True Grit it isn't From the first scene, this movie showed it had problems. Flicking off a quick adaptation of the 1968 Charles Portis novel, the Coens should have done more re-drafts to translate it into their first actual Western. The protagonist girl, Mattie Ross (Hailee Steinfeld), voice-overs from the start, which acts as a poor substitute for action. Mattie chooses "Rooster" (Jeff Bridges) to help her find the "coward" Tom Chaney (Josh Brolin). Rooster is not really the true grit US Marshall promised, but more like a mumbling annoying caricature. And Mattie isn't a loving daughter seeking revenge, but a rich swot balancing her moral ledger. The Coens used the book's period dialog unchanged, but inconsiderately have the characters speaking that complex dialog very fast for the period. Rooster has a forced-in-his-throat affectation. To make his dialog even more difficult to hear, he constantly leaves a cigarette in his mouth, and gravelly mumbles out of the left-hand side of it. LeBoeuf (Matt Damon) is permitted to affect a non-Texan accent for his Texas Ranger character. Add these affectations to period dialog and we endure unbearably fast speech without the benefit of subtitles. To further add to disbelief, Joel and Ethan Coen throw in a discussion discarded from earlier movies. To quote the 14-year-old, "Malum in se. The distinction is between an act that is wrong in itself, and an act that is wrong only according to our laws and mores." Huh? You get the idea. Sure the cinematography is beautiful, the period dress excellent, but the movie is boring. And if you like gritty emotion, you won't find it in this movie. The storyline has them trek into Indian Nations, implying conflict with Indians, but again, not in this movie. So for those who usually like the grit of Coen movies such as No Country for Old Men, I would suggest waiting for their next one, their next original one.