Tells the story of London being torn apart by the turbulent power struggles of its international gangs and the sudden power vacuum that's created when the head of London's most powerful crim... Read allTells the story of London being torn apart by the turbulent power struggles of its international gangs and the sudden power vacuum that's created when the head of London's most powerful crime family is assassinated.Tells the story of London being torn apart by the turbulent power struggles of its international gangs and the sudden power vacuum that's created when the head of London's most powerful crime family is assassinated.
- Nominated for 1 Primetime Emmy
- 3 wins & 13 nominations total
Browse episodes
Summary
Reviewers say 'Gangs of London' delivers a thrilling, violent, and action-packed experience with intense fight scenes and a complex plot. Many praise the show for its gritty realism, strong performances, and high-quality production values. However, some criticize the excessive violence as gratuitous and find the plot convoluted, with lacking character development. Despite these issues, the show's unique take on the gangster genre, diverse cast, and international flair are often highlighted as strengths, making it a polarizing yet engaging series.
Featured reviews
Sure, season 1 had its issues. Unbelievable scenarios, undercooked characters and weird pacing with it peaking at the halfway point, and then lumbering onwards. So yeah, you had to turn a significant portion of grey matter off to enjoy it, but man, it was worth it for the fights/shootouts choreography, editing and brutality. And if you could suspend the huge amount of disbelief and shark jumping, it was pretty entertaining with how over the top it ended up being.
Season 2, on the other hand, has made the mistake of doubling down on all the ridiculous and sub par elements of character writing and plot, asking us to turn off our brains to the point of drooling lobotomy, whilst offering almost none of the rewards of excellent fights/shootouts, editing, creative camerawork and crazy conspiracy cheese of the previous season.
I can't even be bothered to list or explain how bad all the elements of season 2 are. It is just SO stupid, it's beyond belief! Beyond the suspension of disbelief capability of anything with a consciousness.
From the practically total absence of police/ bystanders or concern for leaving evidence everywhere. Like just dragging a freshly murdered gangster from a car, for no reason, in front of security cameras and an amazingly oblivious staff member. To having a skinny woman who you could believe with some effort, could be capable of shooting many men in season 1, to entirely unbelievably beating a number of beefy men in hand to hand combat in season 2. To the point where a main character somehow has a 10x zoom level on a 1x optic at the end, to the ammo capacity of handguns rivalling a drum magazine, to the very poorly integrated digital blood/fire/explosion effects... to even call season 2 stupid is an insult to stupidity.
I don't know if the new producers, apparent non-involvement of Gareth Evans, if the budget was drastically reduced, if some kind of Covid related restrictions/ people just not bothering to do a half decent job at anything any more, or what is responsible for it... but it is borderline unwatchable now. However it does continue the story and have occasional flashes of what made season 1 good.
I can't fathom anyone greenlighting a season 3 after this, but if they do, they'd better make sure they wrap it up with a home run.
Here's the issue with trying to review series, where one season is vastly inferior to another. I'm leaving my overall rating as is, for the excellence in parts of season 1, which truly do deserve merit.
Season 1 - 8/10.
Season 2 - 4/10.
Season 2, on the other hand, has made the mistake of doubling down on all the ridiculous and sub par elements of character writing and plot, asking us to turn off our brains to the point of drooling lobotomy, whilst offering almost none of the rewards of excellent fights/shootouts, editing, creative camerawork and crazy conspiracy cheese of the previous season.
I can't even be bothered to list or explain how bad all the elements of season 2 are. It is just SO stupid, it's beyond belief! Beyond the suspension of disbelief capability of anything with a consciousness.
From the practically total absence of police/ bystanders or concern for leaving evidence everywhere. Like just dragging a freshly murdered gangster from a car, for no reason, in front of security cameras and an amazingly oblivious staff member. To having a skinny woman who you could believe with some effort, could be capable of shooting many men in season 1, to entirely unbelievably beating a number of beefy men in hand to hand combat in season 2. To the point where a main character somehow has a 10x zoom level on a 1x optic at the end, to the ammo capacity of handguns rivalling a drum magazine, to the very poorly integrated digital blood/fire/explosion effects... to even call season 2 stupid is an insult to stupidity.
I don't know if the new producers, apparent non-involvement of Gareth Evans, if the budget was drastically reduced, if some kind of Covid related restrictions/ people just not bothering to do a half decent job at anything any more, or what is responsible for it... but it is borderline unwatchable now. However it does continue the story and have occasional flashes of what made season 1 good.
I can't fathom anyone greenlighting a season 3 after this, but if they do, they'd better make sure they wrap it up with a home run.
Here's the issue with trying to review series, where one season is vastly inferior to another. I'm leaving my overall rating as is, for the excellence in parts of season 1, which truly do deserve merit.
Season 1 - 8/10.
Season 2 - 4/10.
Gangs of London is like a chaotic game of chess played by hooligans in the streets of Britain. This TV show takes the concept of organized crime and turns it into a bloody masterpiece. It's like watching a Shakespearean tragedy, but with more guns and explosions. The characters are as complex as a Rubik's Cube, and just as colorful. From the ruthless Finn Wallace to the enigmatic Elliot Finch, each one is like a piece on the board, moving with their own agenda. But be warned, this show is not for the faint of heart. It's like diving headfirst into a pool of sharks, where every episode leaves you gasping for air. So, if you're looking for a thrilling rollercoaster ride that will leave you questioning your own morality, then Gangs of London is the show for you.
The action in Gangs of London is like a fireworks display on Guy Fawkes Night. It's explosive, mesmerizing, and leaves you in awe. From the first episode to the last, the show delivers jaw-dropping fight scenes that will make your adrenaline spike. It's like watching a ballet, but instead of tutus and pointe shoes, you have blood and broken bones. The choreography is impeccable, and the violence is as British as a cup of tea. But don't let the action distract you from the intricate plot. It's like a spider's web, weaving together the different gangs and their power struggles. Each twist and turn is like a punch to the gut, leaving you breathless and wanting more.
Now, let's talk about the performances in Gangs of London. They are like a symphony conducted by a madman. Each actor brings their A-game, delivering performances that are as captivating as a Shakespearean soliloquy. Joe Cole as Sean Wallace is a force to be reckoned with, portraying the conflicted heir to the throne with intensity and vulnerability. But it's Sope Dirisu as Elliot Finch who steals the show. His performance is like a magic trick, keeping you guessing and questioning his motives until the very end. And let's not forget about Michelle Fairley as Marian Wallace, the matriarch of the family. Her performance is like a thunderstorm, commanding attention and leaving you in awe of her power.
In conclusion, Gangs of London is a wild ride that will leave you on the edge of your seat. It's like a rollercoaster that takes you through the dark underbelly of the city, where danger lurks around every corner. The show is a masterclass in storytelling, with a plot that is as intricate as a spider's web. The action is explosive and the performances are top-notch. But be warned, this show is not for the faint of heart. It's like diving into a pool of sharks, where every episode leaves you gasping for air. So, if you're ready to embark on a thrilling and bloody journey, then buckle up and join the gangs of London. Just don't forget to bring a helmet and a bulletproof vest.
The action in Gangs of London is like a fireworks display on Guy Fawkes Night. It's explosive, mesmerizing, and leaves you in awe. From the first episode to the last, the show delivers jaw-dropping fight scenes that will make your adrenaline spike. It's like watching a ballet, but instead of tutus and pointe shoes, you have blood and broken bones. The choreography is impeccable, and the violence is as British as a cup of tea. But don't let the action distract you from the intricate plot. It's like a spider's web, weaving together the different gangs and their power struggles. Each twist and turn is like a punch to the gut, leaving you breathless and wanting more.
Now, let's talk about the performances in Gangs of London. They are like a symphony conducted by a madman. Each actor brings their A-game, delivering performances that are as captivating as a Shakespearean soliloquy. Joe Cole as Sean Wallace is a force to be reckoned with, portraying the conflicted heir to the throne with intensity and vulnerability. But it's Sope Dirisu as Elliot Finch who steals the show. His performance is like a magic trick, keeping you guessing and questioning his motives until the very end. And let's not forget about Michelle Fairley as Marian Wallace, the matriarch of the family. Her performance is like a thunderstorm, commanding attention and leaving you in awe of her power.
In conclusion, Gangs of London is a wild ride that will leave you on the edge of your seat. It's like a rollercoaster that takes you through the dark underbelly of the city, where danger lurks around every corner. The show is a masterclass in storytelling, with a plot that is as intricate as a spider's web. The action is explosive and the performances are top-notch. But be warned, this show is not for the faint of heart. It's like diving into a pool of sharks, where every episode leaves you gasping for air. So, if you're ready to embark on a thrilling and bloody journey, then buckle up and join the gangs of London. Just don't forget to bring a helmet and a bulletproof vest.
I don't know what's wrong with people here who are commenting this show has action and gore so they don't like it. Also some nit wits here say this show doesn't have a story,I mean are high while seeing this? What else do you want from a show that has good drama, great action scenes. If you want something less action oriented then go somewhere else watch a silly Kardashian show. This show is everything what a good show about Gang's should be about. Give it a go don't listen to the haters
Violence occurs not only in London but Internationally. It begins as a family response to the killing of a godfather figure in London that held the various gangs together for the greater good. With his demise killing became the focus of this series. But, if that was all there is to the series it would be completely unwatchable. The series goes much deeper than the violence and gore as individuals in the different gangs attempt to survive as well as retaliating against the violence directed at them. There are betrayals as well as loyalties and there are efforts to protect family members as the incredible violence increases. Some scenes are so intense and gory it becomes difficult to not avert watching. The one missing element in the series is a significant lack of law enforcement involvement with all of the unrelenting carnage occurring. There also is a total lack of morality with virtually every principle character.
Look, a lot of this show is unrealistic, but it's John Wick unrealistic...which means it's unrealistic hyper-reality but still works. At least for me. I absolutely *loved* season 1 and told friends it was the best show since Peaky Blinders. It had some of the best, if not the best, fight scenes I'd ever seen in a TV show. They used their environments and were highly creative. It reminded me of The Raid movie which, extremely minor spoiler, is shown in the background of season 2. Then I watched season 2 and told them it didn't come close to season 1, even with the suspension of reality. I don't know if they replaced the fight coordinator, or what, but it was like the difference between Jaws and Jaws 3. Now it's hard to recommend anything beyond season 1, although I think the second season can be split in two. The first half is absolutely terrible (akin to the Scream movies where the damsel in distress runs up the stairs instead of out of the house). It's inexcusably bad and nonsensical. The second half is unquestionably better than the first half, but that's still not saying much. Season 2 is about 30% of the quality of the first season. They need to get the original writers back, fight coordinator back or whoever they didn't include for the second season if there's to be any hope for season 3.
Did you know
- TriviaMichelle Fairley [Marian Wallace], David Bradley [Jim], Ian Beattie [Colin], Mark Lewis Jones [Kinney Edwards], Lucian Msamati [Ed Dumami] & Tim McInnerny [Mr. Jacob] starred in the HBO series Game of Thrones (2011) as Catelyn Stark, Walder Frey, Meryn Trant, Shagga, Salladhor Saan and Robett Glover, respectively.
- Alternate versionsThe original series debut episode is split into episode 1 and 2 as shown in IMDb. Thereafter, the descriptions from Wikipedia and IMBb are out of numbering alignment. The original episode 2 is 3 on IMDb etc.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Jeremy Vine: Episode #3.127 (2020)
- How many seasons does Gangs of London have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official sites
- Languages
- Also known as
- Банди Лондона
- Filming locations
- St Clere Estate, Kent, England, UK(Traveller's camp)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content