Add a Review

  • Warning: Spoilers
    Ever hear the behind-the-scenes stories of the Suicide Squad set, where a seemingly deluded Jared Leto would send his fellow cast-mates pig corpses, used condoms, and other such disgusting 'gifts?' Well, Will Smith, Margot Robbie, and the rest have Jim Carrey to thank for inspiring their daily discomfort. Carrey's petulance and mistreatment of his co-stars on the set of Man on the Moon showed his own belligerent attempts to get under the skin of the 'is-he-being-sh*tty-or-is-it-a-gag-is-it-even-funny-either-way' ethos that game-changing comedian Andy Kaufman would come to be known for. Or, was the exclusive, unearthed set footage of Carrey (reportedly buried by the studio so their star "wouldn't look like an asshole") its own meta extension of the performance for our benefit? That is the question that Netflix's Jim and Andy: The Great Beyond teasingly unspools - amidst the laughs, secondhand embarrassment cringes, shots of Carrey looking philosophical and wise with his 'serious artist beard,' and enough Danny DeVito incredulous eye rolls to the camera to fill an entire season of The Office.

    The title's tiering is crucial, as The Great Beyond is very much a documentary about Jim trying to make sense of Andy - as a iconic performer, as a comedy paradigm shift, and of his own role in comedy in Kaufman's wake. As a character study of Carrey, it's superbly revelatory, opening the door (probably more than intended) to Carrey's loneliness, and constant yearning for connection at all costs, from childhood class clown to boisterously over-the-top movie star to present day recluse painter and armchair philosopher. His stories of writing himself an anticipatory million dollar cheque as a starving actor or willing the universe to provide him with a bicycle as a poor child growing up in Newmarket, Ontario, are strangely poetic in their melancholy - even more so, somehow, when his steadfast convictions turn out to actually come true, which he treats as a bizarre form of divine providence.

    There's a sordid irony in that Kaufman's early career got mired in his 'impersonations' schtick, only for Carrey to deep dive into an impersonation of him, and director Chris Smith is careful not to oversell the juxtaposition, but rather let it speak for itself. He provides just enough (reliably hilarious) archival footage of Kaufman to contextualize the comedian and his cultural impact for unfamiliar audiences, before shifting the spotlight to Carrey. Assessed bluntly, Man on the Moon is, at best, a pleasantly rote vehicle for Carrey's unbelievably on-point embodiment of Kaufman (as even director Milos Forman himself seems to concede in behind-the-scenes footage here). Here, Smith provides a further wrinkle to the film being the unabashed 'Jim Carrey show,' as Carrey's belligerent refusal to break character seems altogether too large for the otherwise seemingly quite relaxed, unpretentious set he's part of.

    Kaufman's gags, no matter how ludicrous or purposefully offensive, were always anchored in clear social commentary - poking fun at expectations, or mocking the pompous performativity of wrestling, tabloid journalism, or celebrity culture as a whole. Carrey's on-set antics, refusing to break character, and harassing his co-stars as Kaufman (or, even worse, as Kaufman's obtusely crude alter ego Tony Clifton), are as funny as they are cringeworthy - a prank at Hugh Hefner's Playboy Mansion is particularly inspired. Still, it all plays here with a whiff of desperation - a yearning for the relevance, or rug-yanking mischief of Kaufman. Smith certainly coyly leads the witness by reprising "Imposter," a rap parody from Carrey's In Living Colour days, as a musical leitmotif throughout. Is Carrey's method madness here a p*ss-take on the prima donna movie star, or the real deal? Is the wacky, unsettling climate he conjured worth it in the name of art? Or, Smith teasingly leads us to wonder, does anyone apart from Carrey even particularly care?

    Or, going even deeper down the rabbit hole, is it all an elaborate ruse, tantamount to the hoax fights of Kaufman's misogynist wrestling bit - a meta prank that the entire cast and crew were in on, reenacting their simulated discomfort for our hoodwinked benefit? Certainly, it's fair to be suspicious of director Milos Forman, Danny DeVito, Paul Giamatti, and others conveniently having their befuddled reactions to Carrey perfectly framed in front of a rolling camera. Smith keeps things playfully ambiguous throughout, prodding at the ludicrous presuppositions of documentary 'realism' with Kaufman-esq glee, while still never fully showing his hand as to how many layers the onion skin of gag goes. Still, riddle me this: watch Carrey's contemporary serious, philosophical (and beardy) ruminations on his performance, art, purpose, and the universe (mostly pleasant and occasionally insightful hokum, though his reevaluating his later career through the lens of The Truman Show is really pushing it). If you didn't notice the faintest twinkle in his eye, midway through a solemn soliloquy, the moment he thinks the camera has stopped rolling, I'll eat my DVD copy of The Mask. Sssssssssssssscoundrel!

    Jim and Andy may not provide particularly revelatory answers to the lofty questions it poses regarding the role, purpose, and justified means of art and creation (though its clever riff on the inherent performativity of documentary 'truth' suggests Smith is well aware such questions are rhetorical). Regardless, it's a fun and magnetic watch, thanks to the overflowing and unfathomably peculiar charisma of its eponymous subjects, who, Smith astutely understands, we could watch for hours. And, if Jim and Andy succeeds at anything, it's at ensuring that, in the face of his rubber-faced jubilance, seemingly cavernous loneliness, and in seeking purpose in his desperately on-point mimicry in the face of peer comfort or basic decency, we can't help but understand, and feel connected to Jim Carrey. To which Carrey would indubitably respond: "Theenk you veddy maatch."

    -8/10
  • BandSAboutMovies21 November 2017
    Few things get me more emotional than Andy Kaufman. Even hearing a few words of R.E.M.'s "Man on the Moon" makes my eyes well up. I remember watching his early appearances live on Saturday Night Live and the night he got into a fist fight on Fridays. And while I was alive for his descent into pro wrestling mania and his battle with cancer, I don't remember much of the end. Maybe I didn't want to process it. Maybe that's why I believed — to this day — that Andy is just waiting to pull the curtain back on all of us and come back. And maybe not coming back? Perhaps that's his best trick of all.

    Conversely, I've never liked Jim Carrey. Unlike Andy, who undermined his own popularity and resisted the mainstream while simultaneously making a living from it, he seemed too eager to please. Too happy to take and take from the blockbuster machine, to be in works that didn't challenge him. That's why The Cable Guy surprised me. Here as the buffoon who mugged his way through Dumb and Dumber forcing viewers to contemplate the pain behind the character. He followed that movie with later challenging films like The Truman Show and Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.

    The Jim Carrey that appears here is not the rubber-faced maniac who seemed to cry out, "Watch me! Love me!" This is a graying, faded, bearded, rougher man who has been through no small degree of personal loss and pain. And this is also a man who willingly gave his identity over to not just Andy Kaufman, but to Andy's more frightening side, the villainous Tony Clifton.

    In a recent Newsweek article, Kaufman's sister gives some insight: "I think that Jim Carrey was a vessel," she said. " I do believe he allowed Andy to come through him. I also chose to believe that Andy was coming through him. When he looked at me, I'm not kidding. It was like speaking to Andy from the great beyond. I felt like he was coming through as the evolved, astral Andy."

    I've watched Milos Forman's Man on the Moon numerous times. And I've read plenty of books, digested plenty of articles and watched every appearance Andy did on TV. I look to him in the way that I extend to few performers: he's more of a truth-speaking prophet than just a person. Do I give him too much credit? Do I see things in him, do I project magic that he wasn't able to perform? I think — I fervently believe — that he was something more. A force. Someone who was able to push buttons, upset people and be a real-life wrestling heel while at the same time delivering childlike moments of whimsy and wonder. Just the footage of him inviting everyone to join him for milk and cookies after his Carnegie Hall performance makes me weep openly. It feels too real, too loving, too honest and much too true.

    Read more at http://bit.ly/2jefCzo
  • aciessi19 November 2017
    Jim Carrey was one of my favorite actors as a child. Andy Kaufman fascinated me as a young man. Yet, this incredible new documentary tries to convey that Jim and Andy are two sides of the same coin. Two human beings that learned how to be free through their art. It is all about the making of Man on the Moon, one of the most underrated biopics of all time and in my mind, the crowning achievement of Jim Carrey's career. Carrey didn't simply impersonate Andy Kaufman. Andy Kaufman possessed Jim Carrey. Through never before behind the scenes footage, we see Carrey slowly disappear into Kaufman and whether it was intentional method acting or not is unknown. Carrey came into the project as the hottest comedy star in the world and came out something completely different.

    ... and What of Andy Kaufman? Many say he's dead and many say he's still alive somewhere, playing a big gag that we just don't know about. Andy was mysterious like that. But his spirit exists, somewhere in our universe. Anyone with the bravery to be different from everyone else, in essence is an Andy.
  • After seeing Jim Carrey out of the spotlight for a while, but then recently back in the news with what could be described as "odd" behavior, I was curious as to what this movie would deliver. I was not disappointed. I have always been an admirer of Carrey's work, beginning with my introduction to his comedy on the sketch comedy show In Living Color. This movie/behind the scenes look at Carrey's acting focuses on how Jim essentially "became" Andy Kauffman for his role in Man on the Moon. This is a documentary not only about taking on the mindset and mannerisms of another person, but so much more. It helps explain who Jim Carrey has become... and it is brilliant. Most audiences are used to seeing Jim Carrey being over-the-top, but in this doc Jim shares with the viewer a very intimate piece of himself, which could shed light on most viewers perception of reality. I certainly look at life a little differently now after viewing this. I also have a better understanding of who Jim Carrey is as well. Jim becoming Andy changes how he views life, and as he profoundly says "the choices make you." This documentary was the best and realest thing I have seen in years.
  • For his role in "Man on the Moon," Jim Carrey took on the character of Andy Kaufman so fully that, as he relates here, he found himself reacting off the set as Andy would have reacted rather than as Jim would react.

    Along with his known talents, Carrey shows himself in this doc to be a very articulate speaker, even when describing--as he does here a lot--his internal states. If actors need empathy, Carrey here puts that empathy into words--words we can understand and feel.

    If you're not familiar with Kaufman, there's a great variety of footage from Kaufman's performances.

    It's hard to compare this to any other doc I've seen. Its approach to the subject is as unique as the subject itself. If you want to understand and appreciate a side of Jim Carrey you may never have seen before, or what actors go through when throwing themselves into roles, this film is for you.
  • The agreed common consensus on Jim Carrey's portrayal of American comedy legend Andy Kaufman in 1999's well-liked Man on the Moon is that the king of the 90's comedy scene Carrey knocked his performance out of the park.

    A frighteningly accurate embodiment of Kaufman, Carrey morphed into the mindset and characteristics of the man that inspired his journey into comedy but until now we never truly understood the depths that Carrey went too to become Kaufman while Man on the Moon was being made.

    Jim and Andy: The Great Beyond – Featuring a Very Special, Contractually Obligated Mention of Tony Clifton is a Netflix released Spike Jonze backed documentary that draws Carrey out of what seems like some type of long standing hiatus to talk about his experiences making Man on the Moon, whilst unearthing previously unseen behind the scenes footage of Milos Forman's production in which Carrey refused to be recognised as himself, rather going to the most extreme pinnacle's of method acting and living his days out as if he were in fact Kaufman returned to life.

    It's an incredibly bizarre sight seeing Carrey roam the film studio lot, film scenes and interact with his fellow cast members all under the guise of Kaufman, while fans of washed up Las Vegas crooner Tony Clifton will be in for a treat with the chauvinistic performer getting some decent airplay as Carrey takes charge of the reigns. The looks we get at this insane performance truly make us appreciate just how good of a performance Carrey gave, one that at the time was questionably under-valued.

    Its undoubtedly fascinating footage and a great insight into the lengths some go for their art, particularly when it comes to bringing movies to life but Jim and Andy struggles in tying it all together with the film feeling like at times that its going through the motions, no central driver moving it forward, made all the worse by Carrey's often bizarre explanations or life-musings.

    A complicated public figure, Carrey has quite clearly been through some deep personal issues and while it's refreshing to see such frankness come across from the actor, quite a bit of what his talking about is either cringe worthy or just plain odd, while filmmaker Chris Smith really missed out on his chance to include insights from other figures involved in the film such as Paul Giamatti or other co-stars on the filming of Man on the Moon.

    It would've added a whole different layer to the film getting to hear from more than just Carrey given that there would've been some that loved the whole experience while others would've been ruing the day they took the job.

    Final Say –

    As bonkers as you'd expect, Jim and Andy is both a fascinating look at the movie making process and ones dedication to bringing a real life character to life on screen and a frustrating documentary that gives far too much airtime to Carrey's warped view on all of life's big questions.

    3 paper bags out of 5
  • dougmacdonaldburr19 November 2017
    The film covers Jim a lot more than Andy. It certainly makes an impact. They are both very complicated people and it becomes clear that if anyone was going to play Andy Kaufman it had to be Jim Carrey. He got about as close as anyone ever could.

    In the interview sections Jim comes across charming and occasionally says some very profound and insightful things. The on set footage shows a very different person. He chose to approach the role as a hardcore method actor. Insisting on being called his characters names and never breaking character, even around Andy's family. Some of it is brutal and hard to watch. He is nothing short of an obnoxious, unhinged, tempormental nightmare. Especially when he plays Tony. There are many times when I feel sorry for the crew and his costars. Outside of the craft of acting there is a serious case to be made for Carrey being committed. He seems legitimately insane. That being said so did Andy and maybe Jim had to do that in order to temporarily become him.

    The only fault I can identify with Jim's performance is that there was a sweetness about Andy and his funny antics. There is a dark anger in Jim which occasionally leaks out. Still I think Jim got as close as anyone could to capturing Andy.

    My overall impression is that Andy Kaufman was a strange and beautiful performance artist. Jim Carrey is brilliant and troubled actor. I love watching his movies, but, I probably would not want to work with him.
  • I'd like to start by saying that I find the concept of the movie rather intriguing. Showing the parallelisms between two exceptional comedian who in their own way revolutionized the way we perceive comedy today. Having been a fan of both comedians I was looking forward to this movie. Unfortunately the movie couldn't stand up to my expectations. Firstly, one does barely get to see the transformation of Carrey. The viewer is thrown into the action accompanied by an almost preacher like Jim Carrey who retells his tale which is barely connected to what has happened back then. The movie is merely a documentary without any insight or revelation. Whilst the scenes are well chosen, if one knows the movie, the entire aim of this documentary is not obvious.

    The documentary is rather a piece of art itself than it is a proper movie.
  • First of all, when I saw Chris Smith was directing this documentary, I knew it would be good. American Movie is one of the best documentaries of all time in my opinion. My hats off to Chris Smith. That being said, this is a must see documentary, it's transcendental on all levels or perhaps it's just normal and the way it should be and is on the human level, but we're all living in such a backwards world that we see transcending as related to a spiritual or a non physical realm, but perhaps transcendental is just normal, the way it should be.

    In this documentary one gets to see the process Jim Carrey went through to be Andy Kaufman/Tony Clifton and one also gets to see where Jim Carrey is now, which is a perfect term as he is very much in the now. Jim Carrey is almost an Eckhart Tolle at this point in his life. He just is. One could say that's easy for Carrey as he's got all the money in the world, but the truth is he's seen both sides of the coin i.e. having all the money in the world and being homeless, so he's a good judge of what it is to be happy and at peace in my opinion. Carrey has found his true self and happiness in just being.

    This documentary gives the viewer the perspective of what a remarkable actor Jim Carrey is and also what a thought provoking human being and poet he is too. Jim Carrey says in this documentary 'free of concern.' What a wild and lovely concept. Free of concern. Obviously we all have doubts, concerns and worries i.e. about our loved ones i.e. family, friends, sister, brother, kids, dogs, etc. But past that to be truly free of fear, what a wonderful concept and I believe Carrey is truly free of all of it. How liberating.

    A documentary well worth the watch to see how deep an actor will and can go, and also to see how beautiful a human being Carrey is within all his flaws and imperfections. Please watch this documentary, you will fall in love with your life, with life, with Carrey and the creation of being all over again. A truly moving piece of art. It will make you laugh, it will make you cry, it will make you think.
  • A documentary about Jim Carrey playing Andy Kaufman and Tony Clifton in "Man on the Moon (1999)".

    Jim Carrey stayed in character throughout the production, in and out of filming. This is a combination of both Method Acting taken to the limit and channeling Andy Kaufman who took his jokes way beyond where most people would, as seen in the movie itself.

    The documentary not only shows the production but goes into analyzing Jim Carrey as an actor and as a person. It explores his career from a very early age up to present day and the influence it had by both his father and Andy Kaufman himself. It also shows Jim Carrey's current state of mind which is miles away from where he's been some 20 years ago.

    Recommended
  • Interesting the Grinch did not present the same dilemmas. Here with Hollywood's frightening disconnect. Immoral and indulgent not in a hedonistic but creative way in channeling the collective 'ghost' which I sense we have an almost duty to not do this and respect the illusions of theater.

    The film seems opposite the truth in that it seems he actually found himself through Kaufman, not lost himself, and then attributed nothing because he didn't like what he found. Creatives simply do not realize the sensitivity of the human mind which clashes with the ruthless detachment of the gift. Guess which side wins? Young are especially vulnerable for desiring to prove themselves and seeing no difference between offering a part of themselves with the whole; Carrey being all these things plus 90s prosperity A-list power, ripped a hole so large in his psyche he became a mountain man guru. I don't personally see that as satiric, I think it was the inevitable trajectory polarity from Kaufman and that's the real him is the embodiment of transience. Basically he will copout conclude with anything but Carrey.

    That 90s context at the time seemed so definitive while ultimately it was just a small era inside the expanse, which he is still wrestling to terms with being biggest in the world then, and now being 'After Carrey' and translating its consequences being unintuitive.

    Kaufman here with the mirror on mirror effect, but the mirror is still the single image reflected ad infinitum, meaning it's the same problem in identity and who's playing who over and over, then the artform is the variety in reaction. Such as therapy for Kaufman's dead relatives.

    I believe performers living in this method of voodooism trifle with a gift, forgetting that the benefits in craft are inherent. The theater reflects humanity already and chameleon reflecting chameleon does not reveal but violates.
  • I've watched and rewatched this doc at least 4 times. The last time, I got the distinct feeling Carrey not only trolled everyone who worked on the film, but the audience as well.

    The tone is very reminiscent of Joaquin Phoenix's "I'm Still Here." Why decide after the myriad of films you've starred in to document this one? We knew he was a fan but my feeling is that he pulled off a Kaufman like gag and we are the punchline.

    The premise is that Carrey couldn't break free from his selected role, but had no problem when he was at the Playboy Mansion and Zmuda was playing Tony Clifton. I wouldn't be surprised if Zmuda was in on this the entire time.

    I've read stories about actors getting too close to their characters but this seems like a real stretch. Sasha Baron Cohen would have appreciated this effort but I truly believe that this was an elaborate scheme to troll everyone around him to think he had lost his mind.
  • peterdavies-9633825 January 2019
    Watching this movie, you'd be forgiven for thinking that Jim Carrey had actually met Andy Kaufman. Not because of the way he portrayed Andy - but from the way Jim pats himself on the back for the duration on the move at how 'close' he felt to Andy. You'd think they'd been drinking buddies.

    Andy Kaufman was a game changer in comedy, a true original.On the other hand, Jim Carrey pulls funny faces, makes funny voices and plays in kiddy-comedies.

    Jim is basking in the limelight of a much greater talent. You think Andy would have played "Pet Detective"? Not a chance.

    Andy was the artist. Ultimately Jim is just some guy who pretended to be that artist. I think perhaps Jim may be unaware of the fact that biographical movies represent a complete genre and that he simply did something that many did before and many have done since.

    Where Jim does excel is in being a jerk to people when not filming. We hear all this nonsense about not knowing where Jim ended and Andy began. Well it's simple - Jim was pretending to be Andy - a guy he'd never met. So where Jim ended was Jim and where Andy started was not at all.

    The bottom line is that Jim thinks his performance is up there with the Sistine Chapel.

    Like all actors, Jim gets paid to make-pretend. He's taking himself way too seriously - I suspect because looking back, being a rubbery faced funny voice maker isn't the legacy he'd envisaged.
  • strike-199525 June 2019
    A great document of a man who is suffering. What happens if you aren't content after achieving all your dreams?
  • Andy Kaufman offered a hilarious - and sometimes disturbing - reflection on comedy, celebrity, and being human. Then Jim Carrey became Andy Kaufman...and everything started all over again. This film is so much more than interviews and lost footage. It is a meditation on fame. Even more, it is a meditation on the thin line between make believe and reality. There's something to learn in the space between.
  • Basically, this movie is about jim being an asshole and creating a hostile work environment for everyone else on set. When they are not playing old scenes you are forced to listen to an up to date interview where Jim Carrey Goes on and on about how gifted he is. He seems to believe that he is engaged in the most important work of mankind and that the heavens are deeply concerned with him and his vapid movies. True saints and enlightened beings didn't have such a high opinion of themselves. Unbelievably cringey.
  • Andy is Tony or is he Jim , or is it Jim is Andy or Tony , or is Bob Tony? wonderful overview of the making of Man in the Moon the biopic of Andy Kaufman. Featuring Jim Carey talking though the psychological damage that various characters and the actor profession have done when taking on various roles. Riveting
  • How would I start this review? Where does Jim Carrey start and where does Jim Carrey end? Before watching this film, I had known and was a mild fan of Andy Kaufman and I could really appreciate his proto-absurdist comedy style that would inspire countless comedians of today who would continue to push the boundaries, but Tim & Eric, John C. Reilly as Dr. Steve Brule, Alan Resnick, and just in general the Adult Swim oddballs who came on in the early hours of the morning appealed and captured my interest more. Also before watching this film, I was a huge fan of Jim Carrey for his comedic movies and his more introspective movies, but I had not seen, or had even heard of Man on the Moon. Afterwards, as a good documentary should do, it really changed my perspective on the pair and exposed connections between both of them that had so obviously been lying just beneath the subconscious. Firstly, Andy Kaufman is a much bigger nut job than I had realized, and a quick browse through YouTube comments proves that his performances were still very much ahead of their time decades after the fact as still many people are perplexed. Secondly, I feel a much greater sympathy for Kaufman, particularly in the fact of getting "caught up in his character" as Carrey describes in one of his astounding meditative ramblings. Postmodern philosophical thought of the time believed that no one was actually living their truest self and the roles we played were similar to roles that actors play as society pushes on us "correct" modes of living. I got to thinking that Kaufman portrayed this absurdist belief to an extreme in his character and through that mode, lived how he wanted to, and that strikes upon the big theme of the movie: being yourself. Clichéd, yes, but told in a unique and thought-provoking way. Thirdly, I think Jim Carrey perfectly encapsulated Kaufman's spirit in the shooting for this movie and I have grown to appreciate him even more because of it, and the family and people who knew Kaufman personally seemed to agree. It's a good thing Carrey is not an identity thief because I'd call him the Elmyr de Hory of acting. God, the shot by shot comparisons were uncanny in how similar they were. I loved the thoughts, ideas, and people behind this movie, but I feel the execution was very bland, and quite frankly boring at points, for one of the most eccentric men in the industry. The movie is essentially Carrey rambling on for an hour and a half, and while there are some incredibly touching or thoughtful moments, it feels perhaps a little too windy and by the books. I mentioned Elmyr de Hory earlier because this movie reminded me of F for Fake, Orson Welles' final film, a documentary on the life of the most famous art forager in history. Elmyr seems to me to almost be one in the same with Kaufman's enigmatic character and absurdist tendencies and Welles creates an experimental and enthralling documentary to reflect his life. It includes interviews and musings from Elmyr himself, but Welles takes the themes of the movie and the way he tells them, and the extra scenes and stories he adds in, not only parallel what Elmyr speaks about, but also characterizes his eccentric and wacky lifestyle with eccentric and wacky editing and unconventional storytelling. Chris Smith took this film a little too cut and dry and when recalling a classic like Kaufman, there's no reason to play it safe when you can take a unique approach to the storyboard as well. It's a great story of a legend, retold by a new legend, and the spirit of Kaufman was in Carrey, but it was not in the actual film.
  • This movie is an unique look at the crafting arts of an actor. The details about the transformation of Jim Carrey are something to behold. Of courser, people in the business will enjoy it a lot and in more subtle ways. But everybody can enjoy the expression of humanity here. The camera work is really amazing and it disappears between a very good direction. It really gives a deeper understanding at the fantastic original movie its based on. I think we can agree that it was that movie, and after it many more, that showed us the great actor Jim Carrey is. Of course many of us already knew that when we saw him in The Mask, Dumb and dumber, and Pet Detective.
  • I saw Man on the Moon twice and never actually understood any of the raving reviews back then. It came as a bit of a stretch for Carrey portraying Kaufman, overplayed to horrific extents. The rest of the cast wasn't spot on either and the movie's script was a drag without even close to clear structure. Director fell into his own inability hole. But, boy, watching Jim and Andy doc by Chris Smith made why-it-went-off-hand clear. A great documentary about not so great movie. A portrayal of an actor who crossed one too many lines to get to the Mount Olympus probably thinking this will guarantee what names itself a historic performance. Documentary demystifies it all.
  • I was really looking forward to seeing this, because Man on the Moon is amongst my favourite movies of all time (definitely in my Top 20), and I was intrigued by the fact that, as we recently found out, Carrey "stayed in character" throughout the entire production process. I was curious to see how that all turned out. And even though it was interesting to see all the footage, and I could even relate to some of the things Jim said in his interview bits, but in the end there was no point, no message, nothing that we could learn from all of this (other than the fact that shooting Man on the Moon must have been a painful and exhausting experience for everyone involved). All in all, it was an okay documentary, I was never bored, but I expected something more, to be honest. Even possibly something revelatory, as I always thought there was much more to Jim Carrey than just his amazing on-screen talent. And maybe there still is, but this was not the documentary to reveal that to us.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    On first glance this film seems a little self serving, an interesting but ultimately conceit of hindsight.

    But as the film progresses it messes with your mind, what's real? What's not? Is Jim Carrey really that committed to his performance, is he really the delicate introspective on his way to being lost?

    It's on the whole delightfully chaotic, continuously blurring reality with character and legend. The professional life of Kaufman seems to have been dripping with deliberate misdirection and the manic ability to say the wrong thing at the right time in order to create mischief and crafted mayhem. After all, anarchy is order...

    Carrey is engaging in his interview, drops of real Jim and drips of insight blend into what feels like dead pan method acting, reflecting on the mirror of nearly 20 year old method acting that reflected the managed chaos of Kaufman.

    Or is it all real? It's impossible to tell, the lie is in the truth. Several times art reflects life and Carrey uses lies and truth to very interesting effect. Every time you think you've got a grip of what's real there's a subtle, or not at all subtle, reminder that what you're watching could well be an extension of a very elaborate hoax... Joke... Homage... Dammit it's something.
  • I don't recall any "making of" documentary, could be better than the main movie itself. I so dislike "Man on the Moon", it was dull, not funny, not deep, treated its characters with absolute shallowness. I needed to know "Andy Kaufman", because i have no clue about him, and i never watched "Taxi" the tv show. But, in the movie, it was like sketch gather in its running time. They never explain the human behind the star.

    The Documentary, "Jim & Andy", I learned a lot about both, it is honest piece of art, that elaborate, explain, & enlighten you.

    I'm so glad that i found the documentary in Netflex.
  • Based on the title and premise of this movie, I tuned in hoping to enjoy an in-depth glimpse into two comedic geniuses at their best. What I got was a 1.5+ hour glorification of Jim Carey's ego. Watching Jim 'inhabiting the spirit' of Andy on set, as if he was breaking some new ground as an actor, was painful. Almost as painful was watching the looks in the eyes of his co-stars that practically shouted, "we know what you're trying to do...we get it...now just knock it off and shoot the g.d. movie". Rather than showing the relationship between the two purported stars, this documentary showcases a man who continuously believes his own hype, and insists on his own brilliance and importance to the pantheon of comedy. I love Andy Kaufman, and this documentary is an insult to his memory. Andy was the genius Jim. You may be a comic genius in your own right, I will not argue that here; but just because you can do a reasonable job pretending to be Andy, that does not 'a priori' make you a great comedian; much less a great actor, much less the misunderstood, quirky, eccentric genius you pretend to be.
  • gbill-7487719 January 2021
    As impressive as Jim Carrey's immersion of himself into Andy Kaufman was, the real star of this show to me was his own philosophizing over the stages of his life, and the segments we see of his career. On top of all his other talents, Carrey is one thoughtful, profound guy. It ties in beautifully though - Kaufman, a performer who always seemed be putting on an act and doing weird, absurd things, and Carrey, method acting as the guy who put on act, taking on a pro wrestler who also regularly put on act. It all blurs together, causing us to question the nature of things, e.g. what's real and what's entertainment, maybe showing how Kaufman broke a few barriers in that way. I would have loved to have seen even more of Jim Carrey and less of Tony Clifton, an annoying character who reminded me of a takeoff on Jerry Lewis's Buddy Love, and in any event, not all that pleasant. Still though, this is quite a thought-provoking documentary, and one to check out.

    Quote, Jim Carrey on The Truman Show and real life: "I've stepped through the door, and the door is the realization that this, us, is Seaside. It's the dome, this is the dome. This isn't real. This is a story. There is the avatar you create, and the cadence you come up with, that is pleasing to people, and takes them away from their issues, and it makes you popular, and then at some point you have to peel it away. And, you know, it's not who you are. At some point you have to live, you know, your true man. You know Truman Show really became a prophecy for me. It is constantly reaffirming itself as a teaching almost, as a real representation of what I've gone through in my career, and what everyone goes through when they create themselves, you know, to be popular or successful. And it's not just show business. It's Wall Street, it's anywhere. You go to the office and you put a monkey suit on, and you act a certain way, say a certain thing, and lie through your teeth at times, and you do whatever you need to do to look like a winner, you know. And at some point of your life, you have to go, I don't care what it looks like. You know, I found the hole in the psyche and I'm going through, and I'm going to face the abyss of not knowing whether that's going to be okay with everybody or not, you know. And at times, just like the movie, they try to drown you in the middle of that abyss. They go, 'No, be the other guy. You told us you were this guy. You told us you were Andy. You told us you were Tony Clifton.' You know, no one can live with that forever."
An error has occured. Please try again.