Tempting Fortune

This is odd, 'tempting' fortune but it has them spending on whatever they want, they act like they need it, I don't like how everyone is ok with it, "let her have a $500 milkshake" like if I were old enough I would try to get in to prove their w-e-a-k selves wrong, its absolutely horrendous how they also get the same amount of money a person who spent not a dime would get, like this pos spent 200k and this dude bought nothing and he gets the same amount of money and the praise and acts like he deserves it and telling others to let loose and give in to temptation. They do not need the money, they are not struggling. Rich get richer and get the praise for it. Yes I am frustrated because these people are asses, they give into EVERY TEMPATION!

I thoroughly enjoyed this programme, and got the reasoning behind it, but if I had produced this, I would have stated the winning prize was to be shared by all, but there would be a twist at the end, which would have been , all who spent and were tempted with other's money, would have the amount deducted from their share, and the ones not tempted, would have walked with the full £25,000, plus the amount spent, divided by them.

It was heart reneging to see the ones not tempted, to walk away with just slightly more than the ones tempted, and that for me was disappointing, bad viewing and I was left pulling my hair out at the end. X.

I found it faintly amusing to watch this bunch struggling through a pretty mild hike, complaining and whining the entire time.

Only Luke and Taheera never had anything and yet we hardly saw either of them. Neither of them had much to say or contribute to the group except to agree with everything James had to say. James, the strong and ethical leader who stole a teabag and sugar when the others were sleeping. Yes, that one. He cost the group the same as the ones that openly took the temptation. So there's that. He also never seemed to do any work or help around the camp, but we had to listen to his pompous, self righteous lectures on ethics.

As it turned out, they might as well have taken the temptations as is still cost them almost the same.

They could have had a little fun and a few unique experiences in a beautiful country along the way. After all, when would that kind of opportunity every occur again? They certainly weren't pleasant to watch. Not to say that the blatant weaknesses of Lani, et al were not irritating too.

Although the splitting of the cash at the end was a tad unfair, them's the odds when joining a show like this.

I have little care for Paddy McGuinness as a television presenter. That dating show he did was terrible (ok, I only tried one episode). He would barely exist on tv without Peter Kay giving him a hand with Phoenix Nights.

So back to the program....

It makes absolutely no sense!

It rewards failure. There's only a few of the contestants that are barely likeable (I don't know their names - one of the black guys, black girl, and the young white woman with the pigtails).

They seem like a bunch who didn't make it through 'Big Brother' or 'Jungle' auditions!

Finally, why did they have to all the way to Malaysia?! The UK has plenty places this could have been made in ('Jungle' proved that in Wales).

A load of rubbish.

The progress of this is pretty predictable. Pit one person's values and ambitions against another or at least 12 of them.and the inevitable clashes emerge. Watching the consequences start emerging the entertainment starts big time. That's underpinned and driven by the personalities. We have. James practising being miserable and single minded , Carolyne making up meaningless philosophical sayings to support the moment as she wishes and somewhere in betwen Lani behaving like a spoilt child "I want a pastry" . It's also quite amusing how they see minor climbs and relatively short treks as exhausting and overwhelming but again the consequences of them realising they haven't just signed up for a walk around the block kicks of the entertainment.