User Reviews (6)

Add a Review

  • A note is posted through Father Brown's door 'To catch a thief look to the cross.' The note came with a calling card from Master thief 'Flambeau,' his intention is the Chruch's prized relic The Blue Cross.

    Finally Father Brown comes up against his nemesis 'Flambeau,' his Moriarty, Flambeau appeared in many of Chesterton's short stories, so it was perhaps fitting, that for the first series finale he was brought in.

    Based quite loosely on one of Chesterton's novels. It's a great story, if you're a fan of suspense and intrigue then this offering certainly delivers.

    Very very well acted episode, John Light was excellent in the role, hugely charismatic, I loved his confession scene with Father Brown, John Light would happily reappear for many years to come. Chris Villiers too was very good as Justin de Vey.

    The best episode of Series one, really enjoyed it. 8/10
  • Prismark108 August 2017
    The finale to series one of Father Brown introduces Flambeau. The super villain who constantly crosses sword with the good padre.

    When Bishop Talbot turns up concerned that the prized Blue Cross made out from Welsh gold is at risk from being stolen, Father Brown decides that he will transport the cross himself by train much to the annoyance of Inspector Valentine.

    This begins a cat and mouse game as Father Brown hopes to lure the notorious thief Flambeau out into the open. Among the passengers in the train carriage is the posh Justin de Vey, disabled Mr Dawson and Military man Captain Flynn just off to Korea.

    Once he is exposed, there is a lot of verbal sparring between Flambeau and Father Brown. Flambeau has begrudging respect for the padre, but Father Brown wants him to atone for his sins, he sees a troubled man.

    A nice little mystery and fitting end to a good first series.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    John Light is introduced as the enigmatic and charismatic Hercule Flambeau, who loves his art and will do nothing to get his hands on it. John Light was married to Neve Campbell, famous for Party of Five. Anyway, Father Brown and Hercule Flambeau square off big time, and it's quite the spiritual battle.

    Hugo Speer also appears and I really think that hopefully the Father Brown producers will do the decent thing and not cower to the mob. They need to bring back Hugo Speer please. This is the last episode of Zuzanna "Susie" Jasinski, played by Polish actress Kasia Koleczek. Maybe the producers can bring her back.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The best episode yet, without doubt, without a singular little doubt. What an episode it was, they set themselves up for another season with the introduction of what I can only assume is the Moriarty of the Father Brownverse. I am very excited to watch Season 2, I can only imagine it is even better than the first season which I feel is a solid high 8/10, 8.8 perhaps on average.
  • Mark Williams is a really good actor, and I do hope he is thinking about changing his agent. If the best his present representative can do for him is to get him regular roles in stuff like this series and the concurrent "Blandings", where he's cast as Beach the butler, then his career might well be doomed, and that would be a shame. Two series at the same time whose only function is to travesty well-loved and distinguished works of twentieth century literature whilst simultaneously boring and enraging us all with gross incompetence and vulgarity would put any actor's working life into disarray. This new "Father Brown" series has been truly baffling as well as dreadful, and I cannot shake the suspicion that no-one connected with it has actually bothered to read any of G.K. Chesterton's stories. The prime movers have all seen the 1954 film starring Alec Guinness, possibly a long time ago, and have purloined freely from it. The setting is now the 1950s, as in the film; Father Brown has to cope with a bumptious policeman named Inspector Valentine, as in the film; and he has a slightly dodgy chum who works as a chauffeur, the part Sidney James played originally - and this new version of the character, elevated to regular-sidekick status, is actually called "Sid". However, the film also had genuine wit, real invention and a feeling both for the essential goodness of the priest and his mission (which is not to solve crimes, but to save souls), and for religious faith. A respect for religion is unknown at today's BBC - if it still existed, we would never have had to endure "QI" or "The Vicar Of Dibley" - and the niceties of philosophy are clearly incomprehensible to the makers of this series. Having left out the all-important character of Flambeau in previous episodes, this season finale (allegedly based on the same story which inspired the Guinness film) introduces him, and traduces the character utterly. This Flambeau, far from being the giant of the stories, is actually shorter than Father Brown is, but what's far worse is that he is presented as a kind of Hannibal Lecter devil figure. There seems no hope of redemption for this gun-waving villain who betrays and tortures his confederate and seemingly comes close to making Father Brown doubt his church. Chesterton's Flambeau, far more interestingly, is a good man gone wrong who is made to know himself by the priest - to know that his crimes do not make him a Robin Hood figure, as he has arrogantly imagined, but will set him on the path to Hell. The inventions of the original story - where Father Brown exchanges sugar for salt at a café, and flings soup at a wall so that his police pursuers will find him before Flambeau can make off with the priceless blue cross - are entirely elided (the Guinness film left these famous scenes out, too) and we are left with only Brown's hat and umbrella by a country stile. The old movie made many changes but did at least come up with some excellent new ideas. This TV show is feeble stuff which shows no understanding or sympathy with Chesterton's ideas. So why bother making it? There's certainly no need to watch it.
  • This would be simply a standard BBC anti-Catholic series if it did not defile the mystery writer who showed the way after Holmes. I should think someone would sue for fraud. If you want to enjoy this great mystery story, leave the Beeb behind and read the book. The actual story is well-written with a very clever plot and worth reading. As to another sappy, perjorative anti-Papist series, who needs yet another?