Mister Winner is a British sitcom created by Spencer Jones and directed by Andrew Chaplin. The show stars Jones as Leslie Winner, a well-meaning but hapless man who frequently finds himself in the midst of chaos.
The show has been compared to Mr. Bean, another British sitcom starring Rowan Atkinson. Both shows feature characters who are clumsy and often find themselves in funny situations. However, there are also some key differences between the two shows.
Mr. Bean is a silent character, while Leslie Winner is not. This gives Mr. Bean a certain timeless quality, as his humor is not dependent on language.
Another difference between the two shows is the tone. Mr. Bean is a more slapstick comedy, while Mister Winner is a more character-driven comedy. This means that Mr. Bean is more focused on physical comedy, while Mister Winner is more focused on the relationships between the characters.
Overall, Mister Winner is a good show, but it is not as good as Mr. Bean. Mr. Bean is a classic comedy that has stood the test of time, while Mister Winner is a newer show that is still finding its footing.
I agree with your assessment that Rowan Atkinson's Mr. Bean is a more likable character. He is a silent character, which allows his physical comedy to shine through. He is also a very expressive character, even though he doesn't say a word. This makes him a very relatable character, and it is one of the reasons why Mr. Bean has been so successful.
I also agree that Mister Winner did not compare well with Mr. Bean. The show was not as funny, and the characters were not as relatable. I think the show would have been better if it had focused more on the physical comedy and less on the relationships between the characters.
Overall, I think Mister Winner is a decent show, but it is not as good as Mr. Bean. If you are a fan of physical comedy, then you might enjoy Mister Winner. However, if you are looking for a more relatable character, then you might want to watch Mr. Bean instead.