The Fourth Estate (TV Mini-Series 2018)

TV Mini-Series   |  TV-MA   |    |  Documentary, History


Episode Guide
The Fourth Estate (2018) Poster

A look at how The New York Times covered President Trump's controversial first year in office.


7.6/10
633

Videos


Photos

  • The Fourth Estate (2018)
  • Jenny Carchman at an event for The Fourth Estate (2018)
  • Maggie Haberman in The Fourth Estate (2018)
  • Liz Garbus in The Fourth Estate (2018)
  • Dean Baquet in The Fourth Estate (2018)
  • Brian Koppelman at an event for The Fourth Estate (2018)

See all photos

More of What You Love

Find what you're looking for even quicker with the IMDb app on your smartphone or tablet.

Get the IMDb app

Cast & Crew

Top Series Cast



Reviews & Commentary

Add a Review


User Reviews


4 July 2018 | Tcarts76
7
| The Times doesn't even see their own lack of diversity of opinion.
I give this a 7. I think this was a very good look at the inner workings of the Times. There is nothing wrong with this documentary. It is well done.

The part I find weird is that, watching this you can see the bias. the single minded intent, and the lack of diversity of opinion, pretending to be journalists going after a story. I actually don't so much believe the Times is actively as biased as many conservatives feel, It seems to me to be an almost an aloof bias. When they are breaking stories it is glaring that they don't have a single person on staff to bat a different point of view back and forth. They are all of one mindset, "Get Trump, trash Trump, hate Trump." They are indeed doing their jobs going after the story. There is no argument there, and that is what every news organization should do. But it becomes apparent, if you are not a "progressive," that they are all after an angle on the story, not the story. Every news clip they show is on MSNBC, or CNN. Every news clips on the Televisions of reporters and editors, is...MSNBC, or CNN. Could you imagine if the Times had pursued the Obama Admin in this manner? They would be blasted as racists, sabotuers, etc.

This documentary kind of hurts the Times. It appears through the edits that the Times only reports negative stories on Trump and dismisses anything at all positive. They have no one on the staff that even has a positive mindset towards Trump. In the first episode they show the reporter that covers Republicans and the Conservative movement and its clear from body language that he doesn't understand conservatives, and has a disdain for not only Trump, but all conservatives. This is ok, I guess you could claim that is a way to be critical but my guess is whoever they have covering the progressive movement is likely neck deep in the movement is extremely comfortable and cozy with those they are covering.

Another reporter, not covering Russia, says he tries to write about things that "piss him off." Of course he is attacking the Administrative state on de-regulation. He is admitting he is an activist journalist with a big conflict of interest. He doesn't seem to be concerned for the last admins. destruction of the rights of individual Americans, States Rights, or the trampling of these rights by unelected bureaucrats, but as soon as de-regulation is mentioned this guy is all over attacking the Trump admin. Is this unbiased reporting? No.

The biggest thing this doc shows is the lack of diversity of opinion at the Times. The Old Gray Lady is of one solid opinion and you cannot avoid seeing why they couldn't get the 2016 election right. They were angry about the election and only pay a passing glance to understanding how they got the election wrong. If they want to understand how Trump got elected they really need to dive into the arrogance of their staff, editors, and staff, and that lack of diversity of opinion. The Grey Lady needs an overhaul and it is not one that comes from "understand" by the current employees, but maybe could come with a change over of many of their employees. Go after the stories, they are great at that, but they must have a much more diverse conversation about their narratives. The reason Trump resonates when he talks about "Fake News," is because the media doesn't even recognize their own bias. They spent 8 years cheering on, backing up, and extolling the glories of one point of view. They got so in deep with that Admin. that they completely insulated themselves from any opposing view. This attitude has poisoned them all. At this point, I don't know if they will have anyway to recover at all. America has more opinions than the left.

Critic Reviews


More Like This

Fourth Estate

Fourth Estate

The Family Business: Trump and Taxes

The Family Business: Trump and Taxes

Trumped: Inside the Greatest Political Upset of All Time

Trumped: Inside the Greatest Political Upset of All Time

The Fourth Estate

The Fourth Estate

The Circus: Inside the Greatest Political Show on Earth

The Circus: Inside the Greatest Political Show on Earth

Enemies: The President, Justice & The FBI

Enemies: The President, Justice & The FBI

The Trade

The Trade

The Final Year

The Final Year

Just Another Immigrant

Just Another Immigrant

Girlhood

Girlhood

A Very English Scandal

A Very English Scandal

The Farm: Angola, USA

The Farm: Angola, USA

Storyline

Plot Summary


Genres

Documentary | History

Lance Reddick Talks Keanu, "The Wire," and "Bosch"

The acclaimed actor discusses working with Keanu Reeves in John Wick, his time on the hit drama "The Wire," and how he says the name of detective "Bosch."

Watch now

Featured on IMDb

Check out IMDb's San Diego Comic-Con coverage, featuring Kevin Smith as captain of the IMDboat, July 18 to 20, 2019, visit our guide to Star Wars, family entertainment, and more.

Around The Web

 | 

Powered by ZergNet

More To Explore

Search on Amazon.com