netflix hits us again.this time with a beautifully made Documentary. sometimes the jokes are scripted with a hint of dark comedy. the result is excellent and i go as far to say revolutionary.at least i haven't see something so candid and honest. i enjoyed every episode.the racism episode and drug episode were the best of them.i didn't know Chelsea and i don't know about her past works but with this i became a fan and i want to see more of this kind of open discussions about these subjects.there are not enough people who are bold and honest.its only four hours and i think most would enjoy this show but be warned that she is not afraid to insult stupid ideas and people and i bet there will be a mountain of angry complaints from intolerant viewers.really what is the point of having this much freedom if you never use it.i would have loved to see an episode about religions too.
Add a Review
-
baktash-hesaraki31 January 2016
-
crickey-598681 August 2020Well I am not a fan of Chelsea, but this show is worth to watch. It's fun.
-
mirwais-orbit8 February 2016Chelsea Does is a completely standout escape from what she is known to do. When compared to Uganda Be Kidding Me (2014), also produced by Netflix, Chelsea Does is a major breakthrough in a career of someone who now states to be more mature and aware of her position in the world than before, someone who is now "thinking globally and acting globally".
She takes some issues to discuss them using informality and also self analysis with a great "in between" development. That's why every episode begins in a dinner table with friends and goes thru a more introspective feeling with her personal therapist.
In fact, Chelsea herself does not have much to say. She takes those issues for self-knowledge also clarifying the audience about them by different point of views. Who actually have things to say are the people she invites to debate those themes using the democratic principle, which is: they are free to promote their own ideas or counteract her openly. That principle avoids her from personal judgments most of the times, giving people opportunity to state their opinions the same way she is able to do, confronting them healthily and respectfully even when sometimes seems impossible.
When developing the marriage theme - the first episode - she makes clear to have never cared for it and find difficulty understanding why is it so important in our modern society. At the same time she cannot hide her frustration to be single at her 40's because we have this strong cultural pressure around making us conditioned to accept marriage and fidelity as a goal and a true commitment even when sometimes it's not. It doesn't mean that every marriage is faded to fail and she does not analyze it that way. She knows that there are difficulties in the process and that they can do work, as it did with her parents. What she wants to know is why people are so obsessed by it.
The same tone is approached about technology, wondering all the time how is the relationship between a generation born with few resources and those ones who are born within electronic gadgets.
But undoubtedly the highlights are the last two episodes, which manages the difficult task of balancing both themes between seriousness and humor without turning them into tools for clichéd jokes, as it usually happens.
Chelsea confronts some disgusting individuals about racist matters respectfully. What she does do with those people is let them state their thoughts because their position neglecting any human rights existence becomes a huge rope around their own necks.
She realizes that the more they say the worse it gets and more embarrassing is for no one but themselves. The man who supports the barrier between United States and Mexico, comparing Mexicans to burglars and thieves (especially after claiming to have Mexican people in his family), or listening another one comparing black people to tractors, or a woman stating that there were good consequences with slavery, it's atrocious. At these moments Chelsea uses her sarcasm like knives cutting their throats and they don't even notice that. That's subtle, and that's what she does best.
When talking about drugs, that may sound apologetic, but on the contrary, she proves to be a person who is fully aware of what they are and how her body reacts to them. Her intention is to enlighten its use in the matter of recreational or experimental purposes. That's what she does when undergoing a spiritual session with ayahuaska, or when mixing some other drugs under professional supervision. She wants her reactions to be recorded so we can witness that the indiscriminate and uninformed use of drugs is extremely dangerous.
The episodes have an interesting progression. At first seems that she is just a self centered celebrity who likes to talk about her achievements to preserve the identity of a wealthy influential successful woman who suddenly decided to take herself seriously.
The series starts with themes that seems unimportant but suddenly it proves to be completely the opposite when socio-cultural complexities comes to surface. It becomes obvious how her consciousness about things and herself also changes and improves during the process, like when she is with a group of social representatives in the third episode, and one states that her jokes can be racist even when she believes it's not. Their point makes her finally understand how unaware she was about it and that those jokes actually can still hurt people, races and cultures when analyzed through a wider scope. That is truly the turning point of the series, because from that on Chelsea goes away from her celebrity persona and approaches herself closer to an ordinary human being that lives in a culture so absorbed by racism and prejudice that cannot even notice when it happens. And that's when her perception about things change. That's when our first impression of the show becomes an incredible part of her whole maturity process.
And with the last episode she ends this important modifying path with perfection, finally expressing her fragility, undressing herself emotionally in a way she has never done before and never allowed herself to. For several moments we laugh a lot, but we also feel extremely moved. Chelsea knew how to choose the right people to talk about important issues by the easiest and most affordable way as possible. Either with humor or without it, above all with balance and focus.
It's not a documentary per excellence because it's clear that it is divided between situations created to help an entertainment development at the same it uses real situations to clearly justify the proposed themes. Regardless, it's an important show, especially in a time when instead of moving forward, we are going backwards on ideas and collective thoughts. Chelsea actually becomes a projection of ourselves, of those ones who need to analyze their relationship with the world. -
This is the Netflix version of the B movie exploitation movies of the drive-in era. After watching a couple of these episodes, I realize I've been had. Lame.
-
villellafranco1 February 2016you should definitely watch it, its a comedy as well as a documentary so.. what could possibly go wrong. for me the best chapter is Chelsea does silicon valley, she talks about technology and the way it has changed our life in a good and in a bad way. i the other episodes she talk (in case you don't know) about marriage, drugs and racism, all of them will make you laugh(trust me). also all the episodes are very good ALL THE TIME because she ïnvestigate¨ serious subjects with a comedy focus. its really what you would expect from a Chelsea handler/ netflix show. verdict: Chelsea does its a must see. its funny and informative so stop reading and go watch it really don't wait. thanks for reading
-
PizzaQuixote10 February 2016We watched the first episode of Chelsea Handler's new series on Netflix. It's kind of a personal documentary series, and the first one is "Chelsea Does Marriage."
The cinematography is great. Some superb camera-work. Good pacing, and it was interesting for the full 80+ minutes.
But it's not fun to watch, and a cruel heart is exposed. She covers her disregard for others with a sheen of comedy as she interviews a lot of sincere pro-marriage people during this episode about her own resistance to marriage. She mugs for the camera and rolls her eyes to show her disdain for these sincere people. Why is that cute or funny? It's not. Yes, cruelty is the heart of comedy, but this is just grown-up mean girls schtick.
I've always thought she was cute and edgy and funny; but now I see she's mostly a mean girl getting nasty as her beauty fades. Even the most badly skewed comedians bring us back with some sliver of kindness or thoughtfulness - think Ricky Gervais. But the hints of humanity are too few here. -
srkim25 October 2017This is not a documentary. To be fair, I'm not easily entertained or pleased, I want the stuff I'm spending my time on to provide some kind of cerebral and/or sensory stimulation, to surprise me with refreshing perspectives.
Chelsea talks a lot but she doesn't say much. From the things I've seen so far, it's MAINLY about her getting herself high from being "blunt" and "provocative". The problem is that provocation without real content or any message is just as thought-provoking as your teenage rebel son's rude remarks on your cooking skills. You just know he wants to be an ass.
I seriously didn't see what she could teach me or anyone else. What's the aim of this "documentary" series? "The college education you never had", wrote another reviewer. Well, that may be true, since some people work hard to get actual education.
So, in case you haven't watched this yet, I give you a brief impression of what to anticipate by summarizing Episode 3: Haha, she makes her interview partners say that Jews and Blacks are cheap liars! Wow, it's so confronting, so provocative, especially she is Jewish herself. How ironic and self-deprecating! Haha, she questions the use of a hookah, IN FRONT OF a waiter with Egyptian roots. Savage. We got a badass over here! Haha, she just said that no one in the entire world is attracted to Asian men and she feels sorry for them! WOW, girl's got guts, she's so outspoken, and so so brave!
Critical commentary on the compulsive political correctness in our "Western" societies as well as the wounds that racism brings to those who are affected, is bitterly needed. Chelsea Does it Wrong because Chelsea wants it to be about Chelsea. Too bad that Chelsea is not only incapable of capturing any valuable observations but clearly doesn't know the difference between smart, provocative investigation and saying offensive things for the sake of being offensive. (But at least she said it!!! Right?)
Let's take look on another failed episode. A potentially interesting plot ('cause the older I get, the more I'm revolted by the thought of me being married) was handled in the most shallow way. Not saying that she can't bring her personal stories into this. But. The subject "Marriage" is not covered well if it consists of her delivering derogatory comments as a guest in a Las Vegas Wedding (oh wow, how daring) or her ex-boyfriend sharing uneventful memories after their break-up, what, 20 years ago? Seriously?
Chelsea likes blunt, uncensored honesty, right? (As she keeps stating this over and over.) She is a 42-year old woman with a too-cool-for- school-attitude and the wisdom of a Youtube beauty vlogger. -
stevenyccb16 May 2016It has a 1 star average on Netflix from actual viewers. Not funny, pretty stupid, a bunch of degenerate dull nonsense. This is an election year and starting the show by insulting half of the country is just not smart. Bill Maher can be edgy and sharp without losing much of the audience, but at least he is smart and brings up good counter points. This host seems to be either high or drunk all the time - with a commensurating level of discourse to follow. It is like an ad for what happens when crazy old drunk loons get high on 'shrooms and talk nonsense out of their rear, but you have to pay for it (that is my real beef - I do not want to pay for this junk NFLX - if I am paying then get better content like more House of Cards style shows - I cut my cable to stop subsidizing proliferation of politically correct stupidity. Perhaps the world of Idiocracy is indeed dawning upon us). I could not fathom how this show got approved. I did watch some of her E episodes, and they were funny at times - this is not it! Could not watch it for more than 15 min - and tried it twice. Stay away! I think any positive reviews are fake or friends of the host.
-
This is not funny, not a documentary, intellectually insulting. This is like the liberal version of Ann Coulter. I'm saying this as someone who's not American (I'm from Buenos Aires), so there's no American-based political bias here. This is lady seems to be ignorant, stupid and deranged. You say edgy? I say cringe. George Carlin was edgy AND funny; she's none of those. How is this classified as a documentary? You can already tell the whole production was in hands of dimwits. Absolute crap.