Add a Review

  • If you are not addicted to entertainment motion picture and you prefer deeper meaning. This movie is in my point of view a must watch. Metascore rated this movie 60 whilst it should be 75 minimum. Watch and if I am wrong please tell me why.

    Michael Fassbender just takes emotion to a very realistic place and portrays a man with fear , regrets , love. The decision he makes , as a man , we can relate to it. Alicia Vikander also takes you on a journey that helps you understand what being a parent mean and the sacrifices that comes along with it.

    Rachel Weisz plays her role very well and together with the two main actors gives us some very emotional scene. I was touched by this movie and blow away by the acting.

    Some beautiful shots are taken and really helps to get in the mood for something different , heartbreaking , questionable . The line between right and wrong can be difficult to see and this movie also decides not to give you what you expect. The narrative of the story is simple and yet very complicated once you try understand the reasons for certain decision. Without really realising you , as an audience you start to ask yourself , what would do , as a women , as a man.

    Questions like this scares people unfortunately , but I think we should embrace those movies that challenges you emotionally. It is part of who we are.
  • In December 1918, the traumatized military Tom Sherbourne (Michael Fassbender) is temporarily hired as lightkeeper to work alone for six months at a lighthouse at Janus Rock, Australia. He meets the joyful local girl Isabel Graysmark (Alicia Vikander) and they fall in love with each other. Soon they marry each other and Isabel moves to Janus Rock with Tom. Along the next years, Isabel has two miscarriages and while traumatized with her second loss, Tom rescues a rowboat on the shore with a dead man and a baby girl. When he is ready to report the incident, Isabel persuades Tom to keep the baby as if she were their child. The reluctant Tom has difficulties to agree, but keep the baby named Lisa. In Lisa´s baptism, Tom sees the local Hannah Roennfeldt (Rachel Weisz) praying at a grave and he learns that she is the real mother of Lisa. He writes an anonymous note to Hannah telling that her missing daughter is safe and sound. When Tom meets Hannah again four years late, he takes an attitude that will change the lives of many persons.

    "The Light Between Oceans" is a beautiful film with a heartbreaking story and magnificent performances. It is easy to understand why Tom has difficulties to live a lie based on his rigid military principles but it is difficult to understand why the revelation four years after meeting Lisa´s real mother since he should be aware that his attitude would affect the lives of many people mainly Lisa and his wife. My vote is eight.

    Title (Brazil): "A Luz Entre Oceanos" ("The Light Between Oceans")
  • You better take a box of Kleenex with you to the screening of #TheLightBetweenOceans because you're going to need it, trust me. Heartbreaking pretty much encapsulates the entirety of this film which from the start aims to drive its point home on an emotional level. Based on M.L. Stedman's best-selling novel, starring Michael Fassbender, Alicia Vikander, Rachel Weisz, Bryan Brown, and Jack Thompson, adapted and directed by Derek Cianfrance, THE LIGHT BETWEEN OCEANS is essentially about a lighthouse keeper and his wife living off the coast of Western Australia and they raise a baby they rescue from an adrift rowboat. But years later, the lighthouse keeper and his wife encounter the real mother of that baby. Should they go on with their lie and keep their child or do they tell the truth and risk losing her forever? I've never been a parent, so I don't know what it feels like, because I can only imagine that the fear or anxiety of the possibility of losing your child through any circumstance crosses the minds of every parent who wouldn't want such misfortune befalls them. In this case, it cuts even deeper because it's about miscarriage, to have that happen to a woman whose dream is to become a mother, it's the worst nightmare for her. In THE LIGHT BETWEEN OCEANS, I think Alicia Vikander plays that with such strong conviction and ferocity, so much so that even though you know her character is doing something wrong, a part of you wants her to get away with this act, because Vikander has made you feel sorrowful for what her character has gone through. It's a remarkable performance for a woman who won Oscar for last year's "The Danish Girl," you see THE LIGHT BETWEEN OCEANS and you'll immediately understand exactly why she deserves that statuette. And Michael Fassbender plays the lighthouse keeper husband with a conscience, the film does deal with fate, love, moral dilemmas, and how far you're willing to go to get your dreams realized after having previously seen them crushed a few times, what secrets would you keep to make those dreams realized and so Fassbender's moral compass keeps bugging him. Fassbender is so gentle and sturdy and calmed in this film. If you've seen director Derek Cianfrance's previous films, "Blue Valentine" and "The Place Beyond The Pines," you'd know that Cianfrance is not one to shy away from couples' confrontations, it's as if he wants his actors to really unleash their strongest resentment possible, so when conflict arises between Vikander's character and Fassbender's character or between Vikander and Rachel Weisz's character, it's so real and ugly that you wouldn't want to get in the middle of it otherwise they might come at you as well. The cinematography for this film is exquisite, such a beautifully designed, beautifully shot film, not to mention composer Alexandre Desplat's music, his emphasis on piano, that makes the emotional journey of these characters all the more deeply affecting. THE LIGHT BETWEEN OCEANS guarantees to tug at the heartstrings. -- Rama's Screen --
  • This film tells the story of a married couple living in a remote lighthouse, who finds a drifting boat in the sea with a healthy baby and a dead man inside. They raise the baby as their own, but soon moral challenges arise and they find themselves at an important crossroad.

    I'm impressed by how beautiful "The Light Between Oceans" is. The scenery is so beautiful that it makes me want to visit that place and feel its serenity. The pain of the couple and their reasons for making such a decision is well portrayed in the film, and I do feel for them for having live with the consequences of their wrongs. The story is really beautiful because it is a story of love, and paradoxically tells that sometimes the right thing to do may not be the right thing to do. It is so hard to determine what is right and what is wrong in this situation, thereby creating a conflict which keeps the film captivating. I'm deeply moved by both Michael Fassbender and Alicia Vikander's performances. The film haunts me after it finishes, and I'm still affected by it and ruminating about it.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    It's December 1918. Tom Sherbourne (Michael Fassbender) returns from the war tired and seeking isolation. He takes a job at a remote lighthouse and marries local girl Isabel Graysmark (Alicia Vikander). She has miscarriage after miscarriage. One day, they find a boat washed ashore with a baby and a dead man aboard. She wants to keep her and convinces Tom to cover up the discovery. He learns of Hannah Roennfeldt (Rachel Weisz) who lost her husband Frank and their baby when a mob chased the German to row out into the sea.

    This is beautifully filmed but slow as heck. There is limited tension. It is overwrought and a big emotional epic. Being over two hours does not help. The first half hour lacks any tension with the no drama courtship. There is a flatness to the start of the movie that throws the rest into jeopardy. It never picks up enough speed to truly get started. It would be an easy fix but the movie is intentionally without action. Tom is haunted by war but the movie doesn't show any war scenes. Frank's escape from the mob could be heart-pounding but it doesn't show that either. The story-telling seems very old fashion but it's darn beautiful. By the time the movie get emotionally epic, it had already spent almost two hours of bumping around.
  • When I read this on Wikidpedia I was amazed:

    Critical Review The Light Between Oceans received mixed reviews from critics. On review aggregation website Rotten Tomatoes, the film has an approval rating of 59%, based on 133 reviews, with an average rating of 6.2/10. The site's critical consensus reads, "The Light Between Oceans presents a well-acted and handsomely mounted adaptation of its bestselling source material, but ultimately tugs on the heartstrings too often to be effective."

    This is a brilliantly acted film with some stunning scenery filmed in New Zealand. Both Michael Fassbender and Alicia Vikander put in two very strong performances, along with Rachel Weisz in a supporting role, and the film completely captures the period after the First World War. To me it seemed very much in the mode of 'The Piano' and equally as strong in terms of its dramatic dynamics and conflicts.

    I saw this film with my wife who was equally impressed so I think it has an appeal for both a female and male audience. Definitely should be an Oscar contender and both actors deserve a gong for their performances.
  • In my review of "The Two Faces of January" I described it as a film that "will be particularly enjoyed by older viewers who remember when story and location were put far ahead of CGI-based special effects". In watching this film I was again linking in my mind to that earlier film... and that was before the lead character suddenly brought up the two faces of Janus! For this is a good old-fashioned weepy melodrama: leisurely, character based and guaranteed to give the tear ducts a good old cleaning out.

    It's 1918 and Michael Fassbender plays Tom Sherbourne, a damaged man seeking solitude and reflection after four years of hell in the trenches. As a short-term job he takes the post of lighthouse keeper on the isolated slab of rock called Janus - sat between two oceans (presumably as this is Western Australia, the Indian and the Southern Oceans). The isolation of the job previously sent his predecessor off his trolley.

    En route to his workplace he is immediately attracted to headmaster's daughter Isabel (Alicia Vikander) who practically THROWS herself at Tom (the hussy), given that they only have snatches of a day at a time to be together during shore leave. Tom falls for her (as a hot blooded man, and with Vikander's performance, this is entirely believable!) and the two marry to retire to their 'fortress of solitude' together to raise a family and live happily ever after.... or not... For the path of true motherhood runs not smoothly for poor Isabel, and a baby in a drifting boat spells both joy and despair for the couple as the story unwinds.

    (I'll stop my synopsis there, since I think the trailer - and other reviews I've read - give too much away).

    While Fassbender again demonstrates what a mesmerising actor he is, the acting kudos in this one really goes again to Vikander, who pulls out all the stops in a role that demands fragility, naivety, resentment, anger and despair across its course. While I don't think the film in general will trouble the Oscars, this is a leading actress performance that I could well see nominated. In a supporting role, with less screen-time, is Rachel Weisz who again needs to demonstrate her acting stripes in a demanding role. (Also a shout-out to young Florence Clery who is wonderfully naturalistic as the 4 year old Lucy-Grace.) So this is a film with a stellar class, but it doesn't really all gel together satisfyingly into a stellar - or at least particularly memorable - movie. After a slow start, director Derek Cianfrance ("The Place Beyond the Pines") ladles on the melodrama interminably, and over a two hour running time the word overwrought comes to mind.

    The script (also by Cianfrance, from the novel by M.L.Stedman) could have been tightened up, particularly in the first reel, and the audience given a bit more time to reflect and absorb in the second half.

    The film is also curiously 'place-less'. I assumed this was somewhere off Ireland until someone suddenly starting singing "Waltzing Matilda" (badly) and random people started talking in Aussie accents: most strange.

    Cinematography by Adam Arkapaw ("Macbeth") is also frustratingly inconsistent. The landscapes of the island, steam trains, sunsets and the multiple boatings in between is just beautiful (assisted by a delicate score by the great Alexandre Desplat which is well used) but get close up (and the camera does often get VERY close up) and a lack of 'steadicam' becomes infuriating, with faces dancing about the screen and - in one particular scene early on - wandering off on either side with the camera apparently unsure which one to follow! A memorable cinema experience only for Vikander's outstanding performance. Now where are those tissues...

    (Agree? Disagree? Please visit bob-the-movie-man.com for the graphical version of the review and to comment. Thanks!)
  • For those who were fans of the book, it was a great adaptation. It was slow, but that was certainly true to the book.

    The acting was excellent, and I loved the cast. Fassbender and Weisz are always winners, of course - Vikander I have enjoyed in the three movies I've seen her in. She was great when she needed to be great in this movie - there were some very dramatic and poignant scenes, and she pulled them off.

    I loved the cinematography – especially the scenes filmed on the island – the constant wind! That was something which was conveyed in the book, but it's hard to keep "constant ferocious screaming wind" in your head while reading, because it would be awful if it were mentioned every paragraph, yet it's easy to forget that crucial detail while reading – the movie definitely conveyed that. Very atmospheric.

    Yes, it was on the slow side - so don't watch it while drowsy, and you should be fine!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Start with award worthy performances. Outstanding cinematography. Terrific score. This makes for a very good movie.

    It suffers a bit from the written and directed by syndrome and is too long. There are too many instances where the hand of the director is just too obvious. The man and baby in a rowboat was perfectly timed after the two miscarriages. The unique rattle that had to be there and noticed to move the story. It seemed odd that the only time he had to tend the light the emergency occurred and they had no signal set up to communicate a problem. The little in bed death scene wasn't needed as he could have been sitting in the chair when the car drove up. The time jump was jolting.

    Ignore the flaws and just go with the movie. It is a tearjerker with a big moral dilemma. It's a small movie that looks great on the big screen.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Hardly a movie is so mesmerizing to me. Hardly a movie is so gripping and captivating for most cinema goers these days I believe. The Light Between Oceans is one such movie! I did not expect it to be so absorbing when I chose to watch it while having a day off. I just thought it could be a bit boring as the story is based on a faraway light house. But at the end I was glued in to my seat spellbound by its infinite beauty and strength; quite pleasantly captivated by great acting of Alicia Vikander and Michael Fassbender. Particularly Alicia truly lives in the character and wouldn't let your mind roam anywhere else. She makes it so real and emotional that you feel that it's you who is inside her character. I was just thinking how lucky we are that Alicia came to this world to make us so fulfilled with her spellbinding acting! One of the best scenes displayed with utmost acting talent was the scene Tom agreeing to Isabel's plea to adopt the child, keeping the incident a secret. The facial expressions and the body language of both Tom and Isabella are so natural and intense in those few minutes, you could be frozen to your seat! Fassbender plays the role equally well too, a character well displayed with his identical razor sharp eye and intense facial expressions. He needs no extra effort to play such a complex character as he is born with such fascinating acting talents. Rachel Weiz does justice to her role well but I believe her character belongs to a younger actress to match the story. You get to see great cinematography by Arkapov in such beauty that captures spellbinding New Zealand landscape at its best. It rhymes well with the melancholic music by Desplat. Last but not least I had never watched a movie by Derek Cianfrance before but he simply has done smart work by directing this ingenious epic.

    My only disappointment is towards the end of the movie, as the final scene building loses its momentum. When Tom is in remand the characters begin to lose cohesiveness a bit but it sinks further when Isabel passes away, Lucy is suddenly grown up and become a mother too, within the next five or ten minutes. That chaotic haste really smashes the beautiful rhythm so well built up throughout the movie. And the the age related make-up is totally hopeless as Tom still looks the same person even when Lucy is a mother and visits him after 25 years! However, all in all it's an engrossing cinematic experience that brings you the quality of film making and you will never regret watching such a great creation!!

    It is so sad that great sublime creations like this movie didn't even get a a single nomination for Academy awards in 2016, while a synthetic junk crap raked almost all the awards. It shows what a deep stinky Hollywood political sinkhole the Academy has sunk in to now!
  • Derek Cianfrance, who directed the poignant Blue Valentine and the riveting The Place Beyond the Pines, brought probably the best out of Michael Fassbender and Rachel Weisz in quite some time, even if the film pulls at your heart strings a few too many times.

    Amidst the beautiful landscaping shots of sunsets, beaches, and oceanic views, Cianfrance crafts the story of a couple who desperately want a child but can't have one, extremely well. As much as this film deals with tragedy, grief, and sorrow there was something so beautiful about the way Cianfrance tells the story. It unfortunately becomes flooded with sadness and difficult circumstances, but I never stopped rooting for these characters. Even when they are at the brink of a bad decision, I wanted the best.

    That can be directly contributed to the terrific performances from the cast, and particularly Fassbender, Vikander, and Weisz. Fassbender brings so much power and gravitas to his roles, but I've never seen him so vulnerable. We saw a peek at the emotional weight he can bring to his characters in X-Men: Apocalypse last spring, but nothing can prepare you for his heartbreaking turn in this film.

    Vikander and Weisz are just as good. All 3 characters have bad qualities and choices that could turn them into unlikable human beings, but Weisz and Vikander add a graceful human touch to their roles. Though Vikander doesn't have children in real life, I believed she could be a mother someday with her turn. Weisz on the other-hand is a mother, and that motherly instinct exudes onto the screen. Both performances are so mind-bendingly good.

    One of the issues that's been brought up about this film is its over-reliance on pulling at your heart strings. It's a valid argument, especially considering all of the tragedy and horrible circumstances that occur. I can't really say it's a film I will revisit, but at the same time, I found Cianfrance's directing and the performances enough to get over the depressing nature of the film's plot. It's not an easy watch by any stretch of the imagination, but it's an important one for sure.

    +Oscar worthy performances from all 3 leads

    +Beautifully shot

    +Cianfrance's style

    -Manipulative at times

    7.7/10
  • The Light Between Oceans starts Michael Fassbender, Alicia Vikander and Rachel Weisz. And its the story of a couple living in a lighthouse and in the ocean they find a baby. And that's all I am going to say since the trailer again ruined some important plot points of the film. This movie is very slow but is the kind of movie in which almost everything is on point and it never goes to a route in which derails the movie, I was pleasantly surprised! I loved this film! The cinematography is amazing with a lot of shots of the ocean and the wind, it was truly jaw-dropping. The acting was also great, Michael Fassbender as always gives a brilliant performance. But the actress who surprised me a lot is Alicia Vikander. She is fantastic as this lady who has lost a lot and has a lot of regret. She was truly Oscar-worthy. The story was great as it is not only about the relationship between Tom and Isabel, but it's also about guilt, sadness, loss, etc. The ending floured me, I absolutely loved it. The only issue I have is that Toms and Isabels relationship is a bit rushed and with no real sense of direction, and the beginning is kind-off slow but then it picks it right back up the next 5 minutes. I had a great time with this film and i would recommend it to everybody who wants to experience a heart-breaking story that is actually realistic and authentic.
  • In brief: if I was only going by performances, this would easily be one of the strongest dramas this year. But a drama also should have a strong backbone for drama with conflicts and consequences that ultimately have good payoff, and this one is... alright. There's too much heavy-handed symbolism in the first half (from a hellish storm hitting the lighthouse area as a womb ruptures) to rocks being held by Vikander's character as if it's also her uterus (which unintentionally made me giggle thinking of a line from Raising Arizona, which in a way this is most alike but done in full serious mode), and the last several minutes kind of rushes things along to a finale that is a wee bit more Nicholas Sparks than the movie should be. The Light Between Oceans gains some momentum as it goes along, but Arkapow's cinematography and Cianfrance's choices of the sea and sky and birds and other objects to photograph threatens to overwhelm the already This-Goes-to-11-Volume main cast.

    All the same Fassbender, Vikander and Weisz get their eyes spectacularly wet and pained, and the existential plight of this married couple caught in the old Woody Allen maxum, "our lives consist of how we choose to distort it" (and the widowed mother made a seemingly permanent victim of this), who only want the best for this little girl (albeit in criminal terms of course) is felt deeply enough to make it a unique piece of filmmaking. It is certainly commendable that it simply gets to be on thousands of screens before Oscar season's officially begun and is not something too sappy that it's meant for teens or so restrained it gets stuck in the art house.

    Featuring a massively adorable child actor who adds immeasurably to the problem for the characters, it all makes for a solid moral quandary that has its strengths and weaknesses, the kind of picture that, save some sexual elements, could have been in the Picture Shows of the 30's or 40's, perhaps with Maureen O'Hara or Joan Crawford in a lead role somewhere.
  • wilkiecollins18 June 2017
    Too many sunsets, too many dawns, too many minutes (30, at least, perhaps 40) make this film very cloying, sometimes almost unbearable. Pity. The story is not much but it has something, and with a soberer director... Really ridiculous at the end, when Tom says to Lucy: a pity you did not come before (when Isabel was still alive), and she just answers that she couldn't. What the hack was she doing, during 20 years?
  • "She doesn't belong to us. We can't keep her." Tom (Michael Fassbender)

    I was ready to witness a Nicholas Sparks imitator with The Light Between Oceans; rather I enjoyed a whiff of Thomas Hardy. A newly-married couple, Tom and Isabel (Alicia Vikander), living on a remote lighthouse island off the west coast of Australia in the second decade of the twentieth century, find a baby washed ashore in a rowboat. The tension comes not from storms at sea but the ramifications of their keeping the child a secret.

    Notwithstanding the absurd good fortune that they find a baby after her two miscarriages, the story becomes increasingly complex with intersecting themes of passionate love and doing the right thing. Where this does not become a maudlin, sentimental romance is in a few realistic details. Most of us would question whether we would keep the child, given that we may never have one ourselves, just as this couple does.

    Along the way, the accomplished acting throws a powerful cast over the proceedings so that as outrageously melodramatic as it may seem, the film relentlessly shows at each turn how conscience does indeed make cowards of us all. Just as what he has done preys on Tom's conscience, the needs of his wife to have a child overcome this otherwise beacon of upright manhood and good sense.

    The end of WWI brings survivors like Tom an overpowering guilt that he survived while so many others didn't. With the presence of a child who belongs to someone else, he is tortured by thoughts of taking a loved one away as the war did for so many families.

    Fassbender is the Oscar contender he was meant to be. His every facial muscle works to show immense joy at his marriage and deep sorrow at his crime. Vikander is equally convincing as a youthful bride with grit and joy who convinces her husband, sworn to save lives in the lighthouse, to endanger himself and her by his foolish act.

    The cinematography is frequently gorgeous, and the romantic Andre Desplat music lovely but manipulative. While writer and director Derek Cianfrance navigates occasionally successfully through some choppy tear-jerking scenes (the close-ups of Vikander's tears are too many), it's still also a melodrama with too many fateful turns.

    Besides, what handsome, sensitive war veteran would exile himself to a lighthouse? Only if he knew Alicia Vikander would join him!
  • Top_Dawg_Critic10 April 2020
    133 minutes of an exhausting story, told in long dragged out scenes, with ocean-snail pacing. This film needed to be sped up 2x and/or 30-40 mins cut/edited out. What's even more sad, is that Fassbender and Vikander's chemistry just wasn't there in this film - when in fact they have a real life relationship together. Can you say "awkward" lol? Interesting story concept with great landscapes and cinematography. But that's pretty much it. The two lead stars couldn't save this film with it's terrible screenplay and directing.
  • What do we do when we encounter a situation where there is no definitive correct course of action? Do your own motivations overtake your moral compass? Most of us are fortunate enough never to be tested in this manner. Until we have each faced such challenging decisions it is impossible to know how we might react. There are no good guys or bad guys. No winners or losers. Just those left to deal with the outcome. I know this completely as I am one of the characters in this story. It is not a story for the faint of heart. If you are emotionally mature enough to withstand an in depth examination of your soul, then give this film a go. It will challenge you.
  • There are many moments of sweetness that will make you smile as you wipe away a tear or two (not me...I'm dead inside). But for the most part it's depressing, which is good for me as you all know I do like a melancholic drama. In this tale, a couple reside on a remote island where, after failing to give birth twice, they decide to keep a baby from a boat that has been washed ashore. Riddled with guilt, the husband can't help but contact the real mother who is still mourning her presumed deceased baby. Just that premise alone makes me feel sad. The story as a whole really worked, I was emotionally invested and found the pacing to be consistent...for the first two acts. It starts to lose steam during the final thirty minutes but was pleasantly surprised how quick the time went. It's a tale filled with ultimatums and will evoke the precedent question of "what would I do in that situation?". The film explores this well, and Derek Cianfrance's direction was beautiful. I mean he is already an accomplished director, but my word the visual imagery and the landscape shots were breathtaking. Powerhouse performances all round. Fassbender, Vikander and Weisz all fight to own every scene. There's so much acting here that it's difficult to determine if the narrative was overacted or not. I wanted more from Weisz and the screenplay didn't give her the opportunity. Fassbender and Vikander were perfect though, on screen chemistry was electric (regardless of their off screen relationship). Loved the environment of Western Australia and thought the costumes were authentic and captured the post-WWI years very well. Slightly too melodramatic for my taste, clearly giving cues for the audiences when to cry. And it felt like at least fifty letters were being narrated during its runtime. So. Many. Handwritten. Letters. However, I found this to be heart achingly beautiful but just tried too hard at going for awards. Love the title of the film though!
  • I am not writing movie review much, however, I could not resist after watching this masterpiece. This movie is undoubtedly one of the best dramas I have ever seen and comparable with some big shots like Philadelphia, Schindler's List or Crash. Frankly, I am surprised that the movie was omitted at Academy Awards and Golden Globes. Why nine stars? 3 stars for the cast: The cast is simply great and led by strong performance of Michael Fassbender (one of the best male actor of his age) as an introvert yet very sensitive and upright WWI veteran, followed by Alicia Vikander bringing all range of the femine emotions on the screen from a naive local beauty up to an emotionally destroyed mother (Academy Award worthy) and finally strong performance delivered by Rachel Weisz as loving and forgiving mother. In particular, the chemistry between Fassbender and Vikander is absolutely powerful in portraying of a lovely couple. No wonder :-) 3 stars for the story: The story attracts you from very first moment and is underlined by great casting and cinematography. Every seconds counts and you wish the movie is running longer. You really feel the ethical conflicts of the characters and questioning your own attitude in such matters. These conflicts are very realistic and not pathetic at all. 3 start for movie-making (cinematography, music, etc.): The Light Between Oceans is also very intense because of the very powerful cinematography and music. You really feel a salty cold wind in your face :-) Where is one star missing? Frankly, I wish we would have experienced more about the period between the time in jail and Isabel's death. It would be interesting to follow their romance. Despite this fact, the movie is amazing and worthy every second. Quite rare feeling nowadays.
  • A film full of class, and one of the most aesthetically beautiful films to grace the screens this year, Derek Cianfrance's "The Light Between Oceans" manages some tender and enchanting moments. With that said, it stumbles and falters in certain executions of character motivation and generic story structure. Cianfrance has performed remarkably well in his other two efforts ("Blue Valentine" and "The Place Beyond the Pines") however, this is probably his weakest overall outing yet.

    "The Light Between Oceans" tells the story of Tom and Isabel, who live on a remote island. Tom works as a lighthouse keeper, and is trying to come out of the horrors of World War I. As the couple begin to find happiness in their solitude, their inability to have children begins to plague their fairy tale. Isabel's hopes and prayers are believed to be answered when a dead man and an infant baby girl wash ashore. While Tom grapples with the reality of reporting the incident, or making the woman he loves happy, he ends up choosing the former, kicking into motion some heart wrenching consequences.

    The high marks are present and littered frequently throughout. It begins with the heartbreaking turn from Academy Award winner Rachel Weisz as the devastating Hannah, a grief-stricken mother whose arc goes into interesting territories. Michael Fassbender as the stoic and tortured Tom, has the actor showcasing another effortless and engaging presence that proves he's got plenty more to offer the realm of cinema.

    Co-star Alicia Vikander, recently just crowned for her riveting turn in Tom Hooper's "The Danish Girl" earlier this year, is as capable as ever in portraying a difficult and unlikable character. The problem is the script doesn't particularly offer her an opportunity for the audience to tap into the soul of Isabel. Her behavior at times is so despicable, it's hard to wrap your head around any her actions and why she chooses to do them. What's worse, it that we can't understand why her husband Tom would love someone like her. It feels even at times, unnatural. Everything from the inception of their love, to the finding of their baby, and the surrounding events that follow.

    Technically, the romantic drama is wholeheartedly intact. Composer Alexandre Desplat continues to deliver score after score, with strings and chords that tug at the heart. Desplat's choice of swells and subtlety are quite remarkable. They are choices that can once again, land him an Oscar nomination for Best Original Score.

    Cinematographer Adam Arkapaw ("Animal Kingdom" and "MacBeth") glosses the screen with invigorating colors and breathtaking imagery. When the word "class" is associated with any work of art, Arkapaw is the epitome of understanding in that regard. He frames a scene with respect and adoration, fixating on the not so obvious objects and movements of a scene. He allows us to travel graciously through the picture, enriching a methodical and lavish wonder of screen shots.

    With all these great high points provided, there's a very visible and apparent weakness in the script. Constructed by Cianfrance, and adapted from the novel of the same name, he attempts to build a vivacious love story. He gives us two people who he is saying to the audience are "meant for each other." Cianfrance ends up failing in establishing a believable and unique take on these two individuals from different walks of life. Tom, a veteran and tortured man of war is drawn to the passion and energy of the young Isabel. On paper, that can be sufficient but you must give the viewer motivation, action steps, and beats that prove the point you're trying to make. There's an elephant sized hole in the house that our director and writer tries to build.

    The writer/director truly fumbles in the final third of the film. He chases ideas that are leisurely shoehorned in the story. Cianfrance chases suspense, nostalgia, heartbreak, and resolution. All of these things seem like they're thrown together in a ten-minute scene reel. The filmmaker also manages to go down "J. Edgar" territory of bad makeup, aging characters that end up just becoming beautiful distractions of their former selves. There's even an abrupt ending that manages to raise eyebrows.

    Consequently, "The Light Between Oceans" doesn't totally fail. It's ambitious but unbalanced, desperately attempting to make a modern-day John Cassavettes. His fixation with love, and the dismal look at the reactions of people in a relationship is evident. Perhaps in the future, he'll put a much more focused effort on the sub-stories and actions that surround them.
  • The actors are excellent (especially Alicia Vikander), the scenery gorgeous, the story - moving, reconstructing the reality very well and real. It wasn't so clear what happened in 15 years jump to 1950. It shows values that we forgot in our time. I wish there would be more films like this one. It is a pleasure watching it. I loved it.
  • Alfred Hitchcock once said, "film is life with the boring bits cut out." If that be the case, director Derek Cianfrance seems to be making a career putting all the boring bits back in. At least unlike the dour, navel-gazing Place Beyond the Pines (2012), The Light Between Oceans sees Cianfrance fit to festoon his pensive yet rudimentary directing sights on a remarkably old-fashioned melodrama; the kind that involves a lot of sobbing, stares into the middle-distance and people wearing old-timey clothing.

    The Light Between Oceans takes place largely on an isolated island off the coast of Australia where WWI veteran Tom Sherbourne (Fassbender), has taken a job as a lighthouse keeper. Known to be the stoic but sensitive type, Tom catches the eye of the young Isabel Graysmark (Vikander) whose affluent family owns half the nearby town. Their courtship is one of saccharine kitsch to be sure, but I'd be lying if I told you I wasn't smiling as they eventually get married and carve out their own little corner of the sky on the appropriately named Janus Island.

    Of course if you're to credit anyone for making such sweetness easy to swallow it'd be the combined talents of Fassbender and Vikander, who flaunt their abilities like two Michelin approved chefs whipping something up for a cousin's wedding. They sell the period detail, they sell the merits of their solitude, they sell the rapture of their blossoming love; heck they almost sell the story, which by the second act, works against them like a gale against a wafting paddle boat.

    The film takes its time, but eventually ebbs into a lively littoral zone of story possibilities with the arrival of Lucy (Clery). Adrift on a small boat with her dead father (Ford), the infant Lucy is raised by the young couple who have been struggling to have children of their own. As one would expect, the couple find out a little more than they'd like about Lucy's past and the rest of the movie builds itself on a series of moral choices that risk destroying their reputations, their marriage and their love.

    Cianfrance certainly has a knack for ferreting out stories about the cross-generational ripple effect of one or two bad decisions. Combined with his striking command of film grammar from a purely visual perspective, Light Between Oceans begs to be compared to something like Atonement (2007). Yet the editing of Cianfrance's films always seem to eventually stumble into a consistent stream of "then this happens, then this happens, then this..." which is the antithesis of good storytelling. The last half-hour of the film drags on for so long that it compares unfavorably to Return of the King (2003).

    The Light Between Oceans starts deep and effecting, but eventually erodes your patience like ever punishing sea surf. The film was originally a novel written by M.L. Stedman and by all accounts it seems to want to stay that way. There are a lot of extreme closeups of actors looking pensive and contemplative, as if stuck in an inner monologue we can't hear. Tom and Isabel narrate each other's letters like the belles and beaus of a Civil War documentary. Finally there's the lighthouse itself whose symbolism towers over the film like a cigar at a Sigmund Freud symposium. Yet in the film, everything feels shallow, frivolous and hokey; relying far too much on its leads to tearfully make this film worth something.
  • It took three tries to watch this all the way through. The first time I was annoyed by the story line about half way through. The second time I found the story line too painful to stay with about 2/3 through. The third time was a revelation. It was completely plausible and extraordinary in affect. One cannot help but be greatly moved. In the end, there is a great deal of inspiration and satisfaction which is bittersweet. It is one of those films I have savored long after. Both leads are just incredible and though I was already a big Vikander fan, I am getting more and more enamored with the ability of Fassbender. This is a very special film and I hope many more see it all the way through.
  • jadepietro4 September 2016
    (RATING: ☆☆☆½ out of 5 ) THIS FILM IS RECOMMENDED. IN BRIEF: Well directed and powerfully acted, but it still can't hide its soap opera origins. GRADE: B- SYNOPSIS: A lonely lighthouse keeper marries and hide a dark secret about his family. JIM'S REVIEW: The things we do for love! Based on M.L. Stedman's best-selling romance novel, director Derek Cianfrance takes a beautiful swoon-worthy couple and places them directly in harm''s way. His sudsy melodrama is picture card lovely, set in the early 1900's, with gorgeous sunsets and sandy dunes aplenty, but his characters are not real in any sense. Still, the actors work real magic with their one-dimensional cut-out cardboard characters. Michael Fassbender, looking every inch like an Arrow Collar Man (and then some), plays Tom Sherborne, an ex-soldier haunted by his war experiences. Searching for solitude and inner peace, he goes to the outer banks of Australia to take a solitary job as lighthouse keeper. It is there, he falls in love with Isabel, played by Alicia Vikander, They coo, woo, and marry and life seems complete...until ugly things happen to beautiful people like them. Unable to have a family, starts to unhinge as is helplessly struggling to cope with her melancholia. All seems lost, that is, until fate brings them a small bundle of joy via a tragic boating accident. Do they inform the authorities of their find or quietly adopt the child as their own and call her Lucy? Any guesses? Obviously not, or we wouldn't have much of a movie, would we? That's the tangled set-up of this maudlin and manipulative film, the stuff that makes pulpy romance novels ever so popular with love-starved female readers. But the director valiantly tries to avoid much of the weepiness and skirts sentimentality whenever he can. To his credit, as a director, he makes a engaging film, well-crafted with lovely production values amid the suds. But as the film's screenwriter, he is less successful. The soap opera mechanics of the plot grinds along, including the appearance of the Little Lucy's real mother, Hannah (a riveting Rachel Weitz), who aches for her lost child as both deal with their guilt in varying ways. There are suds galore in this soap opera. The sunlit waves continuously lap against the shore in Adam Arkapaw's glowing cinematography. The actors' tear-ducts do get a workout with all this melodramatic excess. Alexandre Desplat's moody musical score ebbs and flows like the washing tide. Enough water references...here's just one more: Yet because of Mr. Cianfrance's restrained direction and the acting prowess of its stars, The Light Between Oceans is not all wet. A bit soppy and sappy, I will concur, but the film takes a serious look at misguided love and its consequences in adult terms. The plot itself is a muddle. The first half of the film is slow as Tom and Isabel become soulmates. It tries to build a foundation of the romance between the two lovers, but the characters lack depth and their actions are only the mechanisms to service the weepy narrative machine. It finally gets to the main story as it sets up obvious plot devices along the way. Skillful it's not, as any moviegoer can easily guess the outcome before we embark on the journey. Mr. Cianfrance's screenplay rarely touches on reality with its picturesque view of the shore town, its inhabitants, or the era. But to his credit, he assembles a top-notch cast for his movie. Mr. Fassbender anchors the film as the stoic husband who will sacrifice lovingly for his somewhat loopy wife. He underplays Tom's devotion and it works solidly against Ms. Vikander's much showier role as his emotional spouse. While his character's emotions are repressed and introverted, hers are all on the surface.The actress expertly handles the turmoil and places Isabel's tragic side on full display. (Particularly effective is a gut-wrenching scene involving Isabel's second miscarriage and the dissonant chords of a piano.) Also adding very strong support is the aforementioned Ms. Weitz as Lucy's real mother. She brings the ethic question of motherhood front and center and provides the necessary counterpoint to the moral issue at play. All three actors are superb. The Light Between Oceans doesn't shed much light on its solemn subject, but the film is a well-made diversion. Mr. Cianfrance's vision, as a director, is clear as he pays direct homage to this romance genre, even if his talent as a screenwriter can't avoid its shortcomings. NOTE: Was anyone else bothered by Hannah's German husband's lack of an accent?
  • ferguson-61 September 2016
    Warning: Spoilers
    Greetings again from the darkness. As the closing credits rolled, it seemed incredulous that Kleenex was neither a sponsor or even mentioned in the "special thanks". Surely a tissue company was behind such a straightforward cinematic sob-fest (calling this a tear-jerker doesn't do it justice).

    Director Derek Cianfrance is accustomed to wallowing in movie sadness. His 2010 gem Blue Valentine was an expose into a fractured and challenging relationship. This time he tackles the M.L, Stedman novel and slows the pace to an excruciatingly slow crawl.

    Michael Fassbender plays Tom, a tormented WWI veteran so intent on isolating himself from society and people that he accepts a job as the lighthouse keeper in some desolate area of Australia. The locals in the small town of Stanley in Tasmania welcome Tom and provide him a festive send-off. One of these locals is Isabel (Alicia Vikander) who, despite grieving for her brothers killed in the war, takes an instant liking to the handsome and mysterious Tom.

    Soon enough Tom and Isabel are married and living a blissful life on the isolated rock. Emotional turmoil and tragedies follow as Isabel suffers numerous miscarriages. It's then that the movie takes a wild turn. Rather than a message in a bottle, Tom and Isabel find a baby in a boat. Yep, unable to bear their own, the sea delivers a baby to their ocean front home.

    Tom can't help but notice that Isabel's depression instantly disappears as she cares for the baby, and in the blink of a misplaced eye, the three become a family. Of course, it wouldn't be much of a movie if the baby's birth mother wasn't discovered, so Rachel Weisz as Hannah brings her own tragic story and mourning to the façade of Tom and Isabel's make-believe happiness. What follows is a look at loyalty to spouse versus doing the right thing … a dilemma that isn't as easy as it should be.

    The lighthouse and surrounding coastline are extremely photogenic, as is the town and, of course, Fassbender and Vikander (both deliver excellent performances). It's also nice to see Aussie screen veterans Jack Thompson (Breaker Morant, 1980) and Bryan Brown (Cocktail), even in small roles. It's a purposefully sad and gut-wrenching movie that evidently moves so slowly to ensure the viewers have sufficient time to utilize those Kleenex.
An error has occured. Please try again.