Add a Review

  • This woman is playing the victim and I just don't buy it-

    I mean what in the AF. Some fat gambling addict takes over your life and business and you're just powerless to stop it? Please. This whole thing is skewed so heavily towards victimhood for Sarma. Neither of them are victims. None of this makes any damn sense. The whole thing is stupid. I mean how could you fall for this?
  • johnpmoseley20 March 2022
    6/10
    How?
    I get why people think Sarma has to have been in on it with her manipulative husband Anthony because the manipulations he's said to have subjected her to sound so absurd. What I don't see is what the motive would have been for her to ruin her life and business just to feed his gambling addiction. Also the doc includes ample recorded evidence of phone calls in which she argued desperately with him about his demands for money, even if she ultimately acceded to them. It does seem pretty clear she was being manipulated, bizarre as it all is.

    Given the mind games said to be at work here, it's a real shame the documentary makers didn't include interviews with psychologists or shrinks. Absent that, I'll hazard my own theory, which I think at least makes more sense than seeing Sarma as an out-and-out deliberate crook.

    It's clear that, in huge debt as she already was when she met Anthony, she married him not for love but on the promise that he'd get her out of the hole. I think this was his leverage in the demands that followed. She felt guilty enough about trying to use him financially to unconsciously allow him to punish her. The onslaught of his demands, torturous though it was, was a distraction from the guilt - a sort of obsessional state for Sarma, not unlike addiction. It's especially extreme, but it's not that different from self-harming behaviours many of us engage in without knowing why we can't stop: over-eating, alcoholism and addiction, OCD, stupid rows with our partners, self-woundig and many more examples down to just spending too much time dumbly scrolling, liking and swiping.

    Let them who are without irrationality cast the first stone, and watch out that the stone-throwing doesn't become your own addiction.
  • kosmasp19 March 2022
    These real life crime shows are stretching it ... well at least in this case. The Investigating Anna show was quite good - I think even those who thought it was a bit too long, saw the quality in it. And while this is only half as long (episode and especially running time wise) as that show - this feels even longer and ... well more boring.

    No offense to those involved (guilty or innocent), but I feel like this could have been wrapped up in two episodes the most. Also do not expect there to be much of a likeability factor. Fans of this type of stuff may not care, but those who do not have time to waste, should stick to other stuff imho.
  • ts-000019 March 2022
    Bad guy,meets a stupid girl(becomes clear on her judgment skills,as you watch it)& together they do even worse things & eventually face consequences.. The end.

    Honestly the only victims here was everyone but actually them,including the dog!

    As a women & that's been in bad a relationship,eventually either you take some accountability and change things or you are responsible!

    She had a business,was an adult & so much other nonsense but never tried stopping it.. therefore she wasn't a victim but only played a victim after it all came crashing down,to get some sympathy for her role in all this.

    For those who feel she was brainwashed,if this was fact in even the slightest way.. Than how come she didn't seem genuinely remorseful,especially for those also hurt by all this?

    It was odd how her meltdowns & more,was recorded as though to use later in some lame defense? She said that she was alone frequently while traveling,but yet never left or got help.

    Had me wondering if she wouldn't of been a cute,white,blonde would she of been held more liable? It really seemed she had men especially brainwashed,if you listen to them during their interview parts.. I might be reaching to say that,but after hearing the homeless guy he seemed unhinged over her.

    Again.. Why feel she wasn't a true victim,but only played that card at opportune times.

    Is this watch worthy? Well,felt like a train wreck you can't look away from.. So enjoy!
  • This would be a mediocre story about a woman who falls for a run-of-the-mill con game, but perhaps people need to have a little sympathy that this happened to a real person, not an actor in a drama.

    This show is framed as a documentary, but it's more like a docufiction that's based on a true story. You don't get his side of the story (for whatever that's worth), and you may argue how much of her vulnerability was caused by her loneliness and naivete (as she claims), or her trying to dig herself out of a hole she created that the con exploited.

    She doesn't come across in the show as someone you would feel much sympathy for--a privileged, beautiful, Wharton business school grad, engaged in the pop culture foodie scene with celebrity connections, who falls from grace, ensnared by a ludicrous con man. But part of that is that this happened during a vulnerable time (emotional and/or financial?), which should be understandable. We can't really be a judge of how stressful it becomes when playing with big stakes, and the stupid things we do when we're trapped. And once we're trapped, we're trapped--and that's the point, I suppose. It's embarrassing, shameful, and cringy for us to watch, but I'd imagine it's more so to have to tell the story herself.

    It's about as exciting as watching a train wreck in slow motion, a vegan version of Holmes and Theranos, but there are far worse shows out there.
  • "Bad Vegan" (2022 release; 4 episodes ranging from 45 to 60 min.) brings the story of New York vegan celebrity Sarma Meilgailis. As Episode 1 opens, it is "2019" and Sarma addresses the camera: "I'm heading off to Rikers Island in a week. A lot of people have written me off." We then go to "1994" as Sarma, fresh out of UPenn's Wahrton School of Business, takes a job on Wall Street. She quickly finds out that she doesn't like that life, and she quits and enrolls at the French Culinary Institute... At this point we are 10 min. Into Episode 1.

    Couple of comments: this is the latest from director Chris Smith, who just last year gave us the outstanding documentary mini-series "100 Foot Wave". Here he looks back at how Sarma Melngailis, a genuine celebrity in the New York culinary scene (and owner of the restaurant Pure Food and Wine), gets introduced (via Alec Baldwin, no less) to a guy who turns out to be a manipulative psychopath, eventually leading to her complete downfall (and worse). As is typically this cases in these types of stories, this would never be believable, but for the fact that it actually happened. And with a celebrity being involved, there is tons and tons of audio and video footage out there, which Chris Smith sifts through and brings to the screen with good effect. Some, if not many, people ask why Sarma simply didn't stop it all much sooner. That sadly misses the point completely. Sarma was the victim of psychological abuse and simply unable to stop it (similar to how victims of sexual abuse are unable to stop it). As Sarma mentions on more than one occasion: "I can't explain it." In the end, "Bad Vegan" is in spirit quite similar to that other recent documentary mini-series called "The Tinder Swindler", equally worth checking out. Last but not least: this mini-series is not called "Bad Vega: Fame. Fraud. Fugitives", as listed here on IMDb. It's simply called "Bad Vegan", as clearly shown in the documentary mini-series.

    "Bad Vegan" premiered on Netflix last week. I watched all 4 episodes this past weekend. Although there is nothing revolutionary as such about this mini-series, I nevertheless found myself hooked from start to finish. If you like true crime and documentaries, I'd readily suggest you check this out, and draw your own conclusion.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The guy is a psycho who had serious mental issues, but Netflix was trying too hard to push all responsibility on this guy when the woman was obviously responsible too.

    1. She said she was brainwashed and Netflix even makes the connection with the Patty Hearst case but it never felt like she actually believed in what the guy was saying. She always sounded annoyed in the phone calls and the text messages didn't show anything.

    2. She never loved him and was only with him for the money. As the others have mentioned she was in for the money from the beginning and not because she was in love with the guy. They showed a few half assed I love yous from the guy, but nothing like that from her. It felt like she believed that this guy could get him money and when it turned out that he is just a swindler she didn't leave because she invested a lot in him and she had hope that she will somehow get her money back.

    3. She never cared about others. In the beginning Netflix builds her up as a caring and good person, but she was lying to her investor friend and it looked like she didn't care about her employees.

    4. She plays dumb. She said didn't know that she was on the run. She acted like she didn't know that it's wrong to give the police a fake name. She didn't care that she gave the made up name 'Michael' to the investors. I mean really? Noone is that dumb.

    What bothers me most is that even her family and her friends imply that she had some part in it, she just didn't want to take any responsibility for her actions. The whole series felt disingenuous.
  • Interesting documentary about a smart and successful businesswoman who lets her heart rule her head and becomes ridiculously stupid and allows a scumbag huge porker husband to rule her life, ruin her business and spend all her money gambling and eating presumably. That classic stupidity seemed to be inherited from her dipstick mother who also gave Jabba the husband $450,000. What was that hobo all about? Was he some kinda of supertramp as he thought he was lord protectorate. Why would the father being phoning him about the dog he was about to rescue. How did he have a phone and a car> Wasn't he a hobo? Conclusion is she is still the most stupid woman on the planet who it suggests at the finale is still connected to her fat husband. Netflix always make interesting documentaries. This was good.
  • Very slow and boring story telling, that could have been told in one episode. Feels way to stretched. Story is very similar to The Tinder Swindler and the Puppet master stories.

    Not worth the time.
  • noahharrigan23 March 2022
    Another true crime mini-series by Netflix. Interesting documentary to a certain extent; overly dragged out though. I watched the entire series in one sitting, and while it was a decent documentary I thought it was a little dragged out from start to finish. This series could have been a lot better if it had been shorter.
  • She helped burn 6 million dollars and only got 4 months.... People genuinely got screwed here, and she plays up the victim for like 4 hours. Complicit lunacy. She even f'd over her own mom. I didn't need this story in my life.
  • I think the main appeal of this docuseries is to see how con artists are getting caught. We all hope that karma will pick up where human justice fails.

    The question whether Sarma was guilty or not is moot, IMO. Like everyone, she is flawed, and at the very least she made some very bad decisions.

    What's more interesting is the extent to which intelligent, educated individuals fall pray to scams, and are dragged into questionable deeds, and from there into worse situations.

    In this debacle, I sympathize with Sarma's father, who seems the most decent fellow in the story, and the one with the clearest understanding of what happened. He admitted his daughter was on the run when she disappeared, and even recognized the fact that Sarma married Anthony for his money.

    I definitely found this documentary worth watching.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Honestly no one can believe someone can be as stupid as Sarma was. I believe 1000% in paranormal n aliens all my life but even I have limits and also clear logic to only believe things if theirs sufficient evidence to prove it.

    To believe someone saying their in the black ops and then he says hes a billionaire lol and then goes to acting like he lives Dean Winchesters life on Supernatural.. cmon.

    Can u be that idiotic to believe it?

    The amount of contradicting lies she should have noticed and Did notice but chose to ignore.

    I mean she wires money to him and then he goes to gamble and she knows about it n continues to send money many times??

    I do believe she was trying to con him for his fake money at first but then once he tricked her to send abunch of cash and she realized theirs no way to get it back so she kept sending more hoping it will work out and then she can leave him.

    Im sure by the time she almost lost her restaurant the first time she realized she has to play along or her business will go broke and so she got no choice.

    This is what happens when a Woman Gold digs the wrong person and then gets gold digged back on her.
  • An extremely gullible restaurant owner gives everything to a con artist who doesn't have an even remotely believable hustle. Naturally Netflix decides to stretch out what should have been at most a 1 hour story over the course of 4 painfully annoying episode.
  • On the one hand I have sympathy for her being psychologically abused by this despicable guy but on the other hand she never once shows any remorse for her employees who suffered. She cared more about her dog.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    He was just gambling it all away. I was fooled by Will. I thought he was real until he wasn't. And from what I have heard before his current marriage. Alec Baldwin would speak to anyone. So the fact Anthony was able to foster an online friendship doesn't seem that hard to accomplish. And parlay that into a connection with Sarma. This is just another cautionary tale. Spend the 50 bucks to do a background check on a person and vett their finances before you marry or go into business with someone.
  • standbykid20 March 2022
    Sarma is probably one of the dumbest people alive...literally. How does someone fall for that buffoonery. She is an absolute idiot. And Shane should probably suffer repetitive blunt force trauma to the head. Good grief.
  • 4 episodes is way too long. There is so much redundancy or things that are drawn out. There is no twist, conclusion, or closure.

    The series is absolutely biased toward Sarma. Most of it is her telling her side of the story - whether it's truth is another thing entirely.

    Speaking of what's true or not, I can't wrap my head around someone actually believing the supernatural claims she supposedly did. Making her dog immortal? Making her some non-human queen? What?! And she doesn't even acknowledge that she believed those things, really. She brushes EVERYTHING off by basically saying "I don't know why, I just did though." I do find the story itself interesting to an extent. But this presentation is extremely overdrawn and very disingenuous and emotionally manipulative.

    This could have been made a short movie or 2 episodes, instead it's 4 hour-long episodes. I can't in good conscience recommend anyone invest that amount of time into this.
  • Pretty clear what's going to happen and how it ends up, and somewhat slow going. But I found it watchable, I guess in that morbid "can't look away from the car crash" sort of way. The big mystery - and absolutely unsolved at conclusion - is why such a smart (Ivy grad from Penn's Wharton), attractive, successful woman gets taken in by such an obvious liar - fat, unattractive, and obnoxious to boot. Causing her to just destroy the popular, successful restaurant she built. Shows her rebuffing the advances of Alec Baldwin...ok, yeah, but he'd still be orders of magnitude better that the squalid creep she ends up with.
  • lauravdl16 March 2022
    Warning: Spoilers
    Well, I'm a little way into ep2 and it's ridiculous. I do understand how people can be gaslit and fall under the spell of a charismatic narcissist. However, it was clear that many of those close to her had their suspicions from the off. And let's face it, he isn't very good at the old story-weaving. In fact, he's lifted much of it wholesale from a TV show... We've heard references to other realms of existence, angels, killing demons, 'the family business' and just now he's started banging on about needing a meat suit.

    If just one person had watched Supernatural his gig would have been up a lot sooner.

    I'll just continue watching to spot any more references, but other than that it's pretty boring.
  • sangavia20 March 2022
    This documentary is madness , little slow.

    The way Sarma interacts on camera makes more worst to watch even it's 4 episodes, she pretends to feel victim in this story with no empathy for what she has done for so many people who trusted her, didn't even apologise for the harm she caused people, and playing victim card on camera.

    She could have been simple honest with people who really cared about her. Sarma knew what she is doing, and still pushed the button.
  • adomaitytela19 March 2022
    "ignorantia legis neminem excusat "(ignorance of law excuses no one). And in her case she knew everything he was doing with the restaurant money and she still went along. It just infurinates me that netflix is trying to make people feel symphaty for this criminal.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    It's easier to hate her, than to understand her. How come a very successful, smart woman, full of talent and promise ended up like this? Anthony is the kind of narcissist, con artist that Hollywood would glorify and make a movie about him, starring Leonardo Dicaprio. The kind of man that stole from his ex wife all her money and left her with a newborn (he even suggested to her to kill their child), the kind of man that could convinced every person to give him money, and that takes talent. It's not a surprise he was able to steal and literally suck Sarma's life out of her...

    Any survivor of mental or physical abuse is always asked the same question "why didn't you leave?" and only survivors can understand why Sarma made such bad decisions. In the end you end up kind of hating Sarma for letting so many of her workers unpaid and sabotaging so much her life. But to understand who Sarma really is you need to isolate her from Anthony, before she met him.

    Sarma before him, was a woman that helped a homeless man, store his winter clothes and became a friend of his, so much that he was the most loyal friend of hers. Sarma was the kind of woman that before Anthony always paid her debts and respected her workers, so much that even after the first closing of the store they all went back to her, still believing she'll come back. The kind of woman that even after the first closing she managed to find investors to open again in an impressively fast way.

    Sarma as a teen looked like a smart kid who always felt isolated, alone and with a sense of not belonging in this world. She was brilliant, her only flaw? Her insecurity, and narcissists can smell that, and prepare their next move on their prey. Then her fear of not being able to pay off her 2 million dept came and at her lowest, she met Anthony, who at the time presented himself as her savior, from money problems and existential ones. He saw that weakness, saw her fear of aging, being nobody and her fear of her dog dying (the thing she loved the most) , and he step on that fear giving her an, what could only be a supernatural, solution for her fear. Any victim of abuse knows what it's like to be so manipulated into thinking the day is night, he even convinced her he's fat for a supreme reason, and it's clear that their sex was a result of coercion and not consensual. And it's why Anthony's ex wife was willing to help her more than anybody else, and sended the letter, because she's been there.

    It's easy to hate her, to only think of her as an entitled rich white lady who didn't paid her workers. But is it just that? In the end she is responsible for her actions, but form the phone calls and texts it is clear that she was deceived. Any person rich or poor can become a victim of manipulation, and from having a store that celebrities go, ready to expand in the whole word, ending up in cheap motels in bad shape, crying and going to prison. Anthony was a textbook narcissist, he manipulated her, didn't let her to express her feelings by always saying it's not a good time now, isolated her from friends and family (the people that can help you). In the end the only way for a loser like him, could seem superior to her, was to low her at his level, because his whole game was about control. He never loved her, only the way she saw him and the fact that she believed his fake persona. She loved him or thought she did, and that to a person who hates himself, is like a "energy charge", the only problem is that, all the "energy" he draw has sucked out of her...

    This show is important if you see it as a warning that your biggest enemy is many times the closest person in your life.
  • Spoiler alert? This story of fraud and deception has nothing to do with being "vegan." The main subject, Sarma, could've owned a steak restaurant and all else would be the same. Okay, so she gets caught with pizza. Since when do vegan restaurant owners have to be vegan? The restaurant isn't even regular vegan - it's raw food vegan! Who is going to eat that 24/7??

    The problem here is that this whole marketing gimmick, calling the film "bad vegan" fuels the pushback against vegan cuisine. Being vegan isn't a lifestyle, or it needn't be. Any reduction of meat and dairy consumption is good for the planet. Any step in the direction away from industrial animal agriculture is a step in the right direction. It's not about virtue signaling or rigidity. But of course, people have to make it about that. Then other people have to pushback making meat eating about American values and whatever else. Because people are stupid.

    Anyway. Like I said, good doc, fascinating how delusional people can become, but misleading title.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Oh my god, what a total joke this "documentary" is. It should be categorized as a "fictional tale" instead of a documentary, because instead of focusing on the truth of how Sarma is a convicted criminal for her numerous racketeering crimes, this film tries to tell a fictional tale about Sarma being an innocent angel at all times.

    The real story that this documentary avoids telling is that Sarma embezzled money from her investors, her employees, and her business to lavishly travel around the world, buy expensive Rolex watches, and likely store her money into offshore bank accounts. But this documentary tries to weave a tale that none of this was her fault at all because she was in a hypnotic trance for several years! Lol!

    Sarma never expresses remorse, she never apologizes to the many people whose lives she destroyed, and she continually pretends that she was not even responsible for all of the money disappearing! Any smart viewer of this film would clearly see that Sarma was working in cahoots with her boyfriend to steal money, and anyone can plainly see that she is currently living the lavish life as a result of her thievery.

    It seems like Sarma is the uncredited producer/writer/editor/director of this film, because this movie only exists to try to make Sarma look like an innocent angel, even though she is 100% guilty for her crimes, and she literally sits there ON CAMERA lying to the camera and making up stories to the camera.

    Every sentence that comes out of her mouth is a lie, but this documentary thinks that we will somehow side with Sarma or that we will somehow not be able to tell that she is lying.

    For example, she lies that she can't remember why she fired her operations manager, as if any human would forget why she fired her righthand man in a furious emotional rage.

    She lies the entire film that some man was stealing her money, but all of her phone calls with him show that she was fully aware of what was going on, and that she was fully complicit in the financial schemes. We have no idea what Sarma was really doing with the money, because she doesn't tell us.

    She also lies about being a "completely normal boring child who was completely normal at all times", but then we see that the primary thing she did during her youth was dye her hair blue/green/purple/pink, shave her head, and wear wigs. Um, no, this is not normal. Then, when the interviewer asks her about this, she finally admits that she was never normal and never wanted to be normal. So at least she finally admitted one of her lies.

    The documentary, of course, is complicit in all the lies. For example, the documentary lies about Sarma being friends with a "homeless man" to gain sympathy from the audience. This "homeless man" appears onscreen and talks about how he jumped in his car to search for Sarma. Lol, what?!! I'm sure you know of so many homeless people who own their own vehicles and pay for all the expenses that go along with their cars - gasoline, insurance, maintenance, parking spots, etc. Haha.

    This movie solely exists for Sarma to push all of her blame onto another person who is likely more innocent than she is. Apparently, she is the only human who doesn't have to take any personal responsibility for her actions, and the creators of this documentary literally think that we are dumb enough to believe the bulls**t that is spewed forth in this film.

    Oh, and get this - the documentary presents fake "journal entries" from Sharma's "journal" as evidence that Sarma is an angel. You can't make this stuff up. Want to know if Sarma is innocent or guilty? Here's a fake "journal entry" from Sarma's journal! Hahaha.

    Seriously. If you want to see what a criminal narcissistic liar looks & sounds like, watch Sarma on camera in this film. And if you want to know what a completely biased set of filmmakers (i.e. Sarma and her team) will create when trying to defend their friend, watch this film.

    It's surprising that the filmmakers (i.e. Sarma and her team) thought that this film would make us sympathize with her.
An error has occured. Please try again.