10.5 out of 100 I love disaster movies. I even like movies like Dante's Peak and Deep Impact. I did not like 10.5 Apocalypse.
I can usually look past the usual cliché dialogue and the common "America saves the world" attitude. They once in a while mention Canada in these films...since they figure that we are so close, they might as well mention that Canada got some river split action too. In the film they even say something along the line of "Time to save the world, etc." Sure. American and the World must be one in the same. They don't even discuss what the fault will do after it decides to stretch further into the gulf and takes out the Caribbean islands, etc. Perhaps they are leaving that for the 3rd TV movie, although I doubt it since it would not take place in the states.
The states have this obsession, and I am an avid subscriber, for national disaster films. Why is it so exciting and entertaining to watch people die and get buried by earthquakes, and acceptable for prime time TV, while a film on people dying via terrorism/murder is off limits for light ratings and common viewing. Bring on the bird flu and quakes that can cause millions of deaths but do not dare to show a person or group of people to cause it. There is Flight 93, even a TV aired version of it that aired on prime time, but of course is not near as graphic or popular, but bring on KFC and death by chickens.
To be fair to 10.5 Apocalypse, which was a ridiculous 4 hour TV event, I did not watch the first two hours. I picked up after the Las Vegas incident. It got incredibly bad after that. They focused too much on the hotel rescue operation and the pathetic character interaction between Dean Cain and Oliver Hudson. Come on Oliver, call Kate's agent already. Dean Cain, well this movie is kinda perfect for you I guess. The movie sealed its demise with the lack of actual disaster scenes destroying whole places, such as the destruction of Rome or San Fran in The Core. In a desperate attempt to add some more tension, they threw in the nuclear power plot. I actually like the implausible actions in most of these movies but deflecting a 2 mile deep fault around a nuclear power station by planting bombs inside oil pools, that are only like 200 yard away??, c'mon. It sealed its fate and buried it deep in that ridiculous fault line, that looked only about 100 feet deep or so instead of 1-3 miles, with the President and his staff crying/blubbering at the end for no apparent reason. Were they more upset that the fault actually reached the coast and filled with water? Is that more disturbing then all of Las Vegas being sunk? Or perhaps the president is incredibly attached to Houston, Texas. It is Texas after all.
Don't bother to watch this. Or if you do, tape the last two hours and fast forward much of it. I actually had taped the movie. I attempted to rewind it after while it was still on the TV display, hoping to get those hours back. I am pretty sure it didn't work.