al-464

I do wish- i want to say idiots but maybe thats a tad too strong, reviewers who felt the need to review it after watching only one episode and getting bored or i made it to episode 3 and stopped it was lame etc would refrain from leaving a review and a mark. Do they think their opinion is that important to the rest of the world that we should take heed of it despite not having seen more than a fraction of it? By the way ive just left a review for my local michelin star restaurant. I had a £35 fillet steak but i left it and walked out after eating 2 chips cos they werent salty enough. 3/10.

Just do us all a favour and dont say anything. I see people say sam claflin hasnt enough charisma to be cast as a lead singer in a band after watching the first episode when he is in a college garage band learning his trade? And by episode 6 he has plenty of charisma on stage. But they werent to know that. A bit too trigger happy on the reviews people. Stop ruining it for everyone who wants a realistic review. I turned it off after 15 seconds because one of the guitars strung with medium strings had too thick a G string.

Rant over. Ive just watched episode 7 which was the poorest one so far mainly because it focussed on daisy who for me is becoming a bit of a selfish spoilt brat. Now if that is the intention of the whole production then they are doing a good job. But it was the weakest episode for me. With the first episode a close second. It started to get going episodes 4 5 and 6 so anyone thinking of giving up prematurely watch it till at least then. (or dont and have a good moan on here). The scoring on makes me laugh. It isnt a 1 or a 2 or a 3 or a 4. Just like it isnt a 10 or a 9. Ive given it 8 whereas i should have waited for the last 3 episodes before marking it. I do realise some people have agendas and some are a bit odd. Its not bad tv and there is certainly some chemistry building up between billy and daisy. I havent read the book. My daughter has and she loves the series and would mark it 10 so far. In fact shes watched it twice, and im not joking.

Please ignore any 1/10 or 2/10 score reviews on here a few of them are one time reviewers with possibly an agenda? also ignore anything over 8/10 its fun filled ott action just the ticket for a friday/saturday beer takeaway and movie night.

I watched the first of the trilogy yesterday, Batman Begins and thought it was a great film. So i watched this today and felt compelled to write a review. I have never reviewed any film before. My problem is with the Joker and instead of the one or two quick lines we are used to from the joker in previous films and the series, we are treat with a freezing of time while the joker bores us with a minute plus of not very well delivered boredom and the other character in the scene keep silent and listens. This happens all the way through the movie and ruins it. I had heard people rave about heath ledgers performance but they must be young uns who didn't grow up with the American series and then jack Nicholson's excellent portrayal. It was basically a toned down bad copy of jn. Now i know its fantasy and we have to stretch our imagination but there was a point in the film where i nearly turned it off as it simply was beyond belief. Dents loved one has been killed by the joker and he has a gun pointing at him and doesn't kill him. WTF? Heath ledgers dialogue probably bored him into a coma or sent him to sleep. But there is no way if you loved someone and had their killer at your mercy and you had already shown in the film that you were prepared to take a life that you wouldn't have killed him. Sorry i could not get over that. Especially after that point Dent then kills people who were peripheral to Rachels death!!! How the film gets 9/10 on here i haven't a clue. Come on people how can you paper over a massive plot hole like that?