It's the sincerest form of flattery. I won't be alone in my dread of the likely outcome for sitcoms adopted and adapted by one side of 'the pond' from the other. After-all, the industry's forty-odd year record in these ventures is a vast exploded minefield. And the BBC's 'THE OFFICE' had 'HANDS OFF! written all over the studio's master-copies. Its style is, initially, EXTREMELY subtle and not for those with a short attention-span. No offence, 'guys', but penny-drop humour has long been an entirely British preserve (or should that be 'jelly'?). So when I heard that the format had been sold to the US I expected the results to be as unintentionally cringeworthy as the original was deliberately designed to be. How wrong I was. The things that make 'THE OFFICE - an American workplace' so successful are the very same strengths that make the best American TV productions the best TV productions in the world, namely resources and attention to detail. Okay, so it IS rather more ......'surreal'.. than the original BUT that's a teeny-tiny price to pay for allowing it to find enough great story-lines and bladder-testing hilarity to pack out (so far) 5 full seasons. And those Scranton characters - though necessarily in the same career 'ball-park' as their Slough counterparts - are nevertheless sufficiently damaged by their own environments and experiences to be no pale imitations. Perhaps the lesson (in comedy as in life) will at last be learnt; LOSERS ARE FAR MORE INTERESTING THAN WINNERS! So, UK's 'THE OFFICE' or USA's 'THE OFFICE - an American workplace'? Well, just a cigarette-paper between the 2 in my opinion BUT (and I somehow can't believe I've arrived at this conclusion) I'd give it to the latter - and not just because Michael Scott reminds me of the White House's current incompetent (sorry, incumbent).