Ofra Bloch is an Israeli-born psychotherapist who has been living in the United States for over thirty years. In a recent Q&A, Bloch revealed that she began creating her first documentary intending to focus exclusively on the adult children of former Nazis and their perspective on the Holocaust. But soon she concluded that it would be much more illuminating if she also interviewed Palestinians whose perspective on the Holocaust is quite different from the group of sympathetic Germans she ultimately ended up including in the film.
The German interviews (which also includes an interview with a younger man, a former neo-Nazi) reveal shocking revelations about their (now deceased) parents, who even after the war, still harbored feelings of pride in belonging to and participating in the activities of the Nazi party. For these adult children, the Holocaust is a mark of shame and they continue to struggle with feelings of guilt over their parents' moral failure before, during and after World War II.
Bloch is less successful in her segments involving interviews with Palestinians. On the plus side, Bloch allows her Palestinian interviewees to fully express themselves, realizing that proposing any alternative arguments might cause them to "shut down," undermining her goal to elicit a full expression of their point of view.
Sadly, virtually all of her Palestinian subjects come off as sad, bitter and extremely angry. Only one professor, who was fired from his university job and labeled a traitor, after bringing Palestinian students to see Auschwitz first-hand, comes off as someone who can truly appreciate "the other side's" perspective. For the rest, the Holocaust is seen as another way for the Jewish people to justify the "occupation" of Israel-in their view, the Jews use the Holocaust to present themselves as perennial victims, to justify what they regard as nefarious, "racist" behavior.
Bloch seeks credit for her "openness" in "listening" to the Palestinian point of view. Indeed, the value of her film is that we do get to hear the Palestinian perspective-but after the interviews are over, Bloch fails to comment on what we've just heard and fails to present opposing points of view on the Israeli side. Thus, uneducated people might assume that all of what the Palestinians have to say is completely true and legitimate (when of course there are always two sides to a story).
Bloch trots out a Palestinian peace activist whose 12 year old daughter was killed by an Israeli soldier a little more than a decade ago. In so doing, Bloch is attempting to engender an unbalanced sympathy for the Palestinian cause. Lost of course is the knowledge of the countless Israeli victims of Palestinian perfidy. Had Bloch interviewed at least one Israeli parent who lost a child at the hands of a Palestinian terrorist (and perhaps brought those two parents together), her narrative would have proved to be much more balanced (and shall I say, fair?).
Also lost is Bloch's assessment of what the Palestinians are really saying when they use the Arab word "Nabka" (catastrophe) to describe the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948. True, many Palestinians were displaced following Israeli independence and lost their homes. But at the same time, hundreds of thousands of Jewish people were summarily thrown out of their native Arab lands in 1948 with only the shirts on their backs. There is no measure of sympathy for those people, who were forced to come to Israel and other countries, many against their will.
Of course the displacement of people following wars is always a sorrowful event. But the Palestinians aren't the only people who have experienced this (as was just pointed out about Jewish people in Arab lands). But in the case of the Holocaust, this was something different. The Jewish people were not "displaced" by the Nazis-they were exterminated. And for the survivors, they had nowhere else to go. They took the opportunity to settle in the one place they could be welcome (and completely legitimately, as Palestine was promised to the Jewish people by the British government in the Balfour Declaration of 1917).
The negative attitude is embodied in Bloch's interview of what one might term her counterpart: a female Palestinian therapist who in her hatred of all things Israeli, attempts to justify outright murder by terrorists whom she regards as "freedom fighters." The attitude belies a deep sense of victimization in which at its root, the vast majority of Palestinians believe that Israel should not exist and the Jewish people should abandon Israel and find a new land to live in.
During the Q&A I attended, Bloch conceded that she was "uncomfortable" with some of the views espoused by some of her interviewees (particularly by this "therapist"). But unfortunately she's clearly reluctant to push back against this in her documentary by providing some reflective commentary following the interviews.
By no means should we conclude that everyone in Israel has a constructive attitude toward the Palestinians (particularly in the harsh attitude of the Settlers). "Afterward" makes clear however, that the Palestinians will never better themselves until they engage in more reflective self-criticism.