misleading The movie is an "eye candy", but is misleading...
While we see how a sleazy politician is successful in getting the money and weapons for Afgan fighters, we do not see the implications of these investments. Some of the longer reviews here note that Charlie has created a strong network of Muslim fighters, and has flooded Afganistan with free weapons, which has later resulted in the US being the most hated country.
It is a mildly interesting story of a seasoned politician... the end of a movie. However, the continued real-life story has continued in a much more compelling way that this introduction movie.
Needless to say that we (the US) have abandoned these Afgan people and the militant leaders we created. Once Gorbachev was hugging Reigan in Washington, we have cut these Afgan people out. Moreove, we started hunting them and have tried to kill their leaders.
Unfortunately, as a result of treating Afgan people as pawns, we have received 9/11 and other terrorist acts.
Also, has the movie been more insightful, it would've shown the parallel between the Afgan and other similar involvements in Chile, Cuba, Africa, Middle East, Ukraine, Georgia, etc. etc.
The main point of the movie should've been that this is not an amusing part of our past history - this is going on even now. Moreover, the political players are now at a comfortable status quo, which is not likely to be broken by any new president...