Add a Review

  • Nothing more than critics trying to show solidarity for Hollywood. The bad reviews are backlash against Gibson and Safinia for false rumors about their conduct on set. Icon productions and Voltage failed to complete the script which left huge plot holes. That was Gibson and Safinia's gripe and lawsuit. They wanted the movie COMPLETED not FINISHED.

    It's a great film, great story (fill the gaps by reading the book synopsis) , great acting. Just enjoy it ! This was a passion project for Gibson, Penn, and Safinia and they were screwed by the production companies.

    This is why I almost never look at critic reviews. I've seen countless movies that they drool over that I think are trash, and have seen plenty that I find entertaining that they rate collectively below 30%
  • It seems to me that there is some critique-conspiracy going on around this movie. I just found out there were some legal issues surrounding this movie,but I still don't get all those bad reviews about the movie itself. Normally,I wouldn't even look those up,but they are just popping up whenever I want to google something about the plot or the true story behind it. Anyways,the movie was really enjoyable. The acting was great in my opinion,the story was interesting and captivating. It was shot beautifully. It is not perfect tho,not all parts could hold my attention,but it's a film I would recommend to my friends.
  • I wanted to see this movie as soon as I heard about it. Yeah, I know, Im a bit of a word nerd. To find out that Penn and Gibson were going to star in it absolutely fascinated me. It does not disappoint. It is 2 hours long and yes, it is a bit slow, but this kind of movie can't be done in any other way and it is a story, I thought, had to be told. Penn is dynamite!! I love his acting style, where you can see his character's feelings from head to toe. He simply drew me in in every scene to the point where scenes without him in it paled in comparison. Im not much of a Mel Gibson fan, but enjoyed his performance. I thought he and Penn had great chemistry.
  • I could write much on the accolades this film deserves but will stick to the basics of why this film is great.

    Acting across the board is spectacular. Penn and Gibson are in top form and have great chemistry. Coogan and Marsan are also in top form as usual. Ehle and Dormer do a terrific job in bringing that soft feminine touch much needed to balance out the relationships between the main characters.

    The film has its emotional ups and downs while staying on point to tell the amazing story of how the most important English dictionary came to be. It is a testament to the difficulty and perseverance needed to accomplish such a Herculean task in defining the vast English language and the trials and tribulations endured to realize its completion.

    The beauty of this film is in the storytelling of the relationship between the two main characters. The Scottich wordsmith and an American surgeon who suffers from mental illness.

    In order to not divulge more about the narrative I will just end by stating this is a powerful film that will leave you feeling many emotions. A triumphant accomplishment! Time well spent.
  • I mean going in, how interesting could a movie about making a dictionary be? was blown away by the acting from Gibson, Penn, and the other characters. A great story all around.
  • First of all, I didn't ever think Sean Penn could out perform his role in Mystic River for which he won the oscar for and is one of my favorite movies. But he took his role in this film to a different level and couldn't have been done any better by anyone else. Mel Gibson's role was just as powerful and I don't think anyone could have done it better than him and goes to prove that Mel can still play a leading role and still be considered at the top of the list to make a memorable movie. Sean Penn will definitely be a contender to win another oscar and in my opinion, he should win it again because I highly doubt he'll be surpassed this year by another actor. This year's oscar belongs to him hands down. The Professor and the Madman is a remarkable story of history that deserves to be told and rewarded.
  • If I am to fashion a book, I'll need a spine.

    Sometimes you are awed by cinema films because of the immensely beautiful special effects and the use of unparalleled images. The other time it's the inventiveness of a story and the way it's structured. And in other films, you look with admiration at the way certain actors play their role. Is it obligatory that a movie looks phenomenal to you? Or does it happen sometimes that while reading a novel, in which the sophisticated juggling with words creates literary excitement, you have difficulties to keep your eyes open and your head nods back after a short period after which a little snoring is heard? Well, in that case, it might be better for you to ignore this film. Because in "The Professor and the Madman" there are no breathtaking special effects to be found and the emphasis is on the literature from this world. For me, this was a masterful and fascinating story about how the world-famous "Oxford Dictionary" was put together.

    Even though this takes place around 1850, there are certain facts that can be found in our contemporary society. And, of course, there are also substantial differences. The film is not just about the realization of an almost impossible assignment with limited resources. It's also about the existence of class differences, scientific ignorance and the application of inhumane practices in psychiatric institutions. It demonstrates the pretentious behavior of the wealthy class and the political juggling in intellectual circles. And in between these topics, there's the Scotsman James Murray (Mel Gibson) who, with the help of countless strips of paper, miles of knitting yarn and with a ton of patience, tries to contain and interpret every existing English word in literary history. An assignment that requires immense efforts to the detriment of his wife and children.

    I'm aware that literature (at least for me) isn't exactly a sexy subject. I already assumed that this film wouldn't be intense or exciting. But just like with "Kill your Darlings", this historical drama fascinated me. And this because of the challenge Murray took on. I looked in disbelief at the method that was applied. And I was constantly wondering if this was achievable. It's an era where people didn't know the word digital yet (one word they don't need to concentrate on) and they didn't have computers at their disposal. No indexed work file with linked cross-reference tables on which one could release SQL statements, to do big data analyses. No, everything was scribbled down with old-fashioned ink pens on sheets of paper and then attached to the walls. Can it be more primitive? It's wonderful to see that James Murray actually applies the principle of content management here by encouraging the English people to write down English words and send them to them by mail (indeed no e-mail).

    It's mainly the brilliant acting of the gentlemen Mel Gibson and Sean Penn that makes the film more interesting. Gibson plays the Scottish academic and autodidact who, despite the opposition of the established values from the Oxford Board of Directors, is appointed as the driving force behind this renowned work and is a model of perseverance. My favorite scene is where he's introduced to these intellectual snobs who don't even bother to hide their aversion. The moment Murray lists all the languages he knows and I saw those bewildered faces of the narcissistic academics, it immediately reminded me of the scene in a student bar with Matt Damon in "Good Will Hunting". There, too, such a rich man's son with a snobbish attitude was put in his place in a brilliant way.

    Mel Gibson's sparring partner is William Chester Minor (Sean Penn), an American army-doctor and war veteran who is haunted by delusions. In a phase of extreme madness and schizophrenia, he kills an innocent passer-by and ends up in the Broadmoor Criminal Lunatic Asylum. In short, an institution for criminal madmen. The doctor on duty there, Dr. Richard Brayn (Stephen Dillane), initially envisages a decent treatment (which leads to certain privileges such as a large room with a gigantic library). But towards the end, he eventually seems to be a supporter of terrible techniques anyway. It's thanks to a book that Minor received from his victim's widow (In my eyes, the weakest aspect in this film) that he finds out that Murray asked the English people for help. And that's the impetus for Minor to get to work and to overload Murray with thousands of words for the dictionary. The way Penn plays this tormented and insane man is simply formidable. And yes, this tends to look like overacting. But isn't it necessary to portray this type of individual? Minor is after all nuts.

    There are several facets that are beautifully worked out. Such as the detailed decor in which the story takes place. London during the 19th century with its typical costumes, way people behave and attributes. But above all, the interaction between the two extremely brilliant gentlemen is perfectly portrayed. Two tortured intellectuals. The one because of the obstructions and impossibility of the assignment. The other because of the inner demons that make his life unbearable. An individual suffering from a post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). An unknown condition in those days. The dialogues in which the two gentlemen show their love for English vocabulary is sublime to watch. The way in which they both perk up while saying one word after the other with a smile is a feast for the eyes. Perhaps the corny storyline about the widow Eliza Merrett (Natalie "Game of Thrones" Dormer) didn't really fit in with the whole and the emphatic message about regret and forgiveness was a bit over-the-top. But despite those shortcomings, I found this historic film based on true facts fascinating enough. So if you have questions about the origin of dictionaries, you shouldn't miss this film. At the same time, you also have an idea about academic intellectualism (and their self-righteous and arrogant attitude) and the horror of 19th-century psychiatry. But what I wondered the most: are Gibson's and Penn's beard the result of natural beard growth or props?

    More reviews here: movie-freak.be
  • Interesting true story well played by competent actors. Written without insertion of political, sexual or cultural bias for a refreshing change.
  • npjy8320 April 2019
    I was dubious about watching a movie about how the dictionary was created, and put it aside for several days. When I came to watch it, it was a gripping tale of two men with two backgrounds who came together and helped write the dictionary. The story did drag on quite a bit, however it was very intriguing and interesting to watch. Excellent acting once again by Sean Penn, who creates a believable character. As a Scotsman myself, I can spot a fake Scottish accent, sorry Mel. However Mel Gibson's acting was top notch as well, both Mel Gibson and Sean Penn both masters at acting, complimented each other throughout.

    If you want to watch a historic movie, that fills in some spare time, then I recommend this one.
  • I wasn't thrilled about a biographical film story regarding a dictionary, but this one impressed me! Who would've though to know the history behind a dictionary?

    Farhad Safinia makes his first full length feature film debut as writer and director, and nailed it. Produced by and also starring Mel Gibson - who was also great in his role, this film was directed exceptionally well, and the writing was good. I felt the screenplay was all over the place in a few areas, and the 124 min length a little too long for the story being told. I'm not a fan of slow paced films, but this one was just right. Casting was great, including Game of Thrones' Natalie Dormer, but wow did Sean Penn give an Oscar-worthy performance in his role as Dr. Minor. Glad to see him back on the big screen. The score was perfect and the sets/costumes on point for the era.

    This is by no means an action packed Hollywood blockbuster, but instead a historical biopic produced extremely well, and a must-see.

    A well deserved 9/10 from me.
  • cbarcinap25 April 2019
    Despite an auspicious beginning and an interesting and promising development on the characters involved on the dictionary project at the end of the nineteenth century, which seems to be the central theme, the plot meanders tediously through the narratives of (implausible) love, religious redemption and the vagaries of mental illness and academic institutions without the viewer not knowing too well where it is all going. Tedious: too long, slow, or dull; tiresome or monotonous. Favourite synonyms: dreary, soporific, plodding, lacklustre.
  • When politics and social messaging run rampant in today's movies, it's hard to find a good story (even better when true) with a script and actors who sign on to simply do the job at hand - making a quality film worthy of anyone's time. It doesn't matter who you are or what your views are to be completely engrossed and enlightened by this one. It has friendship, courage, kindness and sadness at its heart. It's also further proof that reality is stranger than fiction. Not over-acted or overly anything. Ignore the critics again on this one and enjoy a little known story you won't forget.
  • I very well paced story with a good score to keep it moving along. Strong performances by all involved. Quite informative about how the origins of the dictionary worked and word research. All in all, a good watch.
  • I cannot be bothered to say much more than that. Please do everyone a favor and read this incredible book. Winchester laboriously researched and masterfully penned a fabulous dual biography, and this Hollywood rendition diminishes its wonder.
  • My wife and I watched this at home on DVD from our public library. All the actors are very good in their roles, and especially Sean Penn as the "madman." My only gripe is his mumbling which required us to turn on the subtitles to be sure we knew what he was saying.

    This movie is very historically accurate, as the movie opens in 1872 London we see Sean Penn as American Civil War veteran Dr. William Chester Minor, chasing down and shooting a man he thought was out to get him. At his trial he was declared innocent by reason of insanity then spent the next 38 years in an English mental institution.

    At that same time Mel Gibson as James Murray had been put in charge of assembling the comprehensive Oxford Dictionary of the English language, a monumental task that eventually took several decades to complete, carrying on after Murray died. It turned out Minor had experience and skills that helped greatly and eventually the two became friends even though Minor remained institutionalized. He eventually returned to the USA and was diagnosed with schizophrenia.

    This is an important chapter in human history, the writing of the comprehensive dictionary, and it was nice to learn what all went into it with some good points about human nature and the ability to forgive.
  • This incredible story has made its way to cinema and onwards to our hearts .. Amazing actors bringing a true story to life by great acting and Humble production. .. The story and the script are truly touching .. it lacks suspense and drama .. but I guess it was meant to be this way , Some of those actors we have truly missed over the past few years such as the great Mel Gibson and the wonderful Sean.
  • anjoma5 April 2020
    I haven't seen a movie this good for around 10 years. Truly unbelievable performances from Penn and Gibson. I was balling my eyes out from half way though. Thank god there are still film makers out there who understand the art form.
  • MovieJunkieMonkey27 September 2022
    Warning: Spoilers
    This isn't a movie I would typically go for, but I am so glad I decided to give it a watch. It is based on a true story and a portrayal of all the hard work and backstory of the Oxford English Dictionary. Sounds boring right? You would be forgiven if you were put off reading a brief description of this movie. It just proves we sometimes we need to leave our comfort zone and take a leap into the unknown, in terms of what we think we normally like. I suppose that goes for life as well.

    Regards to the history of the Oxford English Dictionary. I certainly had no idea of all the problems, hard work and dedication it took. The scale of the task was enormous and the length of time it took to complete was never ending. This is due to the continuous evolution of the English language that still goes in to this day and beyond with all the new words, slang and trending sayings etc. It is beautiful in a way how complex language actually is and how adaptable we are as a species. It definitely gave me awareness to the story that I would probably never have if this wasn't made into film, and there's the beauty in it. Film making is such an art, and the world would be a sad place without it.

    It gives well overdue credit and appreciation for all the scholars involved and coveys the total dedication they had for their jobs. This especially applies to James Murray, who was a highly intelligent, self-taught man. However, the main man is the mad man himself, Dr. William Chester. More than anyone else, he almost single-handedly made this project a success whilst it was on the cusp of failing. These two men found a connection to each other through a common goal. There is also an emotional aspect to this story as it portrays all the struggles of the mad man, his victim and a powerful statement of forgiveness and human connection.

    Mel Gibson was brilliant as always, however the star of the show here was Sean Penn, who played the mad man extremely well. Phenomenal performance. I love being pleasantly surprised with a movie like this, especially when it is fact-based. I am so glad I watched it, and although it isn't one I would watch repetitively, it certainly merits another watch in the future.
  • This film is for real cinema lovers, who dont need special effects and flashing images to get excited. I had no expectations when I sat down to view this amazing piece of work. The acting was superb, period costumes on point, casting down to the children, the broadmoor guards all wonderful. Sean Penn deserves an oscar for this extraordinary performance.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    SPOILERS ...one of the two films directed by iranian Farhad Safinia. Sean Penn and Mel Gibson. James Murray (Gibson) is compiling a collection of every word used in the english language, and receives numerous entries from Dr. Minor. Minor (Penn) happens to be a patient in the asylum for the insane. according to wikipedia dot org, there was quite the legal battle involving GIbson, Safinia, and the production company; due to being denied permission to film in Oxford, Gibson claimed he was not allowed to complete the film; he lost the case, and was forced to complete filming in alternate locations. also acc to wikipedia, the actual doctor minor mutilated himself horribly, and was diagnosed as schizophrenic. the film itself is quite graphic and violent, and not for the children! British author and comic Steve Coogan is Frederick Furnivall. interesting intersection of people coming together from different walks of life. pretty graphic though.
  • Of those movies that teach you to value life. Let's see what you did wrong and a way to amend your path. The importance of forgiveness and love, between reason and madness. I think it's one of the best movies of recent years and with a brutally magnificent Sean Penn, perhaps with his most legendary performance, and that's hard to say with a resume like his. In short, a very well directed film, with emotionally descriptive scenes and with a cast of the first order. Do not go looking for shots, bursts of simultaneous action and rampant sex. You will not find them. I recommend this movie for people who see beyond the basics. For a moment I am grateful that I did not pay attention to Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes.
  • "The Professor and the Madman" is a Biography - Drama movie in which we watch the story of the first edition of the Oxford English Dictionary. It started in the mid 19th century from Professor James Murray who received help (10,000 entries) from Dr. William Minor who was a patient at Broadmoor Criminal Lunatic Asylum.

    I liked this movie because it had a very interesting story which is based in true events. The interpretations of both Sean Penn who played as Dr. William Chester Minor and Mel Gibson who played as Professor James Murray were exceptional. I also have to say that the interpretations of Jennifer Ehle's who played as Ada Murray and Natalie Dormer's who played as Eliza Merrett were equally good. Regarding the direction which was made by Farhad Safinia, I believe that he did a good job on it and he presented very well the stereotypes of that time, the difficulties of life on that time and how high society was influencing people and their opinion. I recommend everyone to watch this movie because except of the nice way of presenting those time in England, it's a good way of learning how the first Oxford English dictionary was created and of course the story behind it.
  • Walked into the film with no expectations or knowledge of what it was about, except that it starred Gibson and Penn.

    Walked out of the film blown away. The script, cast (each and every one of them), the story... all beautifully portrayed.

    Though-provoking, heart-wrenching and inspiring.
  • By all accounts, the film's production was a complete mess. Missing scenes, unfulfilled obligations and lack of promised finance all led towards a lawsuit and a distinctly splintered release. It was so bad, apparently, that Gibson actively discourages his fans from watching the thing, and the director - who may or may not have been replaced during filming - is credited only as 'P.B. Shemran'. Thankfully, aside from having a couple of out-of-place 'GoPro' shots, 'The Professor And The Madman (2019)' doesn't seem to be affected by its tumultuous creation. It tells the tale of the man who spearheaded the first edition of the Oxford English dictionary, while also chronicling his friendship with a Schizophrenic doctor residing in Broadmoor Hospital. It's an entertaining enough period piece with an interesting setting, even if it isn't exactly enthralling or, even, all that memorable. The performances are good and the script is steady. Ultimately, it's a generally solid experience. It doesn't have all that much impact, though. In fact, it sort of goes in one ear and out the other. That's not necessarily bad, mind you. The piece passes the time admirably and it is, perhaps surprisingly, generally well-made. If you think you'll like it, you probably will. 6/10
  • I have only viewed half of the movie, and I think it would have been pretty good, at least watchable if 1. I could see it properly and 2. I could hear the dialogue properly. I really cannot understand why some movies are filmed in such dark conditions. I get that here it creates the 19th Century atmosphere where electric light was not yet used in households and everyone worked by candlelight. But do the indoor scenes, especially, have to be so dim? And the men have long moustaches that make lipreading difficult. It also could have done with subtitles. One watches a movie partly for a visual feast. This was not that.
An error has occured. Please try again.