A low-level Cabinet member becomes President of the United States after a catastrophic attack kills everyone above him in the line of succession.A low-level Cabinet member becomes President of the United States after a catastrophic attack kills everyone above him in the line of succession.A low-level Cabinet member becomes President of the United States after a catastrophic attack kills everyone above him in the line of succession.
- Awards
- 3 wins & 3 nominations total
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
Season 1 and 2, Designated Surivor introduced plots and narratives that were a mixed bag. Some were enthralling and alluded to bigger plots, but ultimately led to nowhere, or went out with a whimper. Other elements led to unforseen twists which spiced up the story.
Without any spoilers, there were plots that I had hoped were expanded upon or developed further, rather than being conviniently wrapped up by the end of the episode with little consequence. However, with that being said, there were little details that turned into something big and added a bit of danger to the story.
Maybe this was due to budget constraints or ABC oversight from preventing the series from becoming too dark, because I don't believe that the writers who brainstormed some pretty solid ideas, wanted those ideas to pan out the way they did.
Season 3, is helmed purely by Netflix, and it shows. That's not necessarily a good nor bad thing. The season still suffers from the "long build and anti-climatic whimper" the first two seasons had. Some story points just wrapped up too quickly after they build up they were given. In essence, great concepts but poor execution still plagues this series.
The language is a bit vulgar and gratuitous, hitting me like a freight train roaring down a mountain. The showed laid it on heavy, probably wanting to hammer home that Designated Survivor is now Netflix's new dark-gritty baby and potential heir to House of Cards. The series practically broke the fourth wall when a certain character swore. The language was toned down later on in the season, and the writers reserved its usage to add a punchier effect.
Another thing I noticed with Season 3 is how slanted the politics were, compared to the previous seasons. ABC (according to them) tries to be politically unbiased, and so the first two seasons attempted to reflect that. The villains were based on groups in the real world, but it was far removed enough that there was no direct link. The politics espoused by the President's speech were distinctly centrist. But in Season 3, there is a left wing slant no matter how hard the series tries to tell me that it is centrist. This is mostly a result of the season having a distinct tone of identity politics that just feels off. That being said, the left wing politcs is nowhere near "West Wing" levels, so the politically right leaning shouldn't be turned off by it (I'm also certain West Wing never bothered with identity politics either. It was a show from a different time). The series still does take potshots at both ends of the political spectrum, just not as strongly as the first two, and also notes that not all groups are monolithic, which is nice. However, there is a definite Left-wing slant in Season 3. Right wing extremist groups are mentioned a lot, but not a peep about left wing extremists.
Season 3 also takes a lot cues from what's happening in the world right now. I can't quite articulate it, but there's something jarring about watching the series and instantly being reminded about a certain rally that happened in the real world not too long ago. I'm don't find it off-putting per se, but I do find it jarring and that it would make the season feel dated in later years to come. Not to mention, these references are just that, references. They don't really add anything to the story, or the over arching plot.
This is an issue that I'm noticing more in Season 3, than the first two seasons. There are character arcs that serve no other purpose than just padding out the run time and attempting to make them more than just cardboard cutouts.
Which brings me to my next point, there are a few characters missing. There is a convinient narrative explanation for this, but when you think about the characters that are affected by it, it doesn't make sense as to why they're absent. I am aware that the actors and actresses may not be available for whatever reason and had to have been replaced, but there are a lot of turnovers, and some of the replacements don't feel as valuable or as likeable as their predecessors.
Lastly, the music. I usually don't coment on music, but some of the selections used at the end of certain episodes felt off, considering the subject matter they finished with. The tunes were a bit too spirited for a moment that should be tragic and horrifying.
I know my review has largely been negative so far, but I'll list the good. -Kirkman's character development and interaction with family -Emily's development -New Chief of Staff Mars. He's a new addition but I really enjoyed his arc. Arguably the best part of Season 3. -The Campaign Manager. This character is a barrel of excitement. -A different portrayal of the CIA. In most media, the CIA is always portrayed as this overly powerful organisation that skirts the rules whenever it chooses. Here they're shown as an Agency with not enough domestic resources. I don't know how representative that is of real life, but it's a refreshing change. -Dr Eli, he's a geneticist. Great character. The scientific matieral in season 3 is surprisingly accurate, albeit broad. I guess they don't want to be caught out by the details, but it's nice to see things that are more authentic at first glance.
Without any spoilers, there were plots that I had hoped were expanded upon or developed further, rather than being conviniently wrapped up by the end of the episode with little consequence. However, with that being said, there were little details that turned into something big and added a bit of danger to the story.
Maybe this was due to budget constraints or ABC oversight from preventing the series from becoming too dark, because I don't believe that the writers who brainstormed some pretty solid ideas, wanted those ideas to pan out the way they did.
Season 3, is helmed purely by Netflix, and it shows. That's not necessarily a good nor bad thing. The season still suffers from the "long build and anti-climatic whimper" the first two seasons had. Some story points just wrapped up too quickly after they build up they were given. In essence, great concepts but poor execution still plagues this series.
The language is a bit vulgar and gratuitous, hitting me like a freight train roaring down a mountain. The showed laid it on heavy, probably wanting to hammer home that Designated Survivor is now Netflix's new dark-gritty baby and potential heir to House of Cards. The series practically broke the fourth wall when a certain character swore. The language was toned down later on in the season, and the writers reserved its usage to add a punchier effect.
Another thing I noticed with Season 3 is how slanted the politics were, compared to the previous seasons. ABC (according to them) tries to be politically unbiased, and so the first two seasons attempted to reflect that. The villains were based on groups in the real world, but it was far removed enough that there was no direct link. The politics espoused by the President's speech were distinctly centrist. But in Season 3, there is a left wing slant no matter how hard the series tries to tell me that it is centrist. This is mostly a result of the season having a distinct tone of identity politics that just feels off. That being said, the left wing politcs is nowhere near "West Wing" levels, so the politically right leaning shouldn't be turned off by it (I'm also certain West Wing never bothered with identity politics either. It was a show from a different time). The series still does take potshots at both ends of the political spectrum, just not as strongly as the first two, and also notes that not all groups are monolithic, which is nice. However, there is a definite Left-wing slant in Season 3. Right wing extremist groups are mentioned a lot, but not a peep about left wing extremists.
Season 3 also takes a lot cues from what's happening in the world right now. I can't quite articulate it, but there's something jarring about watching the series and instantly being reminded about a certain rally that happened in the real world not too long ago. I'm don't find it off-putting per se, but I do find it jarring and that it would make the season feel dated in later years to come. Not to mention, these references are just that, references. They don't really add anything to the story, or the over arching plot.
This is an issue that I'm noticing more in Season 3, than the first two seasons. There are character arcs that serve no other purpose than just padding out the run time and attempting to make them more than just cardboard cutouts.
Which brings me to my next point, there are a few characters missing. There is a convinient narrative explanation for this, but when you think about the characters that are affected by it, it doesn't make sense as to why they're absent. I am aware that the actors and actresses may not be available for whatever reason and had to have been replaced, but there are a lot of turnovers, and some of the replacements don't feel as valuable or as likeable as their predecessors.
Lastly, the music. I usually don't coment on music, but some of the selections used at the end of certain episodes felt off, considering the subject matter they finished with. The tunes were a bit too spirited for a moment that should be tragic and horrifying.
I know my review has largely been negative so far, but I'll list the good. -Kirkman's character development and interaction with family -Emily's development -New Chief of Staff Mars. He's a new addition but I really enjoyed his arc. Arguably the best part of Season 3. -The Campaign Manager. This character is a barrel of excitement. -A different portrayal of the CIA. In most media, the CIA is always portrayed as this overly powerful organisation that skirts the rules whenever it chooses. Here they're shown as an Agency with not enough domestic resources. I don't know how representative that is of real life, but it's a refreshing change. -Dr Eli, he's a geneticist. Great character. The scientific matieral in season 3 is surprisingly accurate, albeit broad. I guess they don't want to be caught out by the details, but it's nice to see things that are more authentic at first glance.
This show is one of my favourite Netflix Originals. It kind of combines House of Cards (2013) with 24 (2001) really well with it being half political drama and half action thriller. All of the main cast play such amazing, likeable but flawed characters. Season One is by far the best because you just had no idea where it was going, season two kept the suspense with a different story every week but still had long running stories. Season three however wasn't that good. It had some good moments but it just felt like a very different show.
I've just binge watched it up to the end of Episode 18. The initial premise is interesting, whether or not it's actually based in reality. You always need to grant some leeway with "initial premises", especially these days. I stopped watching 24 after the second season because I found it too infantile and silly. I did watch The West Wing through to the end. This is a sort of 24 meets The West Wing. The show lets itself down with too many loving gazes between the President and his wife (does she have any flaws at all?), some terribly clunky lines and worst of all, the relentless US Patriot, buzz word laden speeches. "The American people deserve...". "Rebuilding our amazing nation...". "Rebuilding our fantastic Government". There's no mention of lobbyists or Corporate involvement in Government. There's no mention of the profound disconnect between citizen and Government that is a feature of contemporary politics. The various "third rails" of US politics are briefly mentioned. It is a show about a fantasy America and a fantasy American Government. It's the TV Show version of America that is challenged by the initial events and it responds the way TV Show script writers think such a world would respond. Having said all that, it moves reasonably quickly and the split between the two story arcs is well handled and engaging. The only caveat is - if you find "true blue, Mom and Apple Pie American sentimental patriotism" too much to bear, you're going to struggle with this show. But it's probably worth bearing with, all in all. There are far, far worse shows on TV.
First two seasons were really good. Great stories, character development.
Third season seems lost.
Netflix took a good thing and trashed it!
Netflix took a good thing and trashed it!
This show started off REALLY well. I was right into after Season 1. Season 2 fell apart, after awhile I realized that if I wasn't watching episodes back to back there would be at least a week in between shows so the randomness might not be as blatant, like characters just vanishing off the show with sometimes not even a mention. The formula of crisis is introduced, crisis is explained as how it will hurt the presidents reputation, crisis is averted with some kind of personal sacrifice from the president. Rinse and repeat after every episode.
I stopped about 3/4 of the way through season 2. I just can't do it anymore with this show. I don't remember seeing a show tank as fast as this one. Super disappointing with where this show went. I think if you are looking for a political drama The West Wing would be better.
I stopped about 3/4 of the way through season 2. I just can't do it anymore with this show. I don't remember seeing a show tank as fast as this one. Super disappointing with where this show went. I think if you are looking for a political drama The West Wing would be better.
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaKiefer Sutherland was not originally interested in starring in another television series after his eight season run on 24 (2001) and the limited series 24: Live Another Day (2014). Sutherland changed his mind after reading the script for the pilot, being blown away at how good it was.
- GoofsIt's occasionally said that Tom Kirkman is the first independent president of the United States. George Washington, the first president, was also an independent, and John Tyler, the tenth president, was expelled from his party and effectively served as an independent for most of his term.
- Quotes
[from trailer]
Tom Kirkman: Mike, please, just tell us what you know.
Mike Ritter: Capitol's been attacked. Congress, Cabinet... Eagle is gone. Sir, you are now the President of the United States.
- ConnectionsFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Best Kiefer Sutherland Performances (2017)
Details
- Runtime1 hour
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 16:9 HD
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content