User Reviews (95)

Add a Review

  • "A United Kingdom" is based on the true-life relationship between Sir Seretse Khama, an African chieftain from what was then the Bechuanaland Protectorate, and a white British woman, Ruth Williams. The film implies that he was the King of Bechuanaland, but in fact no single individual ever held this position; Khama was the ruler of the Bangwatho, one of a number of tribes making up the Tswana nation, the largest ethnic group in the country. In Botswana, as Bechuanaland is now known, Khama and Ruth are today revered figures, as he was the leader of the country's independence movement and its first President when independence was achieved in 1966; unlike most other former colonies in Africa Botswana has remained a democracy ever since, and their son is the current President.

    Khama's marriage to Ruth Williams (they met while he was studying in London in 1948) was highly controversial at the time. Many of Khama's own people, led by his uncle, refused to accept Ruth as their Queen. The South African government, which was just starting to introduce its policy of apartheid, objected furiously to the idea of a high-profile black leader in a neighbouring country marrying a white woman. Clement Attlee's Labour government, anxious to placate the South Africans who were threatening to leave the Commonwealth, intervened, exiling Khama from Bechuanaland and forbidding him to return. Winston Churchill, at the time leader of the Opposition, initially made sympathetic noises, but after the Conservatives were returned to power in 1951 he took an even harder line than Attlee. The situation was complicated by the discovery of diamonds in the territory; the British government, using the rift between Khama and his uncle as a pretext, threatened to revoke Bechuanaland's status as a Protectorate and declare it a Crown Colony. (The real reason was that in a Protectorate mineral rights belonged to the local people, whereas in a colony they belonged to the colonial power). One of Khama's few British allies was the Labour MP Tony Benn.

    The action switches between an austere, drab post-war Britain and a bright sunlit Africa. The recreation of historical detail is well done and both the leading actors, David Oyelowo as Khama and Rosamund Pike as Ruth, are excellent. The film is an interesting look at a historical romance which made the headlines at the time but which today is largely forgotten, at least in Britain. 7/10

    Some goofs. We hear a radio broadcast on the eve of Indian independence in 1947 telling us that Indians would go to bed "subjects of the Queen". Britain still had a King, George VI, in 1947. We are told that Queen Victoria made Bechuanaland a Protectorate to protect its people from "racist South Africa", but the Protectorate was created in 1885, twenty-five years before South Africa came into existence as a single nation. (In 1885 it was still a patchwork of British colonies and Boer republics). Prime Minister Attlee claims that the Presidents of South Africa, South-West Africa and the two Rhodesias were all opposed to Khama's marriage to Ruth. During Attlee's term of office (1945-51) none of these territories had a President.
  • I love it when a story is told that many of us haven't heard of or known much about.

    Although possibly oversimplified due to the necessity of keeping the movie within a normal viewing time, nonetheless, it's a very good story about an amazing piece of history.

    Well acted, well directed and beautifully filmed, this is a film I'm very happy to have seen. It's an inspirational look at enduring love and intelligence, at people power and a nation's faith in their leader, as well as credibly showing yet again how the British Empire and their bevy of crooked prime ministers deem to destroy nations for greed and profit, and to boot, having the gall to treat anyone but themselves as underdogs.

    An excellent film for what it is and I would recommend it.
  • The story of Seretse Khama and Ruth Williams is a fascinating one, and is of a good deal of importance and relevance now. 'A United Kingdom', which had such potential from the get go with the talent involved, doesn't disappoint and tells this story beautifully.

    Admittedly, this kind of story has a fair few potential traps with the themes displayed, being very difficult to get the right tonal balance and to get it completely right. 'A United Kingdom' could easily have been preachy and over-sentimental with any messaging laid on too thick, any feel-good-factors coming over as corny, characters being one-dimensional and too black and white and the sentimentality being too hard to stomach. Luckily, almost all of those traps are avoided, making 'A United Kingdom a truly absorbing and moving film.

    Do agree completely with all but one of the positive reviews, and can understand totally why some may not be as enamoured with it. Usually don't comment on previous reviews, as strictly it's not really supposed to be done here but is frequently done by many, but I too take issue with the content and tone of the top rated review, which is not a review and more a quite incoherent condemnation towards those who rate it low, with ridiculous conspiracy theories that do completely against what 'A United Kingdom' is really about. The number of 1 star ratings in a short space of time may raise eyebrows and can easily be questioned, even if the film didn't do much for me because the production values, directing, storytelling and acting are so well done and what it set out to do is to be admired it would not get less than a 4 or 5. This is all personal opinion of course, and do apologise for the irrelevance.

    'A United Kingdom' is not perfect. Some of the dialogue at the beginning is too in your face and forced and the acting of the extras is a little dodgy agreed, can definitely see why anybody may be put off from continuing. Can also understand any criticisms of the supporting characters (the two lead characters are very compelling and beautifully written characters) being one-dimensional and too neatly black and white, the villains especially.

    However, 'A United Kingdom' does look absolutely gorgeous, the period detail evocative, the scenery a feast for the eyes from the darker and more drab London location to the sweeping and colourful Botswana ones. Amma Asante directs remarkably and with assurance. Patrick Doyle provides another winner of a music score, coming from someone who has liked a lot of what he's done, full of beauty and emotional power in an understated way.

    While not all the script works, much of it is intelligent and thought-provoking, never taking on too much of a heavy-handed tone while making its point clearly, having much to say about the conflicts and explores and balances them with skill and the over-sentimentality never obviously creeps in. The story is beautifully and absorbingly told, told with sensitivity, tension dealt with subtlety but also hard-hitting power and poignant emotion. Seretse and Ruth's love is evident throughout, David Oyelowo and Rosamund Pike's chemistry resonating believably and, even when apart in large stretches of the film, disconnect never creeps in despite the potential to.

    Great performances all round, apart from reservations about the extras. Oyelowo plays Seretse with towering dignity and passionate sensitivity, his speeches very moving in a gut-wrenching and powerful sense. Pike, fresh from her exceptional career-best performance in the brilliant 'Gone Girl', gives one of her best performances and certainly more than just eye-candy (being one of the most naturally gorgeous actresses today), playing Ruth with calmness, sensitivity and commanding steel, Ruth's progressive attitude to race admirably portrayed and got under the skin well.

    Jack Davenport makes for a slimy diplomat, and Tom Felton (who could easily have been out of place, was admittedly expecting him to be) is surprisingly effective and a long way from lightweight. Anastasia Hille and Nicholas Lyndhurst portray Ruth's parents' disapproval very well, Arnold Oceng is very good and there is a quite powerful scene with Pike and the very emotive actress who portrays the mother-in-law.

    Not without its issues, but in summary 'A United Kingdom' is a very good film, telling a fascinating and important true story beautifully. 8/10 Bethany Cox
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Grade: A-

    Rating: PG-13, 111 minutes

    In a Nutshell: Based on a true story, this lovely film illustrates how love and reason can change a crazy world. Bula!

    If you'd like to know more about the real people in this story, you can read Colour Bar: A United Kingdom by Susan Williams.

    Uplifting theme: Duty, honor, sacrifice, patience, tolerance, patriotism Love "We should not be fighting for segregation. We should be fighting for equality." – Seretse Khama (David Oyelowo) "Africa can never be free until all those who live in her, white and black, recognize that race must have no bearing on equality and justice." – Seretse Khama "Opposition is one thing, Mr. Khama; the realities of government are quite another." – Alistair Canning (Jack Davenport) "You have to be strong. You have a voice. Use it." – Naledi (Terry Pheto) "No man is free who is not master of himself." – Seretse "It is time!" - Seretse

    Things I liked: I had never even heard of Bechuanland. Have you? In 1966, it achieved independence and is now known as the Republic of Botswana. I'm always happy to learn new things in movies. I love seeing a proper marriage proposal when the man gets on one knee. Well done, Seretse. Nelson Mandela described the marriage between Seretse and Ruth as "a shining beacon of light and inspiration." Wouldn't that be amazing to have someone describe your marriage and legacy like that? David Oyelowo is absolutely fantastic in this. How about an Oscar for him? I also loved him in Selma. Great movie. Rosamund Pike is great in this also. She was crazy good in Gone Girl too, crazy being the key word in that sentence. Her subtle expressions say so much. Director Amma Asante has a bright future. The scene where the women sing a song to Ruth was so touching. I thought it was funny when Ruth's parents said, "Mind yourself!" and "Come back a missionary!" when she left the house.

    Things I didn't like: · There are some very ugly racial slurs and prejudiced behavior. · I've never understood parents who refuse to see their children again if they do something they don't like. · A lot of the Extras are terrible actors. Then again, they're natives who aren't actors. It's good to see Malfoy (Tom Felton) cast in another movie. Unfortunately, he plays an equally cruel, weaselly snake in this film too.

    Interesting lines: "He scares me a bit…the way he makes me feel." - Ruth "I know I will never achieve anything there if I leave my heart here." – Seretse "We'll take it moment by moment…together." – Ruth "They're trying to define us, based on their rules, their idea of the world how they see it." – Seretse "Let's not allow the ugliness of this world take away the joy from us." – Seretse "Let him go. We need him more than you." – Naledi "We've misjudged this, haven't we?"- Ruth "When a man tells a lie, he loses his dignity." – Seretse

    Funny lines: "Did I ever tell you I didn't marry you just for your good looks?" – Seretse "Liar." – Ruth (as she pulls up her skirt to reveal her beautiful legs.)

    Tips for parents: Some profanity. Some violence, bullying, and racism. Talk to your children about apartheid and segregation. There is some skin shown during a honeymoon moment. Some subtitles. Young children will be bored, but Tweens will be interested in the love story and historical telling.
  • At first I thought this movie would ruin this story. It's a painful, yet hopeful and loving chapter of African history. This is NOT a love story. If people should come to watch this movie hoping for a "love conquers all" plot... They should be very disappointed. And I'm fairly glad for that. I congratulate the director, Amma Asante, for rendering this story into the big screen with delicacy and respect to all involved. I thank her for realizing all this story was NOT, and putting it out for the public from the first frame. I also love her for showing almost everything this story was about, without going into great detail.

    This movie is based on the true relationship between the King of (now) Botswana, Sir Seretse Khama, and a white British woman, Ruth Williams. Today we might know Ruth and Khama as leaders in the fight for the country's independence (since it was, when they married, a British protectorate), but their struggle started way sooner. Their story became their country's story. A fight for their right to choose.

    It's not about their love. It's about his choice, not to marry within his tribe's customs, and her choice, to up and leave her home, building herself a new life from scratch. It's about a country's choice to their leader - and how much the world hates him, her and the country for the nerve to demand their voices be heard with such fire.

    Amma Asante thrives on sewing up Seretse and Ruth deep within the political setting, in a beautiful dance, until we cannot see the lines between them. She also shows how much resistance change can face - and overcome. Their marriage becomes a set of lens for the viewer to analyze strength and frailty confined in this tiny world full of hope. And it gets you going.

    Rosamund Pike and Daniel Oyelowo are simply superb. His performance here is stronger than Selma's, which is saying something. And though Pike had less screen time than Oyelowo, her presence is felt throughout every scene. It doesn't fail. Pike gives a poignant performance of a true turnaround in life, and she gets us engaged with her every move. She doesn't have to show her face; every spin this movie gives gets the viewer thinking about Ruth's reaction, thanks to her powerful deliverance.

    With that power couple, I thought the supporting cast would be weak and acceptable... I was surprised. Again. Tom Felton, Jack Davenport, Laura Carmichael (why, hello, Lady Edith!), Terry Pheto, Vusi Kunene, Jessica Oyelowo and Abena Ayivor, to name a (very) few, were splendid in their roles and really brought the tension between marriage and politics alive.

    Cinematography is delightful, which goes really well with the dazzling music score. The somber tones of post-war London are contrast to the joyful sounds and colors of the southern borders of Africa; yet you hear pain in their laughter as well as you see smiles in British tears. Everything is designed to really bring the viewer there and then.

    It's an interesting and delicate take in a true story, that happened not so long ago. It's a solid 7, because of historical inconsistencies throughout the film (the lasting of the protectorate, Indian's ruler at the time of independence, and so on), but it's definitely worth at least a screening.
  • The hier to the traditional kingship of the people of Bechuanaland studied in England after world war two, and married a English office worker he met there. But after he returned home, the British, within whose empire his country then lay, cruelly banished him, principally not to upset the South Africans, who were busy instating their system of Apartheid, or racial separation, at that time. The story is sympathetically told in Amma Asante's film 'A United Kingdom'. The protagonists clearly had right on their side, and subsequently, as Botswana, their land has become one of Africa's success stories, so the sympathy is not misplaced, but it does remove any sense of moral tension (although not moral outrage) from the film. As a Briton, it's educational to see quite how appalllingly my governement behaved relatively recently, and interesting to see the role played by a young (and not yet famous) Tony Benn; but overall, this is a gentle, positive story, whose fault lines do not really trouble the modern viewer seeking to take sides.
  • Firstly, may I refer to the reviewer here who bitterly complained about the large number of people who gave this movie a rating of 1 or 2/10. I came across just four, yes four, reviewers who scored this movie so lowly. So the tirade that followed about racism and jealousy(?) seems somewhat over the top. The film has many fine attributes - acting, cinematography, location, plot etc - alluded to by reviewers here. However, the treatment of Ruth and her character development in Africa seemed somewhat underdone. Surely more emphasis on this aspect of the story was called for. Overall, a very competently made film with fine performances from all and most certainly a very interesting story which makes one want to know more about the emergence of modern day Botswana.
  • I lived in Botswana for twenty-five odd years and enjoyed every single moment of it, almost certainly due in large measure to Seretse's enlightened politics and the genuine and natural warmth of the Botswana people. I knew both main characters quite well. Seretse was a very approachable man, even as president, and it was a pleasure to spend some time in his company. He was a man well loved by everyone, black and white. In fact, in Botswana one scarcely thought in those terms. As a politician he had huge charisma and was a great orator. He was also a born leader. I remember well being told by insiders that government Ministers who were in trouble for minor abuse of office or the like, would tremble in fear outside his office when they were to be 'carpeted'.

    Ruth was an extraordinarily capable woman and even in her later years had more stamina than almost anyone I have known. She was at work in her office in Gaborone from early morning to the end of the day, patron of the Red Cross, Botswana Council of Women etc etc. Contrary, however, to one reviewer's criticism, Rosalind Pike's portrayal was quite accurate. She was not a strident campaigner but a very effective mover who enjoyed a social life and had many friends. In her widowhood she received constant visits from senior members of the tribe and government and was widely loved and respected by her people. She was most certainly "Mohumagadi" - Mother of the Nation.

    This film portrays their personalities pretty accurately and the characterisation of the actors is extraordinarily true to life. Both David Oyelowo and Rosamund Pike were absolutely convincing. The quality of the acting very quickly overcame my initial niggling concern that the physical likenesses were not quite there. The photography of Botswana was outstanding and the familiar views of Serowe from the Palapye 'road' and the scenes in the kgotla were quite emotional for me; I unexpectedly found I had a lump in my throat.

    I can understand that, for others, the film may not have the immediacy it has for me, perhaps, but previous criticisms of 'cold' and 'unemotional' - No! Leaving aside my personal interest, it deserved to be the opener for the London Film Festival. Maybe not a total "blockbuster" but an unusual and great film nonetheless. Very close to fact.
  • GOOD: - Sensational performances from Rosamund Pike and David Oyelowo, who conjure a terrific chemistry between them. - A film obviously crafted with care and consideration by the hands of director Amma Asante. - Juggles the politics and the romance well - Highlights the themes wonderfully, with a true resonance that never feels outdated. - Enlightening

    BAD: - Uneven and awkward script manufactures a saccharine tone - Lack of subtly on the scriptwriter's behalf - Poor or miscast supporting characters/roles - Jarring editing, as if large chunks have been removed and the gaps have not then been filled back in

    FULL REVIEW - goo.gl/seldw2
  • The English film A United Kingdom (2016) was directed by Amma Asante. It's an interesting love story, based on real events. David Oyelowo plays Prince Seretse Khama, a young African man studying law in London. Rosamund Pike plays Ruth Williams, an intelligent, fun-loving civil servant. They fall in love, and we know that their marriage will be a difficult one, because of prejudice both in England and in Africa.

    What we don't know is that their marriage has implications far beyond each of them. In 1947, South Africa was gearing up for its apartheid program. Bechuanaland was a British protectorate, and Seretse Khama was its rightful prince. However, South Africa borders Bechuanaland, and the South African government refused to tolerate a mixed race couple in a neighboring protectorate.

    That meant that not only did Seretse and Ruth face prejudice from the people around them, but they were pawns in an international standoff in which Great Britain was willing to sacrifice them to appease South Africa. What happened next became the plot of the movie.

    David Oyelowo is a superb actor. So is Rosamund Pike. Ms. Pike has 42 movie credits, but I believe the only other film in which I saw her was Pride and Prejudice (2005), in which she portrayed Jane Bennet. I reviewed that movie for IMDb, and wrote that her performance was "luminous."

    Director Asante is skillful, and the acting and cinematography are wonderful. We saw the movie at the excellent Little Theatre in Rochester, NY. It won't work quite as well on the small screen, because the film has some breathtaking scenes of the African desert.

    For some reason A United Kingdom has a dismal IMDb rating of 6.7. I don't understand this--it's much better than that. Find it and judge for yourself.
  • The inspiring true story of Seretse Khama, the King of Bechuanaland (modern Botswana), and Ruth Williams, the London office worker he married in 1948 in the face of fierce opposition from their families and the British and South African governments. In 1947, Prince Seretse Khama of Botswana meets Ruth, a white London office worker. The attraction is immediate . He was an Oxford-educated African king, while she was a white Englishwoman working as a clerk at Lloyd's of London. Now their 1948 marriage, which caused scandal in Apartheid-stricken South Africa and the British protectorate of Bechuanaland (later Botswana).

    An attractive and brooding look at a historical love story resulting in troubled consequenquences . Rosemund Pike and David Oyelowo star in this romantic drama based on the true story of Botswana Prince Seretse Khama (black) and London office worker Ruth Williams (white), whose marriage defied 1940s social conventions and sparked the rejection of the British and South African governments. Despite Apartheid and a great empire - their love triumphed over every obstacle flung in their path and in so doing they transformed their nation and inspired the world. A stunning period drama starring Britain's David Oyelowo and Rosamund Pike. Oyelowo plays splendidly Seretse Khama, who in 1965 became independent Botswana's first president. He was also kgosi (king) of the Bamangwato people, having been crowned at the age of four in 1925. It also features good performances by Jack Davenport, Tom Felton, Laura Carmichael, and Terry Pheto who was nominated for Best Supporting Actress at the 2011 British Independent Film Awards. And Jessica Oyelowo as Lady Lilly Canning, she's real wife David Oyelowo with whom has four children.

    It displays a sensitive and evocative musical score by Patrick Doyle. As well as colorful and brilliant cinematography by Sam McCurdy . The interesting script is based on the book : ¨The Color Bar : The triumph of Seretse Khama and his nation¨ by Susan Williams. The motion picture was well directed by Amma Asante . She's a good actress and filmmakee , especially known for Belle (2013), Mrs. America (2020) y Where Hands Touch (2018). Rating : Above average . Well worth seeing . The flick will appeal to Rosemund Pike and David Oyelowo fans.
  • This is one of those movies that is flying under the radar and deserves to be seen. It is a wonderful story, well scripted, well acted, and has terrific cinematography. The fact that is a true story makes one wonder what the hell we have been learning in school when we have never been taught this type of history. I give this a ten and really it deserves it. It is a shame people have degraded the rating for some reason other than the fact that this is good cinema. It is a very deserving movie and is like the movie Hidden Figures or Queen Katwe, it is important for history. I am a white conservative and think everyone should see the movie.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I must confess I was completely ignorant of this historical episode, and had the uncharitable thought it might be severely exaggerated, but no, a bit of fact-checking courtesy of the disinformation superhighway reveals that if anything they played it down.

    The new bride was in fact sacked from her job with Lloyd's of London when she refused to obey orders from the government.

    And the marriage we see in the film at the local registry office was actually their second attempt, after the priest who had his church set up to marry the two of them had a call from his bishop on the morning of the day it was to take place, ordering him not to perform the ceremony.

    Perhaps those scenes will be in the outtakes on the DVD!
  • ferguson-623 February 2017
    Warning: Spoilers
    Greetings again from the darkness. Sometimes I just know immediately that I'm going to be out of touch with popular opinion on a movie, and this historical-romantic-biopic from director Amma Asante (Belle) and screenwriter Guy Hibbert (Eye in the Sky) is one of those times.

    It's a crowd-pleaser featuring David Oyelowo and Rosamund Pike in a real life story with some similarities to last year's Loving (the chronicle of Richard and Mildred Loving's interracial marriage). Mr. Oyelowo plays Seretse Khama, a 1947 university student in London when we first meet him. Ms. Pike is Ruth Williams, a local Londoner working clerical at an insurance company when the two meet at a local dance. The attraction is immediate.

    Not long after, Seretse discloses to Ruth that not only is he in love with her, but he's also the King-in-waiting for Bechuanaland in Africa. The marriage is met with dissent from all fronts: family (racism), Seretse's people (cultural and societal reasons), and Great Britain (mostly concerned with appeasing its ally South Africa and the growing notion of Apartheid). Seretse and Ruth believe their true love is strong enough to win over those dissenters. The backlash is much worse than anticipated.

    A very cool element with the film is the use of the actual house Ruth and Seretse lived in, and the locals were more than willing to contribute. While the strength of these two individuals remains inspirational to this day, the film falters in a few ways. Both Jack Davenport and Tom Felton are stuck playing British foils in the overwritten manner in which we would expect from a 1940's movie on TCM. Again acknowledging my out of step opinion, Ms. Pike simply lacks the range for such a role. Her deer-in-the-headlights go-to facial expression is a slap to the courageous woman she is portraying.

    However, the biggest issue with the film is its lack of continuity … its choppiness, if you will. So many scenes abruptly end right as the substance is beginning. Multiple times we are left hanging, wondering why we don't get to finish a conversation or finalize a conflict. There are some terrific moments that are torn apart by the numerous butchered scenes, though the strong performances of Oyelowo and Terry Pheto (Tsotsi) as his sister shine through.

    This is a terrific and interesting piece of history that deserved a better film. In 1966, Bechuanaland gained its independence and became what's known today as Botswana, and the story of Seretse and Ruth is one that needs to be told. Most viewers likely won't be bothered by the things that irritated me, and that's probably a good thing.
  • My wife and I enjoyed this movie much, we watched it at home on DVD from our public library.

    The events depicted here are all factual, starting in 1947 and continuing into the 1950s. David Oyelowo, who was so good in "Selma" as MLK, is Seretse Khama, on track to become King of his small African country. He is completing his education in England when he meets his eventual wife, Rosamund Pike as Ruth Williams, a clerk at Lloyd's of London. About a year later they married.

    Most of the movie deals with the outfall from that marriage. Back in the homeland Khama's people, initially opposed to this white woman to become their Queen, eventually accepted her. But the big problem was being a British Protectorate, the British government prevented this from going forward because they needed S. Africa who objected strongly and at the time was establishing apartheid. So Khama was exiled.

    The story does end well, not all of this covered in the movie, public pressure on the British helped, and in 1966 Khama became the 1st President of Botswana, serving in that role until his death in 1980 at the age of 59. Today his eldest son, Ian, is the 4th President of Botswana.

    Good story, good movie!
  • tlarraya4 May 2017
    I think this was a story worth telling. We love movies based on true stories and learning about things we didn't know. And this one was very enjoyable. It was much better than we expected. You really get to side with the characters and root for them. Even a small tear may be shed with this one. I would recommend (even if it's not a 10).
  • A United Kingdom appears more like a documentary than a film. For a story that was capable of having so much depth it was really a series of events thrown together to resemble a film.

    It never really flies. We do not see a great love story nor do we see a great story. A history channel short documentary could have covered these events better. The cast despite being good fails to carry this film. Historical films need to be made with a certain flair and style to captivate the viewer. Examples of where this has fallen short have been Lincoln or Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom where the director just showed us events with effects rather than telling us a story or taking us on a journey.

    6/10
  • A United Kingdom is a film that is very much in love with its own story. Director Amma Asante is obviously very passionate about the subject of this movie, which is about how a biracial couple in 1940s Africa nearly tears apart an entire village and breaks down the relationship of colonial Britain and Africa. We feel Asante's passion for racial equality, and social justice. We clearly see how adamant she is about doing what is right for a nation, rather than fattening one's own greedy pockets. That's all very evident. However, the one thing Asante fails to do, and a glaring mistake of the film, is that she ignores the core of the relationship between the two main characters involved.

    David Oyelowo (Selma) and Rosamund Pike (Gone Girl) play the interracial couple. They are both very invested in their moments and the actors both allow their care for this story to show through their performances. However, their relationship is not at all developed. I found myself caring more for the people of the village than their relationship. The issue as I see it is that Director Amma Asante skipped past all of the expositional development stage of their relationship. About 20 minutes into the movie we are already in Africa and the conflict of the story has already changed. It changes from 40's race relations in Britain, to diplomatic struggles between Africa and Britain. But we never truly get to know these people.

    Pike plays Ruth Williams, the white Londoner. And, Oyelowo plays Seretse Khama, the King of Botswana. We quickly see how they meet, how they feel, what their families and friends think and then they're married and are in Africa. But we're missing something very essential when it comes to a successful cinematic relationship and that's relational conflict. Despite the fact that Ruth's family is against their marriage and so is Seretse's, we don't how they're affected by it. There's never a moment of problem between the two of them. Essentially, we never see the events in which their relationship is strengthened by adversity before they're off to Africa. That poses an issue going into the second act because, all of a sudden, we're given new conflicts, characters and situations. And, we have to fill in the blanks and imagine that their relationship is one worth fighting for.

    However, once we get to Africa and the colonial conflict starts as well as the conflict within Seretse's family, we're caught up to speed. Asante takes us on a plot of cheer and disappointment and we are never for a moment bored. We're never not entertained and we get sucked into their story and applaud the wars they win amidst the battles they lose. For those reasons, I give this film 3 out of 5 stars and recommend it for ages 13 to 18.

    Reviewed by Willie J., KIDS FIRST! Film Critic.
  • This is an outstanding film about a story I knew nothing about. However, my review is more a review of IMDb and its voting system.

    I note that this film has, at the time of writing twenty-two 1 star reviews. Maybe these are genuine but I suspect they are not. For one thing the film has not had many screenings so have as many as twenty-two different people really hated it that much?

    Secondly, 1 star films do not get selected for the Toronto Film Festival or for the opening night film for the London Film Festival. The programmers and selectors of these highly regarded festivals are at the top of their game and each year they are offered several thousand films. None of them are going to risk their hard fought reputations on selecting a bad 1-star film.

    My feeling is that these 22 people are members of the KKK who hate black people or else they are people who are jealous of the those involved in the production.

    Either way IMDb needs to have an algorithm that can deduce whether these people are genuine, or not. Maybe they are and the press reviews so far, which rave about the film, are wrong, but maybe these people are racist bitter bigots who hate the success of others because they themselves are failures and they have nothing better to do in their small sad lives but set up false IMDb accounts and vent their spleen in the only way they can.

    Time as they say will tell.
  • In a word, A United Kingdom is handsome. To loan it another, it's also stately; handsome and stately, stately and handsome. Both words immediately conjure memories of Enchanted April (1991) or anything adapted from a Jane Austen novel. The kind of movie with people walking down hallways and through courtyards looking flustered. Handsome and stately; But is it important?

    Director Amma Asante and screenwriter Guy Hibbert seem to think so, pitting the film's protagonists against Winston Churchill while evoking memories of no less than Nelson Mandela. Of course it has good reason to; A United Kingdom is not a work of fiction but rather an inspiring true story of an African king and a British subject who chooses to be his queen. The story of Seretse Khama (D. Oyelowo) and the lovely Ruth Williams (Pike) starts like most great romances do, with the intense locking of eyes and a world of obstacles lying in waiting. The two court and marry within the first act and make their way to Bechuanaland (now Botswana) where trouble takes the form of familial tensions and geo-political intrigue. Can their love survive the ever-mounting pressures of the British Crown and neighboring Apartheid period South Africa? Or will the marriage crumble like the infrastructure of what was then the poorest country on Earth.

    That very question, the limits of their undying love, forms the nucleus of A United Kingdom, the implications of which wrap the story like pink colored cellophane. The events of the film span a decade and during all that time, what we mostly get is the same sanitized story beats as a Disney Princess movie. Not much in the way of global politics or economics and nothing but what you'd expect as far as period appropriate racism. It's all done so safely; so demure and limited by superficial pomp.

    The irony of course is director Amma Asante seems to really care about these sorts of true-life stories. Her last film Belle (2013), worked within the confines of a stuffy period piece, to call attention to an obscure life at the nexus of racism and aristocracy. But while that movie had the luxury of gifting its audience something new into familiar wrapping, A United Kingdom can't really break free from its own limitations. We've seen this all before the only difference is the specter of Apartheid isn't personified by a severe man twirling his mustache.

    The British Empire however is personified in Jack Davenport and Tom Felton. Both play British functionaries whose sole job is to pull our two lovebirds apart, and boy do they ever relish their roles. Jack Davenport specifically is at pinnacle Larry Grey; his debonair smugness is so deliciously Anglo that birds would mistake his upturned nose for a littoral cave. Likewise Felton is the epitome of priggishness, a muscle he has toned and perfected with every Harry Potter (2001- 2011) installment. While I'm a little sad that franchise has relegated him to play weaksauce villains for the rest of his life, there's a consolation in knowing there are worse fates for child actors turned adult.

    As for Rosamund Pike and David Oyelowo, they both do splendidly; though is there any doubt that they wouldn't? Both are gifted actors and both do what is required of them which mostly consist of holding hands and looking like the weight of the world is on their shoulders.

    So A United Kingdom may not ultimately be an important movie. Yet its heart is unarguably in the right place. It manages to tell a lovely real-life Cinderella story with accomplished actors doing their best to do their historical analogs justice. The faults lay with the direction and tone of the film which certainly isn't enough to mar the film. Yet considering how safe it ultimately ends up feeling, I doubt the film is doing the legacy of the Khama's any favors.
  • A United Kingdom is a true and gripping tale which handles it true historical source material with aplomb. With fantastic performances from Oyelowo and especially Pike, the central characters plight is beautifully illustrated. It's not perfect; some of the writing is a little clunky, but the character chemistry is there, and you leave the movie theatre feeling like a part of the story.

    Quite how this movie receives the rating it does is completely beyond me. I can only imagine that half the voters didn't in fact see the movie.
  • malcolmgsw15 December 2020
    It is difficult to fully comprehend the battles this couple had to battle against,not least perfidious Albion.An excellent recreation of an important era,when the sun set on Empire.
  • 6.8 does not do justice to a film that tells a story of how love can overcome boundaries. In this case, this is one of the rare African stories that we tend to get to hear about. For a long time, stories to do with Africa have been about disease, poverty and undernourishment. Asante's take on this film does indeed tell the viewer that there is more to Africa than what meets the eye.

    I believe that this film should set a precedent for more African stories to be told . This film tells you that there is a lot more than just about Mandela. There is need to learn about other Africans namely Jomo Kenyatta, Hastings Kamuzu Banda, John Chilembwe and many others. These are perhaps some of the few names that I can think of. I commend Asante for taking a bold stand in producing a film of a figure(s) that most people out there may have not heard.

    For those of you that may want to get a different side to Africa, I would recommend that you begin by watching "A United Kingdom". In my view, it is one of the more decent films of 2016/17 combined.
  • A tale of forbidden love suffused in the nostalgic glow common to any film set more than sixty years ago, it rather anticipates the problems Princess Margaret encountered a few years later when she declared her love for the otherwise charming and eligible Peter Townsend; coming a right royal cropper simply because he was a divorcee.

    Likewise the problem here is one of convention as much as race. An Italian fellow I worked with had an African wife. Whenever they went out together he invariably got stared at by black men, which shows that the problem incurred wasn't simply a matter of white racism; as demonstrated by the scene were Sir Seretse is greeted by his uncle with a face like thunder.
  • Telling the story of the formation of the modern nation of Botswana, and the furore caused in the 1940s when the heir to the throne brought home a white wife, A United Kingdom offers a well-formed period piece that unfortunately suffers from the pitfalls of many such biopics.

    Firstly, the 1940s/50s period setting is often sumptuous and evidently well-created, and the story is rather compelling. Seeing this take on a historical story - of focusing on the human element - is rather good. David Oyelowo and Rosamund Pike are stellar if unremarkable as the leads, even if Oyelowo does get the chance to show some passion in his speeches, whilst Tom Felton (Harry Potter) and Jack Davenport (Pirates of the Caribbean) get to flex their villainous muscles.

    Ultimately, though, there's just not that much of note here, and it simply isn't worth watching as it will have been forgotten within a day. A rather bland and uninspired take on an interesting story, which is worthwhile at times but all in all fails to amount to much. 53/100.
An error has occured. Please try again.