User Reviews (97)

Add a Review

  • A-Zupreme10 August 2017
    2/10
    1981?
    Warning: Spoilers
    I hate to be too hard on what seems to be a low-budget production, but some of the greats were also low budget. Yet, many have managed to become something amazing despite so little so I have to speak frankly on what didn't work about this one:

    1) The film didn't at all look like a representation of an event that took place in the early 1980s. The hook of this movie was basing it off of a real-life murder/kidnapping case of 1981. Unfortunately, neither the house nor the family conveyed a vibe of the 80s which put me off from it from the start.

    2) The loud, over-dramatic music that told viewers when something major was being revealed or happening, as opposed to trusting your audience to know it for themselves. It got to the point where it became funny when this music played, which is a bit awkward of me to say about a movie with such grim subject matter but it almost seemed to border on parody at points. Ultimately, less is more and that's a weapon that low-budget productions need to utilize (and well) in order to succeed.

    3) The look of the masked killers/intruders was not scary. I understand that ski masks and brown-sack bags with eye holes cut out have been done in other movies, but they at least look menacing as compared to these cheesy Halloween masks on display here.

    4) I understand the concept of filler, but a movie as slim as this one shouldn't need it. Yet, there seems to be a lot of that going on here.

    5) Finally, did we really need to hear "Night of the Living Dead" being played in the background on the TV? Did this really happen? Again, their hook was basing this on something that really happened, granted they did say that some things have been dramatized for effect at the start. Yet, it would have been nice for them to be a bit more choosy on WHAT they dramatized. Moments like this just remind you that you're watching a horror movie, not immersed in the terror along with the characters. Also, far too many self-aware horror-comedies play these classic horrors in their films (often as a loving wink by the creators to their favorites). So, it didn't do this one good to fall into that mix if it was trying to achieve something genuinely scary.

    2 out of 10. I just could not get into this movie at all, though I will give it credit for having me look into the real-life case and learning about these poor people and what happened to them all those years ago. Movies like this remind us that the real horror resides not in the cinema but with us... in the real world.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This is the first time I feel compelled to review a film I haven't even finished watching, but with this one I have to. I simply cannot watch any more without sharing my annoyance of the characters and a couple of 'long scenes'.

    Well here is the spoiler so far, until 30min in: Woman moves away from trouble into a cabin. Lots of bad men around. One tries to con his way in, wearing a skeleton mask. Wow. He gets in anyway. Then the incredibly stupid decisions happen. I can't even be bothered to write them all out, needless to say that if you hit a dangerous intruder on the head and he is out, you don't leave the house as the mother, to get help and leave the guy on the floor with all the kids and leave him there untied, or really, really knocked out, you know, extremely!

    And then, as if the character knows just how little the perpetrator is knocked out, she tiptoes around him, she knows he could wake up from her foot steps alone...yeah, guess what?

    At that moment I gave up. Who wrote this? A 12 year old?

    Oh and the other thing is the 'long scenes'. They are scenes, right, that are veeeeery loooong, unnecessarily so. I guess the director wanted to convey some sort of emotion with them, but what they really did was made me fast forward.

    I will now continue this film with the knowledge I feel needed sharing. The fact that I am giving it another chance should help in some way to tell you it wasn't all THAT bad...but I don't think it will go over 3/10.
  • frances_farmer027 September 2017
    4/10
    Weak.
    The movie description says, "based on the true life murders which inspired The Strangers". I knew it would be a lower quality rip off, and it was, but I still expected better. Everything about this movie was mediocre at best. The pacing was really off, which felt like the cinematography version of an 'awkward silence'.

    The characters are so dumb and pathetic that you don't even care what happens to any of them in the end, which is sad because these events actually happened. And what is going on with the Mothers accent?? Cabin 28 is empty, lazy, and neither pays tribute to, nor is a great representation to this real life tragedy.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    If you want to watch something worth your time, you might as well re-watch Strangers. Where do I start? The acting, the cinematography, the musical score, the pacing, the movie? All of it is terrible.

    I was actually infuriated by the terrible accents, and god forsaken acting. The only reason I kept watching was to actually see if the movie could get worse, and SPOILER ALERT, it does. The gore is terrible, and you can't wait for the mother to be killed right from the beginning. Every character has an annoying trait that won't stop, and you constantly wish they are killed next. Save your time, your money, and your IQ for something with a little more substance.
  • claudio_carvalho25 February 2019
    "Cabin 28" is one of those movies that make the viewer regret to have spent time watching it. The story and the screenplay are lame; the acting is terrible; the cinematography and special effects are poor; in summary, this film is an awful garbage. The only thing that works is the wonderful art of the Brazilian DVD cover that lures the viewer. Advice when most needed is least heeded. Anyway, the advice is to stay away from this crap. My vote is one (awful).

    Title (Brazil): "Cabana 28: Madrugada do Horror" ("Cabin 28: Dawn of the Horror")
  • dashawn-2090827 September 2017
    I can'y believe I wasted my time With this movie. Ended up watching the Documentary. But back to this movie, the acting was horrible. There was no introduction with the characters, so it was kind all over the place. Also i felt the writer could've made the characters fight back a little stronger than what they did.

    It's not much I can really say I was just mad I even wasted my time watching this movie.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This production contacted me a year or two back wanting my assistance. I looked up their other titles and new they are schlock merchants, so I ignored them or told them to stuff it- I don't recall which.

    First, the disclaimer at the beginning and tail are lies. Not supposed to represent people, living or dead? How does that work when it's advertised as a true story? Read their own description of this trash.

    Next is the hokey dialogue- none of which ever took place. And why is the cabin so luxurious, and why is it in Wales? Keddie was a dive, 28 was a dive, and the Sharps and Smartts were all poor.

    They stole a lot of info from my site (keddie28.com), including whole stretches of dialogue lifted from the DOJ interview with killer Marty Smartt, so why did they fill the film with absolute lies? Marilyn had no contact with Sue, there was no visit at the dinner table, the only time Marilyn was known to have contact with Sue that day is when she, Marty, and Bo entered the cabin and killed them. And her son, Justin, was 12, not 8, and it is known he was also not just a witness but a participant in the murders. Cold hard facts.

    The murders did not go down even remotely close to how the film depicts them. And, of course, there were no masks- but you have to have masks in order to properly rip off another film NOT BASED ON THE KEDDIE MURDERS, The Strangers.

    This film is worthy of a class action lawsuit. And guess why I chose not to participate in this piece of filth.
  • WHY DID YOU PORTRAY SUE AS A GREASY FLAMING RED HAIRED MORON WITH A COCKNEY BRITISH ACCENT!? Number one, please don't shoot a film based on an incident that occurred in California with actors that have EXTREMELY THICK COCKNEY BRITISH ACCENTS then try to MASK said cockney accents with American southern accents. This took place in CALIFORNIA. Californians don't have southern accents in the first place and JUST BECAUSE YOU'RE BROKE DOES NOT RENDER YOU SUDDENLY WITH THE VERNACULAR OF A HILLBILLY. Sue Sharp was born in Springfield, Massachusetts (where I live, by the way, hint) and had just moved her family from Connecticut (which is on the boarder of Springfield, MA) to NORTHERN CALIFORNIA where no one sounds like a hick. The people involved with this story didn't sound like hicks. WHY WOULD YOU MAKE THEM APPEAR TO BE BRAINLESS HICKS? You've insulted their memory.

    Next, if insulting their memory was not bad enough, this is the world's slowest moving film. Where did they get the idea that a lunatic wore a clown mask? And a white-faced fair haired child mask from The Village of The Damned? Back in 1981 AND YES, I WAS ALIVE IN 1981 masks such as were used in the movie didn't even exist yet save for special effect work and even then they were hundreds of dollars. It wasn't until the late 1990's to mid 2000's when masks like that made it to your local Hot Topic. RESEARCH ASSISTANTS EXIST FOR GOOD REASON, I SUGGEST THE DIRECTOR PROCURE ONE ASAP.

    Next, the "slasher scenes" were absolutely absurd. While the series of events was somewhat SIMILAR to detectives' theories, the movie itself had absolutely no historical accuracy. The atmosphere and set design did not look anything like the cabin, the actors do not represent the actual victims and the actual backstory of what really went on that week and that night was completely ABSENT. They seemed to have taken a story, changed it up and created a slow moving pointless plot-less I don't know what this mess is.

    While some films are low budget they can be excellent hidden gems this is just downright bad. Did you BOTHER TO RESEARCH THESE MURDERS or did you just watch a special on Unsolved Mysteries about it and decide to make a movie with a camcorder? If you want to know what actually happened at Keddie, just do some basic research and watch some actual interviews. This was just...bad.
  • Oh I do love movies that start wihth a legal disclaimer!!!

    The number is 555-02-65-01... Haha, stupid. Girl is not bothered by being given a # that is obviously false.

    -1 Star for that stupidity

    -1 Star for asking 'You Believe Me Don't You??? To her mother. Oh dear...who wrote this mess.

    -1 Star for the stupid stupid reaction of the mother to the daughters distress!!!

    +1 Star For the Cool Mask!!!! Oh masks!!!

    -1 Star for the stupidity of the mask wearer!!! Omg seriously??? lol

    -1 Star LOL...Mom crushed own son with Bat..

    OKay done with this One!! Absolute GARBAGE. OR as they say in Wales where this was filmed, RUBBISH!!!!

    Didn't make it past the stupid cliff. It fell off the cliff halfway through!!

    I recommend the filmmakers , backers, actors, everyone involved in this garbage proceed immediately to the emergency exit of movie making!!!

    Is there 0 Stars???
  • mcerleanpt3 October 2017
    Possibly the worst film I've ever watched. Everything about this movie was just plain awful. The acting, the writing, I struggled to make it to the end. I had some hope for this movie based on the events that inspired the movie, it could have been something great, but it wasn't. If I could give this a 0/10 I would. Do yourself a favor and never watch this movie.
  • jamesedwards-2230018 October 2017
    The first part moves at a glacial pace but from the very creepy scene where the daughter hears a voice on the other side of the door the film is very creepy. The enjoyment the killers get out of tormenting a mother and her children is particularly unsettling. I think even if you don't relate to the characters everyone can relate to how terrifying it would be to get attacked in their own home. The second half of the film will definitely have you double checking the locks on your own doors and windows.
  • After arriving at their remote cabin, a family trying to enjoy their vacation together is soon assaulted and terrorized by a mysterious gang of psychos looking to torture and kill them for staying at the location and must band together to survive the situation and get away alive.

    This was a decent enough if troublesome genre effort. One of the bright spots for this one is the solid build-up to the invasion which has a lot to like. Getting the early work about the family and their interactions while staying there, that starts this off well enough before the film takes a turn with the strangers' arrival as the eerie encounters and chilling resolution play quite well together. This offers a rather fun setup that combines all these elements together to generate a fun entry point setup that puts the likable enough groups into the terrifying ordeal. That provides the point for the film to generate a solid series of confrontations that take place throughout the cabin. The initial series of attacks focus on the family fighting back before the numbers game allows them to gain the advantage and continue the chase which allows the series of shocking appearances to carry things along. Including the final part which features the captured members being tied up and tortured in some rather brutal means which are quite terrifying to see play out as several of these bring about an unexpected emotional resonance. These features provide a lot to really like although the film does have some factors to hold it down. One of the biggest drawbacks here is the general limitations imposed on this one by its home invasion structure. Things aren't as interesting as they should've been with the way this plays out with the villains overtaking the house only through the stupidity of the family not to realize or trust what's going on. With constant instances where characters stand around talking to each other, fail to capitalize whenever they get the upper hand, or drop their weapons and run away allowing the confrontation to continue, these aggravating features are a chore to get through. As well, there's also a highly confusing feature at the end where the invasion has finished and it turns into a true crime documentary where the sheriff and his deputy are interviewing others that had nothing to do with everything about absolute nonsense which just really ends this on a sour note. That the investigation goes nowhere makes everything completely irrelevant, it features nothing of interest due to the lack of interest in who they're talking to and overall its use is just not needed here. These features are the main drawbacks that hold it down.

    Rated Unrated/R: Graphic Language and Violence.
  • sophia_lawrenci12 March 2018
    Worst movie ever. The acting was terrible. Had to turn it off
  • By far the worst movie I've ever seen. The actors are so wooden. The costumes were purchased at a Party Express. The script was written by a 5 year old. The accents switch from bad southern to British to regular American with no rhyme or reason.
  • I should have with this film. I'm a big horror fan. I'll give anything a chance and try to find a redeeming quality. But this is just bad. It's so bad you guys. It almost comes off as a parody, except parodies are funny. Absolutely no connection to the characters, the acting is honestly the worst I've seen (especially the mother), the tired horror cliches, the awful ticking 'suspense' score... Do you brain and eyes a favour and watch something else.
  • Suziesworld27 February 2018
    I made it 41 minutes.....which I will never get back! The acting in this film, if you want to call it that, is ridiculously bad. Don't waste your time on this. It's a shame someone tried to pass this off as a "based on true events" movie. If I were a relative or family friend to the people who were killed in that cabin, I would be upset as how they portrayed them. Just don't waste your time.
  • I went into this expecting it to be based on the Keddie Murders, which is what it is said to be based on, and it's essentially coming to the point that there's no real correlation, though similarities; in addition to that, it's very poorly paced, the blood and gore is bad, the acting is atrocious, and it made me laugh just out of pure pity with how poorly the movie was executed.

    This movie is shameful, and I definitely do not recommend it.

    Only watch this if you hate your life.
  • I am ten minutes into this and I just cant hack anymore of it. It would have got 2 stars if the fake american accents were not so bloody awful. Before I bought it I watched a quick trailer and that was it. The accents were so bad that while watching I had to look up the cast and thats when I find out they are brits. I have seen high school plays with better acting. Clearly the cast were just given a script and told to put on an american accent with no real training. Save your cash and your brain.
  • lcorcoran-3921526 September 2017
    Warning: Spoilers
    Like other reviewers, agree it's a bad ripoff of the strangers. Weak acting, stupid plot, and goofy conspiracy theories. Supposed to believe, a small town law officer is powerful enough to cover up a multiple homicide and quell a DOJ investigation. So stupid. It's annoying seeing such weak characters that you can't even root for their survival. And you're supposed to buy skull man getting cracked in the head with a bat wasn't fazed, and angry clown can be stabbed and still fully function?
  • Despite the bad rating i gave the movie a chance. Right from the start i was starting to regret my decision. The acting is in one word horrible. Then there is pretty bad camera work and very cheap and bad special effects.

    Conclusion this is clearly a low budget production. I advice people not to waste there time watching this movie.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Plot spoilers: A family moves from a trailer to a cabin. There is a brief introduction, but we don't get to know too much about them. Two male neighbors visit them, not overly friendly, and leave. The family is murdered by three people in masks. The two guys we saw earlier are interviewed by the police. The end.

    Based on a true story. It showed because it was fairly boring, mediocre acting due to lack of good imaginative dialogue.

    Guide: no swearing, sex, or nudity.
  • I don't understand the hate in some of these reviews. The film did everything a horror film should which is disgust and terrify you. Some of my friends have seen this and they also found it really disturbing. It makes it all the more unsettling to know it was a true story. Maybe that's what people are uncomfortable with. Its not a happy ending the viewer is left feeling pretty terrible but I imagine that is the entire point. Show the brutality of the crime and the injustice that it has never been solved because of police corruption. If this makes more people aware of this horrible story then the filmmakers have done a very good thing which is why I've given the high rating. It takes guts to make a film about this. Maybe a lot of people are trying to bad mouth it because they don't want the truth out there.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    It says its based on a true story but we all know how Hollywood spin these things so I don't know how real it actually is. But it is a very disturbing movie showing a family stalked and killed at an isolated cabin. Whenever there is hope for the family to escape something goes wrong to keep them at the mercy of the killers. The way the family are tortured and killed is not easy to watch and the acting in those scenes is convincing and unsettling. The plot is paper thin so don't expect a story full of twists and the ending is frustrating as no one is arrested for it. Its mostly just a tense brutal home invasion movie which doesn't end well for any of the characters.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Whether this movie was really based on a true event (as they elaborately claim) or not, I kept wondering why the makers of this... well, what exactly? torture horror? .... were thinking, when they considered doing this project. This movie has no head nor tail, we're more or less plunged into the horror of a nice family who is suddenly terrorized by unknowns for no apparent reason and we never get any explanation.

    In the first 20 minutes we meet the family and are served all kinds of innuendos of complicated background stories (no dad, daughter with an unwanted pregnancy, another daughter sexually harassed), with which nothing whatsoever is done, so they might as well not have bothered. Then the attack begins, by the way very well introduced with a hair-raising scene of the daughter communicating through a closed door with one of the assailants. But when everyone is caught and bound to chairs the whole thing collapses into an overlong part of gruesome and very intense abuse, torture and killing. And then it's the next morning, another daughter finds them dead and snap: the end. After just some 70 minutes of film we are forced to read an endless commentary on how the culprits were never trialled or even found out.

    Who did the production-team think to please with such a unsatisfying movie? Okay, maybe a few gore and torture aficionados, but genuine horror fans like me are just baffled and actually a bit offended for not being taken seriously.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The story could be cool. If it were told by better actors. Every single one of these hackjobs are horrible.
An error has occured. Please try again.