to aging... because being honest and real can't bring you success. I think the movie doesn't really do justice to the characters of Ben and Naomi ,and this is a huge dissatisfaction. They don't really discover or even understand where their true value and their authentic way lies as someone would expect from the ending. But they seem to accept Driver's victory and continue their boring life hoping that a baby will solve everything. What a cliche'...
  • A bit pretentious at times, but clever and fantastically acted- While We're Young may not be the home run the film thinks it is, but is certainly a well illustrated period piece and a wonderful social satire. Ben Stiller and Adam Driver are fantastic, truly delving into their characters to likes I haven't seen them before. The whole cast itself is also quite impressive, with Naomi Watts also providing quite a notable performance. The film is surprisingly entertaining, and paced fairly well, but at times can feel like two different films by its end. To sum it up, the film starts and ends in very different spot, and though it is important to see character growth and plot progression in films, it just feels a bit odd how different the film feels by its conclusion- and you can't help but feel Bumbach didn't entirely realize what to do to wrap it up. Besides that fact, and it's somewhat pretentious nature, While We're Young is written very well in terms of dialogue and social satire, and proves to be a very revealing and realistic look into the world it wants to provide a glimpse into. In the end, While We're Young is not great, but a well-enough executed piece from Bumbach that is certainly memorable, unique, and luckily very entertaining. My Rating: 8.5/10
  • kosmasp12 March 2016
    Growing up never felt so exhausting like it is depicted in this. It still feels fresh and has a lot of neat ideas. At least at the beginning, when we get behind what the main characters are feeling. Ben Stiller and Naomi Watts are amazing in their depiction of a couple with more than just one issue, even if they're not admitting to any of them. There's things you have to accept (like your body getting older and weaker for example, even if the mind doesn't see it that way) and others you have to learn to live with.

    But the movie is not contempt to just deal with those issues, but also a relationship with a younger couple. Something that opens up a new box of problems, but also a new perspective if you will. The ending is a bit messy, but the actors are saving it from itself (the script isn't that bad either)
  • judgejimp6 April 2015
    I saw the trailers for this, thought it looked funny and i like Stiller so gave it a whirl. What a mistake! This is not the comedy the trailers made it out to be, they show the best bits and when it came to watching the whole film it fell flat. This film was trying to be an intellectual dark comedy, maybe in the vein of Woody Allen but lacked the style, sophistication and plot. The mid life crisis thing, done many times before but better, the role reversal with the oldies doing the social media thing and the younger couple living like hippie bohemians felt like an attempt to be clever but just didn't feel real. The whole moral conscience thing Stiller had was muddled because of the way the plot didn't really make out that anyone had done anything very much wrong. This was deliberate but made the whole morality issue just too subtle for the audience to care. At the end i couldn't care less whether they had a baby together or not and found it all very irritating. I know it was supposed to be allegorical and therefore clever but to me at least it was just badly done and a bit pretentious.
  • It feels as if we're back in "Greenburg" territory with "While We're Young" made four years later, since we have the same writer and director (Noah Baumbach) and the same lead actor (Ben Stiller) playing a similar central character. This time, Stiller is Josh, married to Cornelia (Naomi Watts), a middle-aged married couple who find themselves hooking up with Jamie (Adam Driver) and Darby (Amanda Seyfried), a couple in their twenties, who remind the older pair of the freshness and spontaneity of youth while he struggles professionally and she laments their inability to become parents.

    The female roles are underwritten and, while Driver is good, this is really Stiller's film. The trouble is that he is such an irritating character, unable to complete a long-running project to produce a boring documentary and foolishly trying to recapture his lost youth. There are some funny scenes and situations, but this is an uneven work with a sequence at a hippy retreat proving particularly silly.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Josh (Ben Stiller) is a semi-successful documentary film maker. He is married to Cornelia (Naomi Watts) whose dad (Charles Grodin) was a successful documentary film maker. Josh has problems sharing. Cornelia has problems having children. Their friends all have babies as our 40-some couple face the reality of their life. In pops Jamie (Adam Driver) and Darby (Amanda Seyfried) a young unorthodox couple who captures the hearts and mind of our aging couple. He also aspires to be a film maker and invites Josh to help him out.

    The film spends the first hour weaving a tale and presenting us with flawed but likeable characters. Then of course the "twist" comes in at about an hour (typical for all films). At this point the film which had me hooked, loses me. It was a twist I felt coming, but couldn't believe how poorly it was done as compared to the rest of the film. The characters were too out of character.

    The feature had some feel good moments, but didn't excel as a comedy. May work as a date night rental.

    Guide: F-bomb. No sex or nudity.
  • The movie surprised me. I was not expecting the plot to take the turn it does. The acting is good, though I liked Ben Stiller and Adam Driver's performance way more than their feminine counterparts. The strange friendship between these two men and, particularly, the keen depiction of Josh's spiritual "infatuation" for Jamie (a character you won't easily forget) was among the things I liked best. There is something terribly cruel about the entire story, and the film is quite effective at striking more than one sore point. Not a masterpiece, but a clever movie- one the like I would see twice. What I can say is that the ending really did not convince me. I would have liked to see how plot could be developed and made more complex and, to be honest, less banal. After almost two hours of movie, I expect the story to reach a final compromise between the starting point and all the assessments either verified or countered by the events the spectator has witnessed. Instead, the characters have been only partially transformed by their experience: let us say that, if the goal of a story is to bring a character from A to D passing through B and C, it seems to me D is a mere copy of, say, B. On the other hand, the movie tells a lot about acceptance and humility: if regarded under this specific point of view, even a not completely satisfying ending acquires its sense, no matter how bittersweet is the impression the movie leaves you with.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This is one of those movies that are fun to watch, but at the same time give you something to think about. It works on different levels and, although it's far from perfect, I liked this movie and enjoyed watching it.

    On the surface, this is a comedy about a generation gap. A childless couple in their forties, leading a routine life without much excitement, meet another couple in their twenties, leading the life of cool hipsters. The forty-somethings get a shot of energy and try to get hip themselves. The funny thing is that the hipsters play vinyl records instead of CD's, don't want the information overload from smart- phones and Facebook, and even use a typewriter instead of a PC.

    As the film progresses, a second theme develops. The cool hipsters, who at first seemed to be in many ways superior to the dull forty-somethings, in reality turn out to be fraudulent fakes without any moral values. So the film is really about a dilemma: is it better to stay true to your own values, even if they are a disadvantage, than to change your moral compass whenever doing so is useful? In answering this dilemma, the film is not as straightforward as you may think - and that's what I liked about it.

    This sounds rather heavy-handed, but the film really is very light-hearted and funny. Not everything about is is perfect, though. Some of the scenes are a bit overdone. And what really annoyed me was the way a third theme (yes!) was dealt with. The forty-somethings don't have children, although they wanted to, and seem to have embraced the idea that a meaningful life without kids is perfectly possible. There's even one scene in which the father of a newborn baby admits that the child is a bit of a letdown. But at the very end, the couple makes a spectacular U-turn by adopting a baby, thus suggesting that children are the ultimate key to happiness after all.

    Disclaimer: at 51, I am neither a twenty-something nor a forty- something. I own an iPhone but don't have a Facebook-account. I have no children and cherish my own moral values.
  • lex-237021 September 2020
    Something different... we're not used for something like this when there's Ben Stiller. Interesting, but a little bit boring... And the end is very... I don't know 😒😶
  • Josh (Ben Stiller) and Cornelia Schrebnick (Naomi Watts) are a childless married couple in their 40s. He's a documentarian struggling to complete his movie for the last 10 years. She's unsatisfied working for her famed-documentarian father Leslie Breitbart (Charles Grodin). Their friends are having babies but they had tried and failed themselves. Jamie (Adam Driver) and Darby Massey (Amanda Seyfried) are a young hip couple who approaches Josh in his class. Soon, the Schrebnicks are pulled into their world.

    I love the sharp jabs launched at Josh's expense. That may annoy some people who are uncomfortable with the awkward truths being poked at. All four leads are doing amazing work. Adam Driver is the big difference. Noah Baumbach is at his sharpest up to this date. It's hilarious that he does throw-up humor in this.
  • "At the same age of Josh in the movie, Baumbach's self-reflexive instinct posits the story mostly from a flustered Josh's viewpoint, and Stiller is mildly exasperating for unable to act more sympathetic as the cynosure here, while the narrative around Watts' Cornelia, unfortunately still being predominantly defined by her womb (they would be fantastic parents!) and the two men in her life (her father and her husband, plus what is her occupation anyway?), is more amorphous, the same can be applied to Seyfried's Darby, under the shadow of Jimmy's faux-bonhomie and faux-naïf facade, she becomes a mere cipher and introduced as someone who makes ice cream, whereas Driver naturalistically codes Jimmy's unpretentious effusion with a shady self-consciousness might be bypassed by more gullible viewers."

    read my full review on my blog: cinema omnivore, thanks
  • stubbornpanda11 June 2015
    Warning: Spoilers
    When you are above 35 you kinda look forward to seeing something that might challenge the way everything has already been presented to you repeatedly. It doesn't even have to be revolutionary. But with this film you realise you have just sat through another movie where you got served everything just as before. The mundane couple who have just had a child, acting bewildered in the presence of people "of a certain age" that don't. Josh and Cornelia defending their childless state, and for a second you think hm...where could this go..Nowhere interesting as it turns out. Just like most other mainstream films they do not have kids as a result of a traumatic physical problem - and not because they have chosen to (but we can all breathe a sigh of relief, they succumb in the end). So nothing new here. Cornelias hip hop class, Josh getting a "crazy"hat, all from hanging out with people in their mid 20s...and the slight awkwardness they display around them, sigh...how many times do we have to sit through age difference being spelled out in the same way? It is almost like every age group have to identify with these stereotypical differences ....and if you don't...then I just don't know (".") jeez. I am sure there was a message in the film but the mediocrity unfortunately drowned out everything else.
  • While We're Young shines in every aspect: Brilliantly directed, charmingly witty, and performed with graceful ease by it's leading actors. Stiller and Watts have found a delightful chemistry here, and the scenes they share brim with convincing self-awareness and sharp comedic timing, opposite Driver and Seyfried, the wide-eyed twenty somethings who are reminders of a fleeting youth. Baumbach has found a new tempo: Not the jazz of Frances Ha, nor the low, blue notes of Greenberg, but an upbeat, yet real glance into the crises of middle-aged life nostalgic for an earlier time. A must see, hilarious adventure about generations at odds, the search for artistic validation, and finding oneself at any age.
  • For the first half of this film, I thought it was pretty typical Baumbach: a collection of amusing moments and characters that occasionally stumbled into plot. But it became something more. It became a reflection (on aging, on perspective, on authenticity), but - more importantly - it became a story.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This is a film you always feel could be good and should be good by ultimately disappoints.

    There are two main plot lines running through the movie.

    1) - 40 somethings getting older reaching an inflection point in their lives. To baby or not to baby, to relive youth or not to relive youth whilst they in theory still can and the relationships along the way.

    2 - A plot line about the production of films by the two main male characters, Josh (stiler) and Jamie (driver).

    The first of the two plot line is engaging and sometime funny, relatable and has potential.

    The second plot line is utterly banal, pointless, emotionless and does not for one second make you care what happens to the outcome or really worthy of any air time.

    This is the film's major flaw. There is not real direction to the movie, there is no real engagement and thrust. If anything the plot line about the film undoes all of the good work that the 40 something conundrum attempts to do.
An error has occured. Please try again.