Seven Reasons
- Episode aired Jan 22, 2018
- TV-14
- 43m
Dr. Shaun Murphy suspects his patient is lying about the reason for her injury and makes a controversial assumption about her motives. Meanwhile, Dr. Neil Melendez's personal life could be a... Read allDr. Shaun Murphy suspects his patient is lying about the reason for her injury and makes a controversial assumption about her motives. Meanwhile, Dr. Neil Melendez's personal life could be affecting his work and, ultimately, his patients lives.Dr. Shaun Murphy suspects his patient is lying about the reason for her injury and makes a controversial assumption about her motives. Meanwhile, Dr. Neil Melendez's personal life could be affecting his work and, ultimately, his patients lives.
Featured reviews
This episode stands out for its exploration of moral ambiguity and the difficult choices that doctors must make in the course of their work. Freddie Highmore shines once again as Shaun, portraying his character's relentless pursuit of the truth with a mix of determination and frustration. The direction by Mike Listo is sharp, using tight framing and dim lighting to create a sense of claustrophobia and tension that mirrors the high-stakes nature of the case. The script by Simran Baidwan is thought-provoking, raising important questions about the responsibilities of medical professionals and the potential consequences of their decisions.
One of the most compelling aspects of "Seven Reasons" is the way it delves into Shaun's unique perspective on truth and honesty. His black-and-white view of the world leads him to confront his colleagues and the patient in ways that are both challenging and insightful. This episode highlights Shaun's growth as a character, as he begins to grapple with the complexities of human behavior and the sometimes murky ethical waters of medicine. The pacing of the episode is deliberate, allowing the tension to build steadily as the team closes in on a diagnosis.
A standout scene in this episode occurs when Shaun, after discovering a crucial piece of information about the patient's condition, confronts the patient in a tense and emotional exchange. The scene is brilliantly acted and directed, with the intensity of the moment underscored by the stark, clinical setting of the hospital room. The use of silence and minimal music adds to the weight of the scene, making it one of the most memorable moments of the season.
While "Seven Reasons" is a strong episode, it does have some minor flaws. The subplot involving Dr. Claire Browne and her personal struggles feels somewhat disconnected from the main narrative, and the episode's resolution, while satisfying, leaves some of the ethical questions raised earlier unresolved. Additionally, the focus on the moral dilemmas of the case means that some of the secondary characters are given less screen time, which may disappoint fans of the ensemble cast.
Overall, "Seven Reasons" is a thought-provoking and engaging episode that continues to explore the ethical challenges faced by the characters in The Good Doctor. The episode's focus on moral ambiguity, combined with strong performances and direction, makes it a standout installment that adds depth to the series and keeps viewers invested in the ongoing storylines.
But now . . . I have no words. Just. Ugh. WOW. This episode was awful. It really was bad.
I finished this episode feeling offended. I am appalled. I really am. I can't believe a show would stoop to such lows and make such a statement with such strong connotation and present such hasty generalizations that feed into the already altered views of today's society.
Needless to say I will not be watching anymore. I'm not going to watch a TV show that makes me feel personally attacked. TV is supposed to be an escape. This is just absurd.
Anyone who paid attention to this episode will no full well what I am referring to when I say all of the above. I can't believe people find this entertaining.
I'm very shaken up right now. And that's all I can really say.
They did a great job of allowing her to tell her side of prejudicial treatment. It also makes sense that somebody with autism could misconstrue the facts and put it together the way Shawn did.
Taking away all portrayals of prejudicial or racial treatment from shows and movies is just as shortsighted and ignorant as taking away/rewriting all of the books that contain references or descriptions of slavery.
It is an ugly part of our history and an ugly part of our present. But that doesn't mean we can just make it go away and pretend it didn't happen. That won't help anything. What we should be doing is focusing on how far we have come and keep pushing forward. Let people see how change can happen.
Storyline
Did you know
- GoofsAs Shaun is having breakfast, a shot from behind shows him holding his fork in the left hand. Mid-sentence there's a cut to a front view and the fork is now in his right hand.
- Quotes
Dr. Marcus Andrews: Naja Modi. 28 years old, suffered a burn to her left hand as a result of a cooking accident.
Dr. Shaun Murphy: Are Jared and I being punished?
[Marcus looks at him weirdly]
Dr. Shaun Murphy: This is not a very interesting case, is it?
Dr. Marcus Andrews: Lesson one: don't suggest to the head of surgery that working with the head of surgery is a form of punishment.
Details
Contribute to this page
