Add a Review

  • Let me give you some advice: the second that you finish reading this review, get off imdb.com, steer clear of any ratings or stories about this movie, don't watch any trailers, and don't ask anyone about it. Just find the movie, and watch it. Go in with a totally clean slate and enjoy.

    I don't really want to say much more than that out of fear of ruining any element of the movie. I can tell you that it's part scary, part funny, largely surprising, and totally entertaining. The performances are great. I don't want to describe why they're great because that could give something away. Just know that they're superb.

    Plot-wise, the most I can say is that an attractive female babysitter comes over to watch a junior high school boy while his parents go out for the night. After that, visitors arrive and stuff happens. Lots of stuff.

    This is by far the shortest review I've ever written, but I've said all that I want to say. Now go watch the movie.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I expected this to be your run-of-the-mill invader/slasher flick (just with a xmas theme) but was pleasantly surprised to find it far more disturbing than first impressions. I hate to say, but I work with kids this age and this movie was horrifyingly believable on far too many levels. I love horror movies but, as I've gotten older, I've become increasingly bored by the predictability, so it's nice when something catches me off guard by doing something a bit different. Overall I thought the movie was well done, and I liked the acting. It was above par slasher level in appearance and feel (not cheap/good cast/big studio feel).
  • The film begins as any other generic home invasion thriller, and truth be told, I was not getting the vibe at first. I was disappointed and quite annoyed with the series of events that felt so typical and devoid of any excitement. But then, around minute 30th, comes a twist, and the scenario changed, and I was hooked right then and there.

    Although I cannot say much cause even a small word could spoil the story and subsequently ruin your fun, I will tell you this, the story or the trajectory it took to be precise, caught me off guard; I did not expect it.

    Now, the movie does have several logical fallacies, or loopholes, in layman's terms, but it was still thrilling to watch, and as I said, I didn't see any of it coming, which certainly added to my overall enjoyment.
  • Better Watch Out (2016)

    *** (out of 4)

    Ashley (Olivia DeJonge) is about to leave town but before doing that she agrees to babysit Luke (Levi Miller), which is something she has done for many years. After his parents leave the two sit down for pizza and horror movies but then someone breaks into the house and the terror begins.

    BETTER WATCH OUT is Christmas themed horror film that is getting quite a bit of attention. The film has some calling it a great film while others are calling it one of the worst films of the year. It's funny that the film is getting such a wide responce but I think both sides could agree that the film made their blood boil. I say that because there's a twist that happens in the story and it goes in a direction that was quite brave and I'm sure even Hitchcock would have tipped his hat.

    The problem with this twist is that if you're going to try something like it you had better know what to do with it and how to handle it. Director Chris Peckover also co-wrote the screenplay with Zack Kahn and I give both men credit for trying to do something different. Sure, the film's first quarter borrows from some other horror movies but I must give them credit for keeping me off guard as I was never quite sure where the film was going to go or how it was going to play out.

    I don't think the second half of the film is nearly as good as the beginning but at the same time it kept me glued to what was going on. I've got to avoid spoilers but I will say that my blood was boiling at one of the characters and how things were being played out and perhaps this is why so many people are hating the film. It is a bit mean-spirited and it is a cruel. I think a lot of people are hating the film because of the emotions that it is making them feel and I completely understand that. Even I got angry at the movie but when it was over I couldn't help but feel that a good movie should make you feel these things.

    I really thought DeJonge was exceptionally good in the lead role. Her character goes through a lot of different things throughout the picture and the actress nailed all of them flawlessly. Miller and Ed Oxenbould were both extremely good as well and you've also got Virginia Madsen in a small role as the mom. Technically speaking the film is quite impressive and there was some nice tension built up during the opening scenes.

    BETTER WATCH OUT is a film that I'm going to recommend because I think it succeeds at what it attempted to do. It's not flawless by any stretch of the imagination but I give it a lot of credit for trying to do something different.
  • akilose3 December 2019
    Unexpectedly for me, the film turned out great, with unpredictable twists, I expected something more banal. The main character played well, the film recalled its crazy atmosphere - the house that Jack built. A little disappointed with the ending.
  • ...and you won't be disappointed. If you're looking for too much realism or an airtight plot, you look in vain. Despite characters that are mostly paper thin, the actors rise above with enough authority to satisfy all but the most jaded audiences. As well, the production design, cinematography, and so forth stretch its relatively low budget to maximum effect. No, this isn't on a level with Michael Haneke's unsettling "Funny Games" or its American remake; think of it more as a John Hughesian teen comedy that takes a dark turn into violent absurdity. It truly is a comic book potboiler in the vein of "Tales From the Crypt," crude tongue wedged in its cheek, nonsensical plot devices on full display. I understand fully why so many wags here hated it, but despite its flaws, I had fun with its earnest attempt to offer up its twisted take on teen angst. The three Aussie leads will all be actors to keep an eye on in the future, that much is certain.
  • Without giving spoilers: don't babysit teenagers!

    this movie is different from what the trailer makes it seem, I didn't see the plot twist coming. the main kid does a great job. disturbing yet fun, if you like Christmas themed horror.
  • I really don't understand the really bad reviews. Yes, this isn't the best horror movie, but I liked the different take on the slasher theme. All in all a nice and weird take on the slasher genre.
  • Man, what a ride! I love it when I know absolutely nothing about a low budget film and don't expect much - and then get completely surprised at how good it actually is.

    This little gem is an unpredictable, often times either darkly funny or deeply disturbing thrill ride that should not be me missed by genre (or generally film) fans.

    It's beautifully shot, acted and written, and I'm sure we'll hear more from filmmaker Chris Peckover in the future. This is clever, inventive low-budget filmmaking at its best, and it goes to show that a lack of money is not an obstacle that can't be overcome by sheer talent.

    Good stuff: 8 stars out of 10.

    Favorite films: IMDb.com/list/mkjOKvqlSBs/

    Lesser-Known Masterpieces: imdb.com/list/ls070242495/

    Favorite Low-Budget and B-Movies: imdb.com/list/ls054808375/

    Favorite TV-Shows reviewed: imdb.com/list/ls075552387/
  • BEWARE OF BOGUS REVIEWS & REVIEWERS. SOME REVIEWERS HAVE ONLY ONE REVIEW. WHEN ITS A POSITIVE REVIEW THAT TELLS ME THEY WERE INVOLVED WITH THE PRODUCTION & THAT IS WHAT IS GOING ON HERE FOR THIS FILM! NOW I HAVE REVIEWED OVER 300 Christmas MOVIES. I HAVE NO AGENDA. I AM FARE.

    This film is a twisted take on Christmas. It is not for family's and the evilness in every frame of this film is not for me. However I recommend this to people that like inventive horror films and horror fans in general. This is not a film I am a fan of but I did not let that cloud my judgment. It is "Original & Well made". On top of that it is scary!

    In this story a household is being attacked but the enemy is very unexpected and by the end of the night who will survive?
  • marucciolu19 December 2020
    This movie isn't funny nor scary, don't waste your time.
  • When i started to watch this, i thought this was just gonna be your run of the mill home intrusion slasher. but this really surprised me. with an unexpected twist and cleverly written. the actors were great and this movie really kept me interested. definately worth a watch
  • elenamich21 August 2019
    Warning: Spoilers
    Don't watch it if you want to watch a thriller. It's really a black comedy plot. Good acting from the kids though..
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I normally don't write reviews, but whenever something really gets a bad reaction from me, I'm going to break my trend.

    Anyways I checked out this movie after seeing it on the shelf of my library, and the images and summary on the DVD advertises this movie like some sort of horror comedy version of Home Alone, and well I was up for a story like that. I ended up getting something completely different.

    By the 20 minute mark, the movie pulls off their big twist and guess what? There is no home invasion as advertise. It was the kid's (Luke) best friend (Garrett) pretending to be a home invader because he wanted to win over the heart of his babysitter (Ashley) by saving her from a fake home invasion he planned. Ashley figured out it was fake because Garrett stupidly wore a mask Luke owned. Anyway she rightfully decides to leave the house angry and not liking to be rejected, Luke slaps and knocks Ashley down a flight of stairs, knocking her out.

    You know those young kids, specifically boys, who has a secret crush on a older girl but resents that she has a boy friend? Yeah that kid wrote a script and it became this movie. However this isn't the fantasy of a boy winning over his crushes heart against her boyfriends, this is a boy's warped, twisted, misogynist, perverse rape/murder fantasy.

    Ashley wakes up taped and gag to a chair and she's like this throughout the bulk of the movie, so if you're a fan of the actress, this is the state she's going to be in for the rest of the movie. I would recommend you stop watching the movie after this point. I continue because I was sort of curious where this was going and thought maybe the film would take a more comedic turn. It didn't, there was no jokes and if anything it's actually more serious than the first 20 minutes. Luke is not a scary or interesting villain. He's just a annoying little shit who needs a good punch to the face before being thrown into a psyche ward.

    The film wants you to think Luke is this clever mastermind as he mentions how he and Garrett has gotten into lighter trouble at school, but he always figure out a way out of it. No no, he's not a brilliant mastermind as he and Garrett constantly make mistakes that allowed the other characters to nearly stop them as you would expect from 12/13 yr old annoying villains. You remember those silly slasher films of the 80s and 90s that requires for the entire world to be full of stupid people and for the universe to align itself perfectly in order for no one to know there's a killer on the loose? This film takes that style of writing.

    Luke's next step in his great plan is to text Ashley's boyfriend (Jeremy) to come over. Yes nothing dumb with this idea to invite someone who's bigger and stronger than you to come over, and could easily spot Ashley tied to a chair in the kitchen and quickly dial 911 on that phone he'll obviously have on him since you're sending him text messages through it. However since we're dealing with 80s style slasher writing, Jeremy looks in every room in Luke's house except the kitchen where Ashley is. There's not even anything to obstruct the view of the kitchen, they're just completely relying on Jeremy never looking in that direction. They blunder some more and Luke nearly gets taken out by Jeremy after failing to knock him out the first time. However they do eventually manage to tie him up too.

    We then get our Home Alone reference when they bring Jeremy under the second floor balcony and Luke wants to test out what will happen when a full paint can is actually swung over a balcony into a person's head.

    The character of Garrett is possibly one of the biggest raging idiots I've ever seen. The film portrays him like he's suppose to be the Milhouse to Luke's Bart. Now kids with low confidence are known to be easily manipulated by peers to do things like steal or vandalize, but this film takes this idea to the extreme. He also has Milhouse's wussiness as throughout the entire film, whenever Luke takes things to his next step, Garrett has that "this is a bad idea, we should stop this" reaction. He was already freaking out when Ashley found out the home invasion was fake, and again was freaking out when Luke knocked Ashley down a flight of stairs. When kids were pressured to do things they don't want to like vandalize and steal, only to get caught then other kids manage to knock out the person who caught them, they're reaction would be to normally run the hell away. Or in the case you actually know the person very well, try to help them and apologize. Yes it's established Ashley knows both Luke and Garrett very well as she has babysat them in the past. Not Garrett though. Even when Garrett finds out Luke lied about losing Garrett's pet hamster that he loved, that Luke actually killed the hamster and did it intentionally, even when Ashley in one of the times she can actually talk is telling Garrett Luke is no friend and is manipulating him, even when Luke fails his first attempt killing Jeremy with his Home Alone stunt (yes he fails to hit Jeremy's head the first time, so tries it again), even when Luke invites yet another one of Ashley's ex boyfriends after killing Jeremy, even when Luke is showing zero remorse or sympathy for his actions and is actually laughing and acting like he's having the greatest night of his life kidnapping Ashley and killing off her boyfriends, Garrett still continues to help this psychotic little shit carry on his plans. It's not until Luke kills the 2nd ex that Garrett begins to develop something resembling a brain and decides to try and help Ashley. However about halfway cutting her free, Luke blows away Garrett and his head with a shotgun. BTW no one hears multiple loud shotgun rounds going off in the middle of the night. Keep in mind, this isn't a secluded area or anything, it's suppose to be a typical populated neighbourhood.

    There's also two other big scenes of stupidity I need to point out. Ashley manages to free herself after Luke fails his first Home Alone attempt, and gets a hold of their handgun that they left on the counter. We get the typical scene where the protagonist is telling the villain to stop or they'll shoot them. Scenes like this always make roll my eyes because I'm always screaming to shoot them in the leg if you don't want to be a killer, and the actual killers are no longer a threat, problem solved. Eventually it turns out the gun was unloaded and Ashley tosses it away instead of keeping it so they can't get it back then reload it. Eventually there's a small chase between Ashley and Garrett and somehow Luke manages to catch up to Ashley and knock her out with a brick. Let me emphasize how ridiculous this is. Luke's home only has two entry ways as far as we know: the front door and the back door. The front door has carolers there, so Luke obviously couldn't have used the front door otherwise the carolers would've seen him. The backyard where the back door is has a tall fence between 5 to 6 ft high that Garrett is too wimpy to even climb over while attempting to chase Ashley. Luke is about the same height and frame as Garrett, so he would've had just as much trouble getting over it on top of both having a massive head start over him. Yet Luke apparently manages to offscreen teleport (another silly 80s slasher trope) on the other side of the fence and knock Ashley out before she reached the carolers.

    The final big scene of stupidity is Luke's great master plan to get away with it all. What does he do? He cleans up the house like nothing happened while leaving Garrett, Ashley, Jeremy, and Ricky (the other ex boyfriend) dead bodies exactly where they. He put some of the yellow paint from the can that killed Jeremy onto Ricky's hand, then shotgun in his hand and seems to be trying to frame Ricky for the murders. Many problems here. Ricky came into the back yard, and never even stepped foot into the home. Not exactly hard to figure out he was never inside seeing as there's snow on the floor, so his boot prints should visibly stopped where he died. None of his wet boot prints inside the house since it was all cleaned. No yellow paint hand prints anywhere in the home since Luke put yellow paint on his hand. Oh and Ricky is dead with I'm sure a rope mark around his neck since Luke killed him via hanging. Luke also cuts him down and leaves his body on the ground so it doesn't even look like a murder suicide ordeal. I'm willing to bet Luke locked the backdoor too going off his cleanup montage, also adding no signs of forced entry on top of the laundry list to prove Ricky wasn't even inside the house let alone the killer. Then Luke's great master plan ends by literally putting on his pajamas, go to his bedroom and act like he slept through the whole ordeal and this moronic plan actually works! Are you fucking kidding me? There are four dead bodies, one alive who also happens to live in the house the killings took place, directly knows two of the victims, the place is mysteriously clean and he's acting like he slept through the whole thing and knows nothing? Apparently no one even has half a functioning braincell to be suspecting this person?

    Actually there's one more stupid big scene that's suppose to act like dual surprise endings here. We find out Ashley is still alive and we see her giving Luke the middle finger as he's watching her being wheeled into the ambulance from the his bedroom window. After the first set of end credits, we cut back to Luke telling his mom they should visit Ashley in the hospital implying he's either going to successful kill her or more stupidity is going to continue on in the hospital as Ashley tries to get away from Luke.

    I just felt sick and very dirty after finishing this movie. The two guys who wrote and directed this movie (the director is also credit as a writer too) must be two misogynist guys who had one too many women dump them for better people, and this film is their revenge fantasy come to life.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I don't see the appeal here. This is just the sad, unpleasant rape/murder fantasy of a child. There's nothing particularly dark or disturbing here that we haven't seen much worse of in other, better movies. It starts out acting like it's going to be a comedy too, yet nothing funny happens after the kid's annoying reign of terror begins. It's not scary and it's not funny, so what exactly is the big deal here? It's just a couple of annoying children acting like stupid, inept villains.
  • S_dot_M_dot3 December 2021
    During the holiday season, the Lerners (Patrick Warburton and Virginia Madden) leave their twelve-year-old son, Luke (Levi Miller) with the always responsible Ashley (Olivia DeJonge) while they go out for a night on the town. Luke, with the help of friend Garrett (Ed Oxenbould), has decided tonight is the night to make a move on longtime sitter Ashley. Before Luke can make his move, an unexpected intruder attempts to break in. With them being in the safe suburbs, the two are on their own as they have to navigate a home invasion with twists and turns at every corner.

    This film keeps you guessing as each scene evolves. Director Chris Peckover, along with writing partner Zack Kahn, crafted an excellent story that drops hints at the big reveal throughout the movie, but never enough to give too much away. Keeping the film confined to the house keeps everything tight, which could hinder the production, but in this case, it let's the viewer experience everything with the cast. Setting this during Christmas helps make this work and actually adds to some scenes.

    The acting in this film is exceptional, especially Olivia DeJonge and Levi Miller. Miller, for instance, unravels and becomes unpredictable as the film goes on. Olivia DeJonge brings a sense of realism to the situation. Ed Oxenbould is cast to perfection as the timid best friend. All around, the entire cast brings this film to life.

    When you break down the film, there are some issues. The film is paced at a good speed, but some beats are rushed while others drag. Some scenes can become uncomfortable, which is good in a way, but easing up could let the scenes breathe.

    Better Watch Out takes the traditional home invasion scenario and turns it on its head. The cast is tight and the setting is as well. Once this film gets going, it's hard to tell what track it's going to stay on. All the way down to the final shot, Better Watch Out will keep you guessing.
  • Best go into watching it without reading reviews , spoilers or watching trailers. If u need a new film on your Xmas list this is one for a chilled evening.
  • The appealing Olivia DeJonge ("The Visit") stars as a teenaged babysitter looking after a pre-teen charge (Levi Miller, "Jasper Jones") at Christmastime. Soon, it seems as if they are being menaced by a psycho killer, but appearances can be deceiving. The plot takes a turn where the menace is coming from a place that DeJonge didn't expect.

    Admittedly, for this viewer, this was rough going for a while, with too much bad dialogue and too many annoying characters. If you're anything like me, you'll build up such a contempt for the weaselly antagonist that you'll watch this through to the end in the hopes that they eventually get their comeuppance. And make no mistake: this person is despicable, using and manipulating others to their hearts' content. As the story deepens, co-writer / director Chris Peckover is able to maintain a compelling grimness as these macabre "games" are played out.

    The cast does a good job with their roles, with DeJonge remaining angry and feisty throughout, never giving up the fight. She, at least, gives the audience a character with rooting interest. Ed Oxenbould ("Paper Planes"), Aleks Mikic ('Preacher'), and Dacre Montgomery ('Stranger Things') co-star, with token name actors / veterans Virginia Madsen ("Candyman") and Patrick Warburton ('Seinfeld') relegated to brief cameo appearances as Millers' parents.

    This viewer has tried not to spoil too much here, knowing that potential viewers will appreciate this more if THEY don't know what to expect. I will say this: the filmmakers clearly do know how to manipulate their audience and get them involved; this is a purely visceral movie.

    Six out of 10.
  • Having completely unacknowledged this horror for quite some time, I actually removed it from my mind. It caught me by surprise one day, bought it, and here we are reviewing a Christmas film in the peak of summer season (sounds about right...). So, naturally, I had no idea what I was getting into except that it resembled a home invasion film. Oh boy, was I wrong. A babysitter is summoned to watch over a family's son and house whilst the parents go out. The son is hoping to get to "second base" with the babysitter, but his plans are paused as the house is seemingly invaded by a masked individual. Let the festivities, begin! Reminiscent to 'Home Alone', it's a story involving mind games where the residents are at an advantage for knowing the layout of their abode, with a specific scene so self-aware that it actually admits to imitating that very film. But, it's not all sweet like gingerbread men and candy canes. Oh no, there is one heck of a twist that I just cannot verbalise, for it would ruin the surprise. And well, who doesn't like a surprise gift at Christmas? Writer/Director Peckover seamlessly persuades the audience's minds into a false sense of security, luring them down the route of obviousness. We are now Christmas pudding in his hands, and he moulds his way through many well executed twists and turns that unsurprisingly caught me off guard. Deranged, yet psychologically entertaining. DeJonge and Miller give fantastic performances, particularly the latter who was clearly enjoying the role. It's well shot, with technical inventiveness, and includes a rather funny screenplay, but above all it is fun. Good old fashion fun. Frequently, the pacing does dip and takes some time for the thrills to build back up. Also, as elaborate as the conclusion was, it just wasn't believable. Alas, the film knows what it is. A disposable thriller that injects some blood-soaked holiday spirit into Christmas. This will certainly be a new favourite of mine during the holiday season.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Ashley has been babysitting Luke since he was 8. He is now 12, going on 13. A pre-Christmas dinner takes his parents out, following which a home invasion means that Ashley needs to be unusually resourceful.

    This horror-ish movie, with strong elements of black comedy, starts out in utterly predictable mode, with scads of not-very-gracefully orchestrated made-you-jump moments. There is a reason why this film works so hard early on to make you believe that it is a by-rote home invasion movie, and that is because it wants to spring a trap on you.

    It won't work for everyone, but it worked for me, and turned this film from something I was expecting to something I really wasn't. And I don't want to say more than that.

    If you don't like this sort of movie then there is no reason to expect you will like this one. If, on the other hand, you do enjoy the suspense of home murder movies, but you are fed up with their predictability, then try this one - it may offer you some surprises.
  • There's nothing funny about this movie, so I don't know why it is labelled as a comedy first. I didn't laugh once. It's also not scary, but I can see how it would be mislabeled as a horror movie because of the themes of killing and terrorizing. But its more of a thriller than anything. And it is a twisted one. So watch if you are in the mood for a twisted thriller.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    It was fairly predictable at first then goes down a very dark hole. The first half of the movie was well done and entertaining. Then the rest just goes downhill from there on. The main character is so insufferable that you want nothing more than for the movie to end. I kept on looking at the time and hoping that it would speed up so that I could watch something else. I suppose that I was disappointed with this movie because I was expecting a comedy/horror and what I got was a horror and a sense of creepiness.

    I see no humour in watching a 12-year-old drink, bully and try to "roofie" a teenaged girl, attempt to get to "second base" by tying her up and killing half a dozen people. I watched nothing funny throughout the whole movie. So if you watch this movie then...you'd better watch out.
  • My 680th review damn IMDb got rid of the number so I have to do it myself anyway I really enjoy Better Watch Out for what it is! Levi Miller and Ed Oxenbould are very fun to watch; I love how everything plays out. Definitely would wanna avoid spoilers I agree with who says that, I am very satisfied with the epilogue. Better Watch Out is not for everyone which is understandable because it has some outrageous stuff regardless I think the film is spectacular!!
  • I had no expectation for this movie, so I didn't even know what I was sitting down to watch.

    It turned out to be a vamped up "Home Alone" just taken to a whole new level.

    "Better Watch Out" definitely had an interesting concept and idea for the storyline. However, it also had a very unpredictable plot, which was a stone weighing the movie down. But the story as a whole seemed somewhat implausible.

    There was some good acting from the cast, and it was clear that the people here were enjoying what they had to work with.

    "Better Watch Out" is a movie that you immerse yourself into while watching. I will say that the movie is somewhat similar to the "The Babysitter" movie from 2017.

    If you enjoy a good, albeit not overly scary, horror movie, then "Better Watch Out" is a fair choice for a single viewing.
  • Is this what we have come to? A horror movie that destroys our ability to connect to one another, just for the sake of subverting expectations?

    Fine, I know I'm no connoisseur of horror movies. But in every horror movie that I have actually enjoyed or admired, we ended with a sense of renewed faith in humanity - because horror, like an abyss, can bring us catharsis. Looking at something horrific that should not be allowed to exist, we realize how important it is to connect with our fellow human beings. "Alien," "The Cabin in the Woods," "The Thing," "It Follows," even "Resident Evil" managed a smidgen of that.

    But "Better Watch Out" just portrays evil and laughs at it, because it mocks us! Ha ha ha! It portrays the lazy, self-contented n'er-do-wells of American society. I cannot believe that I sound like such an old man as I write this. But I feel as if this movie tried, in quite a unique and ingenious way, to suck the soul out of me.

    Doubtless many people will dismiss this review as the ramblings of a prude. But watch the movie and see for yourself how manipulative it is. I reserve the 1 star rating for movies that genuinely offend me, and this one did.
An error has occured. Please try again.