Eye for an Eye

Plot, location, and music are all cheap.. I really regret that I watched

Inconsistent sound. Poor acting. Poor special effects. Poor poor poor. Don't waste your time.

I sure have watched a lot of low budget movies in my time. But i didnt know there was a low low low budget movie category. But now i found it. I couldnt watch further than the first "action" segment as it had so bad effects that i was sure there had to be something wrong with my new tv....

Stay for god sake away from this move. Its time you never will get back.

Ok, clearly low budget,non studio but found this to be a fun , entertaining easy watch.

Sadly this film could have been many hundreds of times better if the sound department (Madison Erdmann and Frank Ralph) had done even one-hundredth of their jobs. Half the sound, including key dialogue, seems to have been recorded on a pre-2005 mobile phone in a concrete conduit alley. The rest seems to have been recorded somewhere the scene was not set; but it doesn't seem to have been looped-in, just really BAD.

By the last sequence the actors are just running around in an eastern-California field as though the plot expired 15 minutes ago (because it did; the denouement sequence is about 5-10 minutes too long).

It's all a shame because the story itself had some merit.