Solid philosophical science fiction for the Elementary School set Gifted with excellent production design and top flight star casting, the only thing really wrong with this eminently watchable dissection of a prototypical dystopian society is the overwhelming sense of "de ja vu" it carries with it for all those who have seen the many recent films on the same topic.
When viewing the trailers for director Phillip Noyce's mini-epic (a mere 94 minutes, feeling far shorter) I remarked to my friends how much it sounded like yet another go-round of the story twice told already recently in THE HUNGER GAMES and DIVERGENT, only to be told that the "young adult" novel by Lois Lowry (inspired, according to a recent interview, by growing up on the bland "sameness" of an army base across a wall from the dazzlingly colorful Tokyo!) actually got there first - even if the Harry Potter-like success of the copies on page and screen are only now inspiring a big screen version of the original. HAD it come first, I suspect my rating would have been several stars higher, because the story telling, cinematography and acting are hard to fault but for the original now resembling a fairly pale copy.
Of course the core story, while laying out the classic dilemma of all attempted "utopian" societies, that the trade-offs for security and stability, of necessity, involve things most people regard as essential. The idea goes all the way back to Ben Franklin's pronouncement that "Those who would trade liberty for security deserve neither" . . . if not the Garden of Eden. ...but in this telling, the dilemma doesn't bear serious thought even five minutes after the credits roll. In addition to banning all emotion and even literal COLORS in this post-apocalyptic world, they obviously have had to ban all entertainment (old movies) as well. If you're over 15, 30 seconds after the film's first reference to the elderly or rebels being "released to 'Elsewhere'" you'll be screaming "Soylent Green is people!" It's that basic de ja vu problem, only with a longer frame of reference.
If you're UNDER 15, or have precocious pre-teens, I do recommend the film as a good introduction to the ideas contained. The leads, from Australian newcomer Brenton Thwaites as the new "Receiver" for the Giver's trove of memories to grand dame Meryl Streep as the chief elder of the repressive society (is she trying for a more accessible evil female version of Richard Nixon or does she really believe what she says? The subtle distinction makes it a great performance and she even manages a layered complexity to the final resolution of the the film's story - does she see the error of her ways or not!?) and Jeff Bridges in the title role (made up to look as much like Stephen Sondheim as humanly possible - a great touch for a collector and transmitter of collective wisdom) could hardly be improved upon, and the canny casting of minor roles (Taylor Swift as an earlier failed candidate to replace Bridges and Alexander Skarsgård as the blissfully bland "father figure" for the lead, brainwashed into horrible actions) adds immeasurably to the way the film holds the interest and gets its points across.
The only real failing (and it is a relatively minor failing) in the film, taken on its own terms, is the colorful but extremely generic film montages as Bridges pours the societal memories into Thwaites (in some kind of ESP downloading we are generally willing to suspend disbelief for). It's just that the montages are painfully generic and unimaginative - the rest of the film is far better crafted.
At the same time, as the half full Sunday matinée audience (mostly in their mid-teens) I saw the film with today (17 Aug 14) was filing out of the theatre, the muted comments were about evenly divided between whining that "there really wasn't much plot" (I was impressed with their sophistication - there really wasn't) and quiet enthusiasm for the slightly larger than cameo performance from Taylor Swift (also well deserved). I was only a little surprised no one mentioned what a great performance Noyce got out of the unbilled babies Alexander Jillings, James Jillings, Jordan Nicholas and Saige Fernandes as "Gabriel" (ages 6 to 12 months)!
If it's still possible, see this elementary level look at dystopia before any of the HUNGER GAMES films or DIVERGENT series, but if you already HAVE already bought into those, expect something a lot less fully developed, but equally serious and surprisingly enjoyable. I liked it, but wished there were more to it. If your local elementary school or Sunday school class wants a literate special event for the Elementary School set, this GIVER would be an unusually good bet . . . and, for heavens' sake, don't let their older brothers and sisters turn up their noses at something too "juvenile" for them! Point out the great cast which makes even this elementary examination of the classic topic fit for adults. How many other recent films can you honestly say that about?