User Reviews (389)

Add a Review

  • There aren't enough people doing this kind of stuff anymore, you know, the kind of movies David Cronenberg used to do, low budget but well crafted, high concept and not afraid to disturb, then lo and behold, looks like his son took the torch and I couldn't be happier. Possessor has some great performances and nice visual choices, the body horror bits do not disappoint as well and I thought the narrative was engaging from start to finish, found no issues with the pacing whatsoever.

    We need more creative works like this on horror-fantasy.
  • Tasya Vos (Andrea Riseborough) is the Possessor. She's a corporate assassin who uses a brain implant to take over other people to do the killing. Her boss is Girder (Jennifer Jason Leigh). Her next take-over target is Colin Tate (Christopher Abbott) who is dating Ava Parse (Tuppence Middleton), the daughter of tech tycoon John Parse (Sean Bean).

    This is a Brandon Cronenberg film. It has his father penchant for blood. It's a fine sci-fi flick with a dash of style. The filming does need something more. I can't quite put my finger on it. It has style but it needs more. It has moments of intensity but it needs more. It has ideas about control and self-identity. I'm not completely bought into the character Tasya. I don't know who she is and quite frankly, she may not know herself. That would have been an interesting idea if it's clearer about being murky. All in all, this is more interesting than not. There are enough in here worthy of the Cronenberg name.
  • Some artful notions swirling around in this one, "Possessor," but not necessarily always amounting to much. A conclusion of a loss of empathy seems especially trite to me. There's so much more potential here than some character arch. More than the satire on the real world, too.

    We've got mind-body duality of implanted techno body horror (from the son of the master of the subgenre) instead of dreamscape "Inception" (2010), but nonetheless for some generic corporatist plot. There's a bit of "The Puppet Masters" or "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" to the scenario, as well. An actress (Andrea Riseborough) playing a character that also is an actress--practicing her lines, fine-tuning facial expressions until literally embodying her character. It's even in her name, Tasya Vos, meaning "resurrection" and "fox," a symbolically trickster animal. A character who wears other people's faces like a mask and whose nightmare is that one of those people wears her face literally as a mask. Body and mental dysmorphia that becomes bizarre digitally dysmorphic cinematic imagery. Seeing artifacts that aren't there. An identity crisis fully emerging from wearing virtual-reality-like goggles to spy through customers' webcams through the eyes of the body that's consciousness has been hacked via Vos hooked up to another virtual-reality set. It's the sort of film-within-a-film that's within yet another film that really makes a character question their reality.

    This is what got me wondering, then, about those objects Vos looks at in her debriefing meetings with Jennifer Jason Leigh's Girder (which may mean "satirist," by the way). Interesting how Leigh has been cast in so many such detached, clinician-type parts, at least of late: "Annihilation" (2018) and "Awake" (2021) being two of the latest movies I've seen with her, in addition to "The Woman in the Window" allusion to her part in "Single White Female" (1992). This is also the actress from "eXistenZ" (1999), "The Machinist" (2004) and "Synecdoche, New York" (2008). There probably aren't many actors out there more trained in the ways of reality-bending cinematic reflexivity. More interesting methinks than her ex-husband's use of meta-narratives as realistic movie therapy sessions.

    Cronenberg to Cronenberg, but for the actors, Leigh's satirist grooms another actress as her successor. She monitors her character possessing via virtual-reality headwear, illustrates her slasher exploits with bloody big-screen images, and presents her objects from her past--nominally to distinguish her own identity and reality from those she possesses--but, Girder actually advises Vos to detach herself further, from the family connections that distract her from her work. Noah Baumbach should take note.

    All of which makes me wonder about those objects, a pipe and a pinned butterfly. The latter seems to fit the transformation and resurrection themes well enough, but that pipe. And, boy, is there a lot of vaping in this one. A tobacco fix that isn't tobacco. A pipe that isn't actually a pipe. People possessed who aren't actually themselves. Consumers and voyeurs, not people. Pornography instead of sex. Dead images in lieu of reality. Ceci n'est pas une pipe à la René Magritte. This is The Treachery of Images. This isn't reality; it's a representation, surreal, virtual, a movie. "Pull me out."
  • In this film, set in the near future, brain implant technology allows one person to inhabit the mind, body, and spirit of another. A clandestine corporation uses this technology to assassinate wealthy and powerful people for profit. The film explores what happens when the host starts to fight to regain control from a guest who is not entirely mentally stable, to begin with.

    Interesting enough premise. The film is set in a very bleak version of the future where cities appear to be sparsely populated (perhaps from some event that greatly reduced the population such as plague or war; a motif borrowed from Argento's Tenebre). The film relies heavily on psychotropic imagery, and this adds to the overall frightening and confusing atmosphere since most of this imagery is nightmarish (distorted faces reminiscent of David Cronenberg's The Brood, warped colors, bursts of sound and images, blurs, rapid-fire images and strobing flashes of light). The film further relies on ultra-violence as a motif that rivals even the Italian slasher films of the late 1970s and early 80s (such as Susperia, Tenembre, Opera, etc.). Possessor contains explicit sexual motifs including full male nudity and erect penises, which reminds me very much of Antichrist (2009) or The Man Who Fell to Earth (1976). These are juxtaposed with explicit imagery of knives penetrating flesh. All of this results in a nightmare landscape. The ending is purposely left confusing so that that the viewer can arrive at their own conclusions. For some viewers, this will be frustrating.

    All of this wraps up into a very worthwhile enough film, but for viewers with a more sophisticated palate (if you are looking for a Blumhouse type film Possessor is not what you are looking for). It is disturbing to be sure. However, it is very well made and anchored by two very outstanding performances from Andrea Riseborough and Christopher Abbott. It also features Jennifer Jason Leigh and Sean Bean in very laudable supporting roles (whether or not Sean Bean dies I will not spoil). Possessor is a "Criterion Collection" caliber film that will give the viewer some satisfaction analyzing and will with you long after you see it.
  • Rendanlovell5 May 2020
    7/10
    Hm
    Warning: Spoilers
    This should be retitled,"Too Much but also not enough". There are so many ideas pulling the movie in so many different directions. It's ideas the movie, but rarely does an idea get fully realized here. This has me torn on how I feel. On one hand, there is a unique tone to this. It's like Assassin's Creed meets inception. People possessing other people's bodies to preform hits on specific people for political or social gain is a solid premise on it's own. Throw in some great ultra violent gore effects, good performances, and some moody, atmospheric music and you get some really striking scenes. On the other hand, the movie is overly ambitious. There's so much it establishes there's no way it can accomplish it all, and it doesn't. This is exemplified in the first act which feels horribly rushed. We get less then 20 minutes establishing characters, premise, and themes. It feels like it can't wait to move through the set up and what results is a lack of investment from me. We hardly know who anyone is or why they are doing anything. The main character is having a psychological melt down as a result from over working inside this possessor machine but she only takes like a half day off to recover. Then she's right back to work. There's barely motivation for this and in her half day off all she does is sit around at home with her ex. You needed more scenes explaining to us what lead to her breaking up with him and more establishment of why she would want to go back to him. We don't know these people or their story and we leave them so quickly it's hard to care about them at all. We literally get one scene of her away from her work, and it's nothing out of the ordinary as far as normal day goes. Why is she a workaholic? Her home life seems fine to me. Why won't she tell her superiors that she's having a mental breakdown? Is it supposed to be a metaphor about her dependency on work to avoid her real life? If that's the case then why don't we get more scenes showing why she would be avoiding her life? It's a messy movie, full of vague characters and even murkier story progression. Even though the first act is rushed, at least it sets some interesting things up. The second act is where the movie really faulters though. It feels like the same scenes happening over and over again. It gets really tedious watching a character saying the possessed person is acting weird over and over. There are some cool, trippy, drug like sequences showing the main character having more internal breakdowns but I got the point after the first time. Yeah she's not stable enough to be in there and the longer she is, the worse it will get. I get it. We don't need to see it 27 times. This is weird because the first act has the exact opposite problem. Like Inception these people are trying to accomplish something by manipulating others for their gain. Unlike Inception, where the first half of the movie is establishing characters, story motivations, and potential speed bumps, Possessor only seems interested in establishing the story speed bumps. We don't get a clear sense of character motivation or why the story is happening in the first place. This possessor company wants to own this large tech company? But why? Who knows! The real story is about the Possessor and the Possessy who go to war over who should have control over the body. So why even mention that they want to absorb this tech company? Instead, say that she needs to kill these people just because they are evil or corrupt. That wouldn't change what the movie is going for and it would clean up the story a bit. The whole point is the struggle between the possessed dude and the possessor and coming to terms with the horrible things that happened. It's kinda like watching someone with split personality disorder. Which, again, is an idea that could've and should've been fleshed out. It only comes up near the end and is wrapped up so quickly I don't know why they even bothered. The first act is completely rushed, the second act is drawn out to no end, and the third act introduces more things it can't quite pull off. So...eh?

    *2nd viewing edition* I liked this way more on second watch. Maybe it's the uncut version or maybe I just got it this time. The biggest theme explored is the idea that sometimes it's hard to tell who we really are. Are we so inspired by others to do things that we end up losing our sense of self? You could interpret this as a meditation on mental illness but I see it as every day life. The culture is so saturated by "hot takes", opinions, and people "looking out for our best interest" that it can truly be numbing. The disassociation we can feel could be as simple as everyday little things to life altering marriage. Who knows if we love them or if someone we love loves them for us. This is all beautifully captured and comes around full circle at the end. Again, it's possible I just didn't get it the first time around but, this uncut version somehow feels tighter. I was transfixed by it. The first act flows nicely, the second act escalates well, and the climax is thoroughly satisfying. Man, I think I feel a third viewing coming...
  • davidmvining28 April 2021
    I don't think this movie fully works, but I don't want to dismiss it completely. It's aggressively unpleasant for long stretches with a wildly unappealing main character and some unclarity about who's who for a while, but the main character has an emotional (or one might say emotionless) journey that's well built around unpleasantness and the unclarity actually feeds that some of that at the same time. I'm mixed on this, having never really engaged with it on any level while watching it, but having learned to appreciate it on a certain intellectual level as I considered it after it was over.

    Written and directed by David Cronenberg's son, Brandon, Possessor is a weird science fiction horror film of a woman, Tasya Vos, who remotely controls the bodies of unsuspecting individuals to commit assassinations for contracts. The movie begins with her towards the end of one contract, controlling the body of a young hostess that she forces to stab a lawyer to death horribly. There are interesting details here. She has a gun, but she chooses the much more brutal knife killing. When the man is dead, she places her hand in the blood almost celebratory fashion. More importantly to the story, she brings the gun to her mouth to hill her host, breaking the connection and allowing her to go back to her normal body, but she can't make it happen. Whether it's her own inhibitions or the host fighting back is never made clear, but Vos ends up getting released when the police show up and kill her host in a brief shootout.

    The thing about Vos is that she's an inhuman monster, but she's still clinging to her humanity. A test her handler, Girder, puts her through after every job has her reviewing random items to see if she's fully in control of her identity and facilities, enough to identify objects that are hers from those that are not. One particular item, a butterfly killed and mounted when she was a child, elicits words of regret over the action from decades before. She goes back to her separated husband's home, being in the middle of an effort to reconnect with him and their son, and she practices her basic greetings down the street. When she makes love to her husband, she's completely checked out until she decides to mime interest. She had asked for time away from work, but one evening at home and she calls Girder asking for the next job.

    That job involves the future son-in-law of the founder and CEO of a data mining company. The objective is to possess the son in order to kill the CEO, using his strained relationship with the father-in-law as the pretext that will sell the crime to the world. Here is where we see the process from the beginning, where the subject, Colin, has to be kidnapped with some minor brain surgery in order for the process to work. We see the unsure first steps of Vos learning the small details impossible to pick up in surveillance, the unsteady steps into a relationship she can't understand, and her trying to do his job at the data mining firm for him.

    All through this, I was cautiously engaged, waiting for the movie to make something of itself. The ideas were percolating, somethings in vivid visual form, and I kept watching. The montage of melting skin into wax that reincorporates to show Vos taking over Colin's body is vivid and striking. The data mining job is invasive and voyeuristic involving using personal cameras in people's homes to track what kinds of curtains they have. All through this, Vos is having trouble keeping control, leading to Colin blacking out at one point.

    The extended middle section of Vos wrestling with Colin is where I think the movie gets held back. We never get a good handle on Colin, so the fight with Vos never gains any real concrete feeling. All we really have is the idea that Vos is struggling to control herself. That may end up being the overall point, but Colin fighting back in some way indicates that he should have been a greater focus, perhaps creating a direct contrast between the two in terms of views towards humanity. With Colin being such a non-entity through this, until he does gain some control after the assassination and is just panicking, the conflict feels underused thematically, leading to a thinner conflict that means less that it could.

    The finale of the film leads to Vos abandoning all that's left of her humanity completely. She can't pull the trigger with the gun in Colin's mouth, but Girder commits an act of shocking violence. It's hard to take, but it does ultimately have a point, exemplified by the moment of Vos looking over her items post-mission and leaving out the mention of being regretful of the death of the butterfly, meaning that she's abandoned her humanity completely to become a better weapon. I think it's safe to assume that she'll have little trouble pulling the trigger on her next mission.

    It's the story of an inhuman monster becoming more inhuman. I can appreciate that, but it's a hard pill to swallow. Mix in the intentionally uncomfortable imagery (Vos fighting Colin while Colin is making love to his fiancée is probably the central example), and this becomes a hard movie to get into. Vos isn't a character to invest in as she starts bad and just gets worse. Her fight with Colin is indistinct because one side of the conflict is underwritten. However, I can appreciate it, after the fact, on a certain intellectual level about Vos's journey. This is a flawed movie that I find interesting to consider. Brandon Cronenberg could grow into an interesting filmmaker.
  • Ok, i don't usually write reviews here, although I am an avid movie fanatic.

    To be frank i wasn't familiar with Brandon Cronenberg and his work up until now, and I must say this is a treat for the fans of his Dad's work.

    The beginning is kind of meh I admit and nothing special but from the mid point towards the end it keeps getting better and better and the main thing is the beautiful atmosphere and cinematography and visuals and practical effects in the style of 80s masterpieces of his famous father.

    This is by far the most interesting movie in this "subgenre" of horror in years and maybe even from the 80s/90s and since David shifted more towards the "mainstream" if that is something you can ever say about David Cronenberg.

    Also the acting is great as is the casting. The colors and the mood of the film are really on point. Shot out to Director of photography.

    To top it all of the "ending theme" or "possessor" as it is credited in the soundtrack by Jim Williams is nothing short of a masterpiece.

    If you loved David Cronenberg's "Videodrome" or "The Scanners" or even "Dead Ringers" you will surely appreciate this one..

    Do not be thrown away by the bad reviews and take a look for yourself!
  • I think this is one of those films you will love or hate.

    It is quite slow moving and you do have to pay attention to get the most from it. Personally, I enjoyed it, and it makes a change from the usual sci-fi 'factory' movies churned out by Hollywood.

    The acting, writing, and production are superb.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Possessor reminds me of an ultra-violent combination of Inception and Looper.

    It's about an assassin who uses body-hoping technology to kill her targets before terminating the body she's co-opted.

    The movie does not do a lot of explaining, we open up with an assassination in a swanky hotel where one of the staff is manipulated to kill a guest before security guards gun her down.

    Then we see the protagonist (I use the word loosely) Taysa Vos, played by Andrea Riseborough, was controlling the body of the killer from a safe distance. Vos works for a secretive company that offers these kind of closed-loop assassinations. Side bar: Taysa Vos sounds like it could be a name from the Star Wars universe, or is it just me?

    The process of changing bodies seems to take away from her sense of self. She takes a test after each job where she recognizes objects from her past and identifies the one that doesn't belong. When she visits her family, she has to practice sounding like herself -- as if she's rehearsing lines.

    What follows is a kaleidoscope of violence and surreal, dreamy imagery filmed in a cold, deliberate style. Lots of indie movies today go for this kind of neon/midnight movie mixed with Kubrick aesthetic, but Possessor pulls it off better than most.

    Vos is supposed to possess the body of Colin Tate (Christopher Abbott) to murder his girlfriend and her CEO father (Sean Bean) before offing himself to tie up the loose end.

    It goes wrong, but not in the way I expected. I'd recommend this to people who enjoy mindbenders along the lines of Primer, Triangle, or Upstream Color and can put up with a bit of seize-in-your-seat gore.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    One of the greatest directors from the 70s forward who put forth the idea of science fiction with body modification and manipulation was David Cronenberg. Imagine being the son of Cronenberg and having to live up to his record of films. It appears that his son Brandon is doing just that and succeeding. His latest film does just that and more, creating a science fiction premise that is frightening and fascinating at the same time.

    POSSESSOR takes place in the near future and opens with a brilliant yet violent segment that shows what the film is all about. A young woman named Holly (Gabrielle Graham) is seen inserting something into the top of her skull and reacting to the probe emotionally. Shortly after she is attending a party as one of the hostesses there when she takes a knife and kills a high profile attorney in one of the most brutal and bloody sequences seen. Afterward she points the gun in her mouth but doesn't pull the trigger. Instead she points it at the police who kill her.

    But it wasn't really Holly who was responsible for the brutal killing. In reality she was being manipulated by Tasya Vos (Andrea Riseborough), a professional killer who works for a company that implants her consciousness into another person using them to pull of the contract. Having done this many times this last hit proved problematic because Holly was resisting Tasya's plan to kill herself. Rather than inform her superiors Tasya keeps this to herself.

    Tasya takes a short time off to visit her husband Michael (Rossif Sutherland) and son Ira who she has separated with. To do so she has to prepare herself, teaching herself how to speak and interact with normal people. It seems the mechanics involved with her profession are taking their toll on her. Unable to connect as much as she'd like, she leaves early and returns for her next job.

    The next assignment is a top priority one. The man being targeted is the owner of a massive corporation, John Parse (Sean Bean). They've been hired by Parse's stepson Reid (Christopher Jacot) to kill both him and his daughter Ava (Tuppence Middleton) so that he can take over the company. Tasya's company wants the hit done as well so they can use the information to blackmail Reid.

    To put her in place Ava's boyfriend Colin Tate (Christopher Abbott) is captured and linked with Tasya. She now controls his body seeing what he sees, manipulating him when called on to do so. In the meantime her body lays in stasis back at the company's facility being monitored. But things don't go as planned. It seems that Colin keeps trying to regain control of his mind as Tasya works to continue manipulating him.

    Simply getting through the day becomes difficult for Colin/Tasya, at one point with him blacking out. Trying to recognize people and not making him seem different in his behavior is a struggle. All of this leads to a dinner held at John Parse' home. The question now becomes whether Tasya can control Colin long enough to pull off her mission or not and if so can she return to her own body?

    I wasn't sure what to expect when I began watching this film. I knew it premiered at Sundance but that doesn't always mean a movie is good. Sometimes those films can be critic darlings but audience dead weight. Fortunately that wasn't the case here. While the progress of the film is steady the pacing is a bit slower than most. It doesn't hurt the storytelling going on here but some people might not be willing to go along for the ride without that breakneck speed they're used to. That would be their loss.

    The story is compelling on various levels. There is Tasya who you want to understand and figure out why she does what she does. There is Colin who is fighting for his life here inside of his own skull. There is Girder (Jennifer Jason Leigh), Tasya's controller who has concerns for Tasya. There is Ava who seems the most innocent of the entire group. And there is John Parse, a jerk who at points seems worth killing. All of these characters combine to make an interesting story. And the acting on the parts of all involved make them come to life, becoming believable.

    I'd love to say I love the film but in all honesty I really just enjoyed it but found it not a movie I'm likely to revisit. It is worth one viewing at least and will keep you guessing. The version being released is unrated due to a combination of gore and nudity so keep that in mind. Not one for the kids. On the whole you might enjoy this one if you're a fan of sci-fi.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    The same thing always happens. A movie gets hyped, I buy in and get excited, then watch it and am mildly interested in it and wonder what all the fervor was all about. It happened all over again with Possessor (or Possessor Uncut), which is not the alternate title to Horror Express (©Bill Van Ryn for that joke) and it's not one of the movies within a movie within Popcorn.

    The film starts interesting enough, as we watch a woman (Gabrielle Graham) insert a needle inside her head and attach it to a machine. She then goes to work at a party where she repeatedly stabs a man, then nearly turns a gun on herself before the police shot her. It turns out that she's controlled by a possessor named Tasya Vos (Andrea Riseborough), which means that she can directly implant her mind into someone else and use them to kill people.

    As her boss (Jennifer Jason Leigh, always a welcome actress) talks her through the end of the assignment, Tasya must identify objects from her past to prove that she is still herself. That's another lie, as she can barely speak like a normal human being when she meets her ex-husband (Rossif Sutherland) and son.

    But there's no time to consider that. There's another job, as they have been hired to kill the owner of a data mining company, which excites everyone because they'll be able to control the company by blackmailing the man who hired them. They use the owner's daughter Ava's boyfriend Colin (Christopher Abbott) for the hit, but for the first time, the company doesn't have all of the answers. And even after he completes half the job, killing his girlfriend - yet only wounding her father - he takes back over and causes Tasya to vomit blood.

    Can Tasya complete her assignment and get her mark to kill himself so she can be released? Or is this her final possession? And how does her son get involved?

    The main reason most have discussed this film is because it was written and directed by Brandon Cronenberg, the son of, well, you know. This definitely has style, the colors and camera angles are gorgeous but there's an icy edge that ill serves the movie to me. It's as if we are as much on the outside looking in as the titular possessor. I wanted to feel more, to get really excited about it and to find a new favorite, but it was just good.

    And I learned, yet again, that hype can really sell a movie, but once it's playing in front of your eyes, it's your call whether or not you really enjoy it. But hey - your experience may vary and you might completely adore this. Also, knowing me, once Brandon Cronenberg's second movie is hated by everyone else - see this same story played out in Under the Silver Lake and Southland Tales - I'll fall in love with one of his movies.

    That said - it has a psychic possession threeway, so there's that. And oh yeah - of course he points to Argento as an influence, which makes sense, as this film is awash in dream imagery and primary colors. There's also female as male as female - or whatever the possessor is - full frontal nudity, if you're looking to get your mind blown.

    There are some great ideas and images here, so I'll definitely keep an eye on what comes next.
  • Similar in ways to existenz and videodrome themes. Really been missing David Cronenberg as he hasnt made many movies recently, so glad to see his sons taken over. His films are getting much better, this one being my favourite by miles so far. Excellent use of London set, nice camera work and its a real gorefest. It doesnt hold back in that respect, and some of the visual dream sequences were 1st class. Its not a perfect film by any means but has a number of strengths that horror film fans will appreciate.
  • The son of David Cronenberg wants to to a movie like Existenz, but he ultimately fails to do so. The acting is good, but the plot is really drawn out and says almost nothing in the end. Also, as many others noted, there is some gratuitous gore and violence put in which doesn't really advance the story in any way, and that extends to some other things as well.

    The entire thing revolves around people that "jockey" other people in order to do very mundane things like assassinations. The very idea is lacking imagination, considering that the premise of this film is killing people for other people that want their money and the very obvious alternative is to jockey the people directly and take their money. And then there is an entire exploration of what it means to inhabit other people's lives and minds, but it goes nowhere other than hallucinating some images.

    At least the end was good because the jockey finally got back on track and remembered her work ethic! I am kidding. The end was bad.

    Bottom line: an overly long film that shouts "Cronenberg!!!!" but needed very little of the signature characteristics of a Cronenberg movie to tell this story. I hope Brandon will find his own voice rather than bank on the same ideas his father explored. Or was it really Brandon? Maybe his father was jockeying him!
  • Opens really well and sets the scene well. Then rapidly descends into a poor gorefest that has no actual story. The performances are good but there is no empathy felt for the main character. Visually it's ok but nothing special. Too many buts for me. Meh
  • Didn't like this more than "Infinity Pool" but it's still a strong debut from Brandon Cronenberg. This movie is extremely violent and hypnotic in its representation of it. I haven't seen violence this stylized since Tarantino, and I have to say, I quite like it. Cronenberg is able to mix the styles of his father while creating something completely original with his use of synths and psychedelic colors.

    The acting in this is phenomenal by everyone, and I think the credit has to be given to Cronenberg on how tight this script is. There isn't a single moment where a character blurts out their motivations and thoughts and I liked it more for it. Whoever edited this movie as well knew what they were doing. I guess the only reason it didn't reach the four star mark for me was the ending. It felt abrupt and I didn't like how the story wrapped up the more I thought about it. If you are into psychological messed up and violent movies, this will surely satisfy that craving.
  • With its good performances, excellent visual design, and all the blood and gore you could ask for, Brandon Cronenberg's 'Possessor' is a thrilling, engaging experience that succeeds in getting under your skin.
  • Like father, like son.

    I haven't felt a sense of dread in a film, such as this one, in some time. I knew what I was getting into when I found out it was son of David Cronenberg, but somehow still caught me a bit off guard. The uncut is a sci-fi/horror, beautifully crafted tour-de-force of complexity, graphic violence and gore that will test your will and perhaps bend the mind enough to actually get, not only the premise, but at the end of the final act, you feel somewhat rattled and an odd sense of the films relevance, not unlike his fathers filmography.

    Niche genre, much aligned with Alex Garland in concept, and his fathers stylistic vision and fingerprints are on it, but this is Brandon's baby, and what a baby he has conceived.
  • Immensely disturbing, shocking and provocative; "Possessor" takes you on a wild ride while playing with your mind.

    In this science-fiction horror film, an agent working for a secretive organization uses brain-implant technology to inhabit other people's bodies, driving them to commit assassinations for high-paying clients.

    It goes without saying that Cronenberg is heavily influenced by the earlier films his father made but I also couldn't help but think of John Frankenheimer's "Seconds"while watching this. You can see where Cronenberg wants to play with sci-fi, horror and even reality. It's a daring vision and one you won't soon forget (if you have the stomach for it). Christopher Abbott is haunting in the lead role and Andrea Riseborough delivers a solidly chilling performance. It's a scary-ass film and I'm telling you there are visuals in "Possessor" that will haunt you for days, but I recommend you see it.

    Follow @snobmedia for all reviews!
  • Great acting . excellent concept. good plot twists. very enjoyable psycho scifi thriller. a real mimd twister
  • It is almost as if, with the advent of streaming media, the critics are desperate for an actual feature to gush over. They picked the wrong movie. There are clever bits here and there, but the directors endless love affair with the tropes of low-budget film making, static scenes, dim lighting -- all these will ultimately disappoint. And the gushers would do well to remember that the director's father may have started with low-budget productions but eventually graduated to blockbusters like A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE. We can only hope. ((Designated "IMDb Top Reviewer." Please check out my list "167+ Nearly-Perfect Movies (with the occasional Anime or TV miniseries) you can/should see again and again (1932 to the present))
  • The incipit is really good: an agency that perform contract killings, use a very innovative technology that implants a device on the brain of a designated target that allows to the killer to remotely wire. Therefore the person is replaced, his free will is canceled and the killer is then able to complete the assignment, without being directly involved. The concept is really good, but the movie has a lot of issues.

    The movie has an ethereal kind of narration, which is a good choice, considering the main theme, but the pace is too slow. The director, which is also the main screenwriter, wanted to experiment, by creating strange effects and applying weird sound design and music, which I personally appreciated, but the story is not going on. There are a lot of stuff that are not explained: we never know what this agency is, why it exists, is it some kind of secret government project? Who are these agents? Why they are doing what they are doing? Do they receive a special training? Because none of this is clarified, I did not care about the context nor characters, I could not bound with them. The main character, Tasya Vos, played by Andrea Riseborough, has clearly some personal issue with the ex fiancée, or maybe husband, I don't get to know, but why her relationship is broken? What happened? Is it because of her job? You see how many questions I am writing in this review? There tons of plot holes.

    After an interesting and involving intro, the screenplay starts to crumble. I have understood that the director wanted to keep a mistery-vibe, but you cannot keep your audience completely blind for the entire movie. There was a lot of potential, but it was wasted, because the director decided to play too much with visual effects, instead on focusing more on the story.
  • arielbourbona25 April 2020
    I love this slow burn of a movie! The effects are awesome and very 80s like! It's such an interesting idea!
  • It is weird, gory and yet very boring. I just don't understand what is going on.
  • Cronenberg Jr. had the right idea, and his visuals were stunning - albeit the gore borderline overboard-cheesy, but his writing was riddled with plot and technical issues, and the ending was disappointing, forgettable and not worth the runtime's wait. There were also far too many convoluted scenes as well as many long, unnecessary and dragged out ones. The acting, cinematography and score were decent. The pacing was horribly slow, that the 103 min runtime felt like 3+ hours. This film needed faster pacing, and to be cut down to about 80 mins, with more clarity in the writing - especially the ending. Maybe dad should've given the screenplay a once-over to avoid such amateur errors. It's a generous 6/10 from me.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I really anticipated this movie but I was let down after watching it. 5 stars for the acting. That's it.

    Everybody hyped it as the next big thing in body horror but Possessor is just a shadow of David Cronenberg's body horror. His son did a bad job here. A few bloody murders here and there but FAR from body horror. I'm not gonna mention other movies in this review but there are MANY far better modern indie body horror movies out there if you're really looking for them.

    Who was the evil step son? We don't even see him in the movie except that image of him.

    Why did they try to pull Tasya out even though she didn't even kill the CEO?

    Why did Colin/Tasya visit the injured CEO afterwards in that quick scene?

    Why does Tasya hate her family to the point of telling Colin to kill them when at the beginning we see her loving them and wanting to spend more time with them? She loses her guilt at the end but why? Does she want to be the best possessor? If so, why? What happened to her early in her life that later she so passionately wants to be the best possessor/assassin? Child trauma? We'll never know.

    Many plot holes, very little body horror.

    Sad to say it, but I actually don't recommend Possessor.
An error has occured. Please try again.