agof

It's just photographs of people mumbling, archival footage you can watch yourself, and recreations of archival footage you can watch yourself

so what does this film add to the conversation?

Archival footage stretched to widescreen; a scene with a 1950 widescreen CRT showing stretched footage; and black and white physical film to celebrate how it was goo ol days get off my lawn kids these days

the similar All the President's Men is way more dynamic and cinematic, it has characters and knows what it tries to tell and tells it through cinematography

this is just photographs of people talking, confused and confusingly, and it adds nothing.

You would think that an award for "Excellence in the American and International film industry" will have at least some basic objective quality standards, right? This movie has a sequence where 4//3 footage is stretched to the movie theatre wide aspect ratio.

Outside of stretching the aspect ratio of footage it's just a bad film. The movie thinks that ironically rolling credits 20 minutes in, is still as funny past the new millennium as it was back in the 80s. There's terrible film school student cinematography. The story is told out of order for no reason, poorly. The scenes come and go randomly. The film does not know how to enter or exit them, but refused to cut them out. The film pretends that shaking your leg is supposed to mean something, besides that you have a whiny gastrocnemius. And then it doesn't even understand what it tries to say. There are no parallels between the bush parody and the bombed civilian parody. There's literally no stereotypical fake reason for a civilian to do that, outside of whiny gastrocnemius. There's the terrible fake narrator. And no one asked the real person's permission or their family's to depict them this way. And there are extremely embarrassing blatant bad metaphors especially the black black heart.

We watched it with subtitles by Lisok (Lisochek)

It is Asterix-related media, but it is not an Asterix story.

A french kid has to do homework about gauls, so he is having a trip about two roman soldiers hooking up with girls. The story of the soldiers is a variety series of sketches. And it can already be a story in itself, but from time to time the kid appears in the background. Sometimes it is getting out of hand and there are two of them. And sometimes he starts talking to animated Asterix and Obelix.

For a TV film a lot of effort was put into the costumes.

Deux Romains en Gaule (English: "Two Romans in Gaul") is an 59-minute animated/live-action TV special directed by Pierre Tchernia in 1967.

This is a pointless storyless slice of life film akin to Dazed And Confused but instead of being timeless, this is old people mememberring their past, which was the worst. Instead of nice characters spending time, it's a bunch of unpleasant boring characters being unpleasant.

And no, Dazed And Confused is not my nostalgia. I'm no yankee, and it's not even my generation. That film is 10 or more years before my time, i haven't even enrolled in school when it came out.

Gangsters doing stupid crimes and being creepy to females, while the ending pretends it is a true story. A pretty boring waste of time.

This film was a cultural staple of family movies in the 90s, alongside both bad kid films, Beethoven, Critters 3, etc. And now it is very hard to find a copy of this film.

The only part people were squeamish about is the food fight. No one likes the food fight scenes in usa movies. It's another thing which actually happens in real life, and which is another reason why not-first-world countries hate first-world-countries more, than their home-grown dictators. At least the terrible people-killing-dictators don't do food waste. Instead they create famines.

This movie formed how people perceived the split personality disorder for years, even if it is comedically exaggerated. And well, it turned out to be scientifically accurate. Split personality is a hoax spread the same way as the vaccine conspiracy.

The story is unusually compact. Most of the film happens in real-time.

Robert Trebor from Hercules plays one of the characters.

This film can be funny or at-least impressive when it does live-action looney tunes and shows good VFX. When it does generic slapstick it is flat. There's an amount of memorable and iconic scenes.

After seeing a trailer for this movie, i was a tiny little bit interested. There's a new Nick Coppola movie, where they allowed him to act, instead of just staring into infinity with his mouth agape, as in a half of his roles. But then, there's the rest of the film.

Allowing Cage to act is not enough to save a project when it's a bad idea to begin with. This film thinks it's cool and smart, telling you to wait for the twist with its title. But actually the film is trite and dull. The twist would be if it didn't try to make you sympathize with the bad guy. It was already a barely watchable watch, but then after telling you to get ready for a surprise for 90 minutes, the unsurprise is one of the most unoriginal, and poorly written untwist one can find.

The Silence of the Rabbits.

After the first 15 minutes of this dribble, i just paused it, and watched big chunks of The Hunt. Like almost a half of the movie, just to see Betty Gilpin's great acting. I only forced myself to finish this film the next day.

Someone added russian subtitles auto-generated from english subtitles.

It's a weird anti-corruption terrorism-revenge solid action mediocre musical soapy drama movie. In the end it also asks of people to think before voting. How timely.

The film claims no one was hurt after terrorists blew up a building and were firing from a minigun at cops and at civilians running behind them. On multiple occasions.

The old guy character is weird, half the time he is an unstoppable superman, other times he is weak. So the plot is fairly artificial in the second half. And that artificiality is present in the dramatic parts too.

Overall it's an alright watch.

Well, at least unlike The Irishman this is something resembling an actual movie. It's a 4 (thousands) hours long drama with DiCaprio doing a sour mine and a grating accent. And it's based on a book, based on a forgotten "true crime" event when yanks once again offended americans.

When the second half (two hours of footage) starts, i though it'll pick up the pace, but instead it starts to snail and meander. The cinematography is weak. There are some quarter-posteriored attempts at art-housy style, including a lack of any ending, with a radio-drama replacing it and post-credits summary of outcomes.

Well, in the end, as a mostly a movie it is mostly watchable. With a real ending it would've been a bit better.

The be quiet clones of Tremors (or maybe something even earlier) are kinda turning into a sub-genre. This is a generic apocalyptic monster movie with not much though put into the logic of the situation. And it's two times better than absolutely we todd ed A Quiet Place.

The woodchipper scene is the best scene of all those movies. It's even better than all graboid hunting scenes. But it is not used to its full potential. They should've left it for the culmination - after a tense full movie just let the characters in a killdozer take the highway north blasting good music and running the woodchipper full bore, no sleep till canada.

It's a "lyrical comedy" film (which means it's not funny, but you are not supposed to cry over the misfortunes either) with a dramatic story. To put it simply it's a "slice of scam" movie.

It's a bit weird in looking "more" than its subject matter, but it's not pretentious. All the film-students-never-film-workers and the so-called "movie" "critics" tried their hardest to make you think this is some indie art-house mumblecore drama about gay-cowboys eating pudding, and oscars are always a "black spot" for the movies, but in the end this is an alright watch. And it will leave you with nothing, just like all the average films.

It is a british comedy of awkwardness about how bad governments are honey-potting weirdos into being ironic terrorist (but sometimes just actual terrorists) and then busting them while patting each other on the back.

It's more smart than astonishing. It's more complex than blunt. It's weakly great.

It is a british comedy of awkwardness about how bad governments are honey-potting weirdos into being ironic terrorist (but sometimes just actual terrorists) and then busting them while patting each other on the back.

It's more smart than astonishing. It's more complex than blunt. It's weakly great.

I hoped the first one would set the tone, but they are all different. And this one is a scary movie with jump-scares. Not just inside the diegesis, but for your eyes too. Having a ghost story filmed like a ghost story inside a detective movie doesn't feel that satisfying. And despite him claiming that he is tripping balls on LSD and none of what we saw was real (or debunked), it seems like he've actually found a so-called god after his shrooms trip. Because he went back to taking new cases, which he said he won't ever do unless there's a so-called god.

There's an amount of cheeky modern cinematography, achievable only with editing in software and recording with hardware more compact than a centner monstrosity on rails. Seeing that in a fantasy film about king Arthur is one thing, but seeing it in a period-piece about Poirot left me with mixed feelings.

In their latest satirical escapade, the creators of South Park have ventured into the complex and ever-evolving world of deep learning. Known for their fearless social commentary, the South Park team takes on the subject with their signature irreverence and wit.

The episode delves into the often-arcane realm of artificial intelligence, with the show's beloved characters getting caught up in a hilarious mishmash of algorithms, neural networks, and data sets. As you might expect, nothing is safe from the satirical lens of South Park, and they pull no punches in skewering the quirks and challenges of deep learning technology.

While the humor may be crude and over-the-top, it serves as a clever vehicle for critiquing the hype, ethical dilemmas, and societal implications surrounding AI and machine learning. South Park manages to provide a thought-provoking perspective while keeping the audience laughing with absurd scenarios and memorable one-liners.

"South Park Takes on Deep Learning" is a classic example of the show's ability to tackle complex issues in a way that both entertains and prompts viewers to think about the topics at hand. It may not be for the faint of heart, but for fans of the show, it's another wild and thought-provoking ride through contemporary culture.

When i saw that Neill Blomkamp is involved i had a sliver of hope despite the fact that i saw Chappie. Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.

This is not even a movie, it is a multi-media fusion cringe compilation.

It is "based "on "true "events"""". Where, like, nothing is true. It is pushed to the modern times with grand turismo 7. The real guy have spent years training but here he just magically did everything in a month.

It is a damn formulaic stupid biopic. Including the stupid "2nd act low point" cliche.

And it is premium computer game cringe that you can ever see only in cinema. But the straightforward sincere unfun kind.

Die in the game - die IRL.

It is just really, really boring. Meanwhile Ford V Ferrari is a truly captivating watch.

We saw it with the russian dub from ICG.

It's a bad comedy brutal action political musical film. And it's a remake of Stalin.

Some of the copied scenes do not work due to omissions. Without him being named Stalin his name isn't working anymore, at least not for international audiences. The original is way funnier both during the army flashbacks, and the electric shock scene. And that film is way more dramatic during the dramatic scenes. The action cinematography is really overcut here. The scripting and the effects are pretty solid but with so many cuts it doesn't look like actual continuous scenes at all.

Stalin is a better movie, even if Khan has way juicer knockers. It was an okay watch, still.

I remember seeing the spaceworm scene before seeing any of Star Wars movies. So when i finally saw the trilogy on VHS i've recognized it.

Now we are into the 80s and this third film opens with another lazy exposition damp in a form of a plain text. At least with how they went from congratulations to special to hiding in a new base - it's a less of a time-skip than with the most of other sequels. VI to VII to VIII-IX run is outright missing giant chunks of the story between them. So you have to look it up in other merchandise products.

The film starts with a very poorly paced intro. In 10 minutes an entire day goes by, but it's not properly narrated cinematographically. Instead of feeling like an entire day it's filled with stupid comedy robots chatter so it feels more like 2 minutes have passed. So how Vader even knows of Skywalker?

And they are pushing the very cringe Han-Leia romance from the start. Not even cartoons talk like that. This isn't even romance, this is some horror about a serial killer violating females. Han is an absolute creep who is constantly stalking her only to start negging. I'm sure he is wanted for being a sex offender to Jabba's underage niece. But Leia also just kisses some guy only to spite another guy. With no regards to the feelings of her assault victim.

And all of this is especially dumb after the entire first movie was setting up Luke+Leia. Save dat princess get a kiss reward.

The first battle has cool visual effects. The walkers are beautiful, if absolutely stupid. It's a memorable fight but this part of the movie is really just a waste of time.

Everyone is racist to sentient droids. And then Luke is a deserter - he ate too much dessert.

The Yoda puppet and the jedi training are iconic. But as a fact it is just another comedy sidekick. Luke is entirely unfit to be a jedi in this film. He is made whiny. And they did move the goalpost since the original. He entirely fails the training and that's why bad guys have won in the end.

Funny how the purist fanboys got so into their midi-chlorians they forgot the original lessons from their favourite bad movie:

Size matters not.

Only different in your mind.

When Luke fails the training and runs away, master yogurt talks about another chosen one. But that goes nowhere and is never brought up again.

The middle of the movie is jumping between the two boring plots. It ruins the pacing for both. All the urgency is gone from the semi-chase, when it cuts to the training. And the training feels rushed and abrupt. There's no montage. It became a cliche for a reason, it both shows the passage of time and doesn't feel as boring as doing intentionally dragging scenes to represent the real long and arduous training.

During the last scenes the good line "I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further. " sounds bad because it comes out of nowhere. It's like there was a different take where Lando said something like, "that wasn't the deal" to match the Vader's response, but they've used something mismatching instead. This is not like poetry, this didn't rhyme.

The special effects are quite nice. Imperial march is a good song.

When you see it for the first time and don't yet know about the complete lack of ending - it's not that bad. But when you know that this is a waste of time - there's never a reason to rewatch this two-hours-long ad for the ewoks trilogy. This is not a real story, it's overly long two meandering hours about nothing.

Maclunkey!

I'm too young to have watched the movie before the "episode" titles. But i'm too old to have watched the special editions. During my time Star Wars has already became a cultural milestone in the west, with all the imported media referencing and memeing it. So in my childhood i loved imperial march, Darth Vader, TIE fighters and Jabba, long before i ever saw the films properly.

There were many other things called "Star Wars" on TV and none of them was this, leaving me disappointed. For example that name was given to V (1983) that i saw a lot of. I wanted to watch Star Wars films but had no opportunity.

My uncle was the only person who loved Star Wars so he's got a VHS box with the "trilogy" right before the seventh movie came out, and i've finally seen the three main-line movies from start to finish. I've never seen any of the HD remaster editions and don't plan to.

TIFO that technically this is based on a book, because they've released it before the film. It's attributed to Lukas, but it is ghostwritten by Alan Dean Foster. And that name kinda makes me want to read it.

This is a generic space adventure assembled from all the usual cliches. And it sure is better than that stupid Flash Gordon movie. I saw that a very long time ago, but i still remember not liking it.

The main characters is a comedic duo of tall + short. They are literally in, like, every scene from start to finish, while the rest of the cast appears episodically.

Knowing the current lore makes it annoying to watch the first film. They've retconned almost everything show here. All the facts you know are garbage very obviously not present in this film. Not the family relations, not the daddy issues, not the sequels, nothing. I saw these C3PO and R2D2 in the seventh film hanging out with Anakin and never questioned it. But if they knew the whole story, why wouldn't they tell Luke, or would call Leia a random passenger on their ship? I assumed a stance that all the sequels more or less suck some time ago. I didn't expect it to be this true. Everyone is memeing on the bad movies and dislike Jar Jar. But no one talks about how nothing is true to the first film and directly contradicts it in almost every detail.

The first third has quite solid writing in how all these people got together. Instead of stupid artificiality and coincidences, with some luck, all these things are plausible to happen.

But then the film starts to really drag in the middle. It feels too long and should be trimmed. Like the whole segment between them opening Leia's cell and the Darth Vader fight. It is very stupid and kinda contradicts the rest of the movie. First there's the monster that survives regularly being squished with garbage by a hydraulic press. He attacks and then runs away for no reason in a pretty bad scene. Next, Han scares away ten or more troopers solo by running at them while screaming and waving hands. Then they show how Luke fiddles with his very convenient batman belt for ten minutes, while the troopers introduced like great shots can't hit the stationary targets. And everyone just accidentally gets together in the same place.

Obi-Wan's out of body experience is not properly narrated. You have to think up an excuse for this film by yourself. He did that so that the ship would fly away without waiting for him, but it's filmed very awkwardly. And the characters has ruined his fight by screaming at him for no reason, alerting the enemies to their presence.

The last fight is about as solid as the beginning of the film. They actually show them try several times and fail for different reasons. They set up that their computers are not good enough for this shot. It's not a one in a million chance dumb luck. Everything kinda clicks. It's still annoying that after three passes they didn't shoot any of the turrets inside the trench to help the next guys. The literally fly in a straight line doing nothing, wingmen could've shoot at least. This is space, rotate your ships and shoot backwards. Also they don't explain why the trench. Maverick was very clear about its plan stolen from here.

I've spent my life really hating that the spacepedoes do a 90 degree turn in the end. It has bothered me from the first time till now. But it turns out they just poorly filmed a typical gravity-influenced bomb run. Now i'm at peace.star wars torpedoes star wars torpedos slowThey make sure you will see Darth Vader flying away, and it did bother me a little bit in my childhood. But this is a finished story, there's even an awards scene. The most definite imagery for the victory in cinema.

It didn't need bad sequels. Maybe a properly written continuation since there's that cliffhanger. But all we've got is violent retcons contradicting everything. And the longer this franchise goes the more disjointed it becomes.

A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away everyone used WW2 guns.

The movie has a lot of great practical effects, and it's brightly lit for the most part. There's a big variety of aliens, even if episodic or joke ones, like the werewolf and the devil. There's more actual diversity than in the most of space soaps filled with humans, humans but blue, and humans with prank-store rubber noses.

The orchestral music that sounds like crap in the modern movies is a part of the sound picture here, being played over all the noises and sound effects. It's a background element, not a sacred cow for cultists to worship like it became later. And the jizz music in the cantina is just great.

That middle part is dragging unfunnily, it doesn't fit the rest of the movie, and is very poorly written. But all the rest is pretty good. It's an enjoyable watch.

We are 6 (9-10) movies deep into the Tomorrowverse and it has less continuity than DCAMU. All of it is told out of order, and in separate realities. Like, this one is outright an anthology movie, that brings together Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman, and Martian Manhunter, but implies that all of them are from different universes. That's despite that we saw Superman, Lobo and Manhunter from the Tomorrowverse (prime) being together in the first movie.

This film has the same old Tomorrowverse animation - reserved delivery, very thick outlines, and struggling framerate.

And then there is no real ending.

Buy low, sell high.

It does take place in the Barbie universe, but Klaus barely makes an appearance here. Because this is Schipper's film. It's a new entry into the current continuity, but it seems no one is organizing any info on the barbieverses.

With it being about a kid and about babysitting i was wary that it'll be for very little kids. But no it has some jokes even in the beginning. And seeing a /usa/ movie with a daddy and no daddy issues is so refreshing.

And then it starts to really go off the rails. In a movie about child labour, the kids are shovelling an entire pool of human /doodoo/. Now that's what i call putting poo into pool. And of course the writers bath the children in it several times.

Then the five-dimensional bus kidnaps a bunch of kids. I swear it never happened to me before, it's bigger on the inside. And the kids get lost in a sandstorm, then fly an experimental robot clown aeroplane. The new girl is vomiting in every possible way. And the Skipper starts to talk to dolphins. Yeah, this is one of the movies ever.

The animation is of somewhat lower budget. They cut all costs on simulations, so the liquids and adhesiveness look terrible. The 3D models look a bit uncanny, especially their jaws. There are several tangential cheaper 2D scenes. And the movie uses awkward solutions for their own design choices. In real 3D rendering it's harder to deal with the things usa is always being an absolute creep about.

I couldn't find it in the original language so we saw it with a bad russian dub that crushed all the sound.

It's a graphic kinda morbid a bit weird time-travel story, with convoluted reason for the time-travel. They ignore any consequences of their actions, which makes for a weaker time-travel plot.

It's rather pedestrian and unimpressive, but it is tolerable.

I couldn't find it in the original language so we saw it with a bad russian dub that crushed all the sound.

It's a graphic kinda morbid a bit weird time-travel story, with convoluted reason for the time-travel. They ignore any consequences of their actions, which makes for a weaker time-travel plot.

It's rather pedestrian and unimpressive, but it is tolerable.

Xichizheng Zhong Xina, in Kuangnu shabao

It pretends to be a joint production with usa or something, but it is through and through a zhongguo gongchandang film. Middle kingdom's SPETSNAZ has to escort oil refinery's workers out of some middle eastern country. How come that middle eastern oil is pumped by the mao's utopia is almost entirely brushed aside by saying that they are paying for it. Didn't stop them from blowing up three full tankers.

It's a solid action subpar comedy film. There's an amount of interesting and / or cool action scenes and an amount of ambitious cinematography. There are very obvious continuity errors here and there. But the comedy writing is more miss than hit, only some of the jokes do land.

We saw it with russian subtitles by Iceee

Now that was interesting. It's a bharat movie but it doesn't follow the template. Instead, its tone and look are more like tokusatsu, even more like Rodriguez' kids films, and really close to the movies of Tarsem Singh.

It opens with a usa's retro-musical song number. There are no comedic sidekicks, only some minor appearances of "funny" characters. The main actor is kinda dead inside and dreary, on a contrast with a colourful fairytale world. Meanwhile the villain is very flamboyant and is clowning most of the runtime.

Not the best cinematography, not the most exciting watch, but a very interesting product.

Written by ChatGPT

Directed by ChatGPT

Cinematography by ChatGPT

Acted by ChatGPT

Babylon 5 has ended and it has ended entirely. It was blown up. Bu there are still many cliffhangers that are not finished. Yet instead of finishing what they started this piece of (bad thing) wastes our time on showing memeberries and entire scores of AI-generated dead people.

One guy, who is just one of very very many characters and not even the best one is treated like some messianic figure that saved all universes and talks to magic god on shrooms. There is no story but a chaing of vignettes stolen from bad fan-fiction.

The storytelling is one of the worst in history. In every urgent scene people instead of doing just stand in one play and wait for nothing.

And this horrible abomination of all time is also rendered at one FPS to make your eyes bleed, go on strike, and demand free bleach.

The only good thing about this is that no one saw or will see it, and it will be forgotten so hard, that there will be no copies left on earth.

It's a yankee re-make of Den Skyldige and sure it is one. While i suppose it is possible for Gyllenhaal to pull this material off, we don't see it here. The main character is a total posteriorhole and all he does is scream at everyone.

And in general for this new production they've turned a simple one-man show movie into a posterior filled with excess. Opening aerial shots, giant hackerman wall made of TVs showing different channels, stupid-posterior 80s music videos' transparency scenes.

They "spoil" the film in the middle and poorly deliver the twist. (Because yankees morbidly misunderstood the so-called "chehhov's gun".) And then in the stupid yankee ending the kid is alive. A-ha-ha-ha, le wut?

The art-style doesn't look like crap (ie doesn't look like the source material). It actually is quite good. Framerate looks higher than it is. The resolution looks higher than it is. And in general everything looks just good. Like, really good.

And then there's the writing. You know, movies about the wall are so 2015. And everything else is so mundane, generic, BTDTGTTSAWIO and predictable. Usa completely misunderstand Chehhov's gun to the extreme. Instead of avoiding setting up negative possibility spaces, they just tell the entire story in the first minutes. The telegraph all the villains, all the plot-points, all the "twists", the ending and literally everything for the rest of the run-time. If you see some garbage on the screen - it's not just a background detail for flavour, it would be used for plot.

But negative possibility space is what this story has in spades. They show that Nimona can be, like, anything. She can be Jake Suit, she can be a head mask from Total Recall, she can magically materialize clothes out of nothing, she can increase mass, she can generate projectiles, she can mimic anyone or she can modify any shape to be anything at all with no restrictions. She can be anything so she chose to be boring. All those times she couldn't fit in with the animals, it was her choice to not to replicate the colour and the smell. It was always her choice for everything and it was her choice for a thousand of years.

The dude is really dumb too, he flip-flops in his hysterical moods and he is extremely stupid. He didn't upload the initial evidence to cloud, and he didn't film Nimona and the fuhrer in the same frame, or if he did he never bothered to release it. Or well even talk to his man (and she said you're gonna die).

It's filled with tired done to death super dated jokes, if you can even call it that. But also with what they had to work with, the animators did a near-perfect execution. I really wish this studio makes another one like this, but this time with good writing.