User Reviews (39)

Add a Review

  • I'm going spoiler free on this review, so you'll have to forgive me for being vague. The only joy you'll get from this movie is watching it without knowing where it is going. If you know too much, there's nothing worth watching.

    I think there is some merit in seeing this film. My biggest issues with it were the direction it took, which isn't my preferred genre. I really can't say more than that without spoiling it, and I'm sure you're going to rate my review as "not helpful" for saying that, but everyone I said that to at the Phoenix Film Festival (where I saw this film) immediately understood.

    What that means for you, dear viewer, is you're going to have to take a gamble. Do you like non-mainstream horror? How open-minded are you? If you like formulaic horror, move along. The movie is bizarre in many ways.

    My rating reflects that I was not at all happy with the direction it took (as a personal preference...you might think it was the best ending ever), but I'm actually glad I saw it. If nothing else, it's interesting. The soundtrack is also a nice bonus. Loved the music!
  • Warning: Spoilers
    While I do enjoy Natasha Lyonne's slightly more subtle character in Orange is the New Black, she alone wasn't quite enough to hold this movie together for me. I appreciate it for its symbolism and what director, Danny Perez, was trying to achieve: this sort of series of hyped up dualities and sort of flipping standards on their head (pregnancy becoming something horrifying and mysterious rather than a happy, glowing miracle, for one) and a commentary on American consumerism (with the snippets of late-night infomercials seeping through seemingly every scene). But I think it was trying a bit too hard and ended up mashing together a few very different themes in a way that felt more jumbled than complex.

    *** SPOILERS! ***

    Lou (Natasha Lyonne) is the very definition of a partying stoner. She has no interest in anything more serious than which combat boots she'll wear to tonight's abandoned warehouse party. She spends much of her time with her friend, Sadie (Chloë Sevigny), who offers little in the way of support or encouragement, but rather just a consistent partner to dance with in a dark room pulsating with music and strobe lights (really, she's largely pointless in this movie). After a blur of a night, Lou finds herself pregnant (or so she thinks) but can't recall who could possibly be the father, and things just get weirder from there.

    It did a decent job, I thought, of dealing with some serious issues — consenting to sexual encounters, for one, as well as the aforementioned pregnancy and motherhood. There are several references to her pregnancy being unwanted, and being something she felt ill-equipped to handle.

    It initially seems like Sadie's boyfriend, Gabriel (Mark Webber), has something to do with Lou's state — not by means of impregnating her, but through the use of some experimental drugs he is peddling. The setting — a cold, desolate Michigan — is the perfect depressing, end-of-the-road location where people have nothing else to do but get into trouble and find ways to make money. But when Lorna (Meg Tilly) enters the picture, we realize things might go a little deeper than just drug dealers' antics, and there may be government conspiracy afoot.

    The whole body horror side of it was cool — Lou's body changes so drastically in such a short span of time, it's really terrifying to behold. It plays into her character a bit too much, I thought, that she seems genuinely unconcerned most of the time (and somehow still convinced that she is merely pregnant with a human child despite her ballooning to what appears to be full-term in just a matter of days). She's waddling around in her trailer with her skin coming loose and her teeth falling out and this huge, oozing blister on her foot and she's paranoid and angry, of course, but not nearly as much as one might expect.

    In the vein of these sugary happy dualities we have the repeat appearance of the Funzone, a horrifying spin on a sort of Chuck-e-Cheese type of kids' food and game center, with flickering fluorescent lights and guys dressed up in furry, colorful, ape- like costumes dancing around while cake and pizza are inhaled. It definitely added to the sometimes surreal quality of the movie — especially when the furry creatures are standing around Lou in a sort of drugged-up fantasy. Honestly, I couldn't decide if I loved them or hated them.

    BUT then we get to the end and Lorna is trying to help Lou give birth to the "baby" and men in full body armor and guns start busting in and gassing the trailer and… it's awesome. Lou gives birth to first just a disembodied head with a partial spinal column and then a hand comes out of her vagina and melts one of the guys' faces off and AN ENTIRE BODY CRAWLS OUT and she just deflates like an empty balloon while the body sort of does a weird dance and the movie ends with another armed guy rushing in as the body is just standing there holding its own head and… it was incredible. Yes, the story wrapped up (kind of?) by telling us that the military is trying to create a race that can survive the toxic atmosphere of space and Lou's womb was the perfect experimental location for them to try it out because of her years of wreaking havoc on her body, so… it's sad in a lot of ways, and scary, as always, to think of a government entity using its people in such a horrific and clandestine way.

    It's definitely a movie that I am appreciating more now, after the fact, than I did when I was watching it. The themes and the symbolism are much more effective when talked about than they were in this actual movie. It was just like Ron Swanson says: "Never half-ass two things. Whole-ass one thing." Except in this case it's don't half-ass a government conspiracy movie and a trippy stoner movie and a campy body horror. Just choose one and stick the hell with it. (But seriously, the last 10 minutes or so are worth it.)
  • Of course, I freely admit I would watch just about anything starring both Natasha Lyonne and Chloë Sevigny . . . what could possibly go wrong?

    OK, all joking aside (well, sort of), Natasha and Chloe are absolutely brilliant here, they nail their characters perfectly, and then some.

    As for the film itself, the best description that comes to mind is bizarre, twisted, completely ridiculous . . . and very fun to watch.

    This is definitely a low budget, B minus sci-fi horror genre' production, with a dash of evil ET conspiracy twists submerged in a veritable swamp of drug dazed existence. Even if the story, such as it is (or perhaps tries to be) is murky at best, the characters are perfect exaggerations of characters I've seen or met over the years.

    If anything, this production consists of a very loosely connected jigsaw puzzle of plot pieces, which serves as a sort of ecosystem for the aforementioned exaggerated real life type characters to flourish in.

    Well, maybe flourish isn't exactly the appropriate description here.

    But however one may want to judge this production, it certainly can't be criticized for lack of uniqueness.

    Chloë is particularly adept at playing various roles in unique productions ("Hit and Miss" immediately comes to mind), but this definitely rates as one of the more, well, experimental sorts of indie film productions she has appeared in.

    This film is certainly not for everyone, or even most, but for those with an proclivity toward indie projects more than just a bit outside the box, this just could be your cup of tea.

    I'll offer a somewhat tentative 6 stars for this one . . .
  • Some folks are partying, a girl named Lou is dragged somewhere by a guy. Next the girl meets with some girlfriends complaining about not feeling well. They joke that she's pregnant. Some sinister guys are collecting urine from females in a fridge. One of them has her lips chewed off or something.

    Lou in the meantime starts feeling weirder and weirder and sicker and sicker and indeed starts developing a belly. But that doesn't keep her from getting high non-stop. She has some weird visions. All this takes place in some poor town with a Marine base. There's an awful lot of talk and taking drugs and ridiculous music and silly visions.

    At some point Lou meets a woman who seems to have some idea what's going on. She tells her that someone has implanted her with something. She suspects the government is behind this. With her help Lou tracks down some of the bad guys and we more or less find out what they are up to.

    It doesn't take long for Lou to be full term and to give birth and here the movie manages to surprise. Some other characters also make an appearance and things do get interesting.

    Antibirth focuses on a bunch of ugly people doing ugly things and who listen to hideous music. It's not easy caring about any of them or what's going on, which isn't really much. This is one of those movies, where everything that is said matters. At this pace the movie would have been a solid 2/10. But then suddenly the ending is pretty surprising. The movie works toward something, you know or hope that something interesting will happen, but at the same time you quickly give up. But then suddenly the movie does deliver and it changes one's perspective of the entire film for the better. Clearly a lot more could have been done with this script and the budget should have allowed for a better movie.
  • "Antibirth" starts out promising with some really intriguing characterizations from Natasha Lyonne and Chloe Sevigny. The screenplay has some great dialogue, and Ms. Lyonne in particular is, as usual, fascinating to watch. Unfortunately, as the film begins to develop a plot it becomes more and more derivative, confusing and absurd and stops being enjoyable; it just becomes plodding and dull. There are so many stereotypical subplots from body-horror films as well as ripoffs from "Rosemary's Baby," "Demon Seed" and others that "Antibirth" just becomes another minor product aimed at the quickie Hollywood horror market. Meg Tilly is wasted and looks as though she's still trying to figure out the plot herself during her scenes. I recommend watching the first fifteen minutes and then turning it off and doing something more productive... I stayed until the end and felt ripped off waiting for something to original to happen.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Antibirth is a commentary on the debauchery of Western society which has lead to the breakdown of the family. One of the consequences of the breakdown of the family is that there are many alcoholic and gluttonous single women around and they have no interest in settling down or having babies. The evil government is now trying to use such lost single women to incubate some sort of alien life form which cannot survive on earth. But the unhealthy womb of the alcoholic and gluttonous female is a perfect breeding ground for this demonic looking alien life form.

    The film wasn't bad. It could have used better writing. Natasha Lyone is quite good as the female version of Billy Bob Thorton's Bad Santa. Not as memorable though. Bad Santa had great writing. Antibirth did not. Chloe Sevigny is unremarkable in a supporting role. Meg Tilly was unrecognizable as a healer.

    It is sort of a film of place with the whole redneck milieu and characters living in trailers. There aren't too many films about Americans who live in trailers (I can think of Cockfighter, Charley Varrick and Killer Joe). The indie-rock (I don't know what else to call it) soundtrack and the background score were interesting. I liked the use of slow motion throughout the film especially during the film's beginning. The ending was done quite well. I'm glad i watched it.

    (5/10)
  • vasiln2 September 2016
    It seems that hard-drinking, bong-ripping, up-for-anything Lou might be pregnant-- although she has a hard time understanding how that could possibly be the case.

    Antibirth isn't much of a horror movie, even if it has some decent early creep. It's more of the "independent" genre: high weirdness, with a plot that plays second or third fiddle to its characters. But there is a bit of gross-out thrown in, maybe just for fun. And you might find the prospect of watching a pregnant woman down a fifth of vodka horrifying.

    Horror movie or not, AB is a good movie, mostly because of the well-written and well-acted characters. In particular, Natasha Lyonne plays her part perfectly. She makes the entire film work with her drunken, stoned charm.

    The actual plot is a little thin; it ends up being just an excuse to make a movie. The pacing is just a tad slow. And the budget is obviously tight (but still, top notch characters).

    It's not horror, but if you don't like horror, don't watch it. If you spent your youth being useful rather than getting high, don't watch it. If you just want to be scared, don't watch it. But otherwise, check out Antibirth.
  • begob4 September 2016
    A wild stoner girl in the dead part of America becomes mysteriously impregnated, and only a weird outcome can explain the weirdness.

    I like it when things get weird. And I like film types pointing out the weird decay of America under Reaganite values. But this duzzn't work.

    The whole thing is driven by the lead actress, and she is pure force of personality: gutsy, sarcastic, foul-mouthed. Stoned. But she's in almost every scene and did not make me laugh once. Plus they have Chloe Sevigny in a lame, inconsequential part without once making use of her close-up genius. Plus the quirky girl from the Big Chill all grown up and crazy and grey, but disappearing without a whimper. And then there's all that crappy marine stuff. The final image is powerful, but what went before is irrelevant.

    Music is hectic. Photography doesn't do much - lots of cars driving up to boring locations - but the nightscape over the cabin was passably interesting.

    No weird. No insight. Just contrived.

    Overall: boring waste of talent.
  • gavin694210 August 2016
    In a desolate community full of drug-addled Marines and rumors of kidnapping, a wild-eyed stoner named Lou (Natasha Lyonne) wakes up after a wild night of partying with symptoms of a strange illness and recurring visions as she struggles to get a grip on reality while stories of conspiracy spread.

    The film seems to begin with a kernel of truth: that drug use can be terrifying. While I have no personal experience as far as that goes, we are all familiar with the idea of a "bad trip". One could say that what happens to Lou is the worst kind. Although not directly connected to her, we also see the dark edges of drug use, which can lead to addiction, or even to prostitution. Is that aspect "horror"? No. But it is certainly scary in its own way.

    Leading the film are two great actresses: Natasha Lyonne (ORANGE IS THE NEW BLACK), assisted by Chloe Sevigny (AMERICAN HORROR STORY). Lyonne has mastered the trashy woman act (and unlike the caricature rednecks of Rob Zombie's world, this story is grounded in reality). Films with such protagonists do a dangerous balancing act. We feel obligated to have sympathy on Lou (she is our humble narrator), but in many ways we cannot help but feel she brought this on herself.

    One review summarized the film as "really, really weird". Now, I happen to disagree. Sure, we have talk of aliens, and some impressive creature effects in third act. We have a bizarre pregnancy, and some hallucinations. But it still has a coherence that keeps it very real. This is not David Lynch's "Eraserhead". You aren't left with endless questions.

    Writer-director Danny Perez (ODDSAC) has crafted a smart horror-drama, with a big pinch of science fiction thrown in. He has created not only a solid film, but another world. If he happens to return to this snowy wasteland, I suspect there are more stories for him to tell.
  • How does a film with such amazing talent attached to it end up this bad? I am struggling to figure out what went wrong, and I think I might have figured it out. The acting is well-done, the directing is serviceable (if a bit amateurish), the cinematography is decent, and the script is...adequate? So, aside from the acting, the movie is just an avalanche of poor decisions, from the weak editing to the lack of critical analysis into what could possibly be trimmed in order to a yield a more cohesive experience. The story makes little sense, the practical effects are poorly done despite being few and far between, and when the "big reveal" is shown, it looks like something from a bad 70's Sci-fi movie.

    Additionally, am I supposed to feel sympathy for a character that is the architect of her own demise? She drinks, smokes, and does drugs almost incessantly, and when things happen to her, I am supposed to feel sorry for her? I just don't understand this line of reasoning. I did not feel anything for any character in this film, and I think this is its greatest failure. If I can't sympathize with a drunk, drug abusing derelict, have I failed as the audience or is the character just not meant to illicit any visceral emotional response? As it stands, the movie is what could be commonly referred to as "hot garbage", and I will be twirling my lip in disgust whenever the stench happens to cross my mind. Such a waste of a great premise and fine acting. Absolutely abhorrent.
  • This is an artsy horror film that embraces raw American lower class, gritty characters, drugs and neon clothing. So this isn't for everyone and certainly caters to a particular audience. That being said I can recommend this movie if you are a big fan of either Chloe Sevigny or Natasha Lyone because their real life friendship is apparent in this film, especially a stoned dance scene in a trailer. They just had fun making this and embracing the dark, quirky elements, and that made it so enjoyable. If you liked the movies #Horror, Tales of Halloween, Honeybee, Bubba Ho-Tep, ABC's of Death, BeatleJuice, An American Werewolf in London or Tucker and Dale vs. Evil.... Then it's a pretty good chance you will get a kick out of Anti-Birth.
  • Honestly, I was very sceptic going into this movie, however after letting my guard down and allowing the film to get going, I was drawn into its strange world. The whole experience was a rollercoaster ride. Some of the scenes are immaculately shot, the cinematography really impressed me and took me off guard more than once. And then, during some other scenes I just kept thinking: "oh my god why did they edit it this way?"

    The performances are mostly good, the editing, as stated before, has its ups and downs. Honestly just give this movie a shot if you like campy weird horror movies.
  • This flick was an absolute chore to watch -- every single miserable minute of it. At its core, "Antibirth" is almost sort of an allegory about addiction and how putting unknown bad things in your body has bad results. However, calling it an "allegory" gives it way too much credit, because that would imply that there was a lesson to be learned or a point to be made. There is no higher message here about either being sympathetic with addicts or condemning addiction, nor is there anything worthwhile related to aliens and the paranormal -- despite both of those themes being the topic of the film.

    Instead, we get about 20 minutes of plot stretched into 94 minutes of movie, fluffed out by endless scenes of people getting high in disgusting environments that look like they'd give you cholera if you ate an M&M off the floor. The movie doesn't have a large cast, but the plot still somehow doesn't really require even half of them, and the rest are there to pad out the movie's runtime. None of them are particularly likeable or sympathetic. Pretty much the only things I can say positive about this movie is that the first (and probably only) time you watch it, it is somewhat good about making you a little curious about what's really going on. As I said in my review title, though, there is no payoff in the end. The end is gross and probably took up most of the film's special effects budget, but it's nonsensical and absolutely not worth the hour and a half of your life you spent on it and will never get back.

    Last thing -- in point of objective fairness, I can see how there MIGHT be an audience for this film. If you were or are eyeball-deep in drug and party culture and like to see it shown onscreen to trippy visuals, perhaps you might find a little to like here. But for me personally, this was a one-star experience for sure. I regret watching it.
  • I usually come to this site and read reviews on a movie before I watch it....nothing with spoilers, just some headlines of what people thought. The overwhelming response I saw was that the movie was totally worth watching. IMDb does not steer me wrong in most cases but this time, it surely did. Im not sure what the other people who watched this movie saw, but I was actually pretty interested in the story line right up until the end. The two main characters are basically the only good thing about this movie. Their performances, however, were not enough to save me from the absolute and utter disappointment I felt when the credits rolled. The story line was bringing me in hook line and sinker, and then at the end, I shook my head and asked myself...what the heck did I just watch? Was that the best ending they could come up with? Its like they put their all into the movie and then in the last 5 minutes hit the auto complete button that picked from a bunch of random endings to finish it off. Im not going to give anything away, but this movie went from intrigue to idiocy in the last 5 minutes. Basically makes the whole movie leading up to that point seem ridiculous.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Danny Perez knows how to create a scene that is a complete work of art.He is a friend and admirer of his two leading stars Natasha Lyonne and Chloe Sevigny.His vision of making a film came to life with the support of Natasha,so this is their baby!. Meg Tilly gave a dynamic performance along with a Stella cast of supporting actors. Personally I love Natasha Lyonne,she brings a vibrancy to any role she plays.As Lou she keeps it raw and real with a hint of revolting in more ways than one. Natasha and Chloe together is always going to be interesting to see,they have a long history built on love that has fortified their relationship.This adds depth to the interaction of their characters in the film. I enjoyed the dance scenes and the music. I will end on a word of warning if you are pregnant I'd wait till you have given birth BEFORE you watch it,like the next day would be fine. ENJOY
  • BandSAboutMovies22 December 2023
    Warning: Spoilers
    Directed and written by Danny Perez, this film is about Lou (Natasha Lyonne) waking up after a party and feeling the same way she did when she was pregnant, more than a year ago, a horrific experience that ended with her losing her baby in a nightclub toilet. Sadie (Chloë Sevigny) believes that she is knocked up again and hiding the fact. But life goes on and so does work. As Lou cleans a motel, a place where she runs into strange people like Lorna (Meg Tilly).

    There's also Gabriel (Mark Webber), Sadie's boyfriend, a drug dealer who doesn't just sell weed and pills. He gets experimental mind-altering substances that will give you the promise of Screamers for real - they will turn your skin inside out.

    Lorna comes to Lou after she has an episode where some beings from Funzone, an arcade, experiment on her pregnancy and leave her with a festering blister on her foot. Claiming to be a clairvoyant, Lorna says that she was visited by similar creatures when she was in the military. Lou has a worse origin story - she was traded to a mysterious man named Isaac (Neville Edwards) in return for drugs and Gabriel had used her as a test subject for an experimental hormone for women that he's selling as a street drug.

    Lorna tries to remove Lou's child with a cesarian section but she still gives birth to a head. A SWAT team arrives, as do Gabriel and Issac. Lorna is killed and Isaac reveals that he has been to space and this experiment is to make children that can survive toxins - like all the drugs inside Lorna's body - and asks for her help in creating the perfect new being. She refuses as she gives birth to the body of the creature, which causes her to deflate. Whatever that thing is, it kills everyone in the trailer, and at the end, more SWAT arrive to find it holding its head in its hands.

    This movie finds its protagonist finding that the party has ended and that now, you get high just to escape. What was once fun has become work, as you live in a small town where everyone is constantly either getting messed up or stuck in a permanent bad trip. Why should a week-long pregnancy change anything? This movie feels like where I came from.
  • The script and plot just didn't flow. I enjoy most horror and most indie flicks....this ain't one however.

    My first gripe, it is booked as horror, comedy, thriller, mystery...it wasn't thrilling, the mystery was what was I watching essentially. Horror, it was on off trying to be creepy/scary horror like. My big confusion...where was the comedy factor. It was so annoying it became a running joke whilst watching, I would be asking my partner if this part and that part was comedy, maybe categorised wrong?? Comedy horror is like "Shaun of the Dead" for instance.

    Characters weren't memorable or likeable in anyway. So they didn't make me stay engaged with the film. The film ended up being background noise, hoping it would improve.

    The special effects...just terrible, shows budget must have been low...real low.

    I would recommend watching/re-watching an 80's cult classic horror over watching this film any day.

    Had to watch another horror film to palate cleanser my mind from what a poor viewing this film was.
  • So, I can't say that this was my all-time favorite movie of the year, nor can I say it didn't lack substance. However, I did watch this movie 2 times, being an indie film producer and writer before giving any rating or review. This film, in my opinion, is meant to be satirical and humorous while also being horrifying and bloody grisly fantastic. We have Natasha Lyonne, perfectly cast, as the main character who basically wakes up pregnant and has all these strange things start to happen to her. I will say, this film is not a stand alone "Thriller" so do not be confused. After my second go around with this film, I realized the meaning of it. Also, while watching, keep an ear out for the music choice as it is perfectly placed and could not have been picked better. 10 stars on music and Natasha Lyonne's performance. This movie will either be your cup of tea, or it will not. Think, Trainspotting. This movie is nothing like it, but you either loved or hated it. I loved both.
  • Here's a film that I didn't know too much about outside of the fact that the artwork for the film was quite alluring. I'm really starting to think that a good poster is really a great indicator for my interest in checking out a film. The film stars Natasha Lyonne (of Orange is the New Black fame) and Chloe Sevigny. While the film isn't anything amazing I still think its worth checking out if you enjoy old fashioned body horror and psychedelic elements expressed in film.

    This film is about a drug addicted party girl who mysteriously becomes pregnant. However, the symptoms of the pregnancy and the actual circumstances leading to the pregnancy are not quite "regular." As a matter of fact, her baby is not exactly a healthy human. I'll leave the plot at that to not give away much more. Acting wise Lyonne has it down, as this is basically an extension of the drug addicted inmate she plays on Orange is the New Black. Sevigny is also fine for the role as this isn't a challenging role for her either based on her past work.

    The film can get quite gory and if that's not something you can stomach, this may not be for you. Its reminiscent of the body horror films that came before in generations passed, a tribute to the work of the masterful David Cronenberg. There's plenty of bright neon lights and crazy imagery in the form of psychedelic hallucinations. Its a joy to watch if you are a fan of visual cinema, quite like I am. In this specific aspect the film really does deliver.

    I'd say the film isn't always interesting or leave an everlasting impression but this isn't really an issue because the film offers a nostalgic and trippy vibe that I really appreciated (but this may not resonate well for other film watcher's). I think Lyonne could probably get offered bigger roles in the future but whether she will be able to branch out and take on a different kind of role is still up for question. All in all, its under the radar but worth a watch.

    6.5/10
  • This movie will stick with you for days.

    It is an eclectic film that can't be forced into one genre because it really takes on so many themes in 95 minutes. Strong performances from all the actors in the film, especially Natasha Lyonne's portrayal of Lou as she keeps you engaged and attached to a character who is not your typical protagonist. Another great strength of Antibirth is the visuals. Danny Perez is able to combine such raw and real imagery with bigger than life themes.

    I really enjoyed this film and I really can say I have never seen anything like this before. You know you're curious. So go ahead. Watch the film. Buckle up.
  • I fully agree with another reviewer here : "Interesting, but Really, Really Weird.........My rating reflects that I was not at all happy with the direction it took (as a personal preference...you might think it was the best ending ever)" .

    I like Natasha Lyonne, i also like weird and bizarre movies. This is an interesting comedy/drama/fantasy movie, i wouldn't call it a horror movie. There are no twists here, i mean, if you watch carefully, you can understand, in broad terms, where it goes. I kinda liked overall and i would recommend it if it wasn't for the ending. The ending was too gross and surprisingly bleak, for me. I am not saying it was bad, many people liked it. I didn't, therefore i don't recommend this movie.
  • Hey_Sweden17 October 2023
    Natasha Lyonne (also one of the producers here) is utterly convincing as Lou, a hard-partying, substance-abusing woman who spends most of her time getting high in one way or another. Then she finds herself mysteriously pregnant, not knowing how this could have happened. What follows is a succession of twisted imagery as Lou realizes that she's been sucked into some sort of conspiracy involving the kidnapping of women and characters in the military.

    "Antibirth", the outrageous film-making debut for Danny Perez, basically amounts to one VERY bad "trip" from beginning to end. It gets better as it goes along, and the story deepens. Lou doesn't particularly start out as sympathetic, but as her character is fleshed out a bit more, you develop some concern for this insane situation in which she finds herself. The grand finale is worth waiting for, what with its nightmarish quality and memorable birthing sequences. This ends up turning into one very gross and gooey movie, and has some positively squirm-inducing moments.

    Enhanced by an eclectic soundtrack, this features solid supporting performances from Chloe Sevigny, Mark Webber, Maxwell McCabe-Lokos, Neville Edwards, and especially Meg Tilly, who's endearing as a kooky but sincere stranger who really tries to *help* poor Lou. It takes place in some appropriately bleak-looking surroundings (it was filmed on location in Sudbury, Ontario, Canada) and its clearly stated aspect of the potential horrors of drug abuse hits home with the force of a sledgehammer.

    This is definitely one indie horror film that stays with you. I would definitely recommend it to others.

    Seven out of 10.
  • When I was told that this was an over the top gore flick I immediately wanted to see Antibirth. Have seen it I'm left with mixed emotions.

    I mean, this flick is 90% a story about drugs and drugs and being stoned and we do follow a drug- addict but I asked myself, where's the horror or even where's the gore. In the middle Lou (Natasha Lyonne) do experience something is going on with her body. She's pregnant she thinks but haven't had intercourse in 6 months. And her skin peels off in some ways. But it's in the last 15 minutes that this flick filled with drugs turns quickly into a gory mess and moves from a normal flick into something very weird.

    It's also at the end that the effects come in and are really well done. So if you can stand a flick that reveals itself towards the end then this is a must see. But for people seeking a real horror I don't think you will be satisfied.

    Gore 1/5 Nudity 0/5 Effects 3/5 Story 2,5/5 Comedy 0/5
  • "Antibirth" follows Lou, a hedonistic party-girl who lives hard in a desolate and depressed Michigan town. After blacking out at a party one night, she begins exhibiting bizarre pregnancy-like symptoms. Her friend Sadie believes she's simply pregnant, but Lou insists she has not had sex in a year. Meanwhile, an eccentric stranger arrives in the town, and the sinister nature of the local goings-on becomes increasingly apparent.

    Drawing on David Cronenberg and post-millennial conspiratoria, "Antibirth" is a unique genre offering that is in some ways truly original. The film begins as a straightforward tale of drug-use gone wrong, but as "it" grows within Lou, the narrative grows into something quite different. While the film does feel formless at times, meandering through the indolent lives of the characters, there is an immediacy and palpability to the rural ennui that has turned the small town into a drug-addled wasteland.

    Even when the film seems to plod, there are plenty of aesthetic features that make it an interesting viewing experience. Hallucinogenic sequences and hyperreal sci-fi blends with a nostalgic eighties sensibility, which lends the film a very distinct feel and atmosphere. Real-life pals Natasha Lyonne and Chloë Sevigny lead the film, and both do great jobs at playing lost thirty-somethings in a hopeless environment (something of a return to Sevigny's role as a lost young woman in an economically-depressed Nebraska in "Boys Don't Cry" at the beginning of her career). Lyonne is snappy and likable, while Sevigny plays her aloof barfly friend. Meg Tilly has a great part as an eccentric clairvoyant.

    The final ten minutes of the film are where it really starts to gain some steam—as I said, it does meander in the middle—but the finale is giddily gruesome and catches the audience off guard. Overall, "Antibirth" is a solid effort that is helped greatly by talented actors and a remarkably well-realized aesthetic and attention to atmosphere. Even when the script is dragging its feet, the fronts on which the film excels are enough to keep it afloat. Fans of sci-fi and body horror will especially have fun with this weird and outrageous offering. 8/10.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Lou (Natasha Lyonne) and Sadie (Chloë Sevigny) like to party a lot. Sadie lives with Gabriel (Mark Webber) a small time dealer of drugs and clean urine. Lou is not feeling too well and from her symptoms Anha (Lili Francks) the vet, thinks she is pregnant which Lou vehemently denies. As it turns out this self-destructive toxic Michigan girl has something growing in her and she experiences weird flashbacks. When Lorna (Meg Tilly) comes along, she explains Lou's madness... plot spoiled by Amazon's description of the movie, but not IMDb for a change.

    The film appears to be inspired by the superior "Liquid Sky" and another film I won't mention for end plot spoiler considerations. For the most part of film we see the confused life of Lou attempting not to come to terms with what is happening. I thought Neville Edwards was too straight for his role of Isaac and would have preferred Tony Todd. They are several gross scenes. The blister popping got to me.

    Guide: F-word, sex, brief nudity (Natasha Lyonne or body double)
An error has occured. Please try again.