Peter Jackson is a bad director Oh my god
How is this possible? You have millions of Dollars to direct a movie and you are still able to make such a crap. When your name is Peter Jackson I think it's no problem. I mean this movie is ridiculous and even for typical mainstream watchers who care much about special effects, action and childish dialogs "King Kong" should be a disappointment. OK, the effects are mostly (not always) brilliant and 1930th New York was almost perfectly rebuilt but this is the only part of the movie I can appreciate. The rest is just stupid. The best actor in this movie was Kong himself (no joke) because he was not speaking at all. But what is even worse than the awful actors is the whole script (which could have been written by a 5 year old child who has recently seen Jurassic Park, King Kong and Lord of the rings and now tries to combine them. An intelligent person would correctly say: This is impossible, but Peter Jackson seem to think differently. Anyway, there are so many moments which are just unbelievable foolish. To compensate all the mistakes of the plot Jackson (like in all his movies) tries to satisfy the viewer with scary, bloody slaughter. There is not a moment of suspense in this movie which is not based on the appearance of a typical "evil" creature(like dinosaurs, spiders, natives..). Further, the story lines are interrupted quiet often and prolonged, (especially in the beginning) what is just boring. In the middle, it's often impossible to follow the scenes because many explanations are just not made: Where have all the Indians gone; how did the crew manage to find a calm place for their ship and so on.
The movie is so full of unnecessary scenes that it just seem to be too short for Jackson to present the plot in 3 HOURS more seriously.
Sorry but this work cannot impress me much