User Reviews (12)

Add a Review

  • I humbly disagree with "We Make Good Beer". Although this is not a classic movie it is a good movie and much better than some of the drivel that comes out of Hollywood etc. The story got me as the mess the young couple got into gradually got progressively worse. The ending is not your typical "all is well" ending and that alone stands it apart from most movies.

    The movie filmed in Sudbury has four main characters who interact revealing personality weaknesses in definitely three of the four and the fourth finally is caught in the web of self-destruction.

    Canada has great acting talent, obviously glorious locations to film at, great actors and great production companies.
  • rps-25 December 2014
    Warning: Spoilers
    Canada makes good beer. Our whiskey is famous. We discovered insulin and invented the paint roller. Canada has produced great authors, actors and singers. But making movies is not something we do well at all and this puzzling, pointless, predictable turkey is but one more example of our embarrassing sophomoric efforts. The acting is barely adequate. The camera work is unoriginal. The script, with its absurdities and cinematic clichés might have been concocted by a grade school class. Why are we so bad at movies? My guess is that its because all our good talent has been syphoned off to Hollywood, leaving only hacks and losers at home, people who would rather pocket government film subsidies than create meaningful movies. These subsidies and tax breaks may create jobs. But they also result in appallingly embarrassing movies.
  • Mehki_Girl23 October 2021
    Warning: Spoilers
    .. With an unsatisfying ending. Obviously, the law firm partner and his wife are both sociopaths. Many captains of industry are exactly that.

    How else can you can layoff off thousands of people and start wars and still sleep at night?

    Anyway, this movie gets creepier, more implausible, and sillier as it goes along. The fired guy is a guillible idiot. He should have played along and then escaped with his wife or left her and drove straight to the cops. Do what if you want a big house? You're not *entitled* to one. Millions of people aren't living in big houses so no empathy there.

    But no, they get talked into staying with claims of, it'll be okay. No it won't. Didn't this idiot have a law degree?! No wonder he was fired!

    Well, by the time the fired guy gets around to choking to death some old guy while his wife stands by with her mouth hanging open, you're hoping they all get caught.

    And the ending shot maybe tells you they will get caught. I mean someone needs to report someone missing, bring up the feud, trace their phones to the partner's house, do an autopsy and discovery damage consistent with being shot by a shotgun and start putting 2 and 2 together.

    Four of the most unlikable people ever!
  • "The Privileged" is one of those films that depends upon ridiculous actions of the main characters to keep the plot moving. A young lawyer and his wife go to the guy's boss' lake house in a desperate attempt to save his job. What transpires at the lake house would destroy anyone's life for good. While the film is entertaining overall, what transpires borders on the absurd. Start with a character basically being fired by his boss one minute, then invited to the boss' lake house an instant later. Continue with the two main male characters essentially rubbing down each other's wives together while they sip cocktails. I mean, the young lawyer's wife (pregnant) just met the other couple only hours earlier and she's lying across the boss' lap in the skimpiest of dresses after dinner with him rubbing down her bare legs and thighs, while her husband gives his boss's wife a massage across the room? Seriously, where does that happen? A man, disgruntled because the rich couple ran his family out of business and took their land, knocks on their door at night alone unarmed to confront them and-do what exactly? Beat them up? Have dessert with them? Or, maybe just to get killed so the whole movie has tension and a plot. Oh, this is before things really get ridiculous. This is a film that could have been so much better with just an ounce of reality; instead, it is really a total farce.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    "The Privileged" begins as a legal drama where two attorneys and their wives meet at a cabin retreat. But as the night wears on, the situation of the couples becomes more and more violent. Bodies begin to pile up, and the only survivors remaining are the privileged.

    The film had excellent potential to explore how the disenfranchised Linley family members are overwhelmed by the rich and powerful Westwoods. But in the characters of Preston and Julia Westwood, dumb luck seemed to play a greater role than privilege.

    Richard and his pregnant wife Tara seemed at first glance to be decent people. Richard, who felt ethically compelled not to use the Koslow file in a recent case, has been reprimanded by Preston. The meeting at the lake house will determine whether or not Richard is fired.

    But the film took a turn toward the macabre when both Richard and Tara kill two of the locals. Tara kills a man who was about to murder her husband. But when Richard strangled the old-timer John Fox, who was a multi-millionaire, the film no longer became a drama about the privileged.

    By the end, all three of the Linleys are dead. They lost their land due to the greed of the Westwoods. But the death of John Fox, Richard Hunter, and pregnant Tara seemed gratuitous, adding only an element of sensationalism to the film.

    There were moments in the escapades of the Westwoods and the Hunters that nearly became farcical. The most ludicrous scene was when Preston began firing flaming arrows into a barge full of corpses. We never learned the actual contents of the Koslow file. We only know that it was private and confidential and that it was the springboard for the long day's journey into night.
  • gerri1-221 February 2015
    Warning: Spoilers
    SPOILER: Did Richard at any time feel that he was there for the wrong reasons? Why would Preston want him there? Killing someone and hiding the bodies is something else and planned. What would Preston achieve by killing Richard and his wife and exclaiming their deaths later. Where did Preston put Richards body? Why the police did not investigate further is a mystery. Six people dead and they go for a boat ride waving to their neighbour. Storyline just to simple for the real life. How many lines does one need to ask for answers on IMB? I asked enough questions and feel that is sufficient. Did Preston and his wife deliberately invite this couple over to set them up?
  • This movie is awful, I wasted an hour and half with horrible acting, unbelievable plot and situations. Had a viewer not read the details, nothing about this movie synced up. The whole dinner scene, totally ridiculous! There was just so many holes in the plot. Sam Trammell, shame on you. We expect more, I guess I do have spoiler alert, in no way shape or fashion does this movie hit the mark. I debated on 1 or 2 stars but the ONLY thing about this movie worth watching for is the scenery- I even tried to Google where it was filmed as well as where it was supposed to take place. Good luck tbis movie is so bad and there is another movie with same title. WASTE OF TIME, this review, yeah , there is a 600 minimum character limit. I hope viewers read this so they don't waste the time.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Would use NO stars as even forced to pick 1 leaves me semi-livid. I know movies are hit/miss but c'mon writers/directors, etc., of this wastefest! NOT FAIR! People deserve SOME closure on movies viewed. (And if we can't have that, then we can be comforted knowing the movie was somewhat good-which of course this one wasn't. ALMOST EVERYONE got VERY NEATLY BLOOD-SPLATTERED??? Whaaaaa?)

    It had the feel of a "Lifetime" movie but I hung in there til the end only for it to be a "WTH?" ending: There's a shot of an unaltered DRY manila SHARPIE-MARKED envelope (the infamous "Koslow File") w/a wedding band laying on it and you get to make your OWN ending. (How FUN 🙄... NOT!) Even if Tara managed to kill "Pres" in the LAKE that is NOT how that envelope would look (assuming she still had it ON her, to possibly 'send' ?spouse Richard? A strong message w/it). BUT since "Pres" is alive at the end, that means she DIDN'T make it out of the water. . . . OR did 'skinny little thang' somehow manage to escape him in the murky water, in order to leave SOMEONE-we don't know who-w/the envelope? Yeah, yeah . . . That's it.

    And what was Richard's status, after being smacked on the head? Dead and 'buried at sea,' TOO? 🤦‍♀️

    Me thinks the smoking-joint scene was enjoyed A LOT in real life by aforementioned writer(s)/directors, when they made this.

    What a G**-awful mess!!

    ("rps-2"--fm Canada-is right . . .Y'all cannot make movies! 😉 Lol)
  • I enjoyed this Canadian film about a lawyer, Richard, who has messed up and likely to lose a major client who is invited to visit his boss, Preston, and his wife at their island retreat with his wife, in an attempt to resolve the situation and save his job. As soon as he arrives on the island his boss who has come to meet him is in an angry confrontation with a local man. We soon learn that a local family, the Lynley's, were in financial difficulties and Preston had acquired their land for nothing. In the evening while enjoying food, wine and wife swapping their is a knock at the door and this is where the trouble escalates. The Lynley's are set on revenge for the land grab, so clearly there will be some violence soon. While not a suspensful film it moves along at pace, so never becomes boring and I was never quite sure how it would end.
  • This is a riveting, engaging thriller with elements of a psychological drama mixed with plenty of blood and violence and some mild social commentary about class and, yes, privilege. Much of the movie has a stage play feel about it. Kinetic at times, but also with a fair amount of smart dialog.

    Here's the story...

    Richard Hunter (Joshua Close) is a young lawyer with a bright future. But as the movie opens we learn that he has just made a costly mistake in a civil case by deciding not to introduce evidence that, it's implied, was gathered illegally and would harm others. An overconfident, virtuous Richard thought he could win the case without the dodgy dossier.

    Result: his boss, Preston Westwood (Sam Trammel), a senior partner in the law firm, basically fires him by phone on a late Friday afternoon. It seems the other partners and the client are furious. But Richard convinces Preston to invite him and his pregnant wife Tara (Lynn Roessler) up to his "cottage" (most of us would call it a luxurious, large lake home) in the north of Ontario so that Richard can plead to be kept on.

    Preston is quite obnoxious as an overbearing, materialistic showoff, unethical to the core. His wife, Julia (Laura Harris) is a socialite and snob who may have a drinking problem and is not averse to flirting with the much younger Richard.

    Things accelerate and go downhill from there. There is a near wife-swap incident fueled by Merlot and potent weed. That's interrupted by a late night visit from a local family that Preston's had a running feud with. Things heat up from there. Violence ensues. Shotguns, strangulation, blunt force trauma, even propane, gasoline, arrows, a jar of caviar, and drowning are all in the bloody mix. Great fun for those who like this sort of stuff. And much like a teen slasher movie, the question is "who will get it next?"

    As the movie progresses, we see that Richard is not the brave saint he thinks he is. He's a weak-willed, vacillating, very beta male who is resentful of his middle class roots and not averse to setting aside what principles he thinks he may hold. Nor is Tara so pure. No doubt thinking of possible prison time, she reluctantly goes along with a cover-up at least for a while. And we see further evidence that Preston and Julia are just garden variety sociopaths.

    Now, there are a number of implausibilities in the movie, but they're not fatal. A reasonable viewer can come up with some explanations. And the ending is, for some reviewers here, ambiguous. I thought it straight forward though.

    All in all, great fun. A good Friday night movie. Nothing too challenging after a hard day of work.
  • Yes - I have only recently Become a 'HUGE FAN' of this here Director & I admit - I haven't seen a full Film 'TO DATE' only the trailers & such!!

    (seems this site has changed - from days past - when U could 'watch &/or download' right from here?!?!!)

    No so anymore sadly😔

    So - 'HEADS' 'UP' to...

    GerHEAD - & Hoping YOU do get a chance to see this review & Hoping You will be MORE THEN GLAD - That I have finally left You something ON your Site - Acknowledging - YOU - for - Who You are - What You are - & absolutely everything U KNOW YOUR GOOD & TALENTED FOR Bro 🙂🙃😉😊

    xoxo "bb" 'bryan brody'
  • padams-0896715 February 2024
    I'm pretty simple, I guess. It moved along at a decent pace, not too violent, I've seen worse. I'm a crime and law fanatic so I liked the legal predicament here. It was good. I've seen better but it's not easy to find outstanding, so I liked this. And I must say Canada has a lot of great talent!

    I'm pretty simple, I guess. It moved along at a decent pace, not too violent, I've seen worse. I'm a crime and law fanatic so I liked the legal predicament here. It was good. I've seen better but it's not easy to find outstanding, so I liked this. And I must say Canada has a lot of great talent! I recommend it.