Follows a world of even deeper intrigue and subterfuge, with characters fighting their own battles as they grapple with existential threats to the nation and the world.Follows a world of even deeper intrigue and subterfuge, with characters fighting their own battles as they grapple with existential threats to the nation and the world.Follows a world of even deeper intrigue and subterfuge, with characters fighting their own battles as they grapple with existential threats to the nation and the world.
- Awards
- 1 nomination total
Browse episodes
Summary
Reviewers say 'The Agency' garners mixed reactions. Many commend the strong cast, especially Michael Fassbender, and the intriguing spy plot. However, critics argue it falls short as a remake of the French series 'Le Bureau des Légendes,' lacking depth and authenticity. Some cite writing and pacing issues, while others appreciate complex characters and political intrigue. Production values and cinematography receive praise, but the overall reception is divided, with many recommending the original series.
Featured reviews
A well-made series where Richard Gere and Michael Fassbender are wasted on it and play at 40-55 percent of their abilities and instead of the latter, though playing nicely and convincingly good, I would have liked to see Richard Armitage in his place and rank. The Russian and Ukrainian situations and visuals are mostly good as well as are the scenes with Sami Zahir and Danny.
A little suspension of disbelief here and there and you got yourself ten convincing episodes of high value targets drama.
Please bear in mind that it's mostly done right without stellar realism that are impossible to reach at a fictional level without making fuss, creating conflicts and deteriorating the storylines' plots.
A little suspension of disbelief here and there and you got yourself ten convincing episodes of high value targets drama.
Please bear in mind that it's mostly done right without stellar realism that are impossible to reach at a fictional level without making fuss, creating conflicts and deteriorating the storylines' plots.
- Screenplay/storyline/plots: 7.5
- Production value/impact: 7
- Development: 8
- Realism: 7
- Entertainment: 8
- Acting: 8
- Filming/photography/cinematography: 8.5
- VFX: 8.5
- Music/score/sound: 7
- Depth: 7
- Logic: 6.5
- Flow: 7.5
- Political/Drama/thriller/psychology/sp i: 7
- Ending: 7.
A story that unveils the humanness of tradesmen and women in the most controversial business of all time. By the way the characters are built and portrayed any wild guess can be true. Great dim visuals for indoor scenes screams it's all business. Excellent work with camera and visuals. Great work with audio and background music. Intro music is very relatable and mood setting. Performances by the whole cast felt very natural, and it was well chosen group. This is not the regular spy drama we come across but rather a portrayal of the toll it takes for operatives to serve their countries while surviving.
I have not seen the original to compare. However, knowing it was a remake of a French original I approached this with some trepidation as US remakes are usually pretty poor on the whole.
This though I was pleasantly surprised by. It offers something different to the usual spy thrillers focusing more on relationships to agents, colleagues, and loved ones that are often not touched on or rarely developed. Whilst this could still go further than it does those elements are just as important to the story as the main plot line. It's that plot line that is the slow burn as it takes it time to unfold but it is refreshing in a US remake that there is no reliance on action sequences. Action sequences are few and far between and only introduced when necessary. Instead we get a greater focus on the who what and why of the of the various plots and sub plots.
I found it compelling, with Michael Fassbender as Martian/Paul excellent in the main role ably supported by an excellent cast.
There is one thread throughout that seems to have little relevance to everything else that is going on but I suspect it is there because it will become much more important in subsequent series. However, it appears as a little padding to this series, although it is an interesting and watchable side plot. That and the slow burn stop it from becoming a 10/10 series but overall it is well with the watch.
This though I was pleasantly surprised by. It offers something different to the usual spy thrillers focusing more on relationships to agents, colleagues, and loved ones that are often not touched on or rarely developed. Whilst this could still go further than it does those elements are just as important to the story as the main plot line. It's that plot line that is the slow burn as it takes it time to unfold but it is refreshing in a US remake that there is no reliance on action sequences. Action sequences are few and far between and only introduced when necessary. Instead we get a greater focus on the who what and why of the of the various plots and sub plots.
I found it compelling, with Michael Fassbender as Martian/Paul excellent in the main role ably supported by an excellent cast.
There is one thread throughout that seems to have little relevance to everything else that is going on but I suspect it is there because it will become much more important in subsequent series. However, it appears as a little padding to this series, although it is an interesting and watchable side plot. That and the slow burn stop it from becoming a 10/10 series but overall it is well with the watch.
This is a strange one, an spy action series without action.
I mean there is some action but that one is just complementary, the main part is psychology, building drama and staff.
It is a smart show but because things are moving with a slow pace you have time to think about it and process the plot, making the cracks more obvious.
I loved this approach of not filling me with dumb action that force you to shut down your brain to watch it, it was like a fresh breeze of air comparing to other action shows.
But stills sometime it feels odd and temporary spoils the pleasure of watching it.
Overall, not perfect but solid, didn't regret watching it.
I mean there is some action but that one is just complementary, the main part is psychology, building drama and staff.
It is a smart show but because things are moving with a slow pace you have time to think about it and process the plot, making the cracks more obvious.
I loved this approach of not filling me with dumb action that force you to shut down your brain to watch it, it was like a fresh breeze of air comparing to other action shows.
But stills sometime it feels odd and temporary spoils the pleasure of watching it.
Overall, not perfect but solid, didn't regret watching it.
Don't believe the reviews that claim this is masterpiece nor those that claim this is bad. This is thoroughly engaging drama that meanders into the psychological stresses of being an agent more often than not. If you are looking for shoot 'em ups, you're on the wrong train. There is action mind you but that is second to storyline which is as it should be. This is more along the lines of Tinker Taylor rather than James Bond. If that is your cup of tea you will enjoy it.
As others have said the cast is quite good with nary a weak link. There are some traditional tropes throughout relating to the spy game and its role in international intrigue but you can't have it all.
As others have said the cast is quite good with nary a weak link. There are some traditional tropes throughout relating to the spy game and its role in international intrigue but you can't have it all.
Renewed, Canceled, or Ending?
Renewed, Canceled, or Ending?
Check out our list of renewals and cancellations to see if your favorite show made the cut.
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaThe way a Case Officer turns out an Agent ( or Informer or Confidential Informant), is through the use of the acronym MICE, which stands for:
- Money
- Ideology
- Compromise (aka Blackmail)
- Ego
- GoofsDuring dialog from Martian in a discussion with Dr. Blake, the acronym "OBE" is incorrectly explained as "Overtaken By Events". In US Government agencies, including those in the Intelligence Community and Department Of Defense, the correct/official explanation of the acronym "OBE" is "Overcome By Events".
- Crazy creditsThe opening credits presents the characters and scenes from the series interspersed with mirror panes. The former Director of Counterintelligence at the CIA, James Jesus Angleton, also known as the "poet-spy", described the Intelligence game as the "Wilderness of Mirrors", which was a phrase borrowed from a poem by T.S. Eliot called Gerontion (The title is Greek for "little old man," and the poem is an interior monologue relating the opinions and impressions of an elderly man, which describes Europe after World War I through the eyes of a man who has lived most of his life in the 19th century). In the world of Intelligence, in the the search for truth, it is hard to tell the difference between reality and a reflection thereof, an illusion if you will, as if one were in a "Hall of Mirrors".
Details
- Runtime1 hour
- Color
- Sound mix
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content

Top Gap
What is the Canadian French language plot outline for The Agency: Central Intelligence (2024)?
Answer