User Reviews (76)

Add a Review

  • Woody Allen isn't really an actor for hire. It's just not something he does: if he acts, he generally prefers to do so in films he also writes and directs, largely because - one suspects - he only feels comfortable playing parts that he knows are tailored to his particular strengths. So it's odd and potentially exciting that he agreed to take a rather key role in Fading Gigolo, a passion project for actor-turned-writer-and-director John Turturro. As it turns out, it's easy to see why Allen agreed to join the cast: when the film works, it can be as charmingly quirky, odd and romantic as Allen's own movies. Even when it doesn't work, the cheeky byplay between Allen and Turturro's characters remains a selling point.

    The story goes like this: bookseller Murray (Allen) encounters hard times in the bookselling business, and hits upon the novel idea of playing the pimp to his unexpectedly charming friend Fioravante's (Turturro) gigolo. As the business takes off, Fioravante encounters women both adventurous and shy. But, even in the face of such voluptuous and voracious beauties as Dr. Parker (Sharon Stone) and her girlfriend Selima (Sofia Vergara), he's particularly intrigued by Avigal (an intriguing Vanessa Paradis), the buttoned-down widow of an orthodox rabbi who's barely surviving the extremely strict rules and regulations that accompany her husband's death.

    There's a lot to enjoy and even love in Turturro's gentle, quaint film. He excels in injecting tenderness into scenes that are practically structured to be awkward, like Fioravante's first encounters with both Dr. Parker and Avigal. But both turn out to be strangely, sweetly tender, as he manages to tap into something primal within both women that they both sorely need. The gentlemanly respect with which Fioravante treats all the ladies brought to him by Murray help the film's slightly out-dated message - women need a man to help them break down the walls that surround their hearts - go down a lot easier.

    But Fading Gigolo also veers into considerably less successful territory, chiefly by turning Fioravante and Avigal's relationship into an uncomfortable love triangle with Dovi (Liev Schreiber), an orthodox Jew who serves in the community police force in Avigal's neighbourhood and has loved her from afar for years. There are a couple of fun comedy beats in this romantic entanglement, particularly when Avigal remains determinedly unresponsive towards Dovi's advances. But Turturro's tale takes such an odd left turn at the end that it undermines a lot of Fioravante's own growth within the film, which comes about when he realises just how strong an emotional connection he's forged with Avigal.

    Fortunately, the film benefits greatly from the spiky chemistry between Allen and Turturro - their characters spar and tease with words and glances, as Murray talks Fioravante into a business that really doesn't seem to make a whole lot of sense. (It's readily acknowledged that neither of them is a natural fit for their respective roles as pimp and gigolo.) It's not quite enough to completely salvage Fading Gigolo, but the central friendship does survive the script's stranger and less truthful moments, and adds immeasurably to its charm.
  • John Turturro did a good job both as a director and as an actor: I appreciated both his touching and amusing attitude towards the subject and his heartfelt interpretation as Fioravante. When the umpteenth love story seems to arise in a New York apartment, the delicacy of sentiments wraps every situation, with a touching and somehow magic vision of loneliness which releases a very heartwarming sensation. His character is magnetic to women, and indeed he can appeal the female public, he has that courtesy, that delicacy, that simplicity which attracts women, he looks like a man of ancient times, he is capable of looking into a woman's eye, to listen to them, to understand and appraise them without too many words, but simply standing by them. And in the end, nothing really happens, simply because nothing is needed to happen, according to a delicate and almost prudish attitude towards love which never abandons the picture till the end. Allen as a women-recruiter is funny and obsessive as only Allen can be, and the comedy on the whole owns much to him when some comic and ironic style makes us smile, and when the charm of walking along New York streets makes one look forward to being there.
  • Murray's dermatologist tells him she wants a threesome with her girlfriend, and Murray provides the services of his friend, middle aged Fiorovante. The cottage industry of "making lonely women happy" expands to include orthodox Jewish widow Avigal, but she is the object of desire of Neighbourhood Watch operative Dovi. Also, the way people feel towards each other can change.

    Written by, directed by, and starring John Turturro as the unlikely gigolo Fiorovante, an ungenerous soul might suggest that this improbable sex-based comedy drama was just an excuse for him to film a nude scene with Sharon Stone. But I quite liked it. It is rather inconsequential, and the character Fiorovante is fairly inexpressive and therefore difficult to identify with. Also, Liev Schreiber's Dovi is quite unlikeable, and the developments involving his character aren't that convincing. But, as Murray, Woody Allen - not one of my favourite actors - delivers what is probably the best performance I have ever seen from him: gentle, wryly humorous, and spilling over with humanity. The trademark Allen tics are all there, but I liked Murray a lot. And Vanessa Paradis as Avigal was luminous.

    Despite its improbability, this rather odd little drama with comedy engaged and entertained me.
  • Fading Gigolo so easily could be a Rollins & Joffe Production and an Allen film; it has all the sensibilities of Allen's comedies since Manhatten - the sexual confusion, the ennui, the desire for love and romance versus the ambition and instincts.

    For this reviewer? I chose to see it as a grown-up romantic comedy, a comedy of errors, where Woody Allen and John Turturo's characters are both opportunistic and weary and the women are both fantasizing and projecting and being fantasized and projected. There is enough complexity and simplicity to really make this a stylish, witty, and enjoyable film.

    As a jazz geek the score was superb and throughout Turturro adds little touches that make this film a quiet delight. It may not be a perfect film in that the women are too perfect and the contrasts too broad, but you would have to be mean spirited indeed not to enjoy it. It even has something to say about loneliness rather than lust being the source of sex, and that love, however fleeting, even in New York, can happen.
  • Woody Allen only acts in the picture but the John Turturro directed and stared film feels like the movie Allen never made.

    The title Fading Gigolo is perfect as it reflects Turturro who plays the gigolo, a man who could use a little more cash in his pocket so with the help of his friend played by Allen, he becomes an escort to some high class women looking for love and affection.

    Personally I think Mr. Tutturro cast himself as the gigolo just so he can show off how good he looks for his age. Of course he's got nothing on Sharon Stone who was so sexy in this film.

    And of course I can never leave out Sofia Vergara, who plays a sexy vixen who openly embraces the idea of the gigolo

    Though I find Woody Allen charming, I'm glad that his was a John Turturro film. The Director and star adds his known quiet strength to the movie that I have seen in other films.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    If you have seen trailers or advertising for this film, they may have almost exclusively focused on Woody Allen just like it was for me. However, the main player behind "Fading Gigolo" ("Suddenly Gigolo") is John Turturro. He directed it, he wrote it and he plays the central character Fioravante. It sure takes a lot of guts to write a character described by women as a top stud between the sheets and then cast yourself for that role. I knew him mostly from his performance on the TV show "Monk", which brought him an Emmy as the title character's brother. Of course he was also in "Barton Fink" and many more. Apart from Allen and Turturro, Vanessa Paradis (mostly known for her longtime relationship with Johnny Depp) plays the female main role. Supporting players are Sofia Vergara ("Modern Family"), Liev Schreiber ("Ray Donovan") and Sharon Stone ("Casino"), the two ladies being actually typecast for roles that do not look too different than some of their work in the past.

    The best part of the film was probably Allen playing a pimp. He brought the comedic highlights of the movie while Paradis was responsible for the dramatic highlights. Turturro I am not so sure what to think of his performance. I felt it was a bit empty and for the most of the film, he was just there and I wasn't really impacted by his actions. Just like he directed it, I felt all the interesting things in this film had not too much to do with him. If you are nice, you could say, he was quietly convincing. Anyway back to Allen, if some more people had actually seen this film, he may have even been in consideration for a Supporting Actor nomination at the Oscars. But he doesn't care anyway, so it's fine I guess. There was one scene where his character makes a quote about competition, which was pretty funny given Allen's long history of absence at award ceremonies.

    One of the most interesting things here is how all the women admired the name Fioravante as he must be some great Italian lover and the one he actually likes doesn't even know his name. The ending I am not sure what to think of or if I liked it. Obviously, Paradis' character only saw him as a helper to her grief and all of a sudden, she was ready to marry Schreiber's character? It came all out of nowhere and felt pretty weird to me. I don't need a happy end, but if it is unhappy, it has to be at least somewhat credible and I did not think it was. At least they avoided the usual drama when she finds out what he actually does. And the very final scene, with the other lady was pretty insignificant too. It felt only included to make the viewer leave the theater with a smile, but it did not fit at all in relation to everything what happened before. Paradis and Turturro seemed to have good chemistry, so I would have preferred a happy ending in this case I think.

    One real highlight where the dialogs between Fioravante and his pimp. Well, actually it was mostly the pimp talking all the time. I also liked the music (including Dean Martin's "Sway"), but as a whole I would really only recommend this one to Woody Allen completionists.
  • John Turturro is best known to mainstream for his role as Agent Simmons in the Transformers series and has had to suffer many indignities for his sins. But with his latest film, Turturro gets to portray what some may regard as a wish fulfilling role playing a successful gigolo who gets to sleep with many beautiful ladies.

    Fioravante (John Turturro) is a part-time florist who helps his old friend Murray (Woody Allen) – whose bookshop goes out of business. Hard-up for cash Murray tells Fioravante about Dr. Parker (Sharon Stone) who wants to have a threesome with her friend and suggested Fioravante for the role. Soon Fioravante becomes a successful gigolo with Murray as his pimp. But Fioravante's life is complicated by his relationship with an orthodox Jewish widow, Avigal (Vanessa Paradis).

    Fading Gigolo has advertised as a comedy with some of the main quotes on the poster focusing on the comic elements. But the film is as much a drama as it is a comedy and a very mixed bag. It is a film that has some excellent moments but the individual elements do not make the sum of its parts. At a 90 minute running time Fading Gigolo has some parts which were only very minor, playing a bigger role in an earlier draft of the screenplay and should have been cut completely.

    Allen is the comic highlight of the film, bringing energy and expert comic timing. He has the best lines, many based on his new profession or his Jewish heritage. Some of recognisable neurotic persona is around, but it is not as prevalent as it has been. Allen has a particularly strong relationship and interplay with Turturro and the two make a good double act.

    The other really strong element of the film is the relationship between Turturro and Paradis. Both actors are excellent together and give good performances. Turturro directs their scenes together with a tenderness that was required and their scenes together were given emotional weight. Two scenes of note were Fioravante and Avigal first encountering and when the pair are in a park; given extra power by long takes and the lovely cinematography.

    The two women that want a threesome are Sharon Stone and Modern Family's Sofía Vergara, two of the least likely women who would struggle to find a man to join them. Even if they did, considering we live in the digital age, they could surely find someone on the internet.

    Fading Gigolo is a deliberately old-fashioned film, using classic cinematography of long takes, a jazzy score and focuses on close-knit communities. While the film has some solid comic and dramatic moments it suffers from major tonal shift and an unfocused screenplay.

    Please visit www.rocknreelreviews.com
  • bookwoman-617 February 2016
    An unlikely plot, but charming to watch. Best parts of the movie are the sexy "older" ladies and of course the diner where Allen and Turturro meet. Who wouldn't like that New York back? Interesting to find out about the insane lives or Orthodox Jewish women. One thing more: Turturro is unfortunately in his worst role, I mean he doesn't flinch, he doesn't express anything at all. He should have outsourced that role. An "un-pretty man" doesn't have to be that dull. Over all great New York scenes and a good Liev Schreiber as well. Music is great, too, and since one has to write 10 whole lines here, goodness only knows why, I will say that WOody Allen was pretty cute, too. Almost like the old days.
  • ozjosh039 November 2014
    Warning: Spoilers
    If the parts played by Sharon Stone and Sofia Vergara featured instead, say, Kathy Bates and Imelda Staunton, then there might be some way of taking this film seriously. As it is, no way! We're expected to believe that Stone and Vergara would a) need to pay some guy to have a threesome with them, b) that Stone, playing a Dermatologist, would arrange such a tryst through an elderly client, c) that they'd settle on John Turturro as their ideal man, d) they'd pay him $1000 apiece. If it's not already obvious from that set-up, Fading Gigolo is pretty much a Turturro homage to Woody Allen. Beyond being set in a world where sexy women chase after nebbish guys, the humour, the tone, even the soundtrack is all typical Woody. So it's hardly surprising that Woody is there as the pimp, virtually performing an homage to himself. It's all beyond strange.
  • valadas22 December 2018
    And funny too and that's all except the great performance of Woody Allen as a pimp in this comedy. He needs money because his bookshop business is insolvent and he accepts to satisfy his dermatologista lady doctor that needs a man for a sex trio. He asks his friend and assistant Fioravante to do that job which the latter accepts though reluctantly at first. He goes meeting some women and acting as a Don Juan and a male prostitute though not particularly expansive.. Things get a bit complicated when he meets a young widow of a Jewish rabbi with whom he starts a more sentimental relationship attracting the tough opposition of the Jewish community. A movie pleasant to watch and nothing more.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    It's practically impossible to talk about a film in which an unprepossessing writer-director not only casts himself improbably as a babe magnet but selects as his co-star the writer-director Woody Allen who also had a penchant for writing and directing films in which he cast himself as a babe magnet. John Turturro goes one better by casting himself not only as a babe magnet but one who the gorgeous babes in question are more than happy to pay him a stud fee. This is Art imitating Art and it's difficult to believe a word of it. Bizarrely he casts the French pop-star Vanessa Paradis as an orthodox Jewish widow, a role that virtually any Hollywood actress could have played better and ironically although I have always had an aversion to Paradis I was nevertheless thoroughly chagrined when Turturro has her choose the wrong guy - Lieve Shreibman - a character with all the charisma of a gobbet of phlegm and sinister to boot - he not only spies on Paradis he also organises a team of Jewish strong-arms to snatch Allen off the street in the interests of jealousy, and to top it all, a character in whom Paradis has shown not a scintilla of attraction throughout the film. Watchable - just about

    been ave
  • Okay, this could well have been written and directed by Woody Allen. It has the feel of a Woody Allen picture. New York, Jewish neighborhood, and John Turturro as an unlikely Romeo who will quite possibly win your heart. The longer you watch, the more charm you see in him. Woody Allen as Murray was, well, Woody Allen and if you are a fan, you'll enjoy it. I am. And I did. Perhaps the ending wasn't exactly what I would have chosen at first thought, but I as I walked out of there it seemed as if it was probably about perfect. This won't appeal to everyone, but then not everyone is a Woody Allen type movie aficionado. If you are, you'll like this one. I thoroughly enjoyed a quiet little film sans all the non-stop violence and action that leaves you wiped out and drained by the end of it. Turturro did a fine job on this film. I left the theater with a smile on my face and a feeling that this was a really good little movie.
  • "If a man can't get a woman out of his guts, his heart, it means something." Fioravante (Turturro) is best friends with Murray (Allen). Murray tells him he is not doing well financially but has a plan to make more money they they thought possible. What starts off as a way to make some fast cash for the both of them becomes dangerous physically, mentally and emotionally for everyone involved. I have never been a big Woody Allen fan but I have found myself liking the last few of his movies. While this isn't a Woody Allen movie per-se it has the definite feel of one and he is actually very funny in this and I did enjoy it. John Turturro wrote and directed this but gave the best parts to everyone else. Allen steals the movie but Liev Schreiber does a pretty good job as well. On its face the idea of the movie is about being a Gigolo but really that is not what the movie is about. This is about so much more then that and the main aspects of the movie are love and finding yourself. Overall, Woody Allen fans will love this since it does have a very Woody feel to it. I did really enjoy it more then I was expecting to. I give this a high B.
  • iSkyWalKing7 August 2016
    Look I like Woody (I know he did not direct this but...), and he has so many films that not all will appeal to everyone. He is very hit and miss of course.....but are we seriously supposed to believe that these beautiful wealthy women would pay this ugly lurch to sleep with them? Not only pay him but pay him in the THOUSANDS?! The type of money that male politicians spend on prime escorts? Not only would a female not pay this lanky noodle-necked fool for sex, but I think there may even be some women who wouldn't sleep with him if HE was the one paying.

    Also WHY does the Jewish/Zionist industry (98% of Hollywood) feel the need to shove their ridiculous religion in our face at every turn? I get that they are in a 'Jewish' neighbourhood but seriously. It is unbearable. And male 'Jew' figures in Hollywood have a tendency to "shoot up" in their films. Woody Allen does it, Jerry Seinfeld and Costanza did it and so on.....these are some incredibly unattractive characters who just stroll around their made up worlds and score any and every beautiful female who crosses their path and make them fall head over heels for them. Please man.... get real.

    I just could not get past these issues with this specific film. Otherwise it could have been an OK film.
  • Review: I really enjoyed this movie! The storyline is great and I liked the whole, Woody Allen as a pimp, concept. It's very well written by John Turturro, who also directed the movie, and the cast was a great choice. I couldn't help laughing all the way through the film and it's hard not to admire Sofia Vergara's assets. Anyway, with that aside, the performances by the cast was believable and great to watch. When Vanessa Paradis gets emotional, you can't help but feel for her character who eventually comes out of her shell with the help of the gigolo's services. Sharon Stone and Sofia Vergara also benefit from the gigolo's expertise, but he eventually loses a taste for his profession after falling for Paradis's character. It's the type of movie that I would recommend to people who like light entertainment and who have a warped sense of humour. Enjoyable! 

    Round-Up: I liked Woody Allen in this movie. His style of acting really worked with Turturro's script, although he does babble in a couple of scenes. The black family that Allen lives with, was a great touch to the movie and the ending cracked me up. I think that you can tell that I enjoyed this movie but like most independent that don't get a big distribution, I doubt that it will get a massive audience. I always rate actors who can write and direct themselves so my respect goes to John Turturro who should be happy with the outcome.

    Budget: $30million Worldwide Gross: $13.3million (Terrible!)

    I recommend this movie to people who are into there romantic comedies about a gigolo whose pimped out by Woody Allen. 7/10
  • The worlds oldest profession is never a dull subject and such is the case in fading gigalo. Very often when I go to talk with a friend or associate about this film I get shot down with "I don't like Woody Allen and "his" movies" and I get that(you don't like dry comedy that doesn't overwhelm but what needs to be understood is that this film is merely costarring Woody Allen as an enjoyable,humorously scheming accidental pimp in this film with John Turtorro handling the writing and direction excellent costars by the eternally seductive Sharon Stone and Sultry Sofia Vergara made this one interesting and fun for me especially Liev Schrieber as an overprotective neighborhood watch that gives sentimental and comedic value to the already comedic duo Of Turtorro and Allen.
  • Two men, one middle aged the other much older are on cross roads. The business they worked is folding and they both look for an alternative future. As a result of some wealthy contacts the older of the two guys turns the other into a high class gigolo, a venture that seems to be going well until one of the clients is a highly esteemed member of a devout religious community.

    Beautiful and visually melodic character drama about life, fate, next steps. Although not a Woody Allen film, it could as well have been one. Nicely worked dialogue, very lively characters that could be any of us make for a touching experience. It was nice to see Woody Allen in front of the camera again being his usual self, although he has obviously mellowed since his early days.

    People may fade, as the likable gigolo but the human spirit does not and will not stop no matter what the obstacles.

    A cinematic treat.
  • Fading Gigolo actually has much more about Hasidic Jews than I expected, and a touching core plot about a widow's emotional awakening thanks to the not always being in the stuffy world of Hasidics. But when it's the Woodman and Turturro or most anyone else on screen like his adopted black kids (lol) - and of course there's the whole running gag of beautiful women like Sharon Stone and Sofia Vegara paying to have sex, including a three way, with Vito from Do the Right thing as a middle aged man - it's exceedingly amiable.

    Occasionally it's very funny (and I was chuckling and or tittering through much) and in a couple of scenes Allen shows he's a good actor (which, you know, you always expect him to be wisecracking woody and he is but a couple of times he shows that he can reveal restraint, thinking on his feet, other things), but watch him in certain scenes, like when he comes to a realization with a woman character. His mind is working as is his emotions, and it clicks in a way we haven't seen with him in... Deconstructing Harry maybe? It's a good little New York City movie that is better than it has any right to be based on its silly but intrinsically amusing premise, and for a fair chunk of the run time it does take seriously the constructive world of Hasidics in Brooklyn and what happens when Liev Schreiber gets jealous and has to face his own complex emotions.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Here's a mess of movie offensive to women and Jews . It might be the worst directed movie of the year. John Turturro gets all the credit as writer director and star. Scenes are too long and slow with dialogue that says nothing. The only thing worse then the dialogue is the frequent staring left, right, or up like it is supposed to mean something. Turturro's flat emotionless performance is more like a Zombie rather then a gigolo.

    Woody Allen plays Woody Allen. The music is a highlight. There's a opening sequence that is supposed to look like old home movie film for no reason. Venessa Paradis is miscast and unbelievable as an Orthodox widow. Sharon Stone as a Doctor would ask her patient to procure a guy. In what universe? About as believable as Sofia Vergara needing to pay for a sex.

    The movie has no where to go so it ends with another slow talky boring scene. This is a small movie that doesn't need to be seen in a theater. It is best skipped in any format.
  • Actor-Director John Turturro's "Fading Gigolo" was fading my attention span sporadically throughout the movie. Turturro stars as Fioravante, a middle-aged New Yorkan who decides to be a pre-geriatric Don Juan; yes, a male prostitute. The problem is that Turturro prostituted his viewers with an enticing premise, but does not deliver the creative juice in this one with neither his direction, script, and performance in the movie. Woody Allen did pimp up the acting volume with his comical supporting performance as Murray, Fioravante's conniving pimp manager. "Fading Gigolo" is just a so-so gigolo movie, and believe the words I am saying... Sorry David Lee Roth! *** Average
  • In Brooklyn, the bankrupted owner of a book store Fioravante (John Turturro) is forced to close his family business. His best friend Murray (Woody Allen) tells that his dermatologist Dr. Parker (Sharon Stone) dreams on having a threesome and would pay a thousand-dollar to have with her friend Selima (Sofía Vergara). Murray proposes to be Fioravante's gigolo and they start a male prostitution business.

    When Fioravante meets the Jewish Avigal (Vanessa Paradis), who is the widow of a rabbi, they fall in love with each other. But the Jewish Dovi (Liev Schreiber) loves Avigal and will make life difficult for Murray.

    "Fading Gigolo" is a deceptive and pointless movie that is neither a comedy nor a drama. Indeed the story is not funny or dramatic and does not have any message in the end. Further, John Turturro as a sex symbol for lonely women seems to be a problem of middle-age crisis of John Turturro that uses the movie to satisfy his ego. What make this movie worth are the beautiful Vanessa Paradis and Woody Allen. My vote is four.

    Title (Brazil): "Amante a Domicílio" ("Lover at Home")
  • I am very disappointed by the less than intellectual viewers who claim that this film is offensive to Jews. Since when did showing the negative side of a culture become offensive? A more enlightened person would view this film as a brave satire on all fundamental religious fanatics set against a contrasting progressive society. I personally love the indirect social commentary and defiance of the female character Avigal. The film also touches the complexity of living in a society full of protocol and expectations and their impact on individual decisions.

    The entire cast turned in worthy performances but the film did suffer from a very low budget, tight shooting schedule and a somewhat inexperienced Director but overall, it was a couple hours I feel were worthy of my time.
  • kosmasp11 June 2015
    6/10
    Suave
    You get what you pay for. Even when the product itself has no idea of it's/his own value. You could argue that Torturro thinks a bit too much of himself and that's not accounting for him directing and starring in this, but in what role he gets into (no pun intended). But that would be beside the point, criticizing him for that.

    The movie itself feels a bit like a Woody Allen, no surprise he's in it too. He's doing his usual thing, which is either funny or annoying to the viewer. Torturro mostly plays it straight, though he does have a couple of jokes himself. Sharon Stone who did have the only scene of nudity in this, might remind some of her earlier roles (there is more of her in the deleted scenes section), but her character does have an epiphany, which is a nice character note towards the end.

    We have a nice ensemble of actors here, all doing a decent job. The ending also elevates this a bit more, though I'm not sure if it compensates for everyone what came before it
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I am a Woody Allen fan. Perhaps those who aren't will like "Fading Gigolo" more than me. His role is secondary, about half his lines aren't even trying to be funny, and the other half that are trying, aren't anyway. There may be 2 or 3 laughs tops in the 90 minutes of this movie. As for the dramatic part, it doesn't work out very well either, because John Turturro and Vanessa Paradis are both miscast and unconvincing in their roles; Turturro also confuses "low-key" with "catatonic" in his performance, he looks as if he's miserable that he has to be there (even in a menage-a-trois with Sharon Stone and Sofia Vergara!). He only smiles once, in the closing shot of the film. There are some nice shots of Brooklyn in the autumn, but all in all "Fading Gigolo" must be one of the worst films Woody Allen has ever been associated with. *1/2 out of 4.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The best thing about this is the banter, mostly 1-way, with Allen doing most of his neurotic-schtick, playing off of Turturro's more measured, thoughtful, considering characterization. It works beautifully, making me wonder how it would have been if we just spent the entire duration with these guys for the entire runtime instead, more like a road movie. We'll never know now, but I might have been able to re-watch that. Not so this.

    One of the first things I noted, analyzing the list of censored sequences, was that there were shots of 'bare boobies' removed. Now, I don't go into a John Turturro movie for bare boobies, but considering the subject material, nee, the title itself, nudity, intact, would have better served the viewing experience.

    Performance-wise, Turturro has been better, but he does himself a disservice by not giving his own character any kind of an arc. However, the supporting roles fare much better, and he makes them all play to their strengths, and some of the funniest material comes from Stone, Vergara, Schrieber (a tad weaker) and, of course, Allen himself.

    The 2 endings were also not needed, with absolutely no need for the one that precedes the other, going completely against the characterization setup for Vanessa Paradis, and her character's interactions with Turturro's lead. Zero payoff. The one tacked on after seems like Turturro's apology-of-sorts to the discerning viewer.

    The whimsical and farcical parts of the movie did not work for me at all, because of so little being done to warrant the need for such sequences. They are so out of place that it seemed like the first one ended and another movie began, and then Wham, it finished too soon.

    The score, though, is something else entirely. Filled with eclectic compositions from all over (Europe), it elevates the viewing experience, and the movie's all the better whenever someone is belting something ethereal out, in tracks with vocals, as well as those that are instrumental in nature.

    A lot is gonna be said about how Allen has gone away from his comfort zone, but IMO, he has not, not in terms of role or characterization - he sticks to his safe zone. Allowing Turturro the wield the directing reins is all that's different about his 'experiment'. However, I do hope he expands his acting range, whether or not he wields the megaphone.

    In all fairness, worth 1 trek to the multiplex. I also don't think that watching the uncensored theatrical cut in all its glory would have made much of a difference to my opinion.
An error has occured. Please try again.