A "message" film that is confused. Tom hanks is wasted and barely used. The main character, Meg, often does illogical and really stupid things (connect ALL of your personal social media with your work's personal account? No. Go completely transparent so everything u do is record and viewed? No!Involve your close friend and family with this invasion of privacy without asking? NO!) but Meg does dumb stuff like this again and again through out the movie! Then you have it seem like the film's message is a transparent life style is bad! But nope, even though Meg gets her friend killed and alienates her parents, she gets even with her employers for her friends death, then proceeds to continue working for the company(? HOW?) and ends with positive note that privacy is bad!?! Confused? So am I am. Look at all the bad stuff happening because we no longer have the same amount of privacy we used to have! How can some one write an anti privacy film, muddle it til its illogical and confusing - then try to say privacy is bad at the end without laying any real argument? Do not waste your time!