pwk-2
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews3
pwk-2's rating
After the feel-good THE COMMITMENTS and the real-life THE SNAPPER, the third film in Roddy Doyle's Barrytown trilogy is a shade disappointing. THE VAN isn't a bad film by any means; it's just that it should and could have been better.
The screenplay is by Roddy Doyle, which makes it strange that the Rabbitte family has been so radically restructured. Jimmy becomes Larry, Jimmy Jr and the (marvellously funny) twins have gone, Sharon - the unmarried teenage mother of THE SNAPPER - has become Diane. A large measure of the fun of the bustling Rabbitte family life goes with them. Ireland, it seems, is no longer a land of "large families in small houses." The same shrinkage seems to have happened to Jimmy's(no, Larry's)circle of friends.
Presumably this has been done to avoid distracting from the core of the story - male friendship, female growth, living with unemployment. Oh, and football. Easily the best parts of the film, though, are those given over to the details of getting and running a dodgy chipper van. The end is handled oddly, though. What comes over in the book as a vindication of friendship over money appears in the film to be no more than a piece of drunken vandalism.
But something has been lost - richness, detail - in this stripping down of the story. Budgetary constraints, perhaps?
See THE COMMITMENTS for fun, see THE SNAPPER for its gutsy storytelling. Only see THE VAN if you really want to know what happened next.
The screenplay is by Roddy Doyle, which makes it strange that the Rabbitte family has been so radically restructured. Jimmy becomes Larry, Jimmy Jr and the (marvellously funny) twins have gone, Sharon - the unmarried teenage mother of THE SNAPPER - has become Diane. A large measure of the fun of the bustling Rabbitte family life goes with them. Ireland, it seems, is no longer a land of "large families in small houses." The same shrinkage seems to have happened to Jimmy's(no, Larry's)circle of friends.
Presumably this has been done to avoid distracting from the core of the story - male friendship, female growth, living with unemployment. Oh, and football. Easily the best parts of the film, though, are those given over to the details of getting and running a dodgy chipper van. The end is handled oddly, though. What comes over in the book as a vindication of friendship over money appears in the film to be no more than a piece of drunken vandalism.
But something has been lost - richness, detail - in this stripping down of the story. Budgetary constraints, perhaps?
See THE COMMITMENTS for fun, see THE SNAPPER for its gutsy storytelling. Only see THE VAN if you really want to know what happened next.
This is possibly the most perfect film I have ever seen - in acting, adaptation and direction. It is self-contained and of a kind, so there is no point in saying that it is better or worse than other great films, just that it can stand by itself as a perfect work of art.
And it was fun watching confused horror fans getting up and walking out!
And it was fun watching confused horror fans getting up and walking out!
It's been some time since I laughed so much at a film, so contrary to the makers' intentions. How could such decent actors make such a hash? The story - bikers join a mystical frog cult which makes them kill themselves so they can return as immortals - is daft, but no dafter than that of many perfectly good films. I suppose that good actors can only lift a terrible - and it *is* terrible - script if they are given a chance. I can only presume that Sanders, Reid and Hardy weren't given that chance.
This is a genuine "so bad it's good" movie.
This is a genuine "so bad it's good" movie.