2 Jennifer (2016) User Reviews (14)

Horrible, horrible, horrible

[Mogelberg · 2/10 · 20 August 2016]

What an utter waste of time. I wouldn't even call it a film school project, but rather a high school level project. The idea itself I suppose is OK; the execution just awful.

If I have to write ten lines of text about the movie, I will say that the story is awful, the acting is even worse, and the fact that it has been shot on an iPhone just doesn't make it any more interesting. I wonder if the inspiration came from the Blair Witch Project, which, frankly, I also found to be a pretty awful movie, in spite of the cult status it attained.

I suppose the 15 ratings it has received prior to mine, must have been from friends and family of the crew (or the crew themselves) trying to do them a favour, otherwise it is beyond me how anybody would rate this utter waste of time above 5, even if you are a fan of the genre.

I really wish I had not spent a bit more than an hour watching it, and I hope that my review may serve as a warning to anyone considering watching it.

I'm making a movie James

[nogodnomasters · 3/10 · 18 October 2017]

Spencer (Hunter Johnson) with the permission of James Cullen Bressack is making a sequel to "To Jennifer." He travels to L.A. and his buddy Mack (David Coupe) agrees to be his producer. Mack questions Spencer's idiosyncrasies until thing culminate to a point of no return.

Personally I like the second Jennifer reading the best. The first hour is designed to build the character of Spencer and create a mystery about him. If you have a fast forward button, feel free to go to the party that James is attending. That is when the film really starts. This is another hand held camera film, although not filmed through a smart phone camera.

Guide: F-word. No sex. Nudity (Lara Jean Mummert)

Creep Ripoff

[Amptron251701 · 3/10 · 23 May 2020]

This tried too much to be Blumhouse's Creep (2014) movie, but was not executed as well. It was long, boring, you probably knew how it was going by the point the main guy was nude in the bathroom talking to Jennifer. Spoilers!! You could tell the main guy was demented in some way early on, but really you officially find out at the end where he meets the producer of the fake movie he is making. You find out right there when nobody knows what he is talking about. Soon after, we find out he has been lying the whole time and stalked the producer James. This had good gore at the end, and was the highlight of the movie along with the nudity from main girl. The goriest moment even made me cringe, and I am a gore fan! He literally cuts his balls off or stabs and busts them, blood everywhere. Anyways...if you like Creep (2014), you might like this, but it is nowhere as good. Very boring stuff.

total waste of time

[sathyanarayana-88337 · 1/10 · 23 January 2020]

Horrible movie, only good thing is we learn how bad it can be if you choose to film a movie on a mobile phone without any experience in making a movie. It would get an F even as a high school project. .

This is a criminal act

[grayey1 · 1/10 · 8 November 2021]

For real, those involved in this garbage should face felony charges. It's too bad independent filmmakers can not be held to higher standards.

And Tubi should really review what they put on their site before doing so.

Shame on everyone involved in this. I hope you have a good day job.

no need to waste time

[poseidonsoctopus · 1/10 · 22 February 2020]

No need to waste time to watch this film. No need to waste time to watch this film. No need to waste time to watch this film.

One of the all-time worst films

[cdatlas · 1/10 · 15 November 2020]

Don't waste your time watching this, it's one of the all-time worst movies...just terrible.

Another slice of shot on video nonsense

[Leofwine_draca · 1/10 · 25 June 2017]

2 JENNIFER is another nondescript example of shot on video junk with some horror content. The story is about a couple of filmmakers who decide to make their own sequel to a supposedly legendary film, only for one of them to discover that the other is something of a psycho. This is badly acted throughout, unconvincing, and the 'found footage' style of shooting is totally tedious. It's also very slow with the only incident occurring during the big party scene right at the end. I suppose some scenes might have been disturbing had they not been so cheesily acted and unrealistic.

it's..... not terrible.

[yesyeschicken · 4/10 · 8 December 2021]

This movie is not great, but deserves more than a star. And as i slowly make my way through Tubi's seemingly endless horror flicks, this was far from the worst. The fact that it's an iphone movie doesn't help matters, (especially when they constantly reference it throughout).

The first half of the film is a slow SLOW buildup of character development for the main lead, Spencer. Unfortunately, it's unnecessary since almost right off the bat you can tell Spencer is a liar and a lunatic. The real fun starts around the party scene, and I really enjoyed the fact that they brought characters from the first film into this one.

Here's where they got me- The gore and blood effects at the end were very well done, (i clean crime scenes and this was probably the most realistic movie blood i've seen in a while, so hats off to the fx crew.) All in all- it's a good movie to have on in the background while you do something else- especially if you saw the first ToJennifer.

(also- i just saw there's a third movie?? Ugh)

Total crap, waste of time.

[chuckxx · 1/10 · 2 April 2020]

First the self commercial for this stupid movie. Nonstop shocking camera, idiotic ally plot to find a Jennifer for some horror movie. Obviously he lied about that there is a producer James. Totally sucks.

The Slimiest Best Horror Flick!

[meredithjillbrown · 10/10 · 21 August 2016]

Whether you have seen To Jennifer (James Cullen Bressack's film) or not, there is still intense appreciation for this group of friends who set out to make a sequel. Headed up by Spencer (a wicked little ambitious director with the ultimate "creepy" factor), we are led via iPhone into his unwinding madness to find the perfect Jennifer for this sequel. His sidekick Mack is anxious to start, unaware of some foreshadowing that plays a hefty part into the gory ending. Don't miss this little gem. Hunter Johnson proves to be a talented force with this horror mark in the unforgiving genre. I look forward to seeing more from him and the group!

A few slow moments but overall excellent!!!!!!

[Roxannen-3 · 7/10 · 21 August 2016]

I have to admit I was unsure about watching this film, but after hearing that it was shot entirely on iphone6 I had to see it for myself. It definitely took me for a ride. I didn't know this film was a comedy until I watched it. It had me laughing all the way through but also had me cringing at my seat due to the awkward moments of Hunter Johnson's character Spencer. The film suddenly gets more serious when Lara Jean Mummert's character Jennifer appears. Her and Dave Coupe as Mack are impeccable together. I don't want to say to much but give this film a chance. It's fun, awkward, and well shot for an iPhone film. Very impressed, great job guys!!!!!!

Wow! Who Finances This Junk?

[troytheisen · 1/10 · 5 February 2022]

First of all, if you see any reviews that give this turkey any more than 1/10, they are part of the production and submitting false, lying reviews. This has got to be on eo f the worst "high-school" project-type films I have ever seen.

Not only do I wish I had my time back, but I wish I could have my eyes and my mind wiped clean of what I just witnessed! When I was 8-years-old, the kid across the street and I used to make Super 8 movies, and ours make 2 Jennifer look like a Kindergarten project made by 4- and 5-year-old children.

The acting was ... well, what acting? These people have no business acting. Maybe selling produce at the local stand or doling out free samples of fake meat at the nearby grocery store, but acting? NO WAY! Not a person in this movie has had a single acting lesson, and if they had, there is a reason they are in this film, because they suck! That's why!

The script, acting, direction, production, etc., were all just horrible. I recall someone saying that it was all going to be filmed on an iPhone. They weren't kidding. It looked like poop, except the proper word to use starts with the letter "s" and rhymes with "hit."

For a title, I asked who finances this junk? But after writing all this I know the answer. They must have stolen the money out of some poor transient's hat on their way to the rundown motel where they shot the entire piece of garbage. Everyone involved should be utterly ashamed of themselves!

Spencer is a film maker. He and a film maker friend are attempting to make a sequel to a cult film. But, there is something more sinister happening behind the scenes.

[reereem · 10/10 · 28 September 2017]

I have three words to say ," I am Jennifer."

This is the mother load of "It's so bad that it's good." Hunter Johnson's "Spencer" is Norman Bates meets Hannibal Lecter. If nothing else, Hunter Johnson really commits himself to this role. It has over the top performances, underwhelming special effects and the word "dude" makes up much of the dialogue. I say,do yourself a favor, and call all your friends over, pop some popcorn, pull out the tequila and watch "2 Jennifer."