User Reviews (262)

Add a Review

  • The only Guiseppe Tornatore film I've seen is Cinema Paradiso which is an absolute masterpiece. It surprises me that he was only in his early 30s when he directed it as the film already showed the work of an expert, given that his other films aren't as notable. The Best Offer, with its tight screenplay, lush sets, brilliant performance by Geoffrey Rush and beautiful score by Ennio Morricone, also exemplifies the sophisticated expertise filmmaking. It's refreshing to see a film with a unique universe grounded in the culture of our own with some bizarrely specific themes. While my only complaint is that the dialogue has this very "written" quality about it that is near impossible to deliver in a natural way, it's at least consistent throughout.

    The story is constantly intriguing, held together by a Hitchcockian mystery feeling, and always pays off in a unique way. I'm not one for "old man and young girl romance" stories as they're rarely without uncomfortable perversion but The Best Offer completely justifies it with its well developed characters and themes. However, what makes this film so special and strange is the dramatic turn in the third act. Heartbreaking not only for the characters but for the audience that the film changes so drastically. But this is what made the film stick with me so much. It's wonderful to have a film that you toss and turn in your head, trying to figure out what it's all about. I can't divulge as anybody who hasn't seen it will be spoiled. Just go watch one of the best offers 2013 cinema has in store so far.

    8/10
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Set in Italy but filmed in English, "The Best Offer" is a highly unusual and unusually interesting tale of two lost and hurting souls reaching out to one another for meaning and salvation. Or at least that's what it wants you to THINK it's about. What it's ACTUALLY about may be something else again.

    A self-described "old man incapable of love," the allegorically named Virgil Oldman (Geoffrey Rush) has kept pretty much the entire world - women included - at arm's-length for his entire life. He's a renowned, if not entirely scrupulous, art appraiser and auctioneer who has his entire mode of existence turned upside down when he meets a mysterious young woman named Claire (Silvia Hoeks) who pleads with him to come appraise the belongings in her home upon the death of her wealthy parents. The problem is that Claire, who has been a recluse since the age of 16, seems to be suffering from a severe case of Agoraphobia and will speak with Virgil only through a wall in the house. Dismissive, even irritated at first, Virgil soon becomes obsessed with the faceless, disembodied voice that floats to him through the dusky halls of a lonely villa.

    Virgil is so emotionally cut off from the world around him that, despite the fact that he is physically able to come and go, he is just as much a prisoner of his life as Claire is of her disease and of the decaying mansion in which she's chosen to entomb herself. Is Claire the unexpected someone who will finally provide that meaningful human connection that Virgil has avoided all this time? Or is she merely the vehicle through which he will finally be made to pay for the many professional transgressions he's committed over the course of his lifetime?

    Rush carries almost the entire weight of this film on his shoulders, and he certainly shows he has the acting chops to see it through. Since Hoeks is largely off-screen for large portions of the movie, her task is a somewhat less arduous one, though her accomplishment is no less impressive for that. Jim Sturgess and Donald Sutherland are also effective in smaller, yet highly significant, roles in the drama.

    With a smart screenplay and lyrical direction by Giuseppe Tornatore, "The Best Offer" is a haunting, mesmerizing film that draws you into its world and keeps you guessing every step of the way till the big reveal at the end.
  • ... as a result of love and desire, the urge to acquire what you don't yet have. A superb demonstration of the power of film to manipulate, to ratchet up, build pressure, and time its release to perfection.
  • dgilligan1721 May 2013
    Great movies have the power to make you think and this movie had me thinking for so long I couldn't sleep on the night I saw it. It is a tremendous film with a deeply unsettling message and even now, 24 hours after seeing it I am haunted by the end.

    It's a fairy story and nightmare rolled into one. It's not what happens that's important it's how it happens. the story is great but the plot is even better.

    Forget the bad reviews and make up your own mind. If you subscribe to the notion that Life imitates Art or Art imitates Life go see it. You won't be disappointed.
  • jerryos14 January 2013
    I still can not describe my state of mind at the end of the film, a mixture of devastating feelings that left me breathless, a state of mind that only the greatest movies are able to leave, and this is one of those movies ! Inside there is so much stuff to talk about that in a comment like this is highly simplistic! If you love art, psychology, suspense, love stories, in short, if you love life, this movie will surprise you. A great cast of characters and works of art (TONS!) complete the work and make it an unmissable, different from all the other great movies of Tornatore. Beware then by those who want to associate this film with a film of Hitchcock because it means dismantle and destroy the film, this film is much more! Thrilling is only one small part of a masterpiece of international cinema! Absolutely a must see!
  • This is, by far, my most favorite movie of this year! I've always been a Geoffrey Rush fan, but in this movie, I've seen a very special Rush who, by the way his on screen persona goes thru a life changing metamorphosis, creates a real, day-to-day living among us man with real life personal fears, heartbreaking disillusions and self rediscovering. He makes us care for the very rigid and robotic Virgil Oldman in a way that surprises the senses. He is, in the beginning, a character who most people would find repelling by his uncomfortable attitude and bossy ways. But, as the movie proceeds, he is changed by this peculiar and frightful young woman who has a way of bringing him up, and crushing him down within minutes in their dialog. I must say that director Tornatore wrote this amazingly beautiful story with a golden pencil, I'm sure. This is not another love story. It's a life story, set in the world of Arts, where there's more to discover behind the colors of paintings and the still faces of sculptures than meets the eye. As the movie comes to an end, you will face a difficult task: to be thankful that such a story made it to the big screen, or to desire that it would've remain only in the writer's mind and heart. I give it a full 10, with no regrets. Awaiting more from Tornatore-Rush team! They get along pretty well I see.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Too long I am bombarded by TV shows that attempt to create drama within drama to prolong their lives. Too few movies I have seen that are so beautiful and yet have a good roller-coaster plot.

    "The best offer" seems too good to be true. The music, simple, classical and with taste. At times, two channels are separated so that my attention was drawn and I can't stop enjoying the music. The sceneries, full of sculptures, paintings and other sorts of art works, combined with the view of Italy, are mesmerizing. Sylvia Hoeks is just so breathtakingly beautiful. The scene where she submerged herself under the bathtub water was just so picturesquely capture that it itself constructed a french portrait of a girl. The story is just too good to be true, the atmosphere was built up to climax so perfectly that you can sense the doom is imminent. It left me wonder, isn't it too harsh in the end? But

    It is a Geoffrey Rush's show. But don't forget, it was Giuseppe Tornatore who put all these pretty things are put together.
  • 0U23 February 2020
    A film rich in symbolism and meaning, with a superb performance by Geoffrey Rush. Better than average cinematography and a twist that keeps you thinking and considering the message long after the film has ended. (Tell me the statute Rush hides behind isn't a brilliant allegory for the entire film! Brilliant!) The music gets high marks as well. Highly recommended -- even if you're only looking for a good caper movie.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Virgil Oldman, the lead character in 'The Best Offer', Giuseppe Tornatore's 2013 film, is an expert in detecting artistic fakes. He also is a hypochondriac and an old bachelor. As skilled as he is in art, he seems as ignorant of human relations. A mistake of appreciation in his profession can lead to underestimation or overestimation of a work of art. A misjudgment in personal relationships can lead to disaster in one's personal life. Will the hero of the movie know how to avoid the errors of appreciation? You will find the answer to this question by watching this film by Giuseppe Tornatore. My problem with this director is that he once made 'Cinema Paradiso', one of the few films I appreciated with a rating of 10 on IMDB, and a couple more with a grade of 9. From here the comparison is difficult, and I had quite many reasons to be disappointed. It is one of those movies that the audiences loved more than the film critics. In this case, and this is a rarity, my opinion is closer to that of the critics than that of the public.

    Virgil Oldman is also an art collector and a bit of a scammer, enriching his collection by undervaluing works he likes and buying them at a price well below the real value through an accomplice, a painter himself, who is constantly complaining that his talent is not appreciated. His private life is zero, but as a surrogate he has a formidable art collection composed exclusively of portraits of women. When he is called to evaluate the remaining legacy of Claire, a mysterious agoraphobic young woman who has not left the dilapidated villa where she lives for years, his interest will shift from the collection of paintings and art objects to the person of the woman, of whom he slowly , slowly, he falls in love. The confident and facts-of-life advisor to the aging bachelor is Robert, a young and brilliant mechanic, whom he entrusts with assembling the parts of an 18th-century automata, parts of which are found scattered in the various rooms of the villa. When the woman finally reveals herself, the two seem to become a couple in love, overcoming their respective phobia and enjoying happily the relationship despite the age difference. Too good to be true? You bet it.

    'The Best Offer' is a film about art, beautifully filmed by Fabio Zamarion, the music being composed by Ennio Morricone. The cast is remarkable, with Geoffrey Rush as Virgil Oldman, Donald Sutherland (getting better as the years go by), Jim Sturgess and Sylvia Hoeks as the people surrounding Oldman. The plot combines art with erotica and with a detective story. Almost all the prerequisites for a very good movie would be gathered, but a few essentials still don't work. First of all, the location of the story. 'The Best Offer' is one of those English-speaking international productions, but the filming takes place in Italy with Italian being spoken even in the café opposite the villa, which plays an important role in the story. This detail of authenticity is one of the signs that caught my attention from the start. The age gap between the main hero, his mysterious girlfriend and the young confidant are not played out truthfully. Geoffrey Rush is an excellent actor but he doesn't have enough charisma to justify his relationship with Claire, even to himself. I was expecting more than just a beautiful aesthetic film from a director like Giuseppe Tornatore, who had brought many authentic and emotional stories to screen. The professional expertise of the film's hero, Virgil Goldman, is the detection of fakes in the world of art. 'The Best Offer' seems at times one of those fakes.
  • Interesting and enthralling picture with stirring drama , ravishing cinematography and moving musical score . An epic story of a man who could do anything , except be ordinary . A story centered on an eccentric auctioneer , a great art lover , and his obsession with a heiress/collector . As the successful auctioneer called Virgil Oldman (Geoffrey Rush) becomes deeply passionate about a mysterious woman called Claire (Sylvia Hoakes) who suffers agoraphobia . Meantime , the fine art expert Virgil along with his younger friend , Robert (Jim Sturgess) , attempt to remake an ancient automaton .

    Colorful and moving film dealing with a solitary man who punches drunk love with a strange girl who resides at an Italian villa only attended by a handy man . The flick relies heavily on the complex relationship between an older man and a younger woman , but this does not get bored or spoils the tale . This captivating picture contains drama , intrigue , plot twists and nostalgia completely wrapped in an enjoyable love story between a lone winner and a locked girl . The story is narrated with great sense and sensibility , the intelligent screenplay was written by Giuseppe Tornatore himself . Slightly underrated but excellent all the same time , the picture is both , enjoyable and entertaining , but overlong . Magnificent performance from Geoffrey Rush as virtuoso auctioneer who has never set his heart on real love , Jim Sturgess as his best friend and Sylvia Hoakes as the gorgeous as well as rare girl . Good acting from remaining cast , just like : Donald Sutherland , Dermot Crowley and Philip Jackson . Glowing cinematography in colorful scenarios and splendidly photographed by Flavio Zamarion who reflects marvelously the elegant restaurants , apartments , paintings , auction hall and many other things . Rousing and moving score musical by the veteran master and prolific Ennio Morricone who achieved a deserved David Di Donatello .

    The picture was very well directed by Giuseppe Tornatore and won six David Di Donatello awards , including Best Film and Best Director . Tornatore made other similarly attractive films , including good actors , such as : the excellent ¨Cinema Paradise¨ with Philippe Noiret , ¨Malena¨ with Monica Belucci , ¨ The star maker¨ with Sergio Castellito , ¨Legend of 1900¨ or ¨The Legend of the Pianist on the Ocean¨ with Tim Roth , and ¨Baaria¨ with Raoul Bova ; being his English-language debut feature titled ¨The professor¨ with Ben Gazzara . ¨The best offer¨ rating : Better than average , well worth watching for exceptional cinematography , first-rate acting and wonderful score .
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The con-film has become a staple of cinema: so much so, that it's almost impossible for a film's makers to retain the element of surprise. One solution is to layer con-upon-con, with a sense of knowningness deliberately induced in the audience: we're encouraged to think that something is happening that hasn't yet been revealed, even if we're not sure what. But 'The Best Offer' takes a simpler route: a man explores a path through life that ultimately turns out to be fake. In one sense, there are very few tricks in this plot, just a mirage. But the film needs to give us two things for this to work: firstly, a plausible emotional journey for the victim, and secondly, a sense of motivation for those who plan to rob him. Yet the film's Gothic story is never remotely plausible: it's entertaining as fable, but there's no chance of us being fooled along with the character; or if there is, it's only because we consciously suspend our disbelief as the necessary price of continuing to watch. As for motive, it's simply to steal the money, which is plausible, but dull (compare Bielisnky's marvellous 'Nine Queens' to see a more believable, internally motivated, and cleverer story which nonetheless ends in a similar denouement). The set designer must have had fun on this movie: the story as a whole is jolly but shallow, and it's more of a disappointment than a joy when it's Gothic accoutrements are revealed as sideshow to a fundamentally duller story.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Geoffrey Rush's layered, dominant performance is the thematic and emotional crux of this very dense but mesmerising thriller. In one of his best performances, he plays his character Virgil Oldman with theatrical notes, making the auctioneer an impatient and callous man, who is suffering from rhypophobia. His antisocial behaviour and general disregard of other people signposts this as being a story about a man who learns to reconnect with people and to become a better person. Throughout the film Virgil does attempt to reconnect with the world by aiding an unseen woman named Claire (Sylvia Hoeks), who communicates with him through a wall as he helps her value the property of family belongings. This is a mere starting point as the rabbit hole of the narrative is far deeper.

    There is a distinct European temperament to the material, courtesy of Italian filmmaker Giuseppe Tornatore (Cinema Paradiso), whose deliberate pacing of the story provides the narrative with time and spatiality to enhance the themes and characters. The central relationship between Virgil and the mysterious Claire has a fascinating basis, not because of what it provides Virgil, but how it challenges him. Who is this woman and why is she hiding? The suspense is Hitchcock in tone because we're intrigued by what we're not seeing off camera as much as Virgil's delicate actions. This mystery is trumped by story beats that dissolve into intense peaks of voyeurism, enhanced by a Roman Polanski inspired feel for claustrophobic interiors.

    Virgil is a terrific character. As an art expert he has an eye for detail that provides with him the investigative senses of a detective. Watch his intensity increase as he talks to Claire on his mobile phone, hearing the echo of noises around him and through the phone. He knows that she must be nearby. Their relationship is rich with irony, a bond drawn from an aversion to sociality and people themselves. Tornatore's handsome interior stylisations reflect the internal psychology of his lead character. Scenes are filmed with a wide angle lens, positioning Virgil as a smaller figure in the middle of large open room. This asserts his emotional distance and failure to understand people, women in particular. As he grows mentally and physically closer to Claire and the wall that hides her, the framing is purposefully tighter to assert their union of agoraphobic tendencies. Additional glimpses of his home life reveal a highly desaturated, untouched and sterilised living quarters.

    Cleverly, the film's tension levels are spread outside the main story and into two subplots that enhance the complexity of the relationships and the overall plotting. Virgil has two associates with vastly different motives. The first is his friend Billy (Donald Sutherland) who schemes with him on auctions. Virgil conducts the auction, while Billy sneaks in a deliberate final bid. The other man is Robert (Jim Sturgess), who works in a workshop with mechanics parts. Robert forms an unexpected second mystery in the script. As Virgil asks him for advice on women and subsequently how he can grow closer to the Claire, Robert's inner life comes to the fore. He is continually surrounded by various women when he is meant to be in a relationship. If his advice is genuine, why is his personal life such a mess and what is the significance of the robot that he is constructing from various cranks found around Claire's family mansion?

    One of the theories Robert questions about the robot is whether there was someone once manipulating it from the inside. The same can be said about Virgil because of the artificiality of his life and the manipulation that occurs between these characters. One of the key lines in the film is "there is always something authentic concealed in every forgery". Deception becomes Tornatore's concluding theme, along with physical and mental disorientation. The idea is that as Virgil loses his bearings on time and space we do too so that we experience indistinguishable emotions about the real and fake. On top of this is a midget character with a photographic memory and a fast tracked timeline, which makes for a confusing, mind-bending last quarter. I am still not entirely surely what happened but films that let you guess the ending by the second act are stale and boring. This will provoke discussion, not only because it's strange and ambiguous but because of the complexity of the writing and the various layers of the inspired central performance.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The first English language feature film from director Giuseppe Tornatore, best known for his marvelous homage to film with Cinema Paradisio, is a strange mix of drama, psychological suspense and romance. It tells the story of Virgil Oldham (played by Geoffrey Rush), an eccentric and unscrupulous art auctioneer who has a scam going with his long time partner in crime Billy (an underused Donald Sutherland). Oldham is able to easily spot fakes, but he also has an eye for deceiving desperate sellers regarding the worth of their forgotten masterpieces. Oldham is vain, cynical, fastidious and emotionally dry, until he is asked to evaluate the furniture of a house being sold. The house belongs to the reclusive, agoraphobic Claire (Dutch actress Sylvia Hoeks), who has shut herself off from the world and refuses to emerge from a secret room within the house. Oldham finds himself drawn to help Claire overcome her phobia. The Best Offer moves at a slow, measured pace that slowly draws the audience into its world of deception. Just when we think we have it all figured out, Tornatore manages to pull the rug from under our feet. This is one of those films that almost demands to be seen twice so that you can unravel the puzzle and put the various pieces together. The film has been gorgeously shot on location in Italy, Prague and Vienna by cinematographer Fabio Zamarion (Respiro, etc), and the lush score by Tornatore's regular collaborator Ennio Morricone adds to the atmosphere. Rush delivers a strong performance as a cold and unsympathetic character. Sutherland sleepwalks his way through an undemanding role, while Jim Sturgess is solid as a gifted young mechanic who can fix old clockwork pieces.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The cast and creative team endow this film with the promise of greatness. And indeed, for the first 15 minutes or so, the crisp cinematography, coupled with Rush's authoritative characterization, keep this promise firmly viable. In the first instance we have an endearingly dour, (refreshingly heterosexual) dandy of an art and antiques dealer, who likes to dabble in a little illicit personal procurement every now and then.

    So far so plausible. We'll even forgive that they called him Virgil.

    His professional services are enlisted by an elusive 20-something year-old agoraphobe. She consents only to talk with him through a wall, while he systematically itemizes the vast array of antiques housed within her parents' decaying villa (in which she lives).

    Okay.

    But it's all downhill from there, in a series of clichés, 'not-quite' plot devices, and self-indulgent direction.

    Virgil's trusted mechanician and confidant, Robert, for example, is an impossible combination of youth and exhaustive expertise, rendered even more irritating by his British soap-opera cad demeanor. The conversation between him and Virgil in which the latter explicates the significance of a particular 18th Century inventor, is a cringe-worthy exercise in obtuse Hollywoodised scripting.

    Film, as a storytelling medium, has no excuse to lug theatrical economy around with it when trying to relay such information. That's just lazy direction and screen writing. Nor should it require such overt acts as Virgil accidentally dropping his phone while spying-up Miss Agoraphobia from behind a (conveniently erotic, as if we were dumb enough to require further reminding of the dynamics incurred when a lonely old man enters into fellowship with some young feminine eye candy) marble statue at the end of the room. It's the stuff of chick flicks.

    While the twists and half-turns (because they weren't entirely unpredictable) at the end of the film make for interesting, potentially thrilling cinema-fodder, the pay-offs ultimately suffer from clunky set-up. Anomalies such as Claire - the girl-genius with a freakish propensity for remembering details, or the all-too-convincingly-played groundsman Lambert, beg more questions than they answer.

    And not in a good way; rather, in a way that alludes to a director who, like Virgil, was rather too concerned with aesthetics, at the expense of something deeper and more gratifying.

    Unless, of course, you get a kick out of characters called Virgil Oldham transpiring to *actually* be a Virginal Old Man. Then you'll likely consider this film an intellectual masterpiece.
  • Certainly not your every day movie. This story pulls you in from the very beginning.

    I expected very little, but being familiar with Geoffrey Rush and his prior role selections did hold some expectation as to what kind of a story and setting I would be witness to.

    May I say that after watching this movie, I am certain I will see his character from this film in future when seeing Rush perform. His execution of the role was impeccable.

    Overall - movies are very rarely made like this, from storyline, script, acting to music, there was not a moment in which i wasn't captivated.

    Chilled to the bone even after completing the film, this is top shelf work and an unlikely gem I commend and will be indefinitely complementing and recommending.

    Certainly a timeless movie, embark on with a cup of tea (or some pop corn) and settle in for a remarkable journey and emotion roller coaster.

    10 stars.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Goodness, what a film. Like the Usual Suspects, it needs to be watched a second time.

    Very much under the radar; tucked away into the VoD menu like one of the artworks portrayed in it. I thought Geoffrey Rush would forever be the Tailor of Panama, but here he is in the most exquisite form as his more neurotic and successful cousin. The cleverness of the script is in how the viewer is fooled as elegantly as the protagonist, experiencing his disbelief. You can see it coming, but you don't want to believe it - just like him. We thought we were watching a sensitive biopic about two people helping each other to overcome their separate phobias, only to discover you were watching a profoundly targeted and flawless forgery.

    There's also something regal about the underrated Sylvia Hoeks, even if it is difficult to categorise: a maturity for her age, or a perfectly-cast "old soul" vibe that works perfectly for the older man theorem. It's a subtle, robotic simplicity that could so easily be overdone, but is masterfully held back.

    On one side of the mirror, we have an auctioneer - an expert in detecting forgery - breathing life into his greatest artistic work: bringing an agoraphobic heiress back to life, whilst healing himself.

    On the other, we see another artist creating the perfect forgery: renting a mysterious house with an even more mysterious inventory from a dwarf savant, in order to draw his mark into madness so he can steal the most personal, priceless collection of artwork.

    But the final reveal is the painting supposedly obsessed over our heiress, apparently of her mother. The grand revenge scheme has been orchestrated by the protagonist's embittered partner-in-crime and shill-bidder, who was the artist. Before Virgil leaves London, Billy announces he's sent him one of his paintings, almost as if they were never going to speak again. When Virgil returns to see his emptied collection, all that is left are the remains that allow him to connect the dots: after a lifetime of being patronised and criticised by his friend for his supposedly meagre talents, Billy has co-ordinated the elaborate heist involving the girl and the robot, and rubs his friend's nose in his cleverness by signing and leaving Claire's special painting, with his thanks and admiration.

    Structure is everything in screen writing, and this script was beautifully constructed in itself as a piece of art, complete with eccentricities, contrasts, and its own signature. There is no reconciliation, just denouement. Perhaps a little more exposition would have been useful, but like all art, it was made to make you wonder what the artist's inspiration and plan were.
  • Another great role for Geoffrey Rush, possibly his greatest acting performance, up to today. I dare to call it "another" just because his performance in the King's Speech was quite impressive... The movie offers not only an interesting script, somehow near to Agatha's Christie novels, but also fine images and an inspired music. If you like fine paintings and antique furniture, you will enjoy watching this movie, even without paying to much attention to the criminal skeleton that leads the story...there is no place for useless sequences, everything goes smoothly and natural, the drama is well tempered until the very final peak, the whole is well balanced and wonderful. I do not know anything about the director of this movie, Mr.Giuseppe Tornatore, but, I am pretty sure that he has many other things to say in his future career...be sure to not miss this film, you will highly enjoy the time spent watching it!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I was able to find this fine movie on Netflix streaming. It moves neither slowly nor rapidly, it rather paints a portrait of a man and those he deals with. By the same director as one of my favorites, "The Legend of 1900."

    There isn't much divulged about where this takes place but most filming locations are in Italy, but except for the American all characters speak as if they were British.

    Geoffrey Rush, about 60, is the central figure as art expert and auctioneer Virgil Oldman. He even has his own auction firm which is highly respected. But old Virgil has more than a few quirks and one big secret. Among his quirks, always wearing gloves in public, even when dining at a fine restaurant, and holding a phone with a handkerchief while talking.

    His secret is that he is obsessed with paintings of women and he collects them on the sly, enlisting the help of Donald Sutherland as Billy Whistler, to bid in his behalf. And sometimes even declaring an authentic painting a high-quality fake so that he can get it for a fraction of its value.

    His life changes when he gets a call from a mysterious woman whose mother and father had recently died within a few weeks of each other and she needed to dispose of their estate of antique furniture and works of art. She is played by Sylvia Hoeks, about 27, as Claire Ibbetson, with such a bad phobia that she locks herself into her room any time others are in the house. She will not meet Oldman face-to-face.

    The other key character is Jim Sturgess as handyman and instrument repair man Robert. Oldman finds parts of an old machine, gears etc, on the floors of the old home and enlists Robert to identify it and perhaps rebuild it. He thinks it might be an ancient contraption that when restored could fetch millions.

    As the story unfolds Oldman begins to let his guard down and cares about this young woman, but is she everything he thinks she is?

    Really a good movie, well played at just over 2 hours.

    SPOILERS: Oldman gets sucked more and more into his affections for this young woman, an incident gets her to voluntarily go outside for the first time in years. She loses her inhibitions, she moves in with Oldman, they declare their love for each other. Now fully trusting her he shows her his hidden room filled with valuable paintings. When he gets back from London in what is to be his very last auction, he finds that she is gone, he takes a new painting and when he brings it into his hidden gallery he sees that all his paintings are gone. And then he finds out the quirky dwarf that hangs out at the bar across the street is named Claire and is the actual owner of the old house. She occasionally rents it out to film crews, they move in furniture and props only to move them out later. Oldman has been duped, Billy, Robert, and the fake Claire were all in on it, he was the victim of an elaborate scheme to steal his paintings worth millions. But he acquired many, perhaps most, of them dishonestly so maybe it was just justice!
  • I watched 12 most promising movies at recent Berlinale, and this was ultimately the best one. The movie is breathtaking and captures you from the first seconds. Mr. Rush acting is superb, as are the art direction, cinematography, score and of course, the plot. Film is full of beauty, emotion and humor. It feels like a united whole from beginning to the end and leaves a great impression. I was also surprised later, when I found out that it was shot digitally with Arri Alexa Studio - I was sure it was shot on film. This really is a camera which will finally kill film, although I love film so much. Ironically, film may remain the medium of choice for low budget productions, who can not afford renting this Arri beast.
  • The idea is wonderful, the photography and music just what they should be, so why isn't this the best film of the decade? Two reasons. The first is the script, or rather the dialogue. There are moments when it borders on pure am-dram, with globs of exposition and some truly infantile philosophizing. The second is Geoffrey Rush. He's a very external actor. Sometimes, that works. I can't imagine anyone else in his role in The King's Speech. But here it compromises the film, as it did in Quills. The effect is almost two dimensional. This is anything but a subtle transformation. The incongruities just keep on coming! That's at least partly the fault of the director, who seems to have not fully understood, or rather to have not fully trusted his own film.
  • This movie is about Art!

    It uses the Art as a mean to illustrate the Art as an end.

    The Art is used in literal sense. Namely, the exterior is set in Rome (and a bit of Prague) which are finest art statements to this day, while the interior scenes are shot in gorgeous villas among pieces of art (voluptuous sculptures, sensuous paintings, precious pieces of furniture).

    But more importantly, The Art is used in metaphorical sense: The Art of transforming one's Passion into Possession. The Art of transforming one's drive for Perfection and striving for owns Protection into one's Flow and Vulnerability. The Art of merging opposing feelings, causing inner conflicts, arousing thousand emotions, attacking all senses, shaking the nerves...shaking the very ground until...

    ...until it becomes the ultimate Work of Art itself!

    Bravo Maestro's: Tornatore, Moriconne and Rush!

    Biljana Gjoneska - www.evermind.me
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I won't write anything about the ending and while I am only going to suggest things, I still felt I should tag the spoiler box. The premise of the movie is pretty simple and for what it's worth anyone who has seen more than 4 thrillers will know where this is leading up to. It is so obvious that it might actually hurt. But the actors are really good in it and they make it worth while.

    Of course if you never watched a movie like this and don't care about a movie's title than you might actually be surprised. But even without reading the description of the movie (never do that, so I won't be spoiled major developments in the movie) or anything about it, I could tell you after a couple of minutes where this was leading to. So no points for "surprising" ending/twist then. Also it's tough to really completely feel for that particular character, even though he transforms. It's very elaborate but he could/should still have seen through this.
  • blanche-24 December 2015
    I've been very fortunate with my Netflix films lately. This one, "The Best Offer" from 2013 is a fantastic film with a brilliant performance by Geoffrey Rush.

    Rush plays Virgil Oldman, a well known art expert. He and his friend Billy (Donald Sutherland), a failed artist, have an auction scam going which has helped Virgil acquire a huge art collection of female portraits. When he auctions off paintings he wants, he describes the painting in a way that undervalues it, so that Billy bids and gets it for less than it's worth. Virgil keeps the paintings in a secret room, where he will sit and enjoy them.

    Virgil receives a call from a reclusive heiress, Claire Ibbetson, who wants the objects in her family home valued and some of them auctioned. She speaks to Virgil, but he never sees her. He then learns that even people who have worked in the house have never seen her. He becomes obsessed with her, an obviously young, fragile, agoraphobic woman.

    He confides in Robert (Jim Sturgess), a technician who is helping him put together pieces of an automaton he finds in the Ibbetson home; he suspects it might be old and valuable. Virgil admits to having no experience with women at all, and Robert gives him advice.

    One day, at Robert's suggestion, Virgil pretends to leave, but stays behind to get a glimpse of Claire as she emerges from her room. He is surprised to see that she is not only young, but quite beautiful. His obsession is complete.

    An intriguing, suspenseful, and sometimes tense film, The Best Offer is fascinating. As the elderly expert, Rush is elegant, erudite, and on the snobby side. Gradually, as he becomes interested in Claire, he softens. Sylvia Hoeks, a Dutch actress, does not look 27 as she is supposed to be (that was the actress' age as well) - but much younger. Her performance is only partially successful, partly because she does not usually act in English.

    Donald Sutherland is making a new career out of these more eccentric roles, and he pulls them off.

    Highly recommended for the script, acting, production values, and scenery. A gem.
  • kathmummybear16 October 2019
    7/10
    Class
    I don't think I could ever get bored of watching Geoffrey rush his acting is impeccable ! I don't think there is another actor capable of taking such an vile character and make your heart bleed for him . The film is good though a little predictable but well worth a watch
  • Warning: Spoilers
    An arrogant and lonely auctioneer fiddles auctions with a bent colleague to build a private collection on the cheap. An heiress contacts him with a vast collection in a crumbling villa. She keeps evading meetings, and turns out to be an agoraphobic hiding in a secret apartment in the villa.A romantic relationship, complete with furious arguments and reconciliation, blossoms between the fifty-something auctioneer and the 27 year old recluse. A whizz-kid helps the auctioneer on technical matters, including putting back together an automaton pieces of which mysteriously appear out of nowhere, on the floor, in various rooms in the villa. Many other sub-plots emerge, no doubt in order to give complexity and subtlety to the plot, and lead the viewer off on wrong conclusions, all the better to be absolutely amazed when the truth comes to light.

    This fails to happen. The plot lines are transparently obvious, the flaws grotesque ("The experienced auctioneer" can't tell a real 17th century from a version put together by a mechanics nerd. The auctioneer can't tell the "valuable ancient collection in the villa" from bits and pieces put together by the youngsters, and so on).

    It's entertaining for a good bit, but disbelief cannot be suspended for the second half. And then it goes into extra time, and that's just too much.
An error has occured. Please try again.