You can put a Bond jacket on it, but it's not Bond. As a stand-alone film, a one off which isn't part of a franchise or institution I would go e this film a 6/7/8 out of 10. It had a lot of drama and not much action, lots of lovely scenery shots, well made and some early good action pieces. The plot wasn't amazing, loose at points, lacking direction with a baddy who didn't really get off the ground, he was just there to slot around the drama of Bond and his retirement/relationship/child.... Don't get me wrong, as a film I liked that 'this character' had a child and a wife and he was fighting to save them but that's not Bond, Bond is queen and country! Not CIA, wife and child!!!
But it really was lacking, it didn't really gel, it was lacking in.... oomph... an overdose in drama and touchy feely, but no real Oomph... Everyone did their bit, acting was great, scenery, blah blah but it didn't sit right.
It felt like they should have stopped on a high with Spectre. Wait until the end, the final song for the credits just summed it all up for me, absolute cheese.... Not what a Bond film is, it had a Bond jacket on but everything about it was something else.
Anyway, if I look at it with regards to a bond film (note Bond and not 007 film), then I have a whole different thought and hence my rating, because ultimately... this is a Bond film...
The sheer arrogance of the writers Fukunaga to think that after directing 1 bond fi that he has the right to kill Bond off for all future generations of bond fans, to think he will be the last director of bond. I'm even massively disappointed in Daniel Caig whom was my favourite Bond, to be a part in the killing off of the character, it makes me see him in a whole new light, to think he has the right to be the last Bond, to think that himself must think nobody can do better!
Bond is a British institution, a torch to be handed down from generator to generation, bigger than the actor playing him and certainly bigger than the director who has been gifted the opportunity of putting an incarnation of Bond on the big screen. Fleming, Connery they all would be turning in their graves at the selfishness of this generation to think that they own the character and that they can kill him off as they see fit.
It's disgusting to think that my children and my children's children will never have the opportunity to follow this great British character.
Good on Danny Boyle for walking if he truly did it because he disagreed with killing off Bond, at a point in history where we need heroes they've killed off one of the all time British greats. They should have left it at Spectre and waited for a better director and writing team to introduce a new Bond and storyline.
If they wanted to create a New character then make a spin-off film, leave Bond alone, he is timeless and evolves with every generation just like the great British people do....
For the writers and directors of this generation to have the arrogance to think they've do e everything that can be done with Bond and to kill him off, for them to think they can do better than every future generation is shocking, if they cannot think of anything more then it's their limited imagination, they don't have the right to restrict future generations of writers and directors.
Every generation has had a take on Bond and every generation has been different, that's the joy of Bond, every actor portrayed a different version of the same character and that's what makes Bond, not 007, Bond great! The shaken not stirred, martini drinking Aston Martin driving, super spy who puts queen and country first!
As a Bond a 0/10, as a film in general an 7 (being massively generous), so meet in the middle and make it a 3.