User Reviews (248)

Add a Review

  • Warning: Spoilers
    Man, this is a tough one to digest. I really liked the concept, and the story up to a point, but then it careens off the rails, and becomes something altogether different. By the end, it has taken one of the leads into a place that is barely believable, and borderline absurd. I guess it is possible that some relationships could go this route, but it's almost hard to accept that the two people that start out this movie can possibly devolve into the couple at the end.

    The dialogue is solid, the feel for the world of finance is legit... I should know, I was in it. And while Luke's overwhelming job-envy and bitterness is palpable, heartbreaking and brutal, the ending just went too far. The meltdown, the party, the bathroom, the final scene... neither of these two people should ever have gotten near this. I'm all for "girl power" but IMO, the last 30:00 became unfathomably mean-spirited, and wrecked this film for me. Sorry. An "8" for the acting and the beginning and a "2" for what they did to a promising premise, and we'll call it a "5" and be done with it. Ouch.
  • cdespejo6 October 2023
    I thought this was a very entertaining movie. The direction of the movie was obvious from the beginning and yet that didn't change the thrill of the journey. The movie is ultimately about how insecurities and bitterness will rot a relationship. Anxiety and angst are probably the main feelings you will experience throughout the movie but that's because it felt like the stakes were always high. The acting was superb by the whole cast. Phoebe Dynevor's facial expressions really sold the movie. As her character experiences the different stages of the movie, you can't help but feel the same as her. She reminded my of Alexandra Daddario's performance in the White Lotus. So much can be said by bewildering expression. Overall, I'd recommend this gripping psychological drama.
  • First of all, it's incredibly distracting that it's NOT actually filmed in NYC but in Serbia. I literally had to pause the movie and look up the filming location within the first 10 minutes or so, because the entire "feel" of the movie was NOT New York, and I wondered, "Are they supposed to be living somewhere overseas? But everyone has American accents..." It's amazing how unique NYC's entire energy is, that you can't really copy it by filming elsewhere. So, the whole film had an otherworldly feel to it, and that bugged me.

    On to the plot: I was engaged for the most part, and wanted to see what was going to happen. The acting was good. By the time we got to the final scene, though, I was just underwhelmed. It needed a twist, or it needed to have gone much, much deeper into the characters' inner lives. It was kind of like a cross between a character-driven film and a plot-driven film, but neither of those was strong enough to give it the "oomph" it needed to make it a great film.

    I read someone's review that they said the ending was what every power woman dreams of or something. What?? No. I'm a woman who is successful career-wise, and I don't relate to the female lead character at all (okay, maybe a little bit professionally, but not in her relationship with her fiancee). In fact, I would have just dumped the guy after he started pouting incessantly due to my promotion. I couldn't understand why the character wasted her time with him, and I found it tedious.

    That character is also annoyingly terrible at communicating with her mother. The way she lets herself be led around by her is BEYOND annoying. I'm in my 50s and I wouldn't have ever let my mother do what her mother did... (hint: call off the unasked-for party like a grown-up!). How would a younger woman in today's world let that kind of 1950s behavior go on? It just doesn't make sense.

    Overall, the movie was still entertaining. A decent effort and not a total waste of time. But it could have been SO much more, and left me kind of wondering, "What was the point of this movie?"
  • I saw Fair Play at Sundance 2023 in a crowd of cinema enthusiasts, making the theater experience electric and engaging! While Fair Play isn't my typical movie taste, it was exceptionally well done, with tension and stress building consistently from start to finish and exploding into all-out insanity and paranoia in the film's final act. My heart was pounding as the selfishness and jealousy of these characters devolved into pure hatred and disdain. Once the credits rolled, I finally felt like I could breathe for the first time in an hour! Domont did so much with so little, mastering suspense and keeping the audience on edge. With such arrogant and self-centered characters, it is hard to "enjoy" the film and the sexual content was unnecessary, but the craft and skill are undeniable, and it's no surprise why it was so well received at Sundance and scooped up so quickly by Netflix.
  • I based my rating primarily on the good acting. I felt the actors were quite convincing, and most of the supporting roles were also decent. No doubt this is higher than average quality in filmmaking. And as much as I wanted to become emotionally invested, I just couldn't. Some of the behavior with the two main characters was off putting. The back and forth which I thought might create a nice push and pull dynamic, became frustrating for the viewer. And unfortunately the ending seemed more rushed than well-planned. Would I recommend? Yeah, for a run of the mill movie, but will I watch it again? Sorry no.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Regarding the movie, I can say that the depiction of the ruthlessness of the finance sector and the approach to advancement through sexual desires was quite fitting and balanced. It had one of the most original scripts I've seen in recent years, and the casting was of high quality as well. However, I was disappointed with how predictably everything was wrapped up at the end. Let's solve everything, everyone finds their way, Luke starts his own company, Emily satisfies her ego, and they compete. Is this really how real life works? I don't think so, definitely not.

    I read a couple of comments about overacting, and I agree with some points, but I don't think it's solely the fault of the actors; I believe it's because of the script. While some parts of the movie did portray the role of sexuality in ego battles quite accurately, I found the illogical sexual scene towards the end unnecessary. Up to that point, everything related to sexuality was well-placed, but that scene seemed utterly meaningless.

    It had all the elements of a thriller, it was original, but it was definitely wrapped up in a mediocre way. The real world is much more ruthless. If someone is about to confront someone else to the point of physical aggression, they don't just throw a glass and walk out of the room politely, because that would mean sinking to the level of someone who lacks humanity.

    Also, that engagement party part seemed like it was written in about three minutes. I wish more thought had been put into it, and that it had continued with more probing dialogues, instead of ending with a focus on sexuality.

    Let me share my own opinion as well; people mistakenly think that being ambitious is a good thing, but ambition poisons and corrupts everyone. Associating concepts like hard work and effort with ambition and presenting them as if they go hand in hand makes me sick. Ambition is a quality that needs to be cleansed, while appreciation is a quality that needs to increase. Be a good person, don't be Emily or Luke.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    Would probably have rated this a star lower, but the really low reviews are not deserved.

    First of all the cast is great, starting with the young couple, Then the noxious Wall Street frat boys , and of course Eddie Marsan , who is always believable, especially here as the head honcho.

    My major problem is the engagement angle, and the unrealistic parents , especially the voice acting before you actually meet them It is was obvious that once she got the promotion, with the ensuing back and forth , this relationship was doomed. For some reason the screenwriters kept the engagement party arc , go on way too long . Giving the whole second half of the movie a dumb down of this now toxic couple . The actual engagement party with a beer bottle being smashed on potential grooms head, and then the ensuing rape of the bride to be. While the families are no where to be seen, is really far fetched. Plus after she gets a half a million dollar commission, she still returns to the crappy apartment, with a now dangerous sad sack , instead of checking into a nice hotel for a week or two That being said , thanks to the cast, the movie is still kinda good.
  • MickyG3336 October 2023
    7.9 stars.

    Long time since I've seen a movie quite like this. There are a lot of psychological thrillers out there, but very few pull off this genre as effectively as 'Fair Play'.

    These are some actors I'm not very familiar with, although his role as Han Solo was noteworthy, even though I didn't totally love that movie. I see she's in Bridgerton and I watched several episodes.

    What totally caught me off guard was how methodically this film escalates to the inevitable destruction of two previously beautiful and intelligent lovers. No momentum is lost as it builds and builds at a steady and thrilling pace until they implode. What is truly chilling - this is a plausible outcome given the right circumstances. Take an underachiever coupled with someone out of their league, mix in a little crazy and you've stumbled on the narrative of 'Fair Play'. I've seen situations like this with my own relatives when they had a few too many (if you know what I mean) and this couple has a few too many throughout this story. I don't believe the director or writers even realize fully what they are presenting to us. Take the wealth, prestige, good looks, charm, and too much fire water, and you have the perfect set of circumstances, leading to the demise of two talented and lovely young adults.

    This thriller is all about emasculation and lack of confidence in an otherwise normal and down-to-earth guy. In all respects, she is well adjusted, he is not, and this disconnect is the root of their dismantling. As the couple spirals even further into chaos, you might be surprised at how the story ends. The final scene is absolutely brilliant.
  • The acting in this film is on point, especially by the male lead. Luke's actor did so well that I found myself going from "Oh this guy is handsome" to "I wanna see him die on-screen". The actor embodied the type of man the film aimed to portray. The breakdown of the 'tough guy' image by the end is also acted well.

    However, the writing and the plot could've been better. The trailer makes me think the film would focus more on the workplace rivalry thing between the lovers, with them competing against each other with some sly strategies and sabotage. I thought I would see cunning moves and witty plans, but it felt underexplored.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I think a lot of reviewers misunderstand this film. It's not about corporate politics although that's in there by default. It's not about paranoia. It's about how a loss in traditional balance sends a couple into their dark side. Shakespeare is the first to use the phrase Turnabout is Fair Play. At times i thought it might be a Fatal attraction type ending, thus my title, but the ending is about how Emily has found her voice and asserts herself after realizing the man of her dreams was willing to destroy her career as his own ship was sinking. I think a lot of women might appreciate the ending where Emily is not only not a victim and not a people pleaser but has taken a step across a line that traditionally represents how a man might risk himself to make a point. Personally, I didn't find it that edgy or novel but I'm not young and I've seen couples act very similar in real life. Some reviews think Luke intentionally sabatoged her as the PM but I believe that segment was really about how Emily was being too influenced by Luke which paved the way for her to learn that the firm didn't think highly of Luke. I also disagree that it's about paranoia or jealousy. It's not uncommon for men to jump when the boss calls, so this is about that reverse of tradition here, too, and Luke finds himself in a position that women have traditionally found themselves in, growing tired of being 2nd place. It's a film about how the eager passion of a modern me-me couple turned from hot to dangerous when their immaturity was under such enormous stress. It's also about how a female who was willing to be more timid suddenly had a taste of power and what she was willing to do to prove her worth. Hopefully, it's also a message to parents to not push your plans on your kids when they tell you it's a bad time. Some call it a slowburn but I would reserve that term for something much more shocking. This is a character study more than a thriller. The actors did a good job. It isn't on my not recommended list but its definitly not on my list of films to own.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I was really surprised by this. This movie contains two of the best acting performances I've ever seen. Some have complained this is overacted, but I completely disagree. The emotions and tension were well captured. I felt similar intensity in watching Uncut Gems.

    I honestly think you have to be a woman to fully understand this one. Realistic portrayal of a jealous male partner and his escalation from verbal and emotional abuse to an incident of violent physical abuse in which consent was retracted.

    Some reviewers can't comprehend that this isn't meant to portray the reaction of the average man. This is the reaction of a weak, disgusting coward who can't cope with his fiancée's promotion. Their dynamic only worked when his career success was superior to hers. Lots of real couples have a similar dynamic and may never realize it.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    SPOILER ALERT . No one to root for. Two entirely unlikable characters, working for the same Wall Street firm, get secretly engaged despite company anti- fraternization policy. Other than work, sex, and heavy drinking, the pair don't seem to share any common interests. We never see them share a meal, watch a movie, or take a walk together. She gets a promotion to a job he expected to get himself. The best part of the relationship, the sex, goes away as he becomes bitter, humiliated, and depressed . The relationship turns violent in the workplace as he tries to embarrass her In front of her boss and important clients. The violence carries over to an engagement party hosted by the parents. I have never know anyone like these people, and hope I never do. Wall Street took a hit, and NY never looked worse.
  • To be honest, Phoebe Dynevor's passionate performance in this film is quite seductive and different from her previous roles. Fortunately, the main focus of this film emphasizes that they are colleagues who are in love and whether they have different views regarding the only career advancement opportunity. If it were me, I would certainly wish my loved one the best and support her to climb higher. But I'm not the male lead, and I'm just an ordinary Taiwanese person. I'm not very familiar with whether Americans in the finance industry need to uncover secrets like in this film to advance their careers.
  • kaideneve10 October 2023
    A solid premise and setup really don't follow through, considering all of the potential present within a relationship in that sort of environment. In the end, Fair Play ends up being a fairly formulaic, surface-level thriller.

    The acting was convincing enough, I think where points are lost is in the two-dimensional characters, particularly the male lead. Working on Wall Street is a high-stress job that requires a great deal of mental fortitude, but his confidence just seems to crumble at the slightest adversity. It really disengaged me from the story as he just seems to whine throughout, kind of a dud character. Most everything else was good, just not great.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I overlooked this ridiculous and disgusting toilet scene at the beginning. Nothing wrong, of course, with human body functioning, but you can't throw a scene like this in order to show to the audience how madly the couple love each other, lol, who thought this was a good idea? There are million better ways to represent Love.

    I overlooked the fact the couple's job was stealing money legally from the people. Their company was a vulture fund. These people are literally criminals. How can you empathize with characters like these?

    I got past with all of that. Because this was a good movie until the last 30 minutes. A very good one. It felt real and it hit hard. Anyone who thinks it was not realistic, doesn't have a clue about human relationships. All felt real. When your partner is more sucessful than you, tension arises sometimes. Especially in highly competitive jobs like this. It depends on the professional field of course. If both lovers are farmers or teachers, it's not a problem. If they are lawyers or vulture funds executives, then, problems might appear.

    So, this was pretty intense. I really felt this man's pain. I also felt this woman's anxiety. Unfortunately, when this little thing called Envy appears, everything is falling apart. Especially when the male starts feeling inferior. Woman can handle better these situations. We men, are not so capable. This was a great drama/romance movie. Until the ending.

    If the writers were to present both sides equally, this would have been great. But, no, male should be the villain. Again and again. This could be great but it chose to be another depiction of "toxic masculinity". Toxic masculinity is real and too many men are bad persons, no doubt about it. However, there are HUNDREDS OF MOVIES the last 5-10 years that show EXACTLY the same things again and again. This is ridiculous and disgusting. Like the toilet scene at the start.

    This could be a 7,5/10 or a 8/10 movie if both man and woman were victims and victimizers, simultaneously. Success is a drug. It can be toxic. Many insecure men can't stand when their wife is doing better than them. But if i was a writer, i would have a different approach, not taking sides, but showing the troubles in both of their hearts.

    But, no. Husband should be a rapist and a lowlife. And wife should be a Saint. A friendly advice: Your movie will never be a great movie if you are just riding the wave. Your movie is gonna be forgotten and noone will remember it if it is EXACTLY like every movie nowadays. If you want to be an artist, dare to be different.

    Still, i can't rate it lower than 6.5/10, and this is a good rating in my books. Because there was potential here. And both leading actors were amazing.
  • Phoebe Dynevor and Alden Ehrenreich deliver magnificent performances in a well-written, tenser-by-the-minute, erotic corporate thriller currently streaming on Netflix. It deals with the themes of bureaucracy, gender & power dynamics, set within the glassy walls of a Wall Street hedge fund. Chloe Domont, I'm guessing in her feature film debut, sheds light on the sexy shenanigans between the characters of Emily (Phoebe) and Luke (Alden), a couple who are decidedly dating at the workplace (even if it's said to be a strict no-no). We, as audiences, enter their lives at a seemingly interesting point. In the beginning, they're shown to enjoy a bathroom quickie when she gets her period. They both deal with it respectfully and gleefully, like most modern-day "progressive" couples. Now, to contrast this with the almost rapey sex scene that takes place during the climax - what a piece of writing brilliance that is!

    How things get "progressively" (pun intended) worse for the couple when Emily gets a promotion at the firm, instead of Luke (who was anticipating it), is enacted in the most tension-filled, mostly edge-of-the-seat manner in the second act. This particular section of the film is absolutely fantastic - be it the performances, score (Brian McOmber), or cuts. The inflated male ego and its subsequent insecurities drive things to a point of no return. Even when I envisaged certain things to go a certain way, some plot points took a more intense route than expected. There were a few moments where Luke acted somewhat out of character, especially given what we see of him in the beginning. But in the larger scheme of things, the screenplay mostly gets it right.

    While Luke becomes increasingly easy to hate as the plot plods along, Emily also exhibits shades of grey. I appreciate the writer-director's instincts in not trying to paint a one-sided picture here. Not to mention the non-stop sexual urges - the chemistry was blazing when it needed to be! The film gets into a psychological thriller zone right in the middle, and thereafter, it's a riveting ride all through. While I give the script some extra points for portraying the world of Wall Street as cut-throat and unforgiving, I like to think it was by, all means, stretched to its possible cinematic limits. So, is investment management such a toxic industry that you literally have no life outside work? Hey, at least the cheques have many zeroes in them.

    Okay, all said and done, Fair Play has a fairly satisfying conclusion too. It's a punchline, no doubt, and a good one to round off this particular story. But, it sure as hell doesn't end there (..does it?)
  • This was so much better than I expected. It's the kind of movie that you watch and hope it's good then you can't stop as it gets more intense and more intense with each scene. Makes me feel relieved to be over 50 and passed the grinding stage of life.

    You don't want to relate, but you somehow do. In particular, I like how it ended. To me, the ending is very important and never do I ever want to be left, hanging and with questions. Phoebe Dynevor carried the movie and although I've noticed her, now I will have to watch for her. Great actress. Alden Ehreneich, although I never warmed to him, has proven to be a good one. Guess it all depends on the roles you land. Watch it. You won't regret it.
  • So many missed opportunities.

    "Fair Play" had a chance to be a spicy erotic thriller about all sorts of gender power dynamics. But instead an incident late in the film puts one character in the unequivocal role of victim and the other in the unequivocal role of aggressor, and all nuance or ambiguity for the audience is stripped away. It doesn't help that the two leads have zero chemistry, and they're also both fairly reprehensible people as far as anything the film tells us about them (which isn't much). They're superficial and materialistic, and both are willing to sell their souls to a morally bankrupt profession. There's no rooting interest here, so I didn't much care who came out on top. The movie mostly just felt me leaving bad and like I needed to take a shower.

    Grade: B-
  • Warning: Spoilers
    It's a collapsing-relationship movie set in the present time in New York City. It follows the relationship of a newly engaged couple who both work as analysts at a high-stress hedge fund firm.

    Emily (Phoebe Dynevor) and Luke (Alden Ehrenreich) become engaged at the wedding of Luke's brother (Buck Braithwaite). They both work at First Capital, run by a crass, in-your-face Campbell (Eddie Marsan). Company policy does not allow co-workers to be in a relationship, but Emily and Luke have lived together secretly for two years. Suddenly, one of the portfolio managers at the firm has a psychotic break, resulting in an opening for a highly lucrative position. Rumor suggests that Luke is in line, but the promotion goes to Emily, who is obviously the better analyst.

    "Fair Play" follows the changes and struggles in their relationship that gradually deteriorate as the power balance shifts and ends in a violent climax.

    Dynovor and Ehrenreich give intense performances, but I found the script only marginally believable. How does one hide an office romance for two years in a work setting that often abuses alcohol and drugs? The setting for the final confrontation felt artificial. It felt like the two main characters took turns gaslighting each other as they approached psychosis.
  • Fair Play is a sizzling psychosexual thriller that sheds light on the darker side of the financial world and the twisted complexities of gender dynamics at work. Writer/director Chloe Domont skillfully crafts a thought-provoking movie.

    The plot revolves around Emily (played by Phoebe Dynevor), an investment banker who rapidly climbs the corporate ladder in her firm. When she is promoted ahead of Luke (portrayed by Alden Ehrenreich), an experienced male colleague, jealousy and resentment consume him. Luke begins undermining Emily's career, leading to a game of cat and mouse between them. As the stakes escalate, Emily must confront her ambition and face the harsh realities of the finance industry.

    Domont creates an atmosphere filled with suspense and unease, capturing the world of finance through beautifully shot scenes with a cold and clinical aesthetic. The performances by Dynevor and Ehrenreich are outstanding - especially Dynevor's portrayal of Emily - a determined woman navigating her way through challenges.

    Fair Play lingers in your mind long after it ends-an exploration of gender dynamics, power dynamics and revenge that feels relevant in today's society. The film delves into Emily's journey as she navigates an industry dominated by men. She consistently encounters sexism and discrimination when she has to prove herself to her male colleagues. The movie also sheds light on the aspects of the finance industry, where power is frequently misused and corruption runs rampant. These themes reflect the challenges faced by women in the workplace and emphasise the need for greater accountability within the financial sector.

    Fair Play is a thought-provoking film that left me unsettled and deeply affected during its scenes - particularly the final ones. The portrayal of toxic masculinity and the darker aspects of finance depicted in this movie are both disturbing yet captivating. If you enjoy thrillers that entertain and challenge your thinking, this film is a must-watch for you. Highly recommended!
  • renadakif28 October 2023
    I loved that movie so much , the amount of energy those head actors give is phenomenal , the story is so powerful its the real drama that keeps you on the edge of your seat .

    I loved the whoole elements of it , the dialogue , the plot , the direction , the acting and even the realistic and satisfying ending

    I think it discussed a very clever and important issue , how you will act if you r jealous and in the place where u have to struggle ur own selfeshness , desire for success and passion .

    The only thing i hated is their first intimate scene , i thought it was cringe and unnecessary and uncomfortable and has no link to the film so it could has been replaced or adjusted because it was the only thing that is wrong with the movie.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    I watched this film through from beginning to end because, like a bad relationship, I was waiting to see if it could get better. The actors are pretty and the performances are solid but there is literally no reason this should have been made. Why should we care about these two vapid, greedy climbers? In what smartphone centric world does a psychotic boss like that exist without repercussions? Who gives a toss about the 1% fudging a deal and then making it back by reading reddit in the next 10 minutes? What even is the point? Men suck, women can do it better, jealousy is a b*tch, get your stock tips from the interwebs. I was bored and yet like a car crash could not look away. The repetitive use of blood and the constant, overlong cuts of people 'thinking' were so amateurish as to beg the question - how did this little film school project pull in such big names? There's no stakes, no tension, no surprises and no point.
  • khadiij6 October 2023
    Well this movie shows how deep hiding emotion can affect people's life jealousy fear greediness, power,this story could have been happening in any part of the world, a story of success and how partners react to the changes in their relationship specially a men perspective,the 2hours were fully of interesting scenes,I enjoyed watching it,it's the type of movie who keeps me thinking because it could happen to anyone, the acters delivered the story specially the boss cambel his face expression was on top. Overall I give this movie a 6.5,girls you can watch it by your self,some man can be offended.
  • I don't watch many movies nowadays because most of them are simply very bad, I rather stick with the series but this one here did not dissappoint. I wanted to see something longer, without shooting, killing, with some dialogues and I found it. It has good plot, good acting. There are no forced sex scenes, almost no sex at all but there is a good tension between the main characters. Their interaction is very realistic. It is good fun that keeps you watching until the end. Of course it is not a masterpiece but if you want to spend enjoyable evening, maybe with your spouse, I can recommend it to you.
  • "Learn to stand up for your self", that's the lesson to be learned from this movie. A toxic relationship where an insecure man couldn't handle the success of his partner and becoming violent is a very much realistic story. And loved the ending though won't encourage that kind of violence, but she had the right to get that apology out of him as men often think they are the gift of God and they can abuse their partner without any remorse. So i would say, scaring the guy to get an apology, totally legit.

    Hope those who are victims of domestic violence find the courage to stand up for themselves and leave the hell.
An error has occured. Please try again.