The Game is an absolutely first rate Cold War mini-series from the BBC set in the 1970's. The 70's feel is palpably conveyed through the authentic use of the fashions, hairstyles, vehicles and music from that decade. The plot is complex and intelligent with lots of twists and turns and will appeal to Le Carré fans. The acting is absolutely superb all round. The scenes inside the Security Service show that most of the people working there are paper shufflers rather than James Bond action types which is probably a more realistic portrayal. My only gripe is that it was only 6 episodes but as is often the case with the BBC, quality trumps quantity. If I could only have one station on my pay TV service it would definitely be the BBC. The quality of British productions in recent times, both on the big screen (e.g. Tinker Tailor, The Imitation Game, The Theory of Everything) and small screen (The Game, Peaky Blinders, The Honourable Woman), has been absolutely outstanding.
Add a Review
-
pmendham27 April 2015
-
whirligigfrenzy1 February 2015Watched this as a way to relax before going to sleep. Boy, was that a mistake.
First thing's first. This show is intense. There were several times where I had to pause the episode, take a breather (knowing that crap was about to hit the proverbial fan), and then play the remaining scene. The music and camera work seamlessly complemented each other providing tension at every turn. There are strange, asymmetric camera angles that were meant to distort your view so that you, the viewer, couldn't get a good look at what was going on.
Secondly, this show is more than just about the Cold War "game" between UK vs USSR. It shows the games we play in our social, professional, and public lives and how people cope. It's about intrigue and personal aspirations. Everyone is playing a game with each other.
Thirdly, the actors are top notch. So fantastic to see these characters fleshed out and actually have personality.
A thing to note: the show is definitely a slow burn. Things don't really "happen" per se as expected until episode 5. Every episode is DEFINITELY intense but when you stop and think about what actually happened during the course of 59 minutes, very little occurs. Each episode seems to focus on a particular aspect for the entire episode. Of course, in the end, everything comes together like a puzzle.
So I guess an earlier reviewer was correct in saying that the real game is to make us watch. Because it does. It makes you wonder about what's going to happen next, forces you to think back to earlier episodes for little details and hints about upcoming events, and finally reach the conclusion with the characters at the end of episode 6.
Really great watch. -
As for Cold War events, the Brits and lately the Germans as well have produced so many good series that, from time to time, one might wonder that is it possible to outmatch them, to possess good framework and maintaining thrill, yet without insipid cliches. It is to my liking to announce that The Game has got into the list of the best of them in every aspect: there are lots of twists and turns, including each episode ending, the cast is even and distinguished, the mood and era have skilfully captured, and - last but not least - high-society British English is heard all the time. Well, one might ponder if the situation in the UK was then so harsh and unpredictable, with suspicious persons in the very top of the society, but all this does not seem ridiculous, as the logic and shift of scenes are motivated. I liked all the episodes, and it is regrettable that only one season was produced. People like Brian Cox, Shaun Doodley, Victoria Hamilton are always pleasant to follow, they have no trivial roles.
-
Sleepin_Dragon3 February 2016What a welcome return to television for this genre, cold war spy thriller, so popular back in the 1980's and for many years criminally absent. The Game was an awesome five part series, incredibly written and scripted, it was dark, pacey, loaded with intrigue and thoroughly engaging.
Superbly acted, I've been a little critical of Tom Hughes in the past, a guy that looks like a model I found a little one dimensional, but he silenced me in this, he was outstanding. Brian Cox, Paul Ritter, Judy Parfitt etc all fantastic, but Victoria Hamilton was on another level, always been a fan but here she was unbelievable, an awesome actress.
Part 4 was without a doubt one of the best hours of television I have ever watched, outstanding.
Utterly devastating that a second series wasn't commissioned, the BBC missed a golden opportunity with both this and Banished. Nevertheless The Game was a magnificent piece of drama, 10/10 -
smb123213 December 2014The BBC continues to embarrass the American "entertainment" industry with serious actors who are not rap stars, TV hosts or wrestlers. The difference in quality is apparent from the start.
That said, The Game is one of the best. I remember those times and especially the awful 1970's when it seemed that a USSR victory was almost inevitable. I remember being amazed that anyone in a liberal democracy would choose to betray their country for a backward, despotic nation that didn't even pretend to care about human rights.
The cinematography editors are to be congratulated for their portrayal of a London caught up in spies, the IRA and militant unions. The moody, dark atmosphere is near perfection as are the characters. Paul Ritter as the grown gay male smothered by a domineering mother is brilliant. Each episode solves a new problem that only raises the stakes. The question of what is real and what is fake and in the end, what is the Game, is slowly explored and finally answered. -
It is my view that the writer and director did something unusual and experimental with this teleplay, and that experiment "cost" them viewers and ratings.
Which it should not have.
It is all about timing. This six episode mini-series starts slow and picks up speed like one of those amusement park rides, until, by the time you get to very end of the finale, it seems like you are going 100 miles an hour.
This is not the traditional way to execute a narrative. But, if you give it a chance, it works just fine.
Besides, there are so many extraordinary things going on here, that I rather think the odd pacing (which was deliberate, of that there is no doubt) makes the total experience all the better. I am thinking specifically of the performances of Tom Hughes and Victoria Hamilton, which are beyond good, they are unforgettable.
And - another trick of the writer -- he saved the very best lines of dialog for the post-Dénouement (postscript), specifically the lines "It takes a whore to catch a whore" (all the more potent when directed at a man!) and "doubt will kill as surely as a bullet." If you want to know why those lines are so powerful, watch the series! -
Tweekums7 June 2015Set in the early 1970s MI5 operative Joe Lambe is given the task of overseeing the defection and debriefing of Soviet agent Arkady. He quickly learns that the Soviets have a major operation planned, 'Operation Glass', but Arkady doesn't know the details. If MI5 is to thwart the KGB's plan they will have to uncover who is behind Operation Glass as well as its eventual aim. Matters are complicated when Joe learns that one of the KGB men behind the operation is 'Odin' the man responsible for the death of his girlfriend before the events of the series. A further complication is the revelation that a mole within MI5 has been leaking details of their counter-operation to the Soviets.
This gripping cold war thriller nicely captures the feeling of the 1970s and more importantly the sense of paranoia within the Security Services as agents wonder who they can trust; they don't even know if Glass is real or just a ploy to make Arkady's defects seem real. The cast does a fine job making us believe in the characters while still wondering whether or not they are the traitor. The only big name in the cast is Brian Cox, who is great as MI5 head 'Daddy', however the rest of the cast more than hold their own; most notably Tom Hughes who plays Joe and Shaun Dooley, who plays DC Jim Fenchurch, a policeman brought into assist MI5. These spies certainly aren't in the James Bond or even the 'Spooks' mould; they are almost bland in their ordinariness; something that suits the story perfectly. As the series approaches its end the tension mounts nicely as we learn just how dangerous Operation Glass is. Overall I'd say this is well worth watching and hope BBC2 continues to provide us with more quality drama like this in the future. -
I thought this series was a great show and want to know when or if you are making another. I enjoyed watching how the characters were built and unfolded and trying to work out who was what (baddie or goodie) in the characters. Also enjoyed the slower pace of the story as opposed to one and a half hour movies that squeeze as much out of the time as possible without portraying the 'real life' pace and how in 'real life' it is the bringing together of lots of small pieces of information that result in collating the whole picture/story.
Hope you make another one. -
stephen-lambe21 June 2015Many of the other reviews here - whether giving a good, bad or mediocre rating - have got the tone of this fun series about right. This is not for people looking for something in the vein of Le Carre or Deighton, excepting on a surface level. While (as many have said) it is wonderfully played with great intensity and commitment by a great cast, there's always a feeling that it's all style and no substance whatsoever. Like a parody of Le Carre novel with most of the jokes removed and Daddy's M15 never feels like it could really exist. That's not to say that it isn't good fun - I enjoyed it immensely - but while Funeral in Berlin and Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy will stay with me for as long as I have breath I'll have forgotten The Game in a couple of weeks, which is a bit of a shame.
-
I have just finished watching the final episode of The Game, and have to admit feeling on the one hand thoroughly satisfied and on the other, somewhat frustrated. On the positive side, this is a first rate drama with excellent production values - the acting is top notch, the characters well developed yet always leaving a sense that there is much kept hidden, the costumes, locations, cinematography and overall "feel" are spot on. The pace starts slowly - deliberately so - and picks up as the complex plot works its way inexorably towards its ultimate resolution. All in all, the feel is taught, suspenseful and engaging - this is a drama you are compelled to keep watching.
And so to the frustrations - as others have pointed out, there are a number of very glaring screw-ups in plot and "fieldcraft" which seem utterly at odds with the otherwise high quality of the production. I won't repeat all the errors here, but suffice it to say, it was enough to take the gloss off an otherwise exemplary and novel BBC drama. I would, nevertheless, encourage you all to watch it - just cut it a little slack! I for one very much hope there will be further series with this excellent cast. I just hope they spend a little more of the budget ironing out the glitches - if they do, this will be a series to rival the very best spy dramas ever produced. -
paul2001sw-114 June 2015One part 'Tinker, Tailor', and one part 'Spooks', moody thriller 'The Game' tells the story of an attempt by the British government (in a thinly fictionalised 1970s) to spoil a major Soviet intelligence operation. There's the possibility of at least one mole, office politics, and a brooding air of tension amid general social decay. But what made John Le Carre's story so brilliant was its minimalism: not one thing happened that wasn't necessary for the plot. 'The Game' needs too many set pieces and seems to present an intelligence agency repeatedly guilty of both bizarre judgement and operational incompetence. The love story woven into the story has its own tragic conclusion; but none of the subtlety of George Smiley's complicated, broken relationship with Ann. Tom Hughes is underpowered in the lead role; the supporting cast, however, at least play their (somewhat stereotyped) parts with gusto.
-
pbk20108 February 2018I absolutely loved "THE GAME"...while it was on. Why not more than just one season, I'll never know. I love this genre and the 6 episodes drip in espionage as if it was written from the pen of John le Carré's monozygotic identical twin. It has a certified fresh rating of 95% for a reason. I suggest you watch it with closed captions on to help you understand the British accents better. I would also suggest you watch this on your DVD player so you can rewind the parts that might confuse you too much. The show reveals ways in which the USSR would plan out espionage years in advance and how it infiltrated into top positions of government. Deliberately paced and brooding in tone, yet laced with caustic wit, personal tragedy and sinister inference, The Game keeps us wondering how far will a foreign government go to disrupt and destroy our way of life in the west. It is a first rate production of the Cold War terror that we all feared at times growing up in the 60's and 70's.
-
SuzyCayenne16 August 2015Pro: stylish, atmospheric, characters not bad, intriguing premises.
Con: too many ridiculous gaffes I don't ask for realism, only that the gaps be not insultingly obvious while you watch. There are many films that while objectively silly at least maintain a kind of internal believability, but The Game fails even simple threshold tests. The huge strains on logic range from the everyday work of spies to the most fundamental twists of the plot. And it's too bad, because if you like Cold War drama, this one seemed so promising, a sort of Tinker Tailor with better looking actors.
SPOILERS AHEAD! For example, why does MI5 use agents clearly already known to the KGB to do not-at-all-subtle surveillance? And haven't these people even heard of disguises? My god, they don't even bother to change their clothes! Joe Lamb is always wearing that same overcoat! And just how did a bunch of Soviet sleeper agents get to be in multiple British government positions without apparently ever going through even the most rudimentary of background checks? Seriously, we're asked to believe that none of these functionaries was vetted? That no one noticed they didn't exist until they were 20 or so? Okay, obviously British security has had some major lapses of the Kim Philby variety, but I think even your basic personnel office would catch on to this situation! -
jakdolesa1 March 2015First of all - the acting is great. But: If you're a John LeCarre fan looking for something like "Tinker Tailor...", you might end up seriously dissatisfied. That was exactly my problem when I began to watch the first episode. I felt betrayed by the writers: The character Joe Lamme looks almost like Peter Guillam played by Benedict Cumberbatch. The chief of MI5 is called Daddy and nobody knows his real name (like Control in "Tinker Tailor..."). His wife probably doesn't know he's working for MI5 (Control used to have a wife who thought he works as a postman - it's one little sentence in one of LeCarre's books). The evil KGB guy is called Odin (not Karla) and nobody knows his real name. DC Jim Fenchurch is basically Smiley's right hand man Mendel. Joe and Jim try to figure out who the mole is - they pull cards as a symbol for each of their colleagues. There is a mole. This alone would not be upsetting, but then there are goofs like: Joe tells Jim that he will use a workname - aloud, behind the suspect's door. Wendy is shaking all the time, I wonder how she passed the job interview. One scene is almost an exact remake of a scene from the first X-Files movie. I could go on. But it's really pointless, because obviously this series were not made for LeCarre fans. It's simply a well-made spy thriller that uses visual language of Thomas Alfredson's movie and borrows elements from genre classics.
-
dawnraids24 March 2017Call it a Le Carré light. MI5, spies and Cold War. Toby Whithouse, Sarah Dollard and Debbie O'Malley deliver 6 episodes of good fun and high entertainment full of suspense and surprise. Excellent mood and camera play, the viewer is convincingly cast back to a London of the 70's.
A tremendous performance from the entire cast especially Paul Ritter playing the hypocritical British public school creep! Worth watching if only for his performance and the exquisite interaction with his assistant the superb Chloé Pirrie (a touch naive, upright, loyal researcher).
The suspension of disbelief is perhaps called for to draw maximum enjoyment. The strength of the production rests chiefly on the convincing relationships fleshed out.
Why oh Why does the BBC have to nip above average productions in the bud. Xen is another example. It seems that the minute a viewer's brain is in any way engaged the Corporation pulls the plug out on it! Let's have some more please! -
Dave-J75 June 2015A good old-fashioned Cold-war thriller that resembles Len Deighton more than John LeCarre (especially as one of Deighton's books was entitled Berlin Game.) It certainly has the slow pace of the masters in order to facilitate character development as the personalities of the people that play the game are intrinsic to the plot. It's beautifully shot and the scenery is very 1970, although there are far too few cars in shot for it to resemble central London. Still, can't complain as these things cost the cash that the Beeb is usually strapped for.
A few anomalies in the script could have been avoided, though. Why did the KGB pretend to kill Julia instead of making Joe do their wicked will by pressing a gun to her head? Why wasn't Joe chief suspect from the start? But these pale into insignificance beside the scene in the last part where Sarah meets her husband in the safe-house without thinking that the room is certain to be bugged. Beans spilled all over the show after 25 years of great care to ensure against such mishaps. In the annals of great TV dramas, this rates as a schoolboy-howler.
Still an enjoyable, pleasingly-retro, thriller. Those of us who enjoyed LeCarre and Deighton will have a nice glow of nostalgia whilst watching this one and the youngsters can learn how TV drama should be done. -
timdalton00728 July 2017It seems as though the Cold War spy thriller is making something of a come back in recent years. The last few years have seen a spate of new adaptations of the classic Cold War era works of author John le Carre ranging from the Oscar nominated film adaptation of Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy to a slew of BBC audio drama adaptations of the various novels. Authors such as Charles Cumming in his novel The Trinity Six have also explored the legacy of the Cold War as well. Yet there's also been new tales told as well, pastiches of a thought dead genre. One particularly interesting one was the BBC's six part thriller The Game, created by Toby Whithouse, which took viewers into MI5 in early 1970s Britain.
The premise of the series is simple enough. It's 1972 and Britain is the throes of a miners strike, power cuts, and a general sense of unease. Into this world, a KGB Colonel approaches MI5 with word that a major Soviet operation called Operation Glass is about to take place. An operation so major that it will redefine the history of British-Soviet espionage. Investigating Operation Glass are a number of MI5 operatives and brass from field agent Joe (Tom Hughes), counter-espionage boss Bobby (Paul Ritter), his deputy Sarah (Victoria Hamilton), her electronic surveillance expert husband Alan (Jonathan Aris), rising secretary Wendy (Chloe Pirrie), and Special Branch officer Jim Fenchurch (Shaun Dooley) with the agency director known only by the code-name "Daddy" (Brian Cox) sitting at the top.
Whithouse, along with writers Sarah Dollard and Debbie O'Malley for some of the middle episodes, certainly know the genre they are playing with. As well as the mysterious Operation Glass, it becomes apparent quickly that there is a mole within MI5 (potentially within their own little group) which threatens to expose the investigation. There are shades of the le Carre classic Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy as well as other notable Cold War thrillers such as Fredrick Forsyth's The Fourth Protocol. Indeed it would be easy to simply call The Game a potential rip-off of le Carre but that is to give only a superficial glance at the series.
For Whithouse injects into familiar le Carre tropes other elements of Cold War spy fiction, putting them out in the field alongside them as it were. There's fears of Soviet infiltration of the British establishment (a very real worry in the post-Cambridge spies era), nuclear secrets, the inter-service rivalry between the domestic focused MI5 and the foreign-focused MI6 which all come into play. More than that, the series does a nice job of creating a sense of time and place by tying into larger issues of the early 1970s including IRA bombings and the state of British politics, which gives this fictional take on the era an air of verisimilitude. Combined with the characters and often strong guest casts, it's a compelling 21st-century take on the Cold War spy thriller.
That sense of time and place is something apparent in the production values as well. The sense of pastiche comes across especially in the visuals of the series, especially as the series seems to harken back at times to the aforementioned 2011 film version of Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy. From the interior of MI5 to the way people are dressed, there are strong echoes of that film here. More than that, the direction of Niall MacCormick and Daniel O'Hara drives that point home. So too does the cinematography of Sam McCurdy and Urszula Pontikos with its washed out colors that bring to mind the dreariness one often associates with the decade in the UK. How much of this is a deliberate echo of director Tomas Alfredson and cinematographer Hoyte van Hoytema's work on that film is unclear as it might be down to both the film and TV series being set in the same time period but using that as a visual shorthand certainly helps the series in setting its tone. When composer Daniel Pemberton's score is added, especially when his haunting opening theme is paired with a very well opening title sequence, it helps bring to life Whithouse's vision rather nicely.
The Game then stands a Cold War spy thriller made in the present day. It nicely echoes elements of the genre's classic such as Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy while also finding new things to do as well by tying into the wider world of early 1970s Britain, allowing it to be more than just a pastiche of a bygone genre. In the process, it becomes a compelling, twisty piece of work that rewards viewers willing to watch the entire series.
If you can, of course, trust what you're watching. After all, in the espionage world, things are so rarely what they seem. The Game certainly proves that to be the case. -
jammasta-114 November 2015The premise is this: a Soviet agent holed up as a university professor in England gets called up for a major operation that consists in waking up sleeper cells in numbers for an unstated grievous purpose. He defects and spills the beans to the MI5. The MI5 - represented, for the most part, by the love-child of Morrissey and a flock of cats (Tom Hughes) - expects the worst and stands up to the challenge, monitoring the operation in desperate hope that they may get one step ahead of the Russians. Needless to say, with 6 hour-long episodes, it's easier said than done. All this takes place in the bleak environs of early-1970s London, in cramped spaces, dilapidated housing, and persistent rain (reminiscent of "Se7en"). The series is well-made and entertaining. The pace - initially somewhat pedestrian - quickens by the 4th episode to get you panting by the 5th. At first, the drama seems very facile - seeming to boil down to a personal duel between Tom Hughes's "Joe Lambe" and a KGB killer on the loose in England. But there's enough of side story to this to keep you thinking there's more to it than that. And, frankly, you do get rewarded. On the technical side, the editing is near-perfect and the acting is pretty good, too. I was stuck on Victoria Hamilton' performance in "Mansfield Park," but she's a completely different thing here, with enormous self-assurance and power. Brian Cox is also a perfect hit as the head of MI5 ("Daddy"). If anything, it's Hughes that seems rather odd - his appearance and demeanor is somewhat out of place. On the one hand, this may be a virtue, since he does portray a far less bleak character than it initially appears. On the other hand, he's anachronistic - a poster-boy for the new romantic or a candidate for a remake of "Anna Karenina." The portrayal of "the game" resonates with all that an avid reader of le Carre will know - that it's almost never fun and games, and that it's not about the spectacular at all. The "games" we see played out in the series are not just about espionage - they are also about the personal lives of the characters who either play or get played. While it's not on level with the classic le Carre stuff with Alec Guinness, there's enough substance here to make you hope there's more to come from this source. This is really good enough to see.
-
I'm a Cold War spy thriller fan, so I might as well say John Le Carre fan as he was and is the master of all that he surveys. So imagine my excitement that this was coming to my screen courtesy of the delectable Auntie Beeb? I hoped that it was 'in the style of...' and immediately hoped for a Smiley or two and I'm not talking about emoticons at the end of an email. It has all of the classic ingredients and some very canny actors. There is intrigue, cross and double cross, moles, double agents, mysterious and deadly bad guys, vulnerable good guys who actually believe in 'Queen And Country' blah, blah, blah. The look and feel are excellent, the attention to detail and resurrecting the crazy strike happy hyper inflationary IRA infested 70's is spot on.
BUT ONE THING IS BUGGING ME MORE AND MORE AND IS MAKING THIS UNWATCHABLE...
The terrible trade craft. What a bunch of amateurs! If you, like me, have devoured pretty much every Le Carre book going you will know a few tricks of the trade as well. My biggest bug bear is that the defector's handlers are also used for covert and mobile surveillance - this would never happen. Not then, not now. 'Watchers' are specially trained experts and would never be known to the 'target'. It doesn't seem to matter in this. Despite the high risk of discovery and blowing the operation they follow a defecting KGB double agent on more than one occasion. They don't even change their appearance like doff/remove a hat/glasses or change a jacket or the way they walk. Come on guys?! You get it so right, then blow it on minor details like this? Was it budgetary constraints? Not enough money for the extra's? You can fill the streets of London with a myriad of period dressed extra's and rare cars in mint condition but can't afford a few nefarious looking types like ex-safe crackers, burglars and pick pockets or plain Janes as MI5 did for these kind of jobs?
Which brings me on to the question of the KGB Colonel, defecting for love, and to save the world. The KGB were very good at what they did. They knew how to dodge, dive, duck and disappear. This guy doesn't have a clue despite having a lot to hide. On a long drive through the country on a minor 'A' road he doesn't once double back, fake a breakdown to force followers to pass by or notice his own handler following 100 yards behind him in his own car with none in between?! Don't you at least change your number plates? Not in this apparently.
And the Special Met Police fire arms guys? Hanging out of open windows in plain sight with Lee Enfield rifles despite the surveillance on this occasion being aimed at trapping the main bad guy; a top KGB assassin? Surely the first thing he would do is turn up early and check for traps and anything untoward on a chilly day. Wide open windows when it's cold would stand out a mile. How do we know it's a wee bit chilly? Extras dressed for an autumn day in macs and scarves are a clue. Shouldn't they have been a bit more professional and left the windows shut to hide behind the reflections and blend in with the others closed against the cold? Bullets take no notice of a flimsy glass barrier, so why open the windows and telegraph your positions?
ENOUGH!
Despite this being quite a classy production with actors that are definitely a cut above, these stupid mistakes are making it unwatchable. I will keep trying, but I think my neighbours are getting hacked off with me shouting at the telly in an angry fashion every Thursday night.
This review will self destruct in five, four, three, two............. -
gearedqualitygrowth18 March 2019The series builds to the point that, once you learn there is a mole within the unit, you have reason to suspect it could be any of the principal characters. You're not sure who you can trust, even among the protagonists, so the writing was very careful not to give anything away. For example, in the scene when they finally trap the mole, it was cleverly scripted with a whirlwind of confusion until you finally see who it is. I can usually predict where things are going but there were a couple of times I was truly surprised by a character's actions, so I'm always happy when I can be fooled by good writing.
Tom Hughes plays the lead with calculated reticence , leading you to wonder if he's screwed-up because of all the things he's seen at work or because of a screwed-up childhood, and this is hinted at in Episode 6. All of the MI5 characters have some serious dysfunction going on in their personal lives; it's rather poignant that the people who turn out to be the standout heroes are the "outsider" cop, DC Fenchurch, and the not-yet-jaded rookie Wendy. Fresh blood is sometimes the cure to the toxicity of the status quo.
It's a shame it was only one season; it would have been nice to see how the characters progressed. Definitely worth a watch. -
Watching this again on dvd I find I am enjoying it more than previously but it has problems that annoy me.
It is well acted and the plot is more realistic than some hipsters on here seem to believe.
If you are a spy/le carre/Deighton fan give it a shot.
But it is a period piece which uses figures of speech not used in the 1970s.
People say someone is across something,a recent expression I think.
Someone else refers to the PRC meaning Communist China,again a recent expression I think.
It lacks a period feel despite the old cars.
The world war 3 government warning videos were never shown on tv in the 1970s,they were shown in documentaries in the 1980s.
But it is a good story,well acted with an understanding of how MI5 and Special Branch work together.
Pity they never made another series.
Maybe they should make a series of Spooks set in the 1960s or 1970s? -
georgegrimes17 October 2021A good production with an excellent soundtrack, which is evocative of the era and past compositions for similar espionage epics. I particularly liked the amusing middle class values of some of the characters.
-
socrates1717 March 2019This is a throwback in many ways, some good, some not so good. The period is evoked very nicely with lots of detail. The acting is very effective. But the writing, both the plot and the dialog, seem to be stuck in an earlier period as well. Although the actors do their best to sell them, the characters aren't even remotely believable. Neither are the Soviet plots. It wants to be very cynical, but even in the 1960s, Len Deighton adaptations did that a whole lot better. At times, especially with the character Wendy, I thought it couldn't decide if it was a spoof or not. It did not help that I watched it immediately after finishing binging seasons 3 and 4 of the exceptional French spy series The Bureau.
-
enofile21 November 2014Perhaps this reviewed is skewed since I grew up during the Cold War, but although the filming, acting, and atmosphere are spot on, there are inexplicable discrepancies in the plot that simply make no sense. Bodies are knocked out and left prone with no attempt to interrogate. Wire taps are set and the listeners just far away enough not to prevent the obvious disaster. Comedy is interjected at inappropriate moments and seems ridiculous, rather then funny. Also, the writers have thrown historical accuracy to the wind, and the story takes on a "Twilight Zone," science fiction tone. If I provide exact examples, I will spoil the show for those viewers who simply desire snappy entertainment. Thus, I will show restraint. The Game could have been a TV LeCarre, but alas, it is more pop then intrigue.
-
nancyldraper3 August 2019Intrigue. twists. Solid cast with great performances. Just an around good series. I give this limited series an 8 (great) out of 10. {Spy Thriller}