amirrunoron

As i know nothing of bigfoot, amd being of rational mind, I start from the get go with, how are they fooling us?

I watch these shows, just to see if anyone actually has something real.

So, no.

If bigfoot or aliens or anything were actually real, someone in this day and age. Would have proper footage So what do they do differently?

They use an algorithm, that changes the footage.

It seems real scientific.

But just assume that this process works by extrapolating footage from several sources. Merging them and finding all the blind spots using an algorithm.

Seems legit? Right?

But the algorithm was created by human footage (fed into it for optimization) So the älgorithm would adapt the footage to match previous human occurances, thereby changing it to look more human.

Also, algorithms can easily be manipulated to chnage the outcome based on what you want,

So, my verdict is simple.

Stop lying, If people just stopped lying, the world would be a better place.

Just for refference, i am a video editor.

Sad. bad. no. stop. In case this was not obvious enough - This is a bad attempt at "nostalgia" I cannot believe that all these great "talents" cast here made this awful awful show. I could not finish the first episode. Cringe.

NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO.NO. was that enough? Started. one minute in, moved into double speed playing then moved to skimming. then just stopped. if you liked"that guy" from peter pan who for five seconds was cute, then you wont like this. its awful (and not the good funny awful) the terrible,no story,no acting,no visuals kind of awful movie. stay AWAY.

I dont know.was i subtle?

I watched the first episode. its not bad. premise is good, and acting is OK. i don't enjoy much television, because it mostly is garbage, but this was worth the watch. Well done, the guy from community, for not completely stiff acting, which you are known for.(mchale something?) give it a try.

So. What can i say. If you like shaky camera work ANY time anyone moves. this is the film for you. Atmosphere. Grit. South. these are the three things that move this movie. I love John Cusak, and Nicholas cage. cage gets 10 minutes (maybe less) Cusak gets 5 minutes. "entourage guy" nice acting! all the rest is just, Meh.... Good movie to pass the time (1.5 speed on VLC) Some shots are WAY too long (kid walking in arcade????) but... making movies is hard......

Not bad. Moved the time somewhat. I really like j.k. simmons acting, and think he mad this movie much better than it was. I've always liked him, and thought that the "tough dad" part really fitted him.

not the greatest comedy of all time, but not bad at all. worth the hour and a half.

I read the previous posters review, and was so annoyed, he\she actually made me type in my user and password to review this... I will say, that the reviewer was right. This is not your generic Hollywood romantic comedy. He\she actually complained that the movie was not generic. Amazing. This is an OK movie. Its not inception, or The Hatefull Eight, but it is a nice movie to pass the time, during a sleepless night with your 3 week old baby. Was that a burn on the movie? I will say this: The editing was exceptional. It was different. And the movie took several plot turns (not twists) that actually made it an interesting watch. If you are looking for your typical romantic comedy, this is not it.This is better. (once again, this got a 6\10 from me, if you haven't noticed...)

if the dishes are washed, laundry is done, girlfriend is gone, and you have watched absolutely anything else watchable, you can watch this (but will be disappointed) this is a movie with no budget, just a bunch of guys with no acting, directing or any comprehensible camera-work (its mostly point and press record)...

all of the "action shots" are terrible (if you call the final 10 minutes of guys moving around, balls being thrown, but not actually seeing what happens, action shots), and the rest is a bunch of mentally challenged individuals playing stereotypical cast types, and throwing red balls at each other for fun.

its very hard to review this movie, because it was so terrible, but since most reviews on IMDb have the generic "worst movie ever made" posts, you cant really rely on that.

i will say, congrats to the editor of the movie. for managing to create order in the mess that was made of the filming of this movie.

i gave it a 2, because its amazing that they managed to actually finish this production, and create a full length "movie"

thats it. television has hit rock bottom. i saw this program, and was ashamed to call myself a television viewer. what is the reason that this program has to have pornographic clips, and a host that is naked? the material portrayed is very much akin to brain games, only it seems to appeal to the lowest common denominator of men (here, have some nudity and sex, maybe you'll watch) not only is the "acting" or "hosting" awful, but she does not even seem bashful that she comes off as a blonde bimbo with fake tits. is this what men are attracted to? i find her to be repulsive, and an insult to the human race. next step in television is probably snuff reality... please do not watch this if you have an IQ of 10 or above.

i gave this movie a 3 out of 10 because i didn't have to fast forward all of it, and actually managed to spend a whole half hour of my life watching it. i have to say one thing. movies are not supposed to be real. we all know that, and no one is surprised when we watch movies that are "based on" real life events, and know they aren't real. but this movie goes one step further... Mila jojovitch (or however you spell her name) should be embarrassed with herself. coming straight into the movie,she looks into the camera and states that this is "based on true events" when clearly there is and never was a Dr. Tyler in Nome Alaska. nothing is real in this movie, not the alleged and intentionally stated "real footage" in the movie, or all the other "facts" stated throughout the movie. (this reminds me of politicians stating ("i am ... and i approve this message" as if that makes anything they say as real ha ha...) people who "see" aliens, should have their sobriety checked, or should give me the number for the people they buy their weed from. i wanna smoke what they are smoking (-: so people, trust yourselves and your intelligence, what you see is what you get. no god, no aliens. this is life, and at the end, it all ends in black. just accept and life will be a whole lot harder.

I watch these movies, in a hope that maybe someone will give proper documentation of any unknown phenomena that might change my mind about death. This movie started on a good note, taking it slowly and showing us scientists with credentials, leading us to believe this might be a scientific movie. what actually happens is that these "scientists" are actually few and in between. most "professionals" are actually psychics, writers, and people that believe in the supernatural. psychic readings with cuts in between, showing no "bad hits" only the "good hits", that have been edited cannot be proper scientific evidence. i guess i cannot put into words my disappointment. only one thing is actually believable in this movie. the quote that says that "stephen hawking says that there is no life after death" is good enough for me, and can replace this lame attempt at persuasion.