moviewiz-4

Action is fine. The enemies are suitable to be in futuristic film. Wrong script and bad story. Air Force one is so easy to be hijacked? Suggestions for this film maker: 1. Get normal enemies, not the ones that looked like Terminator.

2. Only 1 secret service? Laugh out loud. Make it at least 2 3. How can the technology owned by the villains better than America? You can make iphone but this simple logic can't go through the film.

4. You are showing to the world that to hijack a plane is extremely easy, make it difficult. The agents only can use gun? No martial art or self defense abilities?

Good luck in your next film.

I can say that Michael Bay's films are always good, no doubt about it. This is one of the best that he directed so far but there is a flaw.

I do not know why the camera is moving too fast, and keep spinning around when the shot outside was taken. Even for a non moving characters's scene, we can see the screen can not stand still.

Well, I know these series from my dad who was a fan of bond movie. If we have to compare Bond from the paat until present, the past still the best.

About "No time to die", first scene is rather disturbing, especially a kid that need to hold and shot from a weapon.

Acting are not as good as before. Soundtrack also getting worse. Overall, it is still watchable.

Well done for asian action movie especially for Malaysia country.

Pros: Good story and action.

The kid is good in acting.

Cons: Shouldn't have kids as hostage.

Camera is moving too fast.

I am a fan of American/European films, eventhough my first language is not English. Nomadland is one of them, especially when we have the actress who stars in Fargo.

What amazed me is that her performance is really something, her accent, speaking style and I never get bored with her film.

There is no weakness in this film but the one that need improvement is the ending.

Although the rating is low, I really enjoy this film. The story is not really complicated and the tense in it is beautifully done. The only bad point is the actors and actresses are not really natural in acting.

Seeing so many negative reviews, I decided to give it a go and the comments are wrong. Who cares about the story the same or not as before? I am not caucasian but Western movies are my favourites. This one, ia good. Action film doesn't require us to think much. Sit back, relax and enjoy the film.

The minus parts from this films are: 1. Too dark and too fast(plane scene) 2. Fake body fells down from the factory. 3. Underwater scene, too complicated and again..fast..quick..whatever you want to call it.

If you are going to make an action movie not based on a true story, then , this is a must watch film. Considering yourself as the victims, or people that live in that area or people who has strong religious belief, the film directly aim to them. Those individuals would probably don't like it and can rebel or revolt in anyways they like. Lastly, the market for this film is more suitable for western market like America or Europe.

Actually, giving 10 stars is a must but the plot is simply the same with other films, whether it is Chinese, European etc.

The action and sadistic scenes are all there. It is good that the story tells us about family values and, responsibility.

For Stephen King's fan, this is one of his story that we have to go and watch. Although I am not a native English speaker, I do enjoy watching horror film made in Hollywood.

Now, what's missing from IT2? Well, nothing from story point of view but camera work or lighting makes me feel dizzy, instant flashing especially the cave scene.

The same as other horror movie, great story etc. One thing is that the camera management skill is bad. We know directly there is someone with a film camera moving around.

Well, the story is well known around the globe from series no 1 to the present. I watched this film because of the Samoan. It is a reminiscence from the time when I was in New Zealand. A great idea of bringing pacific culture to the world.

Talking about the story, nothing much. Same action as before. As some people say, "movie maker is crazy". The scenes are rather unbelievable but who cares. A film is made to entertain.

The movie is really good but the handling of the camera is pathetic. What the cameraman should do is to assure smooth camera handling.

It makes me very dizzy.

I have seen all the chucky's series and by comparing all of those, this part matches our new era (the 21st Century). The story, gore, music and settings but....

Scene from the movie that I don't really like:

1. Talking about the doll (extremely ugly). 2. Too much violent and vulgarity especially for the younger stars from the movie. 3. Mother is too young for her kid, more like a sister to me.

Well, since this is an action film, who cares about the story line?

After reading comments from IMDB, a little sceptical with the rating, I decided to go and entertained myself. It is indeed good, nothing to complain, only one matter that I have in mind.

Sophie is a good actress but who dressed her up? Too sexy, can even see her inside. I noticed in the cinema, there are heaps of younger audiences. When I checked the internet, "she" is only 23 years old. Maybe a mature character for her is more suitable rather than a strong superpower female.

A very creative story teller. Actor and actress are fine, they act well. A must see for some ages as there are gore and blood. Looking at the ending, you can make the second chapter.

The fans of Marvel's fan in my country is amazing. We are treated a 24 hours round the clock screening but there are several improvements that can be made. I will write less spoiler but still include a spoiler warning.

First, camera angles, some are too confusing and complicated. Make it still? Second, a good idea to have a flashback(even a minor one) showing how the outcome of an event occured. Third, don't show the place that simply too dark, we don't know who hit who vice versa.

The best part? The battle and the appearance of the female's saviour (you know who)

Frankly speaking, I am a fan of Hollywood movies since 1980 eventhough I am not a caucasian. After 35 years, this title caught my attention to be the best in its line.

The story is really well written. It is full of suspense. The sound, characters and all are beautifully created. The director's name got into my mind from one of the classic song in the 90's.

The villain has deep French accent. This doesn't make the story becomes powerful as the rest of the characters, can be said as English native speaker but again, a tiny plot is hidden, holaa, she is from French.

Maybe a suggestion for the director and screenwriter. Make the story longer and show a good ending rather than "we don't know what happen to the bad guy".

I am a fan of Stephen King. Starting from "Misery" up to "The Langoliers" and more. After seeing the trailer for this remake, I decided to go and watch it. It is a great horror thriller. Several bad points from this films are: 1. Easily guess plot, what comes next. The clues are well exposed. (Frankly speaking, I have known WHAT is coming up next) 2. Camera angles are bad, too fast when changing from one position to the others. 3. Fake hair, fur are well noticed, even from the head of the daughter.

Good aspects: 1. Sound effects 2. Acting, quite natural and real

Maybe the story has to be made like "Langoliers", not showing any clues to the audience at the early stage of the film.

Never seen the original..

It is creative, original and entertaining. There are some movies that have similar plot too but this one is different and better than the others. My comments (can be made better) 1. Camera movement is simply too fast. 2. The speedboat scene was too dark, couldn't see what happened. 3. Many scenes are too dark.

What I enjoyed from this film are: 1. Camera angle. So smooth and not shaky. 2. Effect..last 10 minutes 3. Story..last 10 minutes

Your story is too complicated to understand. Make a simple one, we want action not a psychological thriller.

The movie is fine, story is fine BUT..it simply too complicated to understand. For audiences who don't have science background might not be able to know, how do they do that?

The characters have natural acting BUT the mother, very bad acting and not really pleases me at all.

Make a simple story, enjoyable and exciting.

I seldom watch film by Mr. Eastwood from the past few years. I remember the two film that he starred in, "Unforgiven" and "Absolute Power" really mesmerised me in how he starred and directed those two. I have been watching films for the past 30 years, mostly American or European movies (I am not caucasian myself) and their ending are always unpredictable.

So, when another film of Clint Eastwood up and running, I decided to give it a try. The result is not disappointing. By the way, I am not a fan of him, but my late father looks like Mr. Eastwood. Stay healthy and fit, would like to see more from you.

Nothing much to say Similar to Big Hero 6.. bad acting..bad English..The only good point is the animation, colours and light effects.

I watched this during public holiday in my country. As it us a holiday, people flocked to the cinema to watch it without thinking whether this is good or not. All are ok but because this movie has the resemblance with another title, I have to rate it 5 out of 10 and furthermore there isn't any creativity on the story itself. Need me to clarify more?