User Reviews (20)

Add a Review

  • Worth it. It's long but you don't have to watch it all at once. It's a unique movie that foregrounds the slow details and nuances of the moments we experience. I think it expresses subtle, wordless feelings of magic and also anguish in searching for oneself and for fulfillment in our long (but short) lives.

    I didn't always agree with the women in the movie but I related to how they were questioning the surface of themselves and their lives, searching for something more than what they'd fallen into or were told to be. The movie is humorous at times, depressing at times, and both. It left me with a feeling of silent reflection on the many sides to life and to people.
  • If you are willing to dedicate 5 hours of your time to watch Hamaguchi's Happy Hour, what you'll find is a cozy yet mildly depressing film perfect for those lonely, chilly winter nights alone.

    The film strives to present themes about marriage, divorce, mid-life, relationships, love, and others in an extremely objective way. The dialogue in the café scene even explicitly states this, also inputting that while you can try to be objective, you are ultimately limited by your own experiences. How do you reach this hyper-realism? For one thing you can practically reduce editing to a minimum. The most stand out result of this is not cutting scenes out to pad out the run time. Even I, a person who loves this trend of extending run time in movies, had to split my viewing into 2-parts. However, this luxury of time gives the pacing a very natural feel; characters evolve very logically while not feeling rushed and long scenes of literally just shots of character's faces lets the audience see character's feelings change (or sometimes lack thereof) while not seeming abrupt at all. Another point is how the characters perform. The very amateurish quality in performance is reminiscent of films like Hong Sangsoo, a Korean director well known worldwide for his amateur style. The delivery of dialogue is very flat and relaxed, with only slight changes in intonation and volume for those extremely "dramatic" scenes. Characters display emotion with only subtle changes in facial expressions, or sometimes if they are sad, the director only presents them in the aftermath with their bloodshot eyes.

    On the topic of dialogue, this film does suffer from some expository dialogue, a quality in a lot of French New Wave films that turns me off most of the time. I wish that in the 5-hour run time, Hamaguchi could have found more natural and normal ways of delivering dialogue.

    How the film is presented is gorgeous. From watching some Ozu films, shot composition is very Japanese, a lot of intersecting lines into horizons and such. Color selection and camera positioning makes the film seem very disconnected from the characters, again contributing to the omniscient perspective of the film. And Kobe just seems like a pretty place to be. I especially loved the singles where the camera is placed right in front of the camera, like a Deacons/Cohen Brothers film making us intimate with the character while their cold expressions still leave a veil between us.

    Overall, I think those who are willing to be active watchers for the 5-hour run time can get something out of watching this film, whether if it's about your marriage or if you happen to agree with these other reviews and find that women are evil (?). I personally thought that the main characters felt trapped by the societal pressures of mid-life (marriage, children, love) and that their actions to break out of those chains were out of their intolerance to be stuck in their societal roles as housewives. But the director's purposeful strategy of "present-how-it-is" kind of gives everyone the right to form and support their own ideals based on this film.
  • This movie focuses on 4 Japanese women in their late thirties. We follow their daily lives and their personal journeys. These 4 friends realize that they are unhappy with their (love) lives and they try to take back control. Several interesting topics are addressed, such as the lack of communication in relationships, the emancipation of women and the quest for self-fulfillment. The 4 non professional actresses give good performances and we get attached to their characters. Being immersed in the Japanese culture is also an enlightening experience. However, the movie is long. Some cuts could have been made.
  • Through 4 different characters, the movie make us share the life of today Japan, and the legitimate questions you can encounter in your couple. Necessarily slow, it is a good movie to make us think about our life. True and accurate insight in the woman soul. To be watched in a quiet place.
  • I'll admit my attention often drifted in the first quarter (lingering shots) but by the last hour I was thoroughly engaged - I even wanted to spend a little longer in everyone's company. Like walking back home from your friend's house after a great night, and the subsequent emptiness. I saw fragments of myself in Jun's husband and it terrified me. Kobe looks beautiful!
  • Binged this 317-minute realistic drama about four female friends who come to grips with their feelings of doubt and disappointment as they enter middle age, in particular with the relational shortcomings of men. The slow, detailed narrative, with its prolonged scenes and interwoven story lines around a centering drama and unique structural elegance, mesmerized me. This is rare, meaty fare far afield from the happily-ever-after screenplays that are all too common among Japanese movies, at least the ones I've watched heretofore on Amazon Prime.
  • Giving a feeling of Bergman meets Romer, this movie is very intimate, and quietly leaves deep traces for long after seeing it. About the ambiguity of love, power of friendship, transformation and intimacy, an emotional journey.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    What hits you first with Ryusuke Hamaguchi's epic "Happy Hour" is that it is far from a single hour in length, and that all characters involved are far from happy with their lives. Much like the time shared between the four leads and their significant others, the film is drawn-out, awkward and we learn some things we'd probably rather not have. But while far from comfortable viewing, it certainly reveals a number of traits about our lives, the company we keep and how our feelings differ with age.

    Four friends Akari (Sachie Tanaka), Sakurako (Hazuki Kikuchi), Fumi (Maiko Mihara) and Jun (Rira Kawamura) arrange an outing together, with drinks afterwards. But as discussions grow, snippets of each other's lives are revealed, leading each to question how close they are, as well as if these are the people they still want to spend their spare time with.

    When Jun announces she plans to divorce her robotic scientist husband, the group start to see cracks emerge in their friendship. Not having revealed her ambitions to the whole group, she also lies about certain aspects of his behaviour when in court, which the others feel less than comfortable with. Jun then disappears, leaving the others to help her husband try and find her, but they also start to question their own marriages and where they want to go in life.

    Having to spend over five hours with these characters leaves one conclusion: None of them are particularly likeable, and some feel very unrealistic. The male characters all come across as one-dimensional caricatures of humans, showing little to no emotion. Jun's husband is as textbook as she describes, declaring his love and handling accusations against him in monotone. Fumi's editor husband's expression is far too cool, as he barely bats an eyelid at anything. While Sakurako is housewife to a typical salaryman.

    Part of this is perhaps down to Hamaguchi employing local actors with no real experience in film, and so come across as a little wooden, though some better direction could make them more passable. With Jun lying and Sakurako having an affair, you don't develop the sympathy their husbands perhaps deserve, as they are a little too flat to ever consider sharing a life with. The female leads also come across as acting or hypostasising before actually talking with their husbands, which is a key outcome from the film.

    A fun time for drinking with friends, this is not the 'happy hour' they expect. Now in the latter half of their thirties, they are starting to become set in their ways, and struggle to talk comfortably with one another. This is a collection of people who don't talk enough, saying too much. As such, when in lengthy discussion, they reveal too much in too short a period, leading to conflict.

    The lengthy format allows this to come out, with Hamaguchi - who likes a long runtime - crafting the dialogue with Tadashi Nohara and Tomoyuki Takahashi to lead each to the point of irritation. The more they hear the problems of others, the more they realise their own; left to linger on their mind, their own frustrations are deflected on to others. It takes time to bring that out, and so the ambitious length is necessary in that sense.

    But while Hamaguchi develops the scenarios well, the characters and some of the performances leave a little to be desired, leaving you in two minds as to whether responses come out naturally or by Hamaguchi's contrived design. With the heavy dialogue nature of the film, it is clear to see why he would want to use novices for a more natural rhythm, but their awkwardness at times makes you crave for some better performances, or indeed Hamaguchi giving them a bit more to go on.

    The ambition pays off, however, with alcohol and friends round a table leading to confrontation as we get older, less able to see eye-to-eye with others the further we get down our own path. Hamaguchi teases this out, but it takes time. A happy hour leads to quick drinks, talks and merriment, but once it's over - like these drinking sessions - the cost goes up.

    Politic1983.home.blog.
  • We get to know these characters so intimately, we feel they are our friends and at the same time strangers we discover more and more. The 5 hours 17 mins are perfect and every minute worthwhile. I would even love to continue another 5 more hours and continue to see these interesting lives unfold.

    It is my first Ryûsuke Hamaguchi film and surely not the last. His incorporation of art and amazing stories into the narrative with vignettes of every day contemplation mixed with big events and poignant scenes are masterful. A few standout scenes are:

    A life-affirming course by an artist A writer reading a short story and sublime Q&A A stranger in the bus talking about her father An estranged wife unwelcoming her husband into her temporary home A couple dealing with their son's transgression A nurse scolding a younger nurse about life and death A woman talking to the sister of the man she likes about sex and love

    At the center, there are often friends around a table with sublime dialog and lowkey acting. The nonverbal interactions are extremely effective at conveying intrigue, tension and sympathy. We understand the complicated lives of these four women and the people around them in great detail with non-judgmental equanimity. The story is poetic like Edward Yang's "Yi Yi", but not as funny. It also reminds me of Chang-dong Lee's "Poetry". It is however very much its own film and with its on pace and universe.

    At times, it shows a somewhat bleak reality of failing relationships and discovery but with so much insight and artistic enhancement. A masterpiece in all aspects that never feels forced, by always allowing introspection and growth, and showing the complexity of life and people. It invites us to observe, it expands our boundaries slowly, it questions and reflects. The moving parts are so well woven together, and the attentive viewer never misses a beat or gets bored. We are there with the characters and events, at the table with them, in their homes or in vacation, at the tumultuous crucial reading and its aftermaths.

    A movie that redefines movie-making in its impeccable vision and visceral journey.
  • The longest Japanese marathon is 'Happy Hour', a movie that runs for 5hrs and 10min. Small budget, no frills, non-professional actors, shot as basic as a soapie but with less make-up and without being a soapie despite the topic being 4 female friends, in their late 30s, navigating their male relationships.

    That it was so basic, and that I had patience, equated to it feeling as real life as a fiction could be. No tricks, no action, no melodramatics, just people going through life like we all do.

    The only time I felt tested was when there was a boring book reading which was rammed home as boring by it being approx 10 minutes long with longer praise for the author. However, that tedium had purpose, resulting in an important pivot of realisation in the characters.

    Life is messy. Love is hard to define and few have it. Marriage mostly sucks. People cheat when they mean to and when they don't, for good and bad reasons. Life rolls on. If anything, the aim of the movie was for it to be a lesson in learning to roll with it and be open to learning about who we are, and how we relate to others.

    Highlights for me was seeing real Japan, daily life and its cultural politeness (which, like cheating, can be both good and bad). It was a beautiful and slow unwinding of pain.

    Freedom is hard for adults. The unrelated-to-the-movie catch-22 is that it was impossible for any of us, as kids or teens, to imagine it as anything other than wonderful flight.

    I can't recall watching a Japanese or Korean movie without rice being mentioned. They always make me hungry.
  • Warning: Spoilers
    This three-part, overly-long (by a factor of three) movie appears to have a dual focus: an examination of the brutal destruction of the human spirit by institutionalized marriage; and the study of human communication and connection in ways well known and a few physical means not so obvious. Lead characters are the victims (or will be) of past, present, and future divorce proceedings that come across as little more than legal emotional shakedowns. Script and direction are psychologically adroit. However, editing is over indulgent with way-too-much padding including most of a lecture on physical commutation and a book reading that goes on and on and on! The camera also often lingers on scenes long after the players have exited.

    The four lead actresses hold the audience's attention in what looks like a combination of adlibbed and scripted dialog. Scenes can be exceptionally long (without cuts) that twist and turn but do not ramble. That said, many interactions between the main characters and marginal ones sound under rehearsed and artificial with deliveries more appropriate for a documentary Q&A than a melodrama. Actresses and actors playing thirty something characters appear to be 40-50 somethings.

    Cinematography/lighting is often disappointing. There are many scenes where faces of speakers are hard to see or reduced to silhouettes. Some cleverly shot scenes show characters aboard moving transports, but it remains unclear just which character is moving until the camera pulls back. Sound, especially dialog recording and replacement, is excellent. Music can be fingers-in-ears awful starting with the opening credits. Subtitles are especially good; they are short yet comprehensive.

    Worth watching, but only with a nearby fast-forward button. Viewed at JICC J-Film event. WILLIAM FLANIGAN.
  • This starts out as a really interesting movie about four Japanese 30ish women and how they (mis)manage their lives and the lives of those around them in search of things we are never quite sure of. The film is very good at bringing you close to their world, but keeping you at arms length at the same time, and the characters take turns in being more or less likeable/relatable, but often come off as aliens floating through contemporary Japanese society and trying to communicate (or not- "communication" is the key theme). I don't know the reality of said society, but I have met enough alienated and unhappy people in my own to suggest it rings true, specific cultural issues non-withstanding. That part of the movie was fascinating, including insights into family, divorce, relationships, honor, etc. But the issue is not really the five-hour length, probably used to suggest the real-life unwinding of issues; although it doesn't help. For me the main problem was the long expository conversations/monologues, the many side stories and secondary characters popping in and out, the serious issues that come up with no background (that they have often no resolution is fine by me), and the fact the the actors often seem more part of an acting experiment using amateurs, than players in a movie, which actually seems to be the case. Most actors do a fine job (some are more wooden), but it does feel like an exercise. As a "completist" that watches all movies to the end on principle, I nevertheless felt I would have gotten the same messages by watching any 90-120 minutes of the whole length.
  • I don't know, maybe I just wanted to like this and so I liked it. The 6 hours long Japanese not so very well know movie...it's an appealing etiquette, no?

    But I truly liked. It made me think of a bunch of things first of which is: slow can be fast. If it's deep enough, you have plenty to see.

    And this movie is long and slow but it's so filled with authentic human emotions (or what looks like that) I was captured, especially during the first half.

    This movie talks about four women more or less and I was the fifth, that's how I felt sometimes. To connect this deeply with some characters, it's kind of amazing.

    Subtle, delicate, intimate, nostalgic, melancholic: I don't know if everyone would enjoy this, maybe you could find it frustrating but MAYBE if you just take it in, then you'll like this. Don't rush it, throw away your expectations etc etc. Good luck.
  • Robert-198418 September 2020
    What a surprising triumph! This film is such a delicate examination of private lives, every day happening, presented in a quite and nonchalant way. Highly recommended.
  • This is the story of a group of female friends and their romantic relationships and work lives. The word happy is in the title, but this is not a happy film, and it goes on for over 5 hours. Each of the main characters is struggling with relationship and work issues, and things grow progressively more dramatic as the story goes on. Jun is trying to get away from her obsessive husband, who refuses to let her leave him, and in Japan a husband has some legal rights in this area. Fumi has to deal with what might be a romantic rival to her husband, a thoughtful writer. Sakurako lives with her husband, son, and mother-in-law in what appears to be a loveless home. And Akari, the tough one of the group, is lonely and emotionally isolated.

    There is a lot of loneliness in this film, and it seems like an indictment of Japanese marriages, portraying them as cold and heartless arrangements that are unfulfilling for all concerned. It reminded me of the films of Eric Rohmer, in the way it seriously probed its characters' relationships and emotions. There are long, puzzling sequences, like the odd workshop that takes place near the beginning. It was cool to see Hamaguchi breaking all the rules of mainstream filmmaking by having his characters talk at length about their feelings, and behave in realistic, undramatic ways. This is a serious film that got me thinking about the characters and their lives.
  • william_moon16 August 2022
    This movie resonates with people world wide. From generation to generation we inherit unhealthy relationship standards and expectations. There are many things in this movie. Patriarchy and what it means. Work standards that create family problems. Expectations where people are not willing to accept the reality of their partners.

    It is also a strong observant movie of real woman today that makes it so resonating also with many western audiences.

    Great dialogues, great people who make you reflect and be appreciative.
  • july-1505027 March 2021
    Warning: Spoilers
    A little bit boring, just like our real life, especially for women.
  • ThurstonHunger2 September 2022
    Yes the film is long and requires a commitment (less so streaming or like myself via a library DVD). I thought it was immensely worth it, you develop a strong sense of the four lead characters, characters that might be glossed over in other films (if not Japanese society?!?)

    At times, I think the filmmaker indulges in long scenes, there is a sort of self-help meets yoga class that in many other films would have been cut to 3 mins, but here it must have been 30 mins and did feel interminable at times as a viewer, as it might have felt if I unfortunately had attended one. It built tension for the scene afterwards where more relaxed conversation takes place, and yet not without its own edginess.

    Later there is a book reading that feels the same way but builds up opposing forces for a post-reading interview. The length of time spent on these scenes, helps put you into actresses lives.

    That said, the real immersion comes with some of the dialog between just the actresses. That sharp juxtaposition of civil surface but biting truth beneath it, was pretty fascinating to me.

    But mostly, I think of scenes of the women usually alone in some form of transportation, where they do leave some aspect of themselves behind. Boat, subway and especially that scene with Rira Kawamura as Jun on the bus after that interesting discussion with another passenger. Jun alone and the lighting exudes hope flashing across her, even as she is in isolation away from the quartet.

    Any ways, the movie was moving for me. Even if like a long car trip, you find yourself wondering "are we there yet" the ride is really what it was all about.

    I do like Hamaguchi's battle against the rushed jump-cut style of cinema.....and of life as well!
  • aghaemi18 January 2018
    There are various films whose run-times are much longer than what is considered normal. Lawrence Of Arabia clocked in at 397 minutes. The Lord Of The Rings: The Return Of The King was over 200 minutes long. More recently Blade Runner 2049 clocked in at a 'mere' 164 minutes. Japanese cinema has had its share of longer movies too. The epic Seven Samurai was 207 minutes long, while Love Exposure stopped looking up just shy of the four-hour mark. Happy Hour, ironically given the title, clocks in at five hours and seventeen minutes. Even more irony is supplied courtesy of the 'happy' aspect of things. More on that later.

    What the five hours length offers the viewer is a film that has the space, at what seems like the natural tempo of life, to dwell on the details, subtleties, nuances; delve into the minutiae and the corners of lives of the four female characters. They comprise the portrayals director Hamaguchi Ryûsuke intends his film, and its novice actresses, to deliver. The film is set in Kobe, Japan and makes all women look seamlessly bad. The director sets out to show not one woman as honourable or decent. When the four women run into other females the latter too end up accusatory, suspicious, corrupt and rotten. That over five hours was needed is in part because so much realism is portrayed and in part because the film aims to not be a mere movie, but to act like an unglamorous eye on the perfidy of the modern woman abusing her freedom with abandon. The realism is accentuated because the actresses are all from the director's acting workshops - none of them have any other acting credit to her name - which means their relative amateurism and occasional awkwardness makes their corruption come across as even more genuine. Even on the unintentionally rare occasion that the camera is out of focus and blurry or a fly spontaneously lands and re-lands on a character's head it ends up giving the movie even more authenticity as it helps the proceedings appear true-to-life. The same, one imagines, is true with the film going on for so long that the actors forget they are on film, forget the camera and just relax and become themselves.

    A segment of contemporary Japanese films (Kamome Shokodu, Megane, Petaru Dansu, Tokyo Sora as examples) has garnered accusations of catering to the desexualisation of Japanese women who are accorded a distant and sometimes demented quality. In films like these men are incidental and, when present at all, merely there as inane plot device creatures who help the women and immediately revert to disposability. These women's newfound independence has not enhanced them with love, understanding, happiness or contentment, but unleashed a beast that is morally rudderless, yet unwilling to assume ownership. In these films, the woman is deliberately indifferent to everything except her declared impossible standards. Happy Hour takes the concept to the next level. Men are not incidental. Men are victimized and suffering at the hands of not indifferent, but outright cruel and unhinged malicious female characters who not only not see it that way, they actually believe the opposite is true. Of the four females, one is married, one is divorcing, one is already divorced and the other in flux. Each is in turn abusive towards her man to the extent that in the second half of the film the viewer is treated to evidence of despicable and duplicitous deeds by women whose selfishness is projected through extraordinary demands, insults, psychological demasculinization and actions. Not only the women behave as such, but worse they imagine themselves as the victims. Ironically, they are more accommodating to men who are not physically or psychologically protective of them. One's family, vows, norms - even female friends - and propriety be damned. These women are uniformly hostile and self-absorbed jerks to such an extent that in comparison a fifth woman who characterizes her father's protectiveness towards her as a child as the work of a serial liar and a sixth woman who expresses her love and lust to a married man - right after a dinner with the said man's wife - are the more decent ones. There has been some thought given recently that in contrast to conventional wisdom Japan is a matriarchy. This is not the place for that debate, but in Happy Hour the demanding four use accusatory language to reveal surreal selfishness. It is unfathomable how they do not communicate their outlandish wants, yet demand understanding. They receive love, loyalty, patience and material goods, yet none of it helps tether them to husband or child, feeling or logic. It is a straight road to wanton matrimonial and societal hell.

    Irony has come up a few times in this text. In addition, it is ironic that there is little 'happy' (the title stems from a lengthy and revealing café scene after a workshop where the characters are encouraged to find their centres and communicate, the latter of which the viewer must by this point in this text know is useless) in this film other than the brief times the four women find themselves away from home, responsibility or committed male companionship. What the viewer gets in lieu, however, is something original, something curious, something novel, but never uplifting or inspiring.

    During one seemingly throw-away shot we are treated to a view of the city from the above inclusive of its streets, alleys, houses and yards. We come away wondering at the misery that lies within especially now that we know all the normal tools of human affection, logic or persuasion have lost their efficacy.
  • I watched this movie in pieces over several days, in order to finish the 5+ hour run time. This allowed me to process what I watched during each time. The movie portrays how 4 Japanese women are dealing with each other and their personal lives. The conversations they had were interesting at some moments, but overall it magnified how they weren't able to communicate properly. Not with each other, and not with their husbands either. Each woman seemed listless and just floating through their lives, unhappy, and unsure what to do about it. But maybe that is the life and culture in Japan.