Reviews (538)

  • Cary Grant, never handsomer or more suave; Ingrid Bergman, wearing a series of knockout gowns and demonstrating a hitherto unexposed knack for comedy; polished Stanley Donen direction; what's not to like? Well, there's the flat Norman Krasna screenplay, which he adapted from a so-so stage farce of his, which starred Charles Boyer and Mary Martin. The premise, with Grant pretending to be married so Bergman doesn't get too serious with him, is, first, trite, and, second, implausible. Mostly the two just swan about and convey how besotted they are with one another, and there's essentially no conflict at all. The '50s morality now looks pretty quaint, and the no-name supporting cast stumbles through without much panache. Nice to look at, certainly, and nice moments, particularly one of Grant letting loose on the dance floor. But it's really much ado about not much.
  • Jean Kerr's best-seller was no novel, just a collection of magazine articles, and Isobel Lennart expertly cobbled them into this screenplay, filmed with sass and expertise by an A team at MGM: Charles Walters to direct, Joe Pasternak to produce, and Janis Paige to radiate glamour and sarcasm. (If she had any misgivings about appearing in support of Doris Day, who had filmed her Broadway starring role in "The Pajama Game," it doesn't show.) Lennart took situations and even wholesale lines from the Kerr pieces, but added a neat, convincing throughline, and didn't overstress.the cutesy factor in having Day play the mother of four small boys. David Niven, while not inherently a comedian and certainly nobody's idea of a Walter Kerr stand-in, shows aplomb, and he and Day, meant to play married parents still horny for one another, do generate some heat. The cast is well filled out by such veterans as Richard Haydn, Patsy Kelly, Spring Byington, and Margaret Lindsay, and the widescreen compositions are attractive and to the point. It was MGM's second-biggest moneymaker that year, and it thoroughly deserved to be.
  • Tense post-World War II drama that must have had more fizz when it was released, when ex-GIs were newly home and wondering about the good/bad deeds of their fellow troops. Van Heflin, having returned, married Janet Leigh, having a small son, and starting a successful business, gets sweaty when he discovers that Robert Ryan (excellent, but when wasn't he) is looking for him. They share an uncomfortable past as POWs, and Ryan is out for revenge. This being a more complex thriller than most, the question of who's the good guy and who's the bad is never really answered, though clearly Ryan is unhinged. So the well-shot chase is on. But in comes Mary Astor, as a past-her-prime good-time girl who wants to help Heflin, and she walks off with the picture. Her body language, her look, her line readings all.tell a brutal life story, and this extremely fine actress was rarely finer. It's not flawless-I'm still not entirely clear on WHY what happens at the end happens-and the ending must have depressed contemporary audiences. Quite worth a look, though, especially for watching Mary Astor create an entire life out of a couple of scenes and a few lines.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Laurence Olivier, young and slender and dashing, plays an utter jerk in this pre-Code romance, and plays the jerk all too well. A struggling writer, we'd call him manic-depressive today, and his mood swings.doom his marriage to.svelte Ann Harding, stuck playing another of the doting-wife parts she loathed. They divorce after another of many screaming matches, and she marries nice Irving Pichel, who's rich, worshipful of her, and more tolerant of his wife's many encounters with her now-successful ex-husband than he ought to be. This is the sort of movie where a) the characters keep meeting and re-meeting under the unlikeliest of circumstances, b) they age some 10 years, but their looks, the fashions, the cars, etc. Never change, and c) we're supposed to root for Harding and Olivier to reunite, which is in fact what happens, though clearly she'd be happier with Pichel, who will be miserable if she leaves him, and the reunited couple are just going to keep on fighting. Plus, she indulges in some decidedly suspect canoodling with Olivier while still married to Pichel. It's indifferently directed, buoyed somewhat by a typical early ZaSu Pitts supporting role, and over before you know it. Well, thank heaven for that.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Adapted from a David Belasco play, so we already know the emotions are going to be over the top, "Ladies of Leisure" is a winning pre-Code melo that gave Barbara Stanwyck her best chance in pictures yet, and how dazzlingly she plays it. She's a good-time girl-probably a prostitute, the movie is somewhat timid in explicitly saying so-who becomes the model for Ralph Graves, a railroad tycoon's son who's trying to become his own man as an artist. Some of the best shots, and Joseph Walker's cinematography is truly beautiful, are simply close-ups of Stanwyck posing for him. On the sidelines are Lowell Sherman as Graves's best pal (why? It's not clear), a boozing playboy, and Marie Prevost as Stanwyck's roommate; she's sassy and lively, though rather too much is made of her slight weight problem. The logic of the thing doesn't always hold: If she's a party girl, what's going on on that boat that's so offensive that she has to row away? And if Graves's mother, well played by Nance O'Neil, has convinced Stanwyck, in a wonderful scene, that their backgrounds are so different that he'd eventually come to resent her (it's not a bad argument), then what's with the plot mechanics that grind into place to bring the lovers together by the end? Frank Capra was still learning how to pace talkies, and this one's a trifle slow. But it gives Missy Stanwyck so many opportunities to shine, and she shines so brightly, that nothing else matters much.
  • No-budget indie clustering a bunch of plotlines into one "average" night at an L. A. hospital, this quick programmer is notable for, first, Margaret Lindsay, nicely underplaying the most efficient, caring doctor who ever lived, and, second, tackling some fairly adventurous subject matter for 1956. There's rape, unwed pregnancy, child abuse, alcoholism, guns in the wrong hands, terrible father-son dynamics, and a ringing endorsement of government-subsidized health care. Most of the plots are introduced and resolved disparately, and the dialog isn't what you'd call inspired. But for its time, it feels fairly frank, and there's the added plus of seeing a whole ensemble of actors you never heard of doing pretty good, understated work. Byron Palmer, the juvenile in Broadway's "Where's Charley?", takes a wildly different turn as a playboy race car driver who smashes up his $8,000 (!) Mercedes to avoid hitting a motorcyclist, and the hospital staff, while only as large as the budget will allow, is encouragingly multiethnic.
  • Not the subtlest or most penetrating examination of gambling addiction and its effects, but a juicy melodrama and a splendid feast to throw at Barbara Stanwyck, who plays it magnificently. She's.a Chicago housewife transported by journalist hubby Robert Preston to then-just-exploding Las Vegas, where some early luck at the tables proves her undoing. She also gets in bad with casino manager Stephen McNally, who, surprisingly, is hotter and more appealing than Preston here-his scenes with Stanny have real heat. The black-and-white footage of early Vegas is seductive, the lowlife gambling halls habited by Stanwyck convincing, and the dime-store psychology explaining her downfall-a silly subplot involving her and her troublesome older sister, Edith Barrett-not too intrusive. Michael Gordon, who'd just directed a couple of other heavy melodramas for Universal and was probably its top contract director at the time (he later did a 180 and handled things like "Pillow Talk"), doesn't stint on the seaminess and menace of the gambling underworld, and Tony Curtis has a noticeable bit as a bellboy. It doesn't wear out its welcome, and whatever's lacking the script about the psychology of the helpless gambler, Ms. Stanwyck provides with a rich, layered performance.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Biopic of W. C. Handy, only it can hardly be called that, not with the inaccuracies and one-dimensional conflicts and playing around with time it commits. The continuity is truly bonkers: Handy was born in 1873 and died in 1958, just when the movie was coming out. The picture opens in Memphis in about 1900 and Handy's a nine-year-old or so, secretly practicing on his trumpet despite his preacher father's insistence that if it isn't church music, it's the devil's music. That's the central conflict, and as Handy grows up into Nat King Cole, it feels increasingly trite and tiresome. The continuity's all over the place: Handy hooks up with a sultry saloon singer (Eartha Kitt), in what should be about 1910 but is dotted with 1920s and 1930s automobiles, and later ducks into a cafe where Ella Fitzgerald is singing, in what would be about 1929, when Ella wasn't even a teenager. Eventually the conflict is resolved when Handy, his dad, his Aunt Hagar (a game Pearl Bailey), and his longtime girlfriend (a quite wonderful Ruby Dee) witness Eartha's rendition of the title tune at Aeolian Hall, in a whitewashed Nelson Riddle orchestral arrangement that has nothing to do with St. Louis or the blues. The screenplay makes very little sense, but there are some grand musical moments along the way, including a rafter-raising Mahalia Jackson, and anything Nat King Cole plays or sings. Eartha's sultry and watchable, too, though, again, utterly out of period.
  • No grand Sirkian themes, no big production values, in fact Universal appears to have spent a pittance on this amiable nostalgia trip. But it's kind of delightful, a "Music Man"-esque.journey of a 1904 con man, Dan Dailey very much in his element, and his attempts to break open a corrupt orphans' home while rescuing an orphan boy (Chet Allen, of the sappy boy soprano) and discovering true love in the form of reformer Diana Lynn, who doesn't know her politician beau, a mustachioed Hugh O'Brian not looking much like Hugh O'Brian, is behind all the graft. It takes its time, supporting cast is unstarry (best: Scatman Crothers as Dailey's sidekick, and Carole Matthews as an old flame), and the songbook is strictly public domain. But as these 1950s nostalgia wallows go, it has ample charm, and it does make one wonder why Dailey never quite reached the top ranks.
  • Rosalind Russell had just failed to win an expected Oscar for "Mourning Becomes Electra" when she wandered into this independently produced crime thriller, where she's a glamorous Broadway leading lady who inadvertently murders her producer-lover (a steadfast Leon Ames). Around the same time, she falls in love with architect Leo Genn, and that's quite a feat: He may be the dullest leading man she ever had. The murder gets pinned on jealous co-star Claire Trevor, who's by far the best thing in the picture, and gets investigated by Sydney Greenstreet, who doesn't show up until the second half but lends some authority to the flimsy proceedings. I love Roz in some things, but she's way over the top here, employing a phony upper-crust accent Tallulah Bankhead wouldn't have dared, over-indicating with her eyes and eyebrows, and failing to suggest in the play snippets that she'd be a decent Hedda Gabler, or even a decent light comedienne. The Broadway atmosphere is very appealing, with everybody calling everybody "darling" and lunching at Sardi's and reading Walter Winchell, and there's the usual good supporting work by Theresa Harris as yet another maid, and it isn't boring. But it's kind of ludicrous, and Roz had to wait five years to regain her footing, when she went back to Broadway and into "Wonderful Town."
  • ...because it's an onstage parade of musical numbers supported by a minimal plot of backstage intrigues. Supervised, directed, and starring the revue master George White (though other hands are rumored to havre helped with the direction), it's a rousing, vulgar string of so-so songs and scantily clad chorus girls, who are also called on to introduce the acts, and barely can negotiate their way through that. The top draw is a young Alice Faye, in her debut, basically playing as she did for her first few years there, a Fox version of Jean Harlow. She has only one song but it's a corker, "Oh, You Nasty Man," and she's immediately likable. She also pines for Rudy Vallee, in uninspiring form, while other backstage love stories involve Dixie Dunbar, Adrienne Ames, Jimmy Durante, and a game Cliff Edwards. Exuberant bad taste is all over the place-ethnic jokes, blackface, cheap-Scotsman jokes, breast-feeding jokes, pansy jokes-and this is the sort of 1934 release that may have hastened the instigation of the Production Code. It's not exactly good, but White is an amiable stand-in for Kermit the Frog, and some very long production numbers (when WILL that dog number stop repeating choruses) are at least eyefuls.
  • Such are the title-song lyrics to this 1933 frolic, directed by Raoul Walsh to be modest in story but long on atmosphere. Made at 20th, it has something of an MGM cast: Wallace Beery and Jackie Cooper had been such a hit in "The Champ" two years earlier, the studio must have been anxious to reteam them. Cooper was a good little actor, but here, unsympathetic little ruffian in the Lower East Side of the Gay '90s, he's just marking time, and Beery, whom practically everybody who ever worked with him appears to have loathed, tries and fails to be a charmer. The story's that of Steve Brodie and his alleged jump off the Brooklyn Bridge (it was also the basis for "Kelly," a one-night 1965 musical that was, up till then, the biggest money-loser in Broadway history); it's not much of a story, but it does allow for some lively set pieces, and George Raft, as Brodie, has a part that suits him well. There's also Fay Wray, who's warm and appealing, and Pert Kelton, expertly knocking out one of the sassy broads she did so well back then. Marred by phony-looking process shots and plot implausibilities and non-clear things (I'm still not sure, did they throw a dummy off the bridge or not?), and off-the-charts non-PC by today's standards, it's nevertheless rollicking, and you can be sure that under Walsh's watch you'll get hard-hitting fights, atmosphere galore, rude insult humor, and a setting where, like the song goes, they do strange things.
  • It wants to be "Libeled Lady" or "His Girl Friday" or "Blessed Event," but 1958 is a little late in the game for a screwball newspaper romance, and it's certainly late in the game for Clark Gable to be playing a hard-bitten managing editor who runs around chasing Doris Day and Mamie Van Doren. Day, maintaining her dignity while being forced to wiggle her bottom a lot, is a journalism teacher who's encouraging her prize pupil, a masquerading Gable, to quit his supposed job in wallpaper and pursue a news career. You want to say to her, look, he'll be retiring in a few years anyway. Their chemistry is nil, and the Fay and Michael Kanin screenplay, though Oscar-nominated, has some Act Three problems. Gig Young, who's quite funny as Day's other possible paramour, does some fine drunk scenes, but there's no reason to be believe that this rival for Day's affections would suddenly become a best bud to Gable, who's been terrible and devious to him. There are also some good ideas, like a debate on what's better for journalists, education or experience, and some lovely supporting work, especially by Nick Adams as a copy boy and Vivian Nathan as his worried mom.Mamie is quite decorative in her extended scene, and the black and white Vistavision canvas is appealing. But it's far from the classic it aims to be.
  • It's another steamy, lurid romp through the backlot jungle, this time in Malaysia, where poor Carole Lombard suffers from a one-two punch: Her husband committed suicide under suspect circumstances, and the local Brits despise her for working the only job she's allowed, singing sultry Gordon-Revel ballads in a mixed-race bar. (She's dubbed, I'm sure of it.) There she meets Charles Laughton, expertly playing years above his 34, a rubber plantation magnate who struts and revels in abusing his inferiors. Nevertheless she marries him, it's her only out, and journeys upriver to his sorry domain, which is where the Red Dust ripping off really begins. His overseer is Kent Taylor, and we know there's going to be a triangle, which expands into a quadrangle when new overseer Charles Bickford arrives, oozing testosterone and stirring up trouble. Wildly dated and decadent as it is, it's great pre-Code fun, with uprising, spears, native drums, decapitations, and Laughton looking like he's having a blast. Stuart Walker, a director of little note, ably keeps the pace brisk, and the atmosphere sweltering.
  • Once again, Ms. Canova is a hick-from-the-stix thrust into modern living, in this case going to live with her uncle Charles Butterworth, who's a decent sort, but whose wife and daughter, Katharine Alexander and Susan Hayward, no less, are conniving snobs. Judy and Susan wind up as roomies at college, and from there it more or less writes itself, with misunderstandings, a side trip to burlesque, and some less-than-scintillating specialty acts. Jerry Colonna does what he can with subpar material, and Bob Crosby, singing and conducting pleasantly, has the personality of a lox. Judy gets to sing some pretty good songs by an up-and-coming Frank Loesser and Jule Styne, as well as yodel, jitterbug, and even attempt "Sempre Libre," which unfortunately is rather beyond her. She's an amiable presence who deserved better than Republic could give her, and while this showcase for her talents is a slog when she isn't around, it gives her a nice workout.
  • Fun, '40s-style Warner Brothers melo-thriller, with twin-sister Bette Davises conniving against one another and one ending up dead. Assuredly directed by her old cigarette-lighter, Paul Henreid, Bette essays the farfetched plot contrivances with style and snap, and she's helped by solid supporting work from Karl Malden, Jean Hagen, Phil Carey, Estelle Winwood, and Peter Lawford (third-billed, but he doesn't show up for well over an hour). Photographed by Ernest Haller, her favorite cameraman, she looks convincingly fortysomething, and the Los Angeles exteriors are a valuable time capsule. Also, wonderful work from Cyril Delevanti, as the wealthy Mrs. De Lorca's faithful butler-we don't realize just how faithful. Everything, from the Bette-as-twins device to Andre Previn's noisy Max Steiner score, seems to hark back to an earlier, happier Warner Brothers. But it's a hell of a good time.
  • Pleasant enough B musical from Republic, with country gal Judy Canova, played by Judy Canova, balancing proposals from the local doofus (Alan Hale Jr., and you see why he never became a leading man) and the city-slicker music publisher (Eddie Foy Jr., lost in an unappealing part) who wants to buy her song, which his company has already mistakenly published and recorded. Judy was an enthusiastic and boisterous comedienne with a fine contralto, and like other funny ladies-Martha Raye, Betty Hutton, Nancy Walker-she also did well by ballads. She gets a swell one here, and amid all the slapstick and action and rather dumb comedy (a completely extraneous number featuring ice cream man Fuzzy Knight), she remains feminine and appealing. There's a fairly exciting covered wagon race climax, and Claire Carleton does some good work as a femme fatale. It's all rather stupid, but it's fast, and a good Judy showcase.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    After another viewing of this well-produced 1946 Fox effort, what I'm most struck by is how closely Oscar Hammerstein II adhered to the Talbot Jennings-Sally Benson screenplay in turning the material into "The King and I." There are marked differences: The death of Louis (a 10-second horseback accident scene, not much is made of it), the darker character and fate of Tuptim, the reduction of Lun Tha to a cameo. But so much fine character writing I'd attributed to Hammerstein originates here: the king's "et cetera," the evolving relationships of Anna with the king and the Kralahome, whole swatches of dialogue. The growing warm feeling between Anna and the king stops short of romance, depriving us of that thrilling moment in "Shall We Dance?" when forbidden love rears its head. Yes, it's a pretty much all-white cast, and Harrison exudes less heat than Yul Brynner, and much of the cast isn't even made up to look particularly Asian. But if you can step past the abiding racist casting of the day, you'll find a penetrating character study and an eye-filling production, and a touchingly illustrated dilemma in its monarch's struggle to embrace both science and tradition. Among the cast, Gale Sondergaard's dignified Lady Thiang stands out, and Lee J. Cobb's Kralahome exudes authority while negotiating a difficult character arc. Complain about the Western casting and European-superiority attitudes all you want, this is a fine movie.
  • 2 February 2021
    Warning: Spoilers
    Wanted to love this dutiful biopic of Jackie Robinson, but found it so damn by-the-numbers. Chadwick Boseman, a reasonable visual facsimile of the original, gets all the attitudes of MLB's put-upon first Black player, but he does not let us see into this tormented man's soul; the performance is, in a word, surfacey. He's equipped with a loving wife (Nicole Beharie, who has nothing interesting to do), a game Harrison Ford as Branch Rickey, Andre Holland as the obliging reporter furthering Robinson's cause, a worshiping young baseball fan we just know is going to grow into the majors, and some appealing surroundings: Who doesn't love the cars, the clothes, Don Burgess's color cinematography. There's also terrific work from Alan Tudyk, not afraid to be hateful as the viciously racist Pirates manager, and good work from T.R. Knight and others. But as Robinson lopes around the bases to win the World Series, and Mark Isham's Max Steiner-ish score swells to syrupy heights, we'r'e left wanting. I like the story, of course, and was moved by the finish. But I'd have been a lot more satisfied if the movie did something, just once, to surprise me.
  • Pretty mid-1960s sex comedy set in Paris, filmed on Universal's back lot, but extremely well faked. It's a rather dark-hearted farce about two buddies, an artist (Dick Van Dyke) and writer who doesn't write much (James Garner) who fake Van Dyke's death to raise the price of his paintings. That in itself is pretty tired satire, and it gets more tired when we're introduced to the two men's ladies, a suicidal local girl (Elke Sommer) and Van Dyke's wealthy fiancee (Angie Dickinson), who faints a lot and gets passed between the two guys like a soda. There's also a cabaret-owner-and-probable-madam (Ethel Merman in a series of bizarre wigs), a Jewish deli owner (Irving Jacobson), a fervent private investigator (Pierre Olaf), and a fair amount of slapstick. Van Dyke's expert and does some cute pratfalls; Garner, playing a real rotter, is atypically shrill and charmless. Dickinson hasn't much to offer but a series of eye-popping fashions, and Sommer is unaffected and delightful. A few laughs, but Carl Reiner and Norman Jewison, having recently delivered "The Thrill of It All," were capable of far better.
  • John Steinbeck's epic novel of the poverty, dislocation, and injustices wrought by the Dust Bowl of the 1930s was unfilmable as is; it's raunchier, more political, and more left-wing than what 20th Century Fox could put in a major release. All the same, what they achieved was a masterpiece. The fraught journey of the Joads was boiled down extremely effectively by screenwriter Nunally Johnson, and John Ford's direction and Gregg Toland's superb photography are, in a word, unflinching. They're not afraid to thrust the audience straight into the suffering of the Joads and so many like them, and those hungry kids clustered around Ma Joad's pot of fried dough don't look like Hollywood extras, they look like real, poor, hungry Depression kids. The violence and capitalistic greed visited upon the Okies aren't soft-peddled, they're real and frightening. And the ending, very different from the book, is the right ending for this journey, especially in Jane Darwell's unfussy, deservedly Oscar-winning delivery. So many of the actors give career-high performances: John Carradine's haunted Casy, John Qualen's blighted Muley, Grant Mitchell's fatherly camp supervisor (the one component that feels a little soft: "See, the government CAN do good"). Small scenes, like the one with Mae in the diner, have large resonance, and the have- and have-not verities that are with us still have never been more realistically and heartbreakingly portrayed. "Rebecca" won Best Picture that year-good flick, of course, but this one's magnificent.
  • Cheap sexploitation, wallowing in its sleaze and punctuated by several not very relevant naked-lady sequences, this below-B epic has opportunist William Kerwin leaving his gig at a respectable wedding magazine to found a Playboy-like sex rag, aided by ace photographer Harvey Korman (!), and turning waitress Danica D'Hondt into a supermodel, who also turns improbably into a hopeless alcoholic when Kerwin rejects her. The main mystery in Gordon's and David Friedman's screenplay is what she, or his weepy prior fiancee, or anybody would see in him: He's ambitious, uncaring, shallow, and impatient, with a catchphrase of snapping his fingers and exhorting, "I guarantee it!" He also has a faithful secretary, Janette Leahy, who goes through over a bottle of scotch a day, which is supposed to be funny. Kerwin can't bring this rotter any charm, but Korman amiably plays an amiable shlub, and D'Hondt, despite her character's impossible character arc, is actually touching. Sleazy as it is, Lewis got sleazier, Still, as an indicator of what dirty old men and lewd young schoolboys thought was hot 60 years ago, it's interesting.
  • I'm so fond of Ann Harding, one of the early talkies' most revered actresses at the time, and now, sadly, virtually forgotten. She had a certain stillness and contemplativeness rare for the time, and usually she's so subtle, yet so expressive. But not in this rickety filmed play, where, for the only time I've ever seen, she overacts. But then, Vera, her character, has so much to overact about. Facing marital discord with her eminent judge husband (Harry Bannister, married to Harding at the time), she went off to holiday in Italy and became involved, though not to the point of Doing It, with a rotter lothario. Now, back in Vienna, he wants blackmail money, and she ends up unintentionally murdering him. The contrivances and coincidences just pile up: She just happened to leave an opera ("Carmen," which we see a bit of; Pathe appears to have spent some money on this one) to see the rotter as some friends were trying to run into her during intermission, and the man accused of the murder just happens to have her husband as the judge, and she convinces her faithful lawyer friend (John Loder, rather dashing) to defend him (before his good friend the judge her husband), but he never suspects a thing, and she just happens to faint on hearing the verdict, and the cleared suspect just happens to be her waiter on New Year's Eve, and her husband just happens to overhear a vital conversation between her and the suspect, and on and on until the end. Fairly ridiculous, but entertaining, and while I prefer the subdued Ann Harding, this hyper one's fun to watch.
  • The premise-a woman pretending to be a man pretending to be a woman-is the same, but Blake Edwards considerably revised the particulars for his 1982 version of this 1935 Jessie Matthews musical, which was in turn taken from a 1933 German romp. Matthews is a stagestruck clerk who loses her job and fills in, in a rather contrived plot development, for female impersonator Sonnie Hale, a would-be Shakespearean actor who's putting on a dress to earn a guinea or two. She triumphs, and soon she's touring a surprisingly location-shot Europe as Victor. Matthews is, as ever, charming, a pleasing singer and a marvelous dancer. But with her constant lipstick and eye shadow and plucked eyebrows, the notion that she could fool all of Europe with her gender is absurd, and the screenplay has to go through some strenuous contortions to correctly match her with the dashing Griffith Jones, whose fiancee, a platinum-blonde Anna Lee, winds up with Hale, who wraps up the movie by doing an elaborate production number in drag, and isn't as hilarious as he thinks he is. It's pretty jolly, lavish by 1930s British musical standards, and a bright showcase for Matthews, but I think I prefer Victor/Victoria, and I think I buy Julie Andrews as a boy more than I do Matthews.
  • Remake of a charming 1933 Jessie Matthews vehicle, in turn adapted from J.B. Priestley's then-current novella, this trifle about a traveling music hall troupe is inflated beyond its natural proportions and turned into a vehicle for up-and-coming Janette Scott, as Susie, the ambitious, supposedly wildly talented young thing pursuing fame while fighting off the advances of John Fraser, an unprepossessing juvenile. Some friendly people turn up-Joyce Grenfell, Celia Johnson, Eric Portman, Hugh Griffith, Anthony Newley-and the big musical numbers attempt a Hollywood-type lavishness. But the sad fact is, Janette Scott is neither much of a singer nor a dancer, and when you see the audience going mad for her modest warbling and stepping, you wonder why. She's sweet, with a Debbie Reynolds sort of innocence and chipperness, and she probably melted some British schoolboys' hearts. But she's nothing to mount a big musical around, and J. Lee Thompson, soon to inflict himself on Hollywood, is not a natural musical director. A couple of good sequences, and lots of touring-the-hinterlands atmosphere, but not much else.
An error has occured. Please try again.