Dr. Oliver Wolf, a gifted neurologist, applies his unconventional approach to treating puzzling psychological cases.Dr. Oliver Wolf, a gifted neurologist, applies his unconventional approach to treating puzzling psychological cases.Dr. Oliver Wolf, a gifted neurologist, applies his unconventional approach to treating puzzling psychological cases.
- Awards
- 2 nominations total
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
The first episode kept me so interested!!! A lot of doctors truly don't see the person they sometimes see a helpless person with an illness to the brain. I love that this serious digs deep into who they are not what they're become. My uncle had a stroke the doctors were saying he won't understand speech, won't walk or talk. Truly discouraging it's been 3 months and he understands language, is trying to speak and stand. All n all it proves doctors aren't god they don't know everything. I really like how this series portrays this message. To not give up because of the patients condition. All n all I'm excited for this series. I hope we get a season 2.
Here's a revised version of your text with improved grammar and flow:
I couldn't understand why this TV series received such a low rating. At first, I considered skipping it because of the reviews, but I decided to give it a chance-and I'm glad I did. I started watching it and absolutely loved it. I'd even say the series is quite unusual. Just because it's easy to watch doesn't mean it lacks quality. In fact, there's so much more to it.
The series doesn't rely on shocking twists or exaggerated dramatization; instead, it maintains a balanced tone while deeply connecting with its audience. It offers valuable insights into understanding our brain, emotions, and psychology, which was a pleasant surprise for me. It encourages viewers to question and reflect on themselves, their lives, and the world around them.
On top of that, I learned about many new health-related issues. If you enjoy "hospital-style" TV series, Brilliant Minds delivers more than you'd expect.
I couldn't understand why this TV series received such a low rating. At first, I considered skipping it because of the reviews, but I decided to give it a chance-and I'm glad I did. I started watching it and absolutely loved it. I'd even say the series is quite unusual. Just because it's easy to watch doesn't mean it lacks quality. In fact, there's so much more to it.
The series doesn't rely on shocking twists or exaggerated dramatization; instead, it maintains a balanced tone while deeply connecting with its audience. It offers valuable insights into understanding our brain, emotions, and psychology, which was a pleasant surprise for me. It encourages viewers to question and reflect on themselves, their lives, and the world around them.
On top of that, I learned about many new health-related issues. If you enjoy "hospital-style" TV series, Brilliant Minds delivers more than you'd expect.
I guess it's a good thing that they didn't just reboot House, but this is the next worse thing.
The story is the same: brilliant, but flawed doctor uses unconventional methods to diagnose illnesses. Throw in some politically correct intersections (he's gay) that don't forward any plots and you have Brilliant Minds.
You could overlook that if, like House, they had some really unique illness to keep you interested, but so far the stories have been pedestrian and the plot plodding. Continuity is also an issue as we're told that the protagonist suffers from "Face Blindness", yet doesn't seem to have trouble recognizing people when he sees them.
So it's not terrible, but it's not really good, either. Yet?
The story is the same: brilliant, but flawed doctor uses unconventional methods to diagnose illnesses. Throw in some politically correct intersections (he's gay) that don't forward any plots and you have Brilliant Minds.
You could overlook that if, like House, they had some really unique illness to keep you interested, but so far the stories have been pedestrian and the plot plodding. Continuity is also an issue as we're told that the protagonist suffers from "Face Blindness", yet doesn't seem to have trouble recognizing people when he sees them.
So it's not terrible, but it's not really good, either. Yet?
To start of, I need to tell you that I have always been a fan of House M. D. And that is in some sense strange, since I have totally no appetite for watching other hospital drama series. The "ingredients" of House just make it so much more appealing, that I found it an addictive watch. House is just so much more different than the prototypical view we all have of a doctor... Instead of being a "gentleman" he is more like a distraught Einstein.
So when I heard about this new show called Brilliant Minds, I immediately recognized several traits of House in it. And this caused me to just give it a try! And yes, it appears to be an attempt at creating a show that has many traits similar to the ones that you find in House! First of all, the main character, dr. Wolf, is as awkward as House. Like House, he has a severe medical condition: instead of a pain syndrome with a corresponding painkiller (Vicodin) addiction, Wolf has facial blindness. And like House, there is also a team of young people - called "interns" instead of "residents" - which consists of also a group of brilliant, but akward people. And yes, we see Wolf also faced with challenging puzzles lin finding out what rare condition a patient shows up with (and how to treat / improve it).
The setting is though somewhat different than what you are accustomed to see in House. Instead of the very prestigious "Princeton-Plainsboro" (fictious hospital) where House is working as a doctor, we see Wolf work in "Bronx Hospital". The latter is clearly a hospital on the lower end of the "prestiguous-scale". You won't see expensive offices with glass walls, but more the layout that we as common people are accustomed to seeing in a hospital. So in that respect, many more people will see a hospital environment that they are more used to seeing. At least, that is my personal experience when watching Wolf.
It is further not difficult to see that the producers tried to make it fit with the trend of making socially responsible content (ESG). On the topic of "inclusion", you see that they chose to make Wolf a gay character. Further, they show successful women in business. Wolf's boss is not only a women, but also his team of interns consists of genial women. And last but not least, we see many coloured people. So on ESG, all boxes seem to be ticked on inclusion: i.e. LGBTQ, coloured people and "women in business".
Finally I need to of course mention the main actor, which is Zachary Quinto. This excellent actor - with a pretty impressive slate that includes e.g. Star Trek's Spock - most certainly has the skills to make this show a success. For the Trekky-fans like myself, it takes some time though to get accustomed to a character that all of a sudden has emotions;)
All-in-all, I think this show has many things that can make it a success like House. From what I have seen in the first 2 episodes, it most certainly has a lot of potential for the future episodes. Overall, I am going to score it 7.1/10, which is in my way of scoring a pretty decent score.
So when I heard about this new show called Brilliant Minds, I immediately recognized several traits of House in it. And this caused me to just give it a try! And yes, it appears to be an attempt at creating a show that has many traits similar to the ones that you find in House! First of all, the main character, dr. Wolf, is as awkward as House. Like House, he has a severe medical condition: instead of a pain syndrome with a corresponding painkiller (Vicodin) addiction, Wolf has facial blindness. And like House, there is also a team of young people - called "interns" instead of "residents" - which consists of also a group of brilliant, but akward people. And yes, we see Wolf also faced with challenging puzzles lin finding out what rare condition a patient shows up with (and how to treat / improve it).
The setting is though somewhat different than what you are accustomed to see in House. Instead of the very prestigious "Princeton-Plainsboro" (fictious hospital) where House is working as a doctor, we see Wolf work in "Bronx Hospital". The latter is clearly a hospital on the lower end of the "prestiguous-scale". You won't see expensive offices with glass walls, but more the layout that we as common people are accustomed to seeing in a hospital. So in that respect, many more people will see a hospital environment that they are more used to seeing. At least, that is my personal experience when watching Wolf.
It is further not difficult to see that the producers tried to make it fit with the trend of making socially responsible content (ESG). On the topic of "inclusion", you see that they chose to make Wolf a gay character. Further, they show successful women in business. Wolf's boss is not only a women, but also his team of interns consists of genial women. And last but not least, we see many coloured people. So on ESG, all boxes seem to be ticked on inclusion: i.e. LGBTQ, coloured people and "women in business".
Finally I need to of course mention the main actor, which is Zachary Quinto. This excellent actor - with a pretty impressive slate that includes e.g. Star Trek's Spock - most certainly has the skills to make this show a success. For the Trekky-fans like myself, it takes some time though to get accustomed to a character that all of a sudden has emotions;)
All-in-all, I think this show has many things that can make it a success like House. From what I have seen in the first 2 episodes, it most certainly has a lot of potential for the future episodes. Overall, I am going to score it 7.1/10, which is in my way of scoring a pretty decent score.
I just now realised after watching Awakenings for the first time, that the show is based heavily on real life doctor Oliver Wolf Stacks and some of the medical cases are based of real medical cases that doctor Sacks wrote about just like the amazing case that Awakenings is based on.
I went and searched the Internet and read about him and it gave me a whole now perspective on the show.
The biggest difference is that the show takes place today rather than in dr Sacks lifetime and in my opinion it would have been more interesting to keep the story in the 70s and 80s. Nevertheless the show worth watching.
I went and searched the Internet and read about him and it gave me a whole now perspective on the show.
The biggest difference is that the show takes place today rather than in dr Sacks lifetime and in my opinion it would have been more interesting to keep the story in the 70s and 80s. Nevertheless the show worth watching.
Did you know
- TriviaThis series, and its main character, is inspired by the life and work of Dr. Oliver Wolf Sacks (1933-2015), a British neurologist, naturalist, historian of science, and writer, and his books "The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat and Other Clinical Tales" (1985) and "An Anthropologist on Mars: Seven Paradoxical Tales" (1995). His previous 1973 book was adapted into the Academy Award-nominated "Awakenings (1990)", starring Robin Williams and Robert De Niro. Like Zachary Quinto's character, Sacks was gay, though he only addressed his sexual orientation openly very late in his life, in his second autobiography "On the Move: A Life" (2015).
- How many seasons does Brilliant Minds have?Powered by Alexa
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
