User Reviews (208)

Add a Review

  • Granted, the inside bank heist plot is implausible in 'Bastille Day' (retitled 'The Take' for its USA release), but the director James Watson paces the film so well with non-stop tense moments, and taps Idris Elba's innate tension-building talents and ability to deliver quick dialogue (as he does with Sorkin's trademark banter in 'Molly's Game'), that one overlooks the spectacularly unrealistic story of the intended heist.

    This is a pure entertainment escapism - an action film that does not pretend to be more than it is.

    Therefore, I'm giving two thumbs up 👍👍 for a good fun-to-watch action flick. Grab a dish of popcorn and enjoy. Note my 7 Rating means it's good (like an 8 by most User standards).

    Richard Madden and Jose Garcia are well-casted.

    Is it just me that thinks Garcia looks and acts a lot like Harvey Kietel in his 30s?!
  • mumia-14 September 2016
    Ever wanted to know what happens when you mix 24, Bourne, Die Hard III, and Luther on a tight budget, and then you spice it all with a little Luc Besson? Then you have your answer right here.

    It's a fast paced, no-nonsense action spy thriller, without a single piece of originality. But it manages to present all the borrowed bits and pieces in a way, to deliver a very entertaining experience.

    The main character is almost a carbon copy of the title character in Luther, so Elba naturally revels in the role. They even managed to include one of my favorite lines from Luther, the little thieves. Which is funny since the second main character is actually a thief in this. Self irony maybe? The movie never slows down, not for a minute. I haven't seen anything like it for quite some time. There is less Neutral Gear in here, than in Luc Bessson's original Taxi.

    Of course you shouldn't expect a masterpiece. The characters are all shallow, and the story is predictable. It doesn't even try to be clever, it just gives you everything at face value.
  • The use of subtitles is so inconsistent that it's rendered useless

    Luckily the French movie follows nearly every American action movie, so it's not hard to follow

    Just wish Netflix showed some effort when it splashed up on the main page as a new movie to watch.

    Rated a 6. But if I spoke French, I would have rated it higher
  • lbcook-4293120 September 2020
    I always use subtitles since I don't hear well.

    The spoken English was subtitled, which was helpful, but the long spoken exchanges between the French police/tactical/intelligence was spoken in French, but NONE of the French dialog WAS TRANSLATED and SUBTITLED.

    Maybe not a huge issue except that the 'good guys' had maybe ten pages of dialog between them. The French speakers provided about 80% of 'The Take's' total spoken word.

    Now, Idris Elba is the caliber of actor who doesn't need to chatter in order to get his thoughts out.

    Still, with the Strong, Silent Type in the lead, there was no way to follow the plot. When we thought we'd identified the villians, we had to watch and wait for another character's confirmation of events.

    I don't know who's responsible for subtitles...but really, our phones can transcribe a spoken voice message. We can speak to lock our doors, turn off our lights, and play our favorite music.

    #pleasefixsubtitles
  • This film (unfortunately) is most famous because it was set to come out at the same time as a Islamic terrorist attack in France, and one of the reasons I waited a while to watch this film was because I was wary of how Muslims would be portrayed in it etc. Let me without spoilers tell you this film is almost entirely unpolitical, with the 'Islamic threat' so far down the radar it can't even be said to be a theme.

    Now on to the film! Do you like Idris Elba? If you don't, stop reading this review and never watch this film. This is his film. He plays a bad-ass CIA agent (there is an irony of a British actor playing a CIA man stationed in France) who does not like to follow rules, and he is on the trail of a master pick pocket (Richard Madden) who gets wrapped up in a plot to blow up France. Cliché, yes, but the film does avoid some obvious ones, surprising pleasantly at some points.

    Elba is menacing, cool and always fantastic, and all of his co-stars pull their weight, but none are particularly likable, and they just have very little chemistry together. But, this is an action, thriller, so who really cares about that. The action is solid, but not mind blowing. The balance between action and thriller is about right, and the director does not get distracted with too many side characters or plots.

    This is about as standard a movie as you can get, with the only real plus being Elba. He needs to do more action movies, he needs to be the next Bond. 6.5, but IMDb won't let me give it that score so I bump to a 7 on Elba's performance!
  • I'm torn between a 6 and 7 for this film. This has everything a good thriller should have, but nothing notably unique about the film or the way it's done past the protagonists and some of the cinematography.

    The film is a spiral into chaos and the characters are very likable, forming an unlikely friendship between a thief and a CIA agent. Idris Elba and Richard Madden show off some great acting that really drives the film, with the dialogue between the two easily being my favourite part of the film. The directing is great, too, with a riveting chase sequence that looks and feels exciting and some lovely cinematography in France.

    The premise isn't anything amazing, but throwing a sly, witty pocket thief into the mix of what would be an ordinary every-year thriller is what drives the film and makes it anything worth noting. If you're going to see this film for any reason, it should be for the two leads. Bastille Day is nothing unique, but it's definitely a good film if you're in the mood for a thriller (however I'd recommend Eye in the Sky over this). This is a film for people that are into thrillers and fun character interaction.
  • SnoopyStyle14 October 2018
    Michael Mason (Richard Madden) is an American pickpocket in Paris. Zoe (Charlotte Le Bon) is an anti-fascist who is recruited to place a bomb in an empty right wing party building. Sean Briar (Idris Elba) is a reckless CIA agent assigned to Paris. The three are pulled into a conspiracy to heighten the political atmosphere for a Die Hard scheme.

    This proves to me that Idris Elba could have been a great Bond. The story is a good convoluted thriller. The only thing missing is a truly fun buddy chemistry. Madden needs to be a little funnier to make the pairing better. I'm reminded of 48 Hrs or various other odd couples. This is not quite up to that level. It's not as fun but it's a solid thriller.
  • kosmasp20 February 2017
    And no I'm not talking about a river. The charisma and screen presence Idris Elba projects is amazing. He can throw shades, have a stare-down and just generally make you do things without saying much. If someone like this is on the hunt to get you ... well you better run fast. But this is not just a chase movie. This has unfortunately some roots in reality with its terrorist attack theme.

    This is something that is hard to stomach and might be too much for some to view, in light of things that did happen in Paris or anywhere else in the world for that matter. But if you can blend that out and just accept this as entertainment and a movie, you will get a suspenseful story, that is intriguing and decent enough to watch
  • You have to forget that, during the making of this action film shot in Paris, the French capital was the scene of a brutal terrorist attack. Instead you have to go with the flow - and, boy, does it flow with constant flights and fights and a frenetically-cut chase sequence on rooftops that could have come straight out of a Bourne movie.

    British director James Watkins has given us a thoroughly entertaining romp that never lets up and looks great. The plotting is utterly implausible but the hard-as-diamond core is the former CIA agent Briar played wonderfully by Britain's Idris Elba in a role that could be seen as an audition to be the next James Bond. Not at all sure about his 'singing' over the credits though ...
  • But a half or so is in French, with no English subtitles, or at least very inconsistent ones. It might be good, Idris is always great, but I lost the plot because I don't know what half the people in the movie were saying. Shoddy production.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Yes, they did it again! They have saved the World. Thank God they are Americans, because if they were from some place else, I would probably thought that the movie was an absolute fraud. Those greedy French people (police) that want to steal money from trier own bank and they do it by lying the people through terrorist attacks that they have made up... and again the Americans (CIA) who apparently know way more about the French, who know nothing at all - they don't know what is happening in their own country.

    It is 2016, something dramatically has to change in the American cinema as it is scratching the bottom of the ocean. Good actors - stars from hit TV shows, THE WIRE and GAME OF THRONES, but that doesn't help bad written story, whit 1 000 000 plot holes and again....the GOD Americans! Propaganda, HELLO!

    I am putting 2 stars, because there was one good scene in that awful peace of film.
  • Surprised this isn't at least in the 7's on here. Elba is excellent, no cheesy crap Bond esque love interests. Just a proper thriller with some great twists and decent action sequences. Some comical moments in a non Marvel universe cheesy way.

    Nothing incredibly new with the plot, but it does keep you interested for the duration. The end hints at a sequel, which could be interesting.

    If you like a good action / thriller - this is the best I've seen in a long while. Not quite as good as the old Bournes, but certainly better than recent Bonds.
  • This was a great action movie. The movie held my interest for the full hour and a half. I enjoyed the close hand to hand combat. There was an interesting twist. I really enjoyed watching Idris Elba. Overall very enjoyable movie to watch.
  • Prismark1017 March 2018
    Warning: Spoilers
    Michael Mason (Richard Madden) is an American pickpocket in Paris, thieving to make a living.

    A case he steals goes off as it contained a bomb. Now he is hunted by the French police and a CIA agent based in the city, Sean Briar (Idris Elba.)

    They uncover a conspiracy at play to blame Muslims for the bombing atrocities while anti fascist protesters campaign against police brutality.

    The Take is a routine but underwhelming thriller. There are a few twists that involve corrupt cops but Elba is wasted as the maverick CIA agent who is frankly a bit dull.

    The film also has too many British actors playing Americans, surely the producers could afford some genuine American actors!
  • The good: The 2 leads play their roles well enough and are entertaining to watch. The movie clips along at a nice pace and whilst predictable, is entertaining from start to finish.

    The bad: The dialogue / interactions between the protagonists is average - a missed opportunity with the 2 very capable actors. Whilst the action is ok, the editing is horrific. Especially during fight scenes. There are so many quick cuts and continuity issues it's nauseating (i.e., John Wick, this aint).

    Should you watch it: Bastille Day / The Take is a solid action flick that is well paced and entertaining throughout it's 1.5hr runtime. A one-and-done only though.
  • Idris Elba is well cast as Sean Briar, a CIA agent on the trail of a Paris bomber. He is a bit of a 'one tough guy against the world' type character who he plays very well. It's a bit of a job application for the James Bond roll, but is an enjoyable thriller nonetheless.

    Richard Madden plays, Michael Mason, a cheeky pickpocket, who steals a handbag that, unbeknown to him, contains a bomb. When the bomb explodes Mason becomes Paris's most wanted and is hunted by Briar. There is a great chemistry between the two leads and although the story is a little predictable it bubbles along nicely with some good action scenes and stunts.

    The movie is nothing special, but throw in the wit of Mason and you have a descent movie with a few laughs for good measure.
  • "This is crazy. I don't work for the CIA." Michael Mason (Madden) is an expert pick pocket that is working the streets of France. While sitting down counting his loot he notices a woman throw a large bag away. He walks to it and looks for cash. As he walks away the bag explodes and he is picked up as the only suspect for the bombing. Now Michael must work with the anti-terrorist force to try and figure out what happened and what will happen next. This is a very exciting, tense and entertaining movie. It keeps you guessing and really sets the tone right off with Michael being brought in. You are never really able to settle in and trust anyone. That detail adds something to the movie that is needed and helps you become more involved. Elba and Madden are great in their roles and their acting along with the little details it throws in really transforms this movie from just another "let's stop terrorism" movie into something that seems fresh. Overall, a movie that could have been generic but enough aspects just clicked and the movie became tense and exciting. I give this a high B.
  • Bastille Day is a vehicle showing off Idris Elba's action hero skills and it succeeds in that respect, menacing with a suave meanness, kicking asses and taking no prisoners but all with charm. He commits to the action hero role with a screen presence that carries the film, even as the script goes down every clichéd path B-grade action movie. The Paris we see is not the City of Lights but a place where the lead actor drives his way through gritty Parisienne outskirts, avoiding bad guys, all the way drawing the viewer's eye away from the secondary actors who never get a chance to flesh out their characters. All in all a nice story with an original location.
  • beautygyrl21 September 2020
    Love the movie, couldn't give it 10 stars because they don't use captions for all the French being spoken. Not sure why they only give captions for a few of the french parts and there's a lot of French in the movie.
  • There's an opinion that Idris Elba would make a good James Bond, and although this is different in context, Bastille Day might just be the closest thing. It's a thriller based on espionage set on beautiful city of Paris, offering a few layers of subplots which unfortunately not equal in effectiveness. It does succeeds in a simpler scale where the actors are given more spotlight either it's from action or occasional comedy.

    Story mainly follows Michael (Richard Madden), a pickpocket who unluckily stumbles upon a package of bomb meant for terrorist attack. He's then chased by various parties for a crime much worse than he actually committed. Among them is Briar (Idris Elba) who eventually uncovers something amiss which leads him into a much bigger conspiracy.

    The main duo has more chemistry than expected. Michael is a skilled pickpocket, although he's younger and seemingly more gullible when faced with more extreme threat. Briar takes the mantle of senior officer with shady track record who has a tendency of going rogue based on his instinct alone. One of the correct things the movie does right is showcasing them in their fields, not in all out brawl.

    It also gives a few comedic moments that surprisingly presentable, the addition of Charlotte Le Bon as Zoe, the unintentional accomplice, rounds up the ragtag crew. At latter end, this eclectic party is a good choice for protagonist perspective. However, it often delivers the plot in rather complicated route, shifting between one set piece to another without smooth transition.

    There are moments where the characters run or drive around in the city sporadically. If it's to push the plot, then the scene could've been incorporated with better flow. The movie soon treads on terrorism subplot, but it clearly doesn't have the large production to pull off such city wide mayhem. Aside from a few gorgeous use of choreography, the movie mainly plays out in typical apartments or hideouts.

    The better parts come from small scale fights and chases. These are better choreographed, it presents more tactical approach, especially in subtle motions that the visual cleverly tell. The action could have less cuts, but it's produced with focus as audience could follow the motion easily.

    Ambitious in its deception, the espionage / buddy cop gig works better in modest scope.
  • A low budget actioner. It's nicely paced so keeps your attention throughout with pockets of gunplay and fight scenes. The action style isn't anything different but it gets the job done. Some cheesy lines from a typical Euro action script. It isn't anything you haven't seen before but if your fine with that then you'll be satisfied. It ain't no Taken, Transporter or London Has Fallen (all being set in Europe and with that similar feel.) And sadly Idris Elba isn't a Liam Neeson, Jason Statham or Gerard Butler in action-man terms, he'd easily lose a fight between any of them. Yes he is tall and imposing but delivers quite an empty performance, it doesn't seem like he had to make much effort and unfortunately it shows. Maybe the money men behind this production wanted this kind of performance from Mr. Elba but being cool takes a lot more effort than this. If it was a Luc Besson production i think we would have had different results in regards to the action. Its an entertaining one-watch. 5/10
  • I am not speaking frivolously when I say that overall, although produced with a fraction of the budget, this is a much better film than the fourth Bourne.

    Specifically:

    * great opener -- film opens with a dramatic situation that immediately grabs the viewers' attention. You have "connection" from the getgo.

    * great script --- many layers and twists. Clever dialog. (At one point the bad guys gloat about how they are manipulating "the hashtags" -- thereby dissing an entire generation. Another line of dialog refers to the use of "action and reaction" to achieve their end -- which is a very sophisticated dig at how politics are managed today.)

    * Director writer Watkins know to keep things interesting, you are never bored.

    * Elba is nothing short of awesome. Other reviewers are saying he could be a major international action figure. Agree!

    Solid entertainment, does not take the viewer for granted, and the clever story keeps you hooked.
  • 'The Take' feels like it has all the major trademarks of the 'Action-crime-drama', which is why it takes a good cast & crew to separate itself from cliches and predictability. The concept is great: an unlikely team-up, a pickpocket gets caught up in a terrorist plot and is forced to join up with a CIA agent. Pair Richard Madden and Idris Elba as the two characters and you have two people that can elevate pretty much anything they're in. The first half does a nice job of subverting your expectations, something the second & third act seem to forget about accomplishing. The reason for that being that the scope of the film continues to increase with each scene, thus losing the thrill of having this being a smaller-scale crime-thriller. At first it feels like the 2016 film 'Focus', then a little more like 'The Purge' franchise, perhaps throw in a little 'Fast & Furious', and you have 'The Take'. A good film in its own right, though, all I could think about was how much I would still love to see Elba & Madden play James Bond one day.

    7.1/10
  • There isn't much of anything to this movie, other than a lot of fast action, with the usual "collateral damage." Idris Elba is an actual actor, but he has no material to act with here. So, for that matter, is Thierry Godard, one of the leads in the French TV series Un Village français, but here he gets nothing at all.

    Every now and then there are allusions to current politics in French - the National Front, etc. - but they don't go anywhere, and are not explained.

    Not much is done with the Paris setting. No pleasant scenes in the Eiffel Tower restaurants, or along the banks of the Seine, etc.

    There is no point in summarizing the plot, such as it is, because it's not very interesting. Suffice it to say that, when all is said and done, this is actually about an impossible bank holdup.

    If you decide to watch this movie - and I can't imagine why you would - watch it late at night when your mind has shut down and doesn't catch all the holes in the plot.
  • For some reason, I had not seen this movie when it was released but thanks to the recommendation from another movie enthusiast I got caught up. If you enjoyed the series McMafia, co-written then directed by James Watkins, you will like Watkins' work again. The producers managed to get a good cast, an interesting storyline and topped it with lots of action, none gratuitous, kind of like the first two Bourne movies.

    Early on, the movie wastes little time before plunging you in the action; you get a sense where this may be heading and can't wait to see how it develops. There's a scene that will really have you on the edge, perhaps even gasping and if you suffer from vertigo you will not forget it; I thought at the time that it was a dangerous thing to attempt, either that or the undetectable special effects were perfect. I sure hope they used stunt doubles, because... you'll see.

    The Sean Briar character seemed tailor-made for Idris Elba, going by the several performances I've seen from this actor; either it was or Elba made the lead his own. From the first scene when Briar is introduced, you know he will be at odds with the rules, the protocols and what is expected of the almost rogue CIA agent, but you also know he's one to get the job done. Michael Mason is the second main character, played Richard Madden, from Games of Throne fame, and it's a character with a complex background and an even harder mission, if you can call it such, to complete. I would best describe it, without making it a spoiler, as being caught between a rock and a hard place. Some keen script writing, and you solved the problem of conveying Mason's character complexity, as you quickly figure out.

    Now some may be critical of how plausible the story develops, but it isn't anything we haven't seen some form of before; a little suspension of disbelief never hurt anyone, besides, it was necessary to go where it goes. I wondered about the budget for this production, for a second, then I didn't care anymore, I just enjoyed what I saw. There's comfort in tried and true formula 'good guys are the bad guys, and money, corruption, is the best vilain', which is what you'll get here. The ending begs for a sequel, I thought; I'd like to think this was intentional, but it ties it all up nicely, which I felt was unexpected given the mostly European cast, production and of course the venue I always like, Paris.
An error has occured. Please try again.