User Reviews (106)

Add a Review

  • Shut In is a rather predictable thriller that treads a well worn path.

    That's not to say this is a poor film, its just that this concept has been recycled so many times, its become rather obvious whats happening and where its going.

    Naomi Watts hands in a decent effort in the lead role and indeed, the cast in general hand in competent performances. The tension builds nicely but I felt, the reveal was too sudden and robbed the film of much of the scare factor that had been built up to that point.

    The actions of the key character also seem a bit absurd at times as does the overall concept, which stretches credulity to a degree.

    In short, not a bad film if you like a few scares but regrettably nothing terribly special either. Six out of ten from me.
  • "I just want to help you." Mary Portman (Watts) is a child psychologist that has lost her husband and is taking care of her invalid son. She does her best to counsel other children while her life is crumbling down. She becomes concerned with one child in particular and now she has to decide to do what is best for the child. What she wants, or what others think. This is a movie that is worth watching because of Naomi Watts. She does everything she can to hold this movie together but it still just doesn't work. The movie starts off OK, but by the end it was hard to tell what was actually happening and what was real and what wasn't. I do like movies you have to think about, but this one just didn't make sense and you are left thinking about what is happening, then something else strange happens and you are trying to figure out how it fits and then something else happens and you just give up. That is not a good thing to happen in a movie. Overall, a movie with really good acting but just never really settled into something I could get involved in. I give this a C-.
  • rockman18218 February 2017
    I like Naomi Watts a lot but boy does she really need to pick and carefully choose what she wants to be in. I thought she was really fantastic in Mulholland Drive (probably my favorite film of all time). She's also been in a number of great memorable performances. i fact, shes even been in good horror in the past. Years later she's in a really awful "horror" film that doesn't offer any thrills or chills but rather just insists on wasting your time.

    This film is about a psychologist, played by Watts, following a car accident that killed her husband and left her son paralyzed (played by Stranger Things' Charlie Heaton). She starts to think that someone is inside her house trying to harm her. Who could it be though? Her son is paralyzed and immobile? The plot doesn't even sound interesting and there really isn't anything in the film that you could actually enjoy. The film is devoid of any actual chills, the scenes meant to make you jump are set up in a way that is so manufactured over the years, where you know exactly what to expect.

    The film just kind of throws characters into the mix and you are left wondering what purpose they really serve? Poor Jacob Tremblay, going from a wonderful performance in Room, to being thrown into something like this. The twist ending is so awful. Its half expected but doesn't bother offering any consolation for wasting your time. There's honestly too much going on in this film, its too busy with people and trying too hard to deliver a substantial story but it comes off really uninspired, tired, and boring. The twist also offers some really weird awkward moments too.

    Check this out if you want but there's really nothing to see here. Shut yourself out.

    4/10
  • ddbeuth15 November 2016
    Warning: Spoilers
    This movie can be summed up in a single word: awful. The performances were phoned in, the plot was weak, and the premise was ridiculous.

    ***** SPOILERS *****

    The person who wrote this drivel apparently expected everyone to believe a number of complete implausibilities: that a catatonic boy who requires extreme care would be released to a home that lacks any accommodation for his condition other than an adjustable bed; that someone could convincingly fake being catatonic for six months; that despite his need to never be seen moving about, he also managed to slip his mother frequent doses of a tranquilizer that had been prescribed to him (we aren't shown how he managed this); that somehow the missing pills were never noticed during the six month period; that a raccoon rummaging in the garbage outside would wake her from her drug- induced sleep feeling compelled to investigate, but her supposedly catatonic son running around the house at night didn't disturb her a bit; and that the little boy trapped in the house only managed to make it to Naomi during the night when she was in drugged slumber and the fake catatonic was free to run around, not during the day when the fake catatonic had to sit passively in his chair or reveal his farce.

    In my experience, the care the makers' of a movie take with the minor details shows how much they care about the production as a whole. Here, they apparently didn't give a f---. An unexpected visitor tells the mother that the huge storm raging outside has already deposited so much snow that the end of her driveway was blocked when the road was plowed. Yet a little while later, when she runs outside, her driveway appears freshly plowed and there is a well beaten path to a dock on a little lake or pond. Despite the supposedly raging winter storm, the dock is free of snow and ice. Although it is supposed to be bitterly cold, there is not so much as a crust of ice on the pond/lake. This list could go on and on, but that's enough.

    In short, there are so many good movies out there, that it would be a shame to waste any time watching this one.
  • 6 months after a car accident that killed Richard Portman (Peter Outbridge) and left Richard's son Stephen (Charlie Heaton) in a vegetative state, Richard's second wife, child psychologist Mary Portman (Naomi Watts) lives in an isolated part of caring for Stephen's needs while also seeing patients at her home. Mary herself is also in therapy via video conferencing with Dr. Wilson (Oliver Platt) as Stephen was having behavioral problems that lead to her deciding to send Stephen away to boarding school which was what lead to the accident. When one of Mary's patients, a young troubled deaf boy named Tom Patterson (Jacob Tremblay), comes to Mary's home she calls the social worker and volunteers to care for him, but he has seemingly fled into the woods during an incoming Winter storm. As Mary wrestles with worry for Tom and authorities having no luck finding him, Mary begins to hear and see things in her home leaving her to believe there's a malevolent presence.

    Released in 2016, Shut In was acquired by Luc Besson's joint venture with Relativity, Relativity EuropaCorp Distribution, which was Luc Besson's attempt to gain a foothold in distribution within the United States after having seen profits from Blockbusters such as the Taken franchise and Lucy kept by Fox and Universal respectively. The screenplay for Shut In written by Christina Hodson had appeared on the 2012 Blacklist of best unproduced screenplays, and the script was acquired by Europacorp for development in 2014 when the company was seeking genre fare to build their release slate. Shut In marks the second, and so far last feature film effort of British TV director Farren Blackburn whose work can be seen in The Fades, Doctor Who, and The Musketeers, and also helmed a number of episodes for Netflix Marvel series Daredevil, Iron Fist, and The Defenders. The movie received terrible reviews from critics and audiences and was a commercial dud upon release. Rightly so because Shut In is an absolute mess of a movie and probably one of the worst mainstream horror films of the 2010s.

    The movie's first hour is filled with terribly uninteresting melodrama with Naomi Watts saddled with a lead weight of a role (which Watts was in my opinion unfairly nominated for a Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actress) who's so poorly written that we never actually see her do anything constructive as a child psychologist with almost all of her patient interactions either done off camera or featuring her character distracted and not really doing anything. Watts is clearly trying to give the role something, but the movie is so bereft of anything interesting for the first hour that it ratches up the fake out dream sequences and jump scares to the point the film gets desperate enough to give us a "racoon scare". I can't really go into anymore detail than that, but there's an absolutely ludicrous twist in the movie that only works if several dozen people were blind and/or stupid because there's absolutely no way that what this character does would've been possible to fool this many people who (supposedly) went through an extensive amount of education and certification.

    Shut In is absolutely awful. While the movie is well shot and the actors are trying to give something to their thinly written roles, the movie is boring for the first hour then becomes crazy, stupid, and nonsensical in the last 30 minutes. If the movie had been that level of stupid in the last act throughout the entire movie I might've recommended this as a "so bad, it's good" viewing experience, but from its dour tone to its stoic performances the movie just feels boring and never comes to life.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Child psychologist Mary is trying to put her life back together after losing her husband in a car accident. Her teenage son was in the same car and he's in a coma.

    Mary, who works from home, is given a patient, Tom, a boy grieving after his mother's death. When she's told Tom is being taken away, she doesn't agree that the move is the best thing for him. He escapes from custody during a storm and is presumed dead by authorities.

    Mary starts hearing his voice in her house and catches glimpses of him. But then more mysterious things happen as she's trapped in her isolated home during the storm.......

    What could have been a totally perfunctory little supernatural thriller starring a once prolific actress, turns into nothing more than a bland thriller that thinks it's something better than what it is.

    Watts sleepwalks through her performance as the troubled Mary,,and it's not surprising, because this film is so dark at times, it's really difficult to see what is going on. But it's all for the sinister effect of the overall product, isn't it?

    Platt pops up every now and again as Mr. Skype advice, but then turns all Scatman Crothers in The Shinjng come the third act, and you can probably guess what happens.

    But it's this huge, ridiculous twist at the end that makes the film so laughably bad, and it almost harks at an incestuous relationship.

    Instead of shocking the viewer, it almost turned my stomach, making me dislike this wretched film a little but more.

    If the thought of a once great actress walking around a dark house for ninety minutes with a look of disdain on her face throughout, then this may be your cup of tea.

    Watts must have needed some money quick, because heaven knows why she agreed to be in this ridiculous piece of work.
  • It's crazy how bad movie production has become lately.. What is wrong writers and directors? This predictable movie stuff being produced now days is no excuse to blame on piracy or low sales.. It IS getting Ridiculous!

    I practically sat there with my wife at the movies and could dam near predict almost half of what was going to happen past half way through the to the end.

    Its a shame because this movie could have went so many other ways to give us something refreshing to look at.. but NO.. The laziness kicked in on this movie like many of the other crap being produced now..

    It's getting bad!
  • From my point of view this movie was a good movie that has all ingredients which a suspense/thriller movie demands. Story was OK, acting was OK, dialogues were OK according to the scene neither more nor less, cinematography was also good. I think it was a perfect movie i don't know why people have given below 5 rating with bad comments. For me if you have to watch a suspense/ thriller and horror movie then there are some rules to apply before watching. first you make an environment for the movie, you have no other work to do between the movie, you don't talk between the movie, you don't even miss a single dialogue, your lights should turn off so that your focus should be completely on the movie. So i think those who have given it less than 5 rating did not apply those rules otherwise the rating of this movie should have been not less than 6.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This review of Shut In is spoiler free

    * (1/5)

    EVERY ONCE IN a while there will be a horror-thriller with an interesting premise, and for a while this will bode well for the film industry but then disaster strikes. There will be a film released when the thrills take ages to kick in which is interesting if it's done well, even Naomi Watts has been in a few of them Mulholland Drive and The Ring to name a couple.

    If it's done horribly nothing bodes well for the film, this shows in director Farren Blackburn's Shut In. Here Blackburn is away from his natural home of directing TV episodes (he's even been tasked for making the first episode of this year's Iron Fist). The film stars Watts as Mary Portman a Child Psychologist who works close to home. She has a good day working with a child until she gets the call that her 18 year-old stepson (Charlie Heaton) has been involved in a head-on collision, and he is paralyzed. She has to take care of his every need, bathe him, feed him and clothe him.

    For a while this isolation horror-thriller has an interesting premise, there are even a couple of gorgeous shot of Watts walking through the snow covered wooded environment outside her home. Unfortunately the screenplay written by Christina Hodson is garbage, and at points awkward down to a tee that it makes it hard for its main star to read out the lines. In addition with terrible performances, even at Watts' standards. There is a point in which Mary seeks help from her employer (Oliver Platt), she states that she is seeing a ghost of a child that she takes care for, he then says that ghosts don't exist she's just sleep deprived. It plays on this for quite some time not giving much information or any idea of where the film is heading.

    To an extent the film also involves pretentious jump scares, which appear in a theme, of she hears banging goes to investigate and it turns out to be a false alarm, or she is grabbed and scared half-to-death, this sparks a vulnerability theme. There are a lot of those feelings in this. It's not original. At this point there is no hope left for Shut In. Seemingly we wait for what feels like an eternity for something even remotely thrilling to happen, at which point we've had our thousandth yawn. To spark the audience's attention it calls the barricade & hunt style card, last year's The Boy played on that theme too. It doesn't need to be said, but it's fair to say this is a tired - frankly unoriginal, incoherent horror-thriller with nothing interesting going for it, it's just drivel we've seen before.

    VERDICT: A tired horror-thriller, with poor performances even by Watts' standards, and garbage screenplay. It'll be better to watch this while sleeping.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Teared down by the press but still it popped up on horror sites now and then as worth seeing so I gave it 91 time out of my life. It isn't that scary and maybe you have seen a lot of flicks in this kind but for me it wasn't that bad at all.

    It's the performance of Charlie Heaton (Stephen Portman) also famous for Stranger Things (2016) series that elevates this flick. What he does with his character from disabled to creep is outstanding. The fact that Naomie Watts plays his mum does give it an extra touch.

    On part of the story itself it may be all predictable and you can guess who's the stranger in house rather quickly but still it entertained me. There aren't many effects used, it's the house that must deliver and that one shot while Dr Wilson (Oliver Platt) is skyping with Mary (Watts) and he notices stranger things (hihi) going on.

    Not one for the horror geeks but if you do like home-invading flicks or a bit of suspense then this is worth seeing.

    Gore 0/5 Nudity 0,5/5 Effects 2/5 Story 2,5/5 Comedy 0/5
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The beginning of this film has Watts' character suffering the sudden loss (in a car crash) of her husband, which seemingly sent his 15 years old son (her stepson) into catatonia. She then cares for him (despite the fact it was clearly established that he was aggressively violent toward her, and his father, and the three of them never got along with each other).

    Then, a small boy Watts is counselling disappears from her house, in the freezing cold winter in Maine. She then seems to be going mad, both searching for the boy, and blaming herself for her stepson's accident, which it turns out, was all an act by him to get attention from her, despite the fact that again, they didn't get along to begin with, so why does he suddenly care if she pays attention to him?

    Far too complicated of a setup, especially for a film which cannot decide where it wants to go, this then degenerates into a really lame combination of this year's The Boy (which was quite derivative of several other films), Halloween (during the hiding-in-the-closet climax), and The Shining, with Oliver Platt's character obviously standing in for Scatman Crothers' Dick Hallorann.

    Seriously, anyone who cannot figure what his fate will be is a moron.

    There is so little to say about this one because there is so little substance to anything here. None of its under developed plot threads make any sense, or go anywhere. Seeing Naomi Watts just kept reminding me of my second favourite movie, Mulholland Drive, and seeing Oliver Platt just kept reminding me of Lake Placid, and made me want to watch both of those gain. They're both vastly superior movies than this.
  • I'm not sure why this movie is getting such bad reviews. I actually thought it was pretty good.

    I enjoy "psychological thrillers" that keep you guessing, and this movie kept me guessing. I wasn't sure what was real, who was doing what, or exactly how it would end.

    I thought the acting was great and that the scenery was lovely.

    If anything, it was a little more horror-esque than I really needed, but overall I did not feel as though it was a waste of time or money.

    I enjoyed the pacing of the movie and felt that they built up to a good climactic ending. Two thumbs up from me.
  • devils_neighbor_66720 October 2019
    Not horror really, but suspenseful much of the time, with good cast and the storm helps fuel the suspense! A decent film
  • Warning: Spoilers
    It has to be very difficult to care for a shut-in, especially when you're doing it by yourself, and even more so when you live in the middle of nowhere. You have very little support (physically or emotionally), which means you're probably very lonely, overworked, frustrated, you can't easily go out much and you don't have much of a life to call your own. Even if you love the person you're taking care of (as most, if not all caregivers do), it has to be extremely tough. That's the set-up for "Shut In" (PG-13, 1:31).

    Oscar nominee Naomi Watts stars as Mary Portman, a family psychologist who's unable to help Stephen (Charlie Heaton), her troubled teenage stepson, get past his (unexplained) inner turmoil. When Stephen gets expelled from school (for reasons also not explained), Mary and her husband make the very difficult but necessary decision to send him off to a special boarding school. On the way to that school, a car accident kills Stephen's father and leaves Stephen in a catatonic state, with Mary as his sole caregiver.

    Mary loves her stepson and does her best with him, but she also has to keep working. After feeding, bathing and dressing Stephen each morning, she sets him up in front of the television and walks over to her office in a small building right next to her house in rural Maine. One of her patients is a young orphan named Tom (Jacob Tremblay), who is nearly deaf and doesn't speak. When Tom finds out that his caregiver is planning to send him to Boston, he runs away and shows up back at Mary's house.

    Before Mary can get Tom's caregiver to come out to her place and pick him up, Tom disappears. As that cold Maine winter day turns into an even colder night, Mary and those helping to search for Tom fear the worst. Mary starts "seeing" Tom in her bedroom at night and actually starts thinking that he has died and his ghost is haunting her. Mary has a psychiatrist (Oliver Platt) who tries to reason with her and offers to prescribe sleep medication, until he learns there's something about Mary that he didn't know.

    "Shut In" is an entertaining thriller… if you can look past the many plot holes in Christina Hodson's script and inconsistencies in Farren Blackburn's directing. There are numerous basic questions left unanswered (like those examples mentioned above and others like why, in the midst of a winter storm, there's no ice on Mary's pond) and some characters' actions don't make sense in light of their motivations. The twists are cool, but the acting is shaky and the plot is simplistic and contrived. "C+"
  • smoke015 February 2017
    Warning: Spoilers
    I find it hard to hate a movie. No matter how bad it is, I can usually find something redeeming, but the more I think about this movie the more angry I get that I actually sat through the whole thing.

    I tagged this review as a spoiler because I couldn't possibly explain why I hate it without spoilers: From the fact that we are constantly told that the kid is a step-son, as if that will be important later on but isn't, since we see from the start that Naomi loved and cared for him from the age of five, to the fact that Naomi won't have a dinner date with a patient's father due to basic ethical standards, and then goes ahead and has dinner with him anyway, to the fact that the raging blizzard comes and goes based on plot points, to the fact that there is a small wood burning stove in the kitchen of this gigantic home with no fireplaces and no central or solar heating system, to the fact that the kid managed to play catatonic for six months until a random patient breaks into the house for no reason, to the fact that Naomi can hear the boy breaking into the garage on the other side of the house as well as a raccoon on the other side of the house in her sleep, to the fact that Naomi tries to reason with the suddenly psycho step-son by telling him the accident messed with his mind, to the fact that the suddenly psycho step-son tells her he deliberately caused the car wreck so he was always psycho, even though we have already seen that it was clearly an accident, to the fact that with this piece of information Naomi is now free to change her mind about loving her step-son and now wants to protect the random patient from her recently unloved step-son, to the fact that we have to watch naked Naomi puke in a toilet bowl, and really, haven't you had enough by now, because I have, and I am not even finished listing everything that is wrong and stupid and idiotic about this movie, including all the references to so many other, better movies.

    Anyway, if you get a chance to see this, don't.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Shut In represents the worst that the horror/slasher/stalker/thriller genre(s) have to offer, but it's also lame in the way that is all too common to screen writing. It's got a hackneyed story that for the first two thirds is dull as dishwater - deathly serious when it should be interesting, or at least giving us more with the character that Naomi Watts plays (or, I should say, passively inhabits until she gets her quick pay day for filming) - and then in the last third becomes atrocious as far as doing what I'm sure they thought of as "homage" to the Shining when it comes off as being a shallow and insipid rip-off.

    It's unimaginative in the ways that should matter for it to either be a legitimately good movie about a mother taking care of her invalid son (the opening shows her aggressive teenage stepson, going off to some special school after being expelled with his dad, and the two get into a car wreck that leaves the father dead and the kid in a lobotomized state), while also tending to a seemingly troubled boy who is practically deaf (this Jacob Tremblay, making sure like Jennifer Lawrence and Kristin Stewart before him among many others to get in that s***y horror movie in early in his career) and who runs away and he may be a ghost now, OR if it became a sleazy exploitation picture with hints/direct references to incest and gratuitous nudity and violence.

    Instead this is kind of lazy, boring thriller where the main character has dream sequences that are meant to trick us to make us think something terrible or suspenseful is happening (she's washing her son and then tries to drown him, so early on in the movie, wow that's effed-oh wait nevermind). It does something I cannot abide or stand by when it comes to clichéd screen writing which is not carrying the courage of its storytelling convictions: it should take its premise of a woman in a snow-bound Maine area and run with it in creative ways, not in fake-outs and dreams/nightmares that are meant to make us jump. And, as is the case with spineless horror thrillers from Hollywood (The Darkness was another one this year, but at least that had the slightest bit of something different with the conceit of its premise), it's PG-13. Soft, squishy, one F-word and 'partial' nudity with Naomi Watts (or, as Jerry Seinfeld might say, "Bad naked" in the scene we actually see her exposed in an act of escape from a bathroom).

    This isn't the kind of movie that could have been saved necessarily by stronger performances - Watts is doing her best to keep above water, and Oliver Platt is there to, uh, deliver lots of clunky exposition about medical stuff and "there's no such thing as ghosts" - but I could have at least seen someone with stronger balls or crazier sensibilities. Here, Charlie Heaton is the son (or, sorry, 'step son', got to continue to say that, god forbid they went for the much more dangerous territory), and he comes off less like someone who could give this a pair of over-the-top magnificence (think 80's Nicolas Cage or early Crispin Glover for example), and is instead like a 2nd rate Dane Dehaan. By the time his 'secret' is revealed it's a) so preposterous that, as it turns out, was actually a *joke sub-plot* on Arrested Development, and b) if it's meant to be serious it doesn't hold up to a shred of scrutiny. Compared to this, this year's The Boy is Hitchcock's Psycho.

    But at least The Boy tried to give it a good go with giving good actors some decent dialog, and once it finally went full-stupid it was so mind-blowing as to grab my attention by the throat (the ending, as uproariously silly as it was, at least tried something different). This does nothing different, aside urinate on The Shining and Stephen King in general, and if I wasn't being angry at other times I was nodding off almost about to sleep, which is very hard for me to do given the light and sound of a theater experience. It's not scary, not thrilling, not dramatic, not exciting, not enticing, not well acted (yeah, it's a career low for Watts), and it's not even much of anything. I'd expect it on a ten-pack DVD of bargain basement horror flicks you can get in Wal-Mart, not on over 1,000 screens.
  • ... from EuropaCorp and director Farren Blackburn. Naomi Watts stars as a child psychologist working out of her home in snowy, remote Maine. She stays close to home to care for her teenage son (Charlie Heaton) who has been left in a vegetative state for the last six months since a car accident that also killed his father. Watts has grown weary of the burden, and has decided to move her son into a care facility, but she also has to deal with another patient, a mute boy (Jacob Tremblay), who has gone missing. As her mental state continues to deteriorate, things take a shocking turn when a massive blizzard hits, leaving her even more isolated.

    Watts is a good actress, and she brings what little is good here. The "twist" should be obvious to even the dullest of viewers, and the final portion of the movie devolves into suspense film cliche. .
  • This slow, dull, pointless "suspense" picture offers Naomi Watts, who still retains some of the beauty she exhibited as recently as "King Kong" (2005) and "Eastern Promises" (2007), but that doesn't justify this turkey. The production values are good as befits a picture with a star and one supposes this screenplay was greenlighted when she came aboard, for the same reason that most politicians win elections: name recognition. Charlie Heaton is well cast as the young maniac, but some big moments are stuff like having Watts' blood pressure found to be too high, sipping wine, sipping coffee, sighing, and resting.
  • Shut In is a movie that will scare you, thrill you, and make you hate Maine lol. Naomi Watts is great in her lead role, she really is convincing you can tell her character really is at her wits end. The suspense and scenes of terror are well done and very convincing. The son really does give a great performance and I love him in the role, he is so creepy and disturbed. The boy that plays Tom is also good in his role. I liked Oliver Pratt too, his character does not require a whole lot, but none the less, he is still good at what little of a role he has. The script is well written and I liked the dialogue between the characters. The ending was very well done and entertaining, didn't exactly suspect it, I had the considered the possibility of a version of how it ended, but I was not sure of it. Bottom line: shut in is a very entertaining, well acted and all around well made film. 7/10.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    SHUT IN is a low budget Canadian thriller with a Hollywood star in the form of Naomi Watts, who really needs to learn to pick better material (but then I wasn't fussed about the bloated KING KONG remake that made her name either). She plays the stepmother of a boy (as played by STRANGER THINGS star Charlie Heaton) badly disabled in a car accident that also killed her husband. The two share many dark times but there's a ray of light when another vulnerable boy comes into Naomi's care. All this is rather insipid and tired, and then towards the end it suddenly shifts into a laughably predictable psycho thriller mode with jump scares and the like. It's not believable for a moment.
  • nogodnomasters20 August 2017
    Warning: Spoilers
    Richard and Mary Portman (Naomi Watts) have an unruly teen child, Stephen (Charlie Heaton) so they are "shipping you off to military school with that... g-d- Finkelstein... s**t kid!" or something like that. As dad is driving his son away, they get into a tussle..."Hey stop touching me!" kiss a truck and the next thing you know dad is history and Stephen is somewhat catatonic being cared by Mary, who is actually his step-mother. Fortunately her office is next door. Tom (Jacob Tremblay) a hard of hearing nine year old who doesn't wear any type of unsightly hearing aide, is one of her patients. On his trip to Boston, he runs away and shows up at her door in the cold and snow.

    Mary has issues. She has dreams where she kills or injures Stephen. She also has those realistic dreams where she thinks someone is in the house and everyone has this figured out except for her. Long time actor Oliver Platt has a small role as a doctor.

    Watts did her normally great Oscar style performance for a film nobody is going to see. Unfortunately the plot was lame and formula. A second issue is that half the movie is filmed at night in candle light or filtered moonlight. You literally miss seeing scenes and have to figure out what is happening from the sound. Where is Tom Bodett when you need him? Guide: F-word. No sex. IMDb claims nudity, but it was dark and from the side.
  • "Shut In" is a very mundane, predictable and derivative thriller, so the only noteworthy thing to wonder is why a classy and multi-talented actress like Naomi Watts agreed to star in it. She appeared in horror movies/thrillers before - like "The Ring" or the remake of "Funny Games" - but that was quite a long time ago. The times and the competition must be rough in Hollywood these days, I guess. Sure, "Shut In" remains a watchable and competently made little film, but it isn't the least bit memorable and you honestly have to be pretty naïve NOT to see the principal plot-twist coming. From quite early in the film already, in fact. Watts is a great actress, and if there still are a few atmospheric and intense moments to enjoy, it's undeniably thanks to her performance. She just deserves better than to depict a so-called "damsel-in-distress".
  • After seeing the rating, reading some reviews...I didn't even want to watch this movie. BUT, I'm happy I did. I honestly think it's good. It will not change the world with unexpected twists or so, but an overall rating under 6?? I don't get that.

    Give it a try guys :)
  • Naomi Watts stars in this thriller as a psychologist who lost her husband in an accident and is tasked with caring for her wheelchair bound stepson. A young deaf boy is a new patient (Jacob Tremblay) and then strange things start happening. The boy appears in the middle of night and noises surround the house on every level. What follows and the revelations that finally come satisfy the viewer's thirst for several good scares.
  • Clinical psychologist Mary Portman lives with her paralyzed stepson Stephen and a recent accident killed her husband. Mary treats a deaf boy named Tom and one night he entered her home and just disappears from their. She starts to hear noises and she should find tom before the ice storm kills Tom. An empty thriller with a few lazy jumps- scares. The casting was good and Both Watts & Platt give their best shot. Clangs did his best on the soundtrack to create tension where none exists. Overall, it's a total waste of time.
An error has occured. Please try again.