Plot

Walsh exposes the collapse of the gender-affirming care narrative, criticizes Tim Walz's dishonesty, and mocks Colin Kaepernick's contradictory NFL aspirations and his latest venture, Lumistory AI, as a continuation of his con artistry.

Matt Walsh discusses the collapse of the supposed consensus supporting gender-affirming care, emphasizing the recent admission by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons that they do not endorse these procedures for minors due to low-quality evidence. He criticizes media and political figures for perpetuating false narratives and contrasts their behavior with that of Tim Walz, who Walsh accuses of lying about his military service and enforcing harsh COVID-19 restrictions. Walsh also highlights the hypocrisy of Colin Kaepernick, who continues to seek a return to the NFL despite previously comparing it to slavery. Kaepernick's latest venture, Lumistory AI, aims to help talentless individuals create content, which Walsh mocks as another scam in Kaepernick's ongoing con.—J. Spurlin

Matt Walsh discusses how the supposed consensus supporting "gender-affirming care" has collapsed. He explains that a major medical organization, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS), recently admitted they do not endorse these procedures, and the evidence supporting them is considered "low quality." Walsh criticizes the media and politicians for perpetuating the false narrative that there is widespread agreement among medical professionals on this issue. He highlights how this false consensus has been used to silence dissent and how the truth is only now beginning to emerge, revealing significant uncertainty about the efficacy of these treatments for minors.

Walsh continues by discussing how the claim of consensus on gender-affirming care is baseless, as revealed by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS). The ASPS, when questioned, clarified that they do not endorse treatments for children with gender dysphoria. Walsh emphasizes the ramifications of this revelation, noting that thousands of double mastectomies have been performed on minors, some as young as 13, without solid evidence or the endorsement of major medical associations. He argues that the increase in these surgeries, combined with the lack of consensus, could lead to significant legal liabilities for doctors, including potential malpractice and fraud. Walsh also highlights recent developments, such as the National Health Service in England questioning the evidence behind gender identity treatments, and a U.S. court upholding Tennessee's ban on child castration, suggesting that the foundations of gender-affirming care are rapidly crumbling.

Walsh elaborates on the rapid disintegration of the supposed consensus around gender-affirming care, highlighting the role of various organizations and reports that have emerged over the past year. He notes that the American College of Pediatricians called on medical organizations to halt the promotion of treatments like social affirmation, puberty blockers, and surgeries for children. Despite a growing number of young people identifying as LGBTQ+, Walsh argues that the foundation supporting gender-related treatments has been shattered. He points out that the recent statement from the American Society of Plastic Surgeons has effectively demolished any pretense of consensus, exposing the entire framework as a manufactured and fraudulent narrative.

Walsh shifts focus to a recent incident involving White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, who struggled to name any significant policy achievements by Vice President Kamala Harris when asked by a reporter. Despite the question being a simple one, Jean-Pierre was unable to provide a clear answer, further highlighting the administration's lack of accomplishments. Walsh compares this to a performance review for an ineffective employee, noting the absurdity of claiming that the Biden administration is the most legislatively accomplished in modern American history while being unable to point to a single specific achievement. He contrasts this with Donald Trump's frequent public appearances, including press conferences and interviews, suggesting that while Trump engages openly, Harris avoids situations where she might be asked challenging questions.

Walsh turns his attention to Tim Walz, who recently responded to accusations of Stolen Valor by defending his service record, though Walsh criticizes his response as disingenuous. He compares Walz's defense to someone falsely claiming to be an astronaut and then protesting when called out. Walsh argues that the issue isn't about denigrating military service but rather about holding Walz accountable for misleading the public. Additionally, Walsh highlights a story from Lisa Hanson, a small business owner in Minnesota who was shut down and arrested during COVID-19 due to Walz's policies. Hanson recounts how her business was destroyed by the state's selective shutdowns, which targeted small businesses like hers while allowing large retailers and liquor stores to remain open. Hanson was fined and sentenced to 90 days in jail, illustrating the harsh consequences faced by those who defied Walz's orders.

Walsh continues to criticize Tim Walz, highlighting the hypocrisy of Walz telling critics to "mind their own business" while he interfered with small businesses during COVID-19, such as Lisa Hansen's. Walsh expresses frustration that the political impact of the COVID-19 lockdowns seems to have faded, with those responsible facing no significant consequences. He then discusses a recent appearance by CNN anchor Kaitlan Collins on "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert," where Colbert's comment about CNN being objective was met with laughter from the audience. Walsh finds it telling that even Colbert's audience, presumably left-leaning, viewed the idea of CNN's objectivity as absurd. He argues that this moment underscores just how out of touch media figures like Colbert and CNN personalities are with the general public's perception.

Walsh discusses the disconnect between media personalities like Stephen Colbert and the general public. He points out how Colbert's audience laughed at the idea of CNN being objective, highlighting how out of touch Colbert is with how people perceive the network. Walsh then shifts to his upcoming project, "Am I Racist?" which satirizes diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, urging viewers to buy pre-sale tickets to support the film. Finally, Walsh revisits Colin Kaepernick, who compared the NFL to slavery but continues to seek opportunities to play in the league. Walsh mocks the contradiction, emphasizing the absurdity of Kaepernick's stance and the backlash he received, even from his defenders, for the inconsistency.

Walsh continues to critique Colin Kaepernick, describing him as the greatest con artist in the history of professional sports. Despite comparing the NFL to slavery, Kaepernick is still trying to rejoin the league. Walsh mocks Kaepernick's delusional efforts to return to football, likening him to an obsessive ex-girlfriend. He also criticizes Kaepernick for his hypocrisy and opportunism, arguing that Kaepernick says whatever will maximize his relevance and income. Additionally, Walsh highlights Kaepernick's latest venture into AI with a company called Lumistory AI, which aims to help creators generate stories using artificial intelligence. Walsh derides this venture, suggesting it will only produce homogenized, corporate-like content. He notes that despite Kaepernick's efforts, the company has only raised $4 million, far behind competitors like Google.

Walsh concludes his critique of Colin Kaepernick by describing his latest venture, Lumistory AI, as a scam aimed at enabling talentless individuals to create content. Walsh mocks the idea that people with no skills in writing or illustration can suddenly compete with Disney by using Kaepernick's AI platform. He highlights Kaepernick's admission that he lacks creative abilities, questioning how someone who cannot write or draw can claim to be a creator. Walsh also points out the absurdity of Kaepernick's ongoing NFL aspirations, noting that even Kaepernick likely knows he will never play in the league again. He argues that Kaepernick's career as a racial martyr is waning, as his victimization narrative has lost traction. Walsh predicts that Kaepernick will fade into obscurity, ending his relevance in the public eye, and officially cancels him once more.