User Reviews (82)

Add a Review

  • Warning: Spoilers
    Jonah works third shift at a hotel. He cleans the pool, retrieves rackets from the racquetball court, and polishes off the restaurant's dishes. He is a utility man. Jonah toils in the belly of working class employment. He has voluntarily allowed himself to be swallowed by capitalism. His days and nights have become shuffled. A wife and daughter fuel this purgatory.

    Marty, Jonah's wife, was the first soul to accept his junkie heart. At a church food pantry she served him then invited him into the kitchen for a kiss. Jonah's reformation began there. Marty's parents never approved, but their child, Roxy, gave the couple a hefty bargaining chip.

    Jonah becomes rehabilitated and pretends to fear God on Sundays. But he never needed a pew. He needed a cabin, or dreams of a cabin. A home to raise Roxy in, void of the putrid society that delivered him into the clutches of drugs, and imprisoned Marty in the legalistic jaws of religion. He crawls into another state of servitude in hopes of eventual freedom.

    The still, twilight hours perpetuate his daydreams. On one fateful evening, The Last Free Man walks in and preaches of the Inversion. An event that will usher in the collapse of all things restrictive. All digital identities erased. A clean slate. And few will survive, only those privy to the coming seduction. Jonah begins to reluctantly entertain the man, but quickly starts sipping his kool- aid.

    The seemingly endless road to his family's cabin leads Jonah into more impending delusions. Instead of being preached at, he chooses to become a prophet. He becomes Buster, a lock-picking mountain goat. He politely pillages vacation homes that he could only dream to build. He treats the vacant homeowners with respect, but finds ways to subtly rebuke.

    Buster and Jonah are the same man on two different paths. The former, a man who denies tragedy. The later, the man responsible for tragedy. Buster's Mal Heart is a film that makes you think twice about who you let in your life. Or maybe the film wants you to stand on trial for all your personal trespasses. Put your hand on the bible and proclaim, "I couldn't see the blood until the lights were on."
  • After a first watch, it's difficult to characterise or rate this movie. Certainly intriguing and engaging, the viewing experience is mind-bending. The atmosphere is a weird mix of claustrophobia, psychedelia and human drama. The movie explores ideas around sanity, reality, imprisonment and the quest for freedom. It comes over as sensitive and real on a human level, alternately touching, tragic, funny, sad, depressing, chilling, and strangely inspiring. The main character gives a brilliant portrayal of an altered state of consciousness. The meaning and story of the movie are expressed in a very unconventional way; non-linear, disorientating and confusing - which I'm sure was intentional. The experience is rather psychedelic, and there isn't quite enough logical substance to really carry the viewer to a satisfactory conclusion, but this might change with a rewatch, when the rating might go up.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Buster is a man walking on the edge of a knife. On the run from the law in the Montana wilderness and fueled by drugs and crackpot theories, Buster breaks into cabins and rants about "the coming inversion" and when things will be turned upside down. He is the "last free man." In flashbacks we piece together events of Buster's shattered life and see glimpses of the person he once was. As a family man named Jonah, he worked hard, went to church, suffered verbally abusive in-laws and co-workers, and followed all the rules. During the night shift at a small town hotel, Jonah encounters a dangerous drifter who has a devastating impact on his life. It begins his transition to Buster. Who Buster really is and who he will turn out to be, is a matter of immense consequence to those Buster has brought into his life. It is a cosmic mistake that he got this far.

    The film is a cerebral thriller. Part of the vanguard series at the Toronto International Film Festival, an integration of film and art that I love, the film has tremendous depth and independent charm. It includes amazing quotes, immense wit and creativity, Biblical allusions including a nod to the story of Jonah and the whale, and a dreamy puzzle of a plot. It is set mostly in Western Montana and the surreal forests of Western larch and firs. While I loved the plot, storyline and setting, it is a little disjointed and could definitely benefit from a larger budget and the filmmakers getting more experience under their belts. I work for the National Park Service and noticed the characters wearing our uniform askew, but I doubt anyone else will notice or care about the same. A film sound/audio company in the credits should get a prize for their name; Eargasm. LOL! World premiere seen at the 2016 Toronto International Film Festival.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    There's been one point or another, during our lives, that we've found ourselves in conversation with someone who has both intrigued and concerned us with their eccentricity. For me, these moments are often experienced around public transport; the stranger that sits next to you despite the available seats on the bus, the slightly intoxicated person at the stop whilst you're waiting for the last bus, or the person hanging around the train station waiting room that doesn't appear to be waiting for any particular connection. For Jonah (Rami Malek), this interaction was with The Last Free Man (DJ Qualls), whom he meets at the hotel in which he is the concierge. Despite the company policy, and the sight of his drug addiction, Jonah agrees to provide a room for The Last Free Man where he preaches of a conspiracy known as the Inversion. From here begins the descent of Jonah's mind; he becomes slowly-and-then-suddenly fixated around the concept of wormhole's – Not dissimilar from those depicted in Donnie Darko (2001) – and becomes increasingly dissatisfied with his work as the night manager.

    Structuring the chronology of Buster's Mal Heart simplistically, however, reduces the complex portrayal of the disparate temporal episodes. During these sorts of crises in film, the viewer can often safely turn to visual symbolism and verbal leitmotif to engage with the deeper echelon of meaning in the narrative. For example, in The Godfather (1972) we can take the oranges as portent for impending death, and in Hitchcock's Vertigo (1958) we can take the spiral imagery to represent confusion and disorientation. The issue presented in Buster's Mal Heart is that the haven of symbolism does not seem to complement the narrative directly and opens up a new avenue of interpretation. Through the fog of suburban discontent and the forests of Montana is a cache of religious symbolism present to conflict and supplement the film. Early in the film, during Jonah's internal struggle with his ideals, it is learned that his wife is an ex-addict who was reformed through the church. She tells him that he is pleased that he has 'found faith in his heart' for them to be together. This appears to be of little consequence as many rehabilitated addicts utilise the structure and comfort of organised religion to conquer their issues. However, much later in the film during a newscast featuring 'Buster', his mother watching expresses the importance of the role of God in restoring him. These two episodes bookend the film, demonstrating the imposition of religion on Jonah, a man who spends a great portion of the film buying into the concept of the Inversion – something dismissed and ridiculed by the public as mere conspiracy.

    It is not so much the agency of clarification that these references to Christianity provide for unlocking the demanding rhetoric of the film, but the frequency of symbols is something that cannot be dismissed as coincidence. It seems likely that the aesthetic of Buster on the rowboat in the middle of the ocean, where he spends a figurative forty-days and forty-nights in a form of desert, is designed to draw comparisons with the Western imagination of Christ. It seems more than coincidental that this image is contrasted with one of Buster wearing a Santa costume whilst he squats in the holiday home, taking hostage the elderly couple that have returned.

    Perhaps the most curious of all the religious symbolism throughout the film are the allusions to the Ten Plagues of Egypt. Whilst not all of the plagues feature explicitly throughout the film, the subtlety and consistency of the religious imagery indicates that the plagues, or trials, present to test Jonah demand investigation. During Jonah's 'staycation' in the hotel, he experiences the first and tenth plagues. Buster returns to his room, to find the bath tub full of water. Moving into the bedroom, he discovers his wife and child are dead and are covered in blood. It could be argued that this represents the first plague: water into blood. It seems that The Last Free Man; the man with a cocaine addiction, a disbelief in forms of personal identification, and a penchant for drifting, was the murderer. However, his identity is proved to be questionable as the police and security review the CCTV footage and find no man present at all. This appears to suggest that The Last Free Man never truly existed and that the perpetrator of the infanticide was Jonah himself, thus bringing on the remaining plagues. Later in the film, the frame is filled with the sight of Buster, alone, drifting afloat a rowboat in the ocean begging for death. Whilst it is unclear whether this expression originates in existential ennui, honest grief, or remorseful guilt, it could simply be interpreted as an emotional darkness, a metaphor for the ninth plague: darkness. When Buster awakes the following morning, he finds the boat full of frogs: the second plague. Whilst any self-respecting survivalist would interpret this infestation as a source of sustenance for the future, it is not hard to suspect that these victuals would provide little restoration. The manifestation of the remaining plagues is implied rather than represented directly; whilst Buster is living in the cave amongst the Montana forest the plagues of lice, boils, thunderstorms of hail, locusts, and vicious animals are easily imaginable as aspects of wild living.

    The film does, however, engage with the tenets of Christianity and highlight tensions between organised belief and conspiracy theories to a degree that refusing to recognise them would be an incomplete approach to the film. The function of this imagery is elusive, it might serve to engineer Jonah's cognitive dissonance and existential collapse, or rather, it might be something of a muse for director Sarah Adina Smith, designed to represent the trials of one's mind when balancing personal belief and social expectation.

    Read more reviews at 'The Cineaste Review' - www.thecineastereview.wordpress.com
  • rcowles032422 October 2017
    I was able to suss out the plot line about midway through the 2nd act. Still, there were a few surprises working through to the end. Rami was excellent and perfect for the role; there were a few cool Easter eggs as the film progressed. Anything more would be spoiler-ish.

    Overall, I'd recommend this flick to any M. Night Shyamalan fan.

    Well done.
  • Greetings again from the darkness. A film festival wouldn't be complete without at least one mind-blowing avant-garde cinematic experience. I'm not the kind that needs every ending neatly bow-wrapped, and I often enjoy having conventional story structure challenged and even dissolved. Writer/director Sarah Adina Smith seems to thrive in such an environment in this twisty psychological thriller covering three timelines (one of which may be a dream) … or a split personality … or two/three men from one … or some combination … or something else entirely that I might have missed. (I'm not too proud to admit this distinct possibility).

    When a filmmaker bravely dives into the bizarre, casting becomes crucial. Ms. Smith nails it with Rami Malek, DJ Qualls and Kate Lyn Sheil. Thanks to the popularity of TV's "Mr. Robot", Malek is now a leading man – albeit far outside the Ryan Gosling mold. Here he plays Jonah, a struggling family man with a wife (Ms. Sheil) and young child. Working as a night Concierge at a hotel, Jonah tries to make the best of the lack of sleep and minimal contact with his family. In addition to Jonah, Malek plays Buster, a slippery and hirsute mountain man who negotiates his way through the Montana mountains by hanging out in the multi-million dollar vacation homes (mostly) vacated by their owners during the snowy winter months.

    The film bounces between 3 periods for Jonah/Buster: the elusive near-mythical mountain man running from the law, the bleak nights of the family man, and a dream-like sequence where he is adrift at sea in a row boat. Throughout the film, references to "sphincter" and multiple proclamations that "The Inversion is coming" lead us to believe there could be a sci-fi connection or an apocalyptic ending headed our way. Instead, it's "the belly of the whale" that might unlock the mystery or mysteries serenaded by the thunderous techno-bass bass. Even with the dark comedic elements, it's a head-scratcher for sure; but one that manages to keep us engaged despite our whirlwind of theories and uncertainly.
  • I appreciate independent movies that go against the conventional Hollywood grain but this movie just did not do it for me.

    THE GOOD: -production and cinematography are well done and the camera shots are excellent.

    -The acting is very good, especially from the lead character.

    Now for the bad- the movie felt like it was trying way too hard to be something unique and it devolved into a pretentious, nonsensical mess. I was left with too many questions and there were a lot of plot holes. I can appreciate a movie that doesn't spoon feed the viewer everything but I have to have some kind of understanding of what's happening. This movie just left me in complete limbo. Too much of it made zero sense and that really took away from the story.
  • I only have a vague idea of what I just watched, but whatever it was was extremely well done. Sarah Adina Smith definitely has a brain 4 times the size of mine.
  • This film is more than just a film. It is an experience, and it has you from start to finish in its seemingly quiet way. Then it comes to you in your dreams too, in your conversations about it, and your will for others to see it too. The characters, the world, the scenarios, all bring to light a new perspective. I loved the storytelling and it's fresh, funny, and dramatic.

    I often find that I am not so moved by newer films, that they aren't succeeding in providing me with new insight or actual cinema or unique stories. I have no issue with walking out and never needing to look back. This is a movie I want to see again. And I will find new revelations there.

    I wish many more films would aspire to this, which succeeds in what it does.
  • kosmasp23 March 2018
    What a weird movie. And that is not just because of the time line, but because of the main character and his .. well way to "freedom" I guess. It really is messy and I'm not just talking about his "future" self, that seems to have gone a different path than his former self. And we do jump back and forth, which makes the movie more interesting. I imagine having our main character be in one mindset for a longer period of time - that might have taken some of the tension out of the movie and make it boring (dare I say?).

    The central performance is amazing. Also DJ Qualls really surprised me, being quite humorless and just being as serious as possible. In a good way that is, in case I wasn't clear. And that is what makes the movie really enticing, but you really have to have patience ...
  • Superb acting from all 3 main characters. The story just drags along. There's no real explanation of some of the events that take place. Sort of like a lower scale Lighthouse version.

    One figures out soon that the main character is not right and is not at all surprised of the twist fifteen minutes prior to the film ending.

    An ok movie, just lacked drive.
  • This is a visually striking film with an amazing plot. It took some time for me to fully understand this film but once you understand it, it will stick with you for a long time. Rami Malek's performance is flawless and minimalistic. If you're obsessed with filmmaking and cinematography you will appreciate this to its full potential.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    (Flash Review)

    This is a peculiar, complex and confusing film to sort out. The core story is a sleep deprived hotel concierge encounters a strange man late at night at work who spews thoughts about regular life being part of the cycle of 'the machine' and the need to live off the grid to be 'free'. The sleep deprived man also has a wife and young child which is hard on him as he works nights. The lack of sleep and this strange man hints that this man may be his inner psyche personified. This nameless man generates fear over the end of the world; an "inversion" where the world turns upside down at the moment if Y2K (year 2000). During the main story, there are two other sub stories with the protagonist as a heavily bearded man wandering the woods; perhaps now 'free' as well as him stranded on a boat in the sea or ocean. The film has a unique at appropriate soundtrack, melancholy colors and very good cinematography and solid acting from the main character. Overall, these stories slowly unfold while laced with symbolism which are hard to clearly comprehend at first pass.

    The oddest moment, of many, is the scruffy man in wilderness story is scavenging a hotel kitchen for supplies WHILE having called into a phone sex line. Who writes that stuff? So random.
  • This reminded me of The Matrix. If you haven't seen The Matrix you will not have a clue what I am talking about.

    Three story lines, never sure which one is the real one and which is imagination or hallucination. Development of each could have been much better, but it would have made the movie a lot longer, which was probably a constraint along with the obvious low budget.

    Remi Malek does very well in his role, the obvious likenesses to Mr Robot show though, even though I believe he did this prior to Mr Robot.

    Some of the movie is slow, other parts are very entertaining, but it could have been done better so only 5.5/10 for me.
  • There are definitely different ways to approach this film. It can be darkly comic, but at its core, it's a tragedy with one actor at the center of it who is ready to give it his all. Malek has become a star due to his TV series, Mr. Robot, and here he gets an opportunity to shine even further. The lead character is a tricky one, balancing different story lines and timelines and personality traits while still having to be consistent in characterization. It's not hard to see why Malek was cast here. He has such a bubbling intensity and forceful acting style that comes across natural while leaving a lasting impression, and that's exactly what he does here.
  • This movie is like a long extended episode of the Twilight Zone. The one thing I hated about it - I'm not bilingual - there's a lot of Spanish and no subtitles to translate so I was completely lost during those dialogues. It's def a movie you have to watch more than once to fully get it.
  • What starts as a regular drama, really surprises towards the end, when things take a different turn. Consider yourself warned if you aren't a fan of surreal film.

    Buster's Mal Heart is really slow, but it develops nicely, without feeling dragged on. There are mainly 2 time lines. Present and Past. We see Buster as he is now, and throughout his days, we experience his memories. At times, there are a few dislocated scenes, not adding up to the story, though, they add up to the nightmarish feeling of the movie. The director is actually very good at playing with that feeling of underlying dread of a bad dream, and she does so more prominently at the end of the movie. Between the dramatic sequences of Buster's Mal Heart, there is a solid performance by Rami Malek, and later, his work remains consistent with the strangeness of the last segment.

    However, not all is great about this film. The biggest problem is that all of the movie conjectures feel too loose to be tied up by the end. Most of the keys to unravel the story being touched upon too superficially to impact harder or stand out. A lot could've been explored further, and rather than playing at being something else, from the begginnig the movie should've been blurring the line between memory and delusion. Some other aspects of the story were predictable, leaving even more to be desired. Nonetheless, the experience was worth it, and most of the mistakes were covered by the grand finale, definitely recommend it for the right people. If you know what to expect, go for it.
  • I'm keeping with the on the run theme, having just watched The 39 Steps. Buster (Rami Malek) is no Robert Donut though and this is a much more involved film. We first meet Buster or Jonah as he was, looking like a wild hermit, the local cops inform us he's been on the run for 5 years, breaking into places for sustenance and evading capture. What plays out is essentially what's lead Buster to this place, but it's not a smooth ride. He works hard. Works the night shift. Has a young family, goes to Church. There's niggles though. His wife's parents that they live with don't approve of him. He's a free thinker, motivated, ambitious, there's a lot of energy in him and Malek taps into it well. I've often thought about how hard working nights must be. For Jonah here, well it's the catalyst for his break with society and reality. Working in the hotel as concierge when there's little to do but tidy up, he's on the edge of sleep deprivation with his mind time to wander. An encounter with The Last Free Man (DJ Qualls) brings some excitement. Qualls does paranoid crazy well. He's a torrent of conspiracy theories, Y2K, CIA Hitlists, the Inversion. This becomes Buster's new centre, The Inversion, his obsession, the idea of an impending event, one that will deliver him and others that he tries to warn by ranting on local talk radio. Taking refuge in vacant summer homes, his life on the lam is not unpleasant. Hot baths, some personal hygiene care, mixed with what I'm sure he'd denote as warnings of The Inversion, turning family photos upside down. It's all a bit like The Shining without the focus. This isn't a great film, but Jonah's desire to live his life free, away from the system of renting a home, working for the man, that's interesting and his struggle to make that work for his family, well there's real substance. There's a lot going on in Jonah's head and we only really see things from his perspective, meaning things can get a little fuzzy as he becomes more and more disconnected. It's intentional though, allowing the viewer to decide what's real, what's psychosis, what's important, what's the minds way of coping with horrible events. It would be better if it left some things left unsaid, but instead it feels the need to explain and simplify. This is a bit frustrating, but with so many possible interpretations, I guess Sarah Adina Smith who wrote and directed this wanted to throw us a bone. It's a twister, it's good, a little confusing, not overly satisfying, somewhat maddening, but highly engaging and the sort of film I could watch a few times, digging further into various theories. At the same time, it can be interpreted as being quite simple. The story of a bloke losing it, breaking down and healing to perhaps only relive the cycle over and over. It's not for everyone.
  • jasondwight-4552726 August 2020
    Very slow burner. If you're a Rami Malek fan then it's probably for you but otherwise it's just very slow.
  • 'BUSTER'S MAL HEART': Four Stars (Out of Five)

    An indie mystery about a mentally unstable mountain man, and former family man, who now survives by breaking into empty vacation homes, while he constantly warns others (on talk radio) about an upcoming 'Inversion' at the change of the millennium. It was written and directed by Sarah Adina Smith, and it stars Rami Malek (in his first starring film role), Toby Huss, Kate Lyn Sheil and DJ Qualls. The movie had it's world premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival, and it's received mostly positive reviews from critics. I found it to be bizarrely interesting, and for the most part pretty well made, but it also left things just a little too unexplained for my tastes.

    The film opens with a mountain man, Buster (Malek), desperately trying to escape the authorities that are chasing him. He makes it to the top of a mountain, where the film then flashes back to his past as a family man, with a wife (Sheil) and daughter (Sukha Belle Potter). He also recollects on his time breaking into empty vacation homes, and calling into radio shows ranting about an upcoming 'Inversion' (at the turn of the millennium). Buster also has multiple visions of being lost at sea. As a viewer we have to interpret what's real, what isn't, and when and where it's all taking place.

    The film is definitely bizarre and interesting, and I was always curious of where it was leading to. I think the acting is good in the film (especially Malek in the lead) and Smith is obviously a very talented filmmaker. I was just hoping for a little more from the conclusion. I don't need everything explained to me in a film, but I don't like everything to be left a question mark either. I'm sure some viewers will think they understand it, but I think most of the film is entirely left up to individual interpretation. If you like that type of movie you'll probably love it, I'm not a huge fan of the genre though.

    Watch an episode of our movie review show 'MOVIE TALK' at: https://youtu.be/j_XDrmlMJNY
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The film has an incredible cinematography, the story is very engaging, but sometimes a bit confusing, but engaging nonetheless, it always keeps you guessing at whats going on, and I feel like it leaves a lot to interpretation. There are some scenes in the film on which I was left wondering what the hell is going on, as Jonah makes some decisions that were at the very least weird, but that are somewhat explained throughout the film, there is a point in where you're like oh, okay, I get it, I don't wanna spoil anything here, and there are clues throughout the film that leads to that conclusion if you pay attention, so that made it a little bit predictable, but it doesn't ruin the experience, overall it was a great film and I recommend it.
  • Meaningless movie. Please don't watch. Waste of 1,5 hours of our life. Malek is good but the script is no good.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I think if you look at the film as being similar to a long, deep episode of The Twilight Zone, you'll get it.

    Jonah is a graveyard (sad pun) shift concierge in a crappy, dead-end hotel in a crappy, dead-end town. He and his wife Marty and toddler daughter Roxy (adorable Sukha Belle Potter) live with Marty's parents in order to save money for a better life. Marty's mother is a shrill harpy and her father is silent. There is a subtle hint at one point that perhaps Roxy is not Jonah's biological daughter, which armchair geneticists will notice right away when they see her chocolate brown eyes yet her parents both have blue.

    Jonah tries to stay awake while working his night shifts and watching his daughter during the day, and it's never clear when he sleeps. How much of what happens to him is real, and how much is a sleep deprivation-fueled hallucination? There are more easy-to-miss hints in the soundtrack of the movie; listen for static noises that indicate something's not quite right in Jonah's world.

    Religious allusions are rampant. Obvious are the name Jonah and being "in the belly of the whale," and also the frogs that appear to rain from the sky. Look, too, for a shot where a heavily bearded Buster lies in a bathtub, arms spread wide, looking for all the world like a picture of The Crucifixion. Finally, at the end there is a cave scene that recalls the tomb of Jesus on Easter morning -- is he there or is he not? What can we believe?
  • A movie that I didn't understand until 20 minutes after the movie was over - just the way it is supposed to be. The director/writer has outdone herself.
  • basimtaha9 December 2021
    I can't deny that the idea was good i was so excited to see something but the writing had issues First of all the film is so boring who said that you have to make the shots so long to deliver the idea Under any circumstances if you want to make deep film with conspiracy and mental illness you shouldn't forget the main basics of making a film Which are simple don't make the audience bored by the long unnecessary shots.

    The cinematography was good, Rami Malek performance was great and the soundtrack was kinda annoying.
An error has occured. Please try again.