dg-7
Joined Sep 2001
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews6
dg-7's rating
"Star Wars - The Phantom Menace" is placed within the deep lore of the jedi myth, the force that guides everything in the galaxy. People who are interested in the deep fabric of the story will like this movie best. The rest of the movie is forced, uninvolving, and kind of desperate especially when it comes to trying to create the new Han Solo, the new Darth Vader. Jar Jar Binks? Darth Moll? No, it just didn't happen.
This is a movie that has to establish everything so why does the movie contain so many scenes similar to the original trilogy? The celebration, the light sabre duel in the corridor(and death), the imperial "stompers". None of this sticks. The film is a triumph of visual effects(although I found the federation robot army a bit glassy) but in the service of what, really? Kids are not compelled by this kind of stuff, not the politicking or the King Arthur elements.
What I liked about the film, aside from the technical elements, were some of the actors strangely enough? Jake Lloyd was very engaging as Anakin and Liam Neeson found the right tone of reverence and age for the role of the Jedi Master, although I'm not sure why his body didn't vanish at the end......but never mind. Ewan McGregor looks lost in his role but I guess staring at a blue screen will do that to you. Natalie Portman was quite fetching as the Queen.
I liked the deep respect and awe shown for the jedi myths and procedures and Darth Moll was a suitably fearful and challenging villain and his dual light sabre was splendid to watch.
I am looking forward to the next two installments which will no doubt be more meaty and aggressive, but Lucas really has to be more sharp and less naive and generic with the screenplay. The Queen says, "they've won this round". A boxing analogy? And on.
The identity of Anakin's father is a deep mystery, although how Luke Skywalker and Princess Leia came to be most certainly is not. I recommend the film, in spite of itself, even though it pales in comparison to any of the previous three films, even though it lacks heart and magic. It is an important movie, undeniably. It's just a shame that with all of the resources that it wasn't a whole lot better and smarter.
To anyone who says that they'd had enough of the original Star Wars characters, I say that I couldn't disagree with you more.
**1/2 (out of four)
This is a movie that has to establish everything so why does the movie contain so many scenes similar to the original trilogy? The celebration, the light sabre duel in the corridor(and death), the imperial "stompers". None of this sticks. The film is a triumph of visual effects(although I found the federation robot army a bit glassy) but in the service of what, really? Kids are not compelled by this kind of stuff, not the politicking or the King Arthur elements.
What I liked about the film, aside from the technical elements, were some of the actors strangely enough? Jake Lloyd was very engaging as Anakin and Liam Neeson found the right tone of reverence and age for the role of the Jedi Master, although I'm not sure why his body didn't vanish at the end......but never mind. Ewan McGregor looks lost in his role but I guess staring at a blue screen will do that to you. Natalie Portman was quite fetching as the Queen.
I liked the deep respect and awe shown for the jedi myths and procedures and Darth Moll was a suitably fearful and challenging villain and his dual light sabre was splendid to watch.
I am looking forward to the next two installments which will no doubt be more meaty and aggressive, but Lucas really has to be more sharp and less naive and generic with the screenplay. The Queen says, "they've won this round". A boxing analogy? And on.
The identity of Anakin's father is a deep mystery, although how Luke Skywalker and Princess Leia came to be most certainly is not. I recommend the film, in spite of itself, even though it pales in comparison to any of the previous three films, even though it lacks heart and magic. It is an important movie, undeniably. It's just a shame that with all of the resources that it wasn't a whole lot better and smarter.
To anyone who says that they'd had enough of the original Star Wars characters, I say that I couldn't disagree with you more.
**1/2 (out of four)
'Manhunter' is about real fear, real terror, something that thrillers rarely are able to convince us of. Anyone who thinks 'Silence of the Lambs' is a better film then 'Manhunter' knows nothing about movies - period.
HARD CHOICES begins with a young boy in a small town who dreams about flying planes. One day his brother and another guy take him on a joyride, which culminates in the murder of a store clerk in a botched robbery. That's the end of the kid. The kid is a victim of circumstance but not to the law who put him in a cell with the hard criminals.
HARD CHOICES begins in almost documentary fashion. We observe the Tennessee backwoods where Bobby lives. Up until the crime the movie seems painfully routine - I guess that's the idea - and then the murder. The middle text of the movie is with Bobby in prison, and he's a hearbreaker. A female social worker(Margaret Klennck) comes to visit him. Bobby's attracted to her and she to him and then the unpredictable happens.
HARD CHOICES, gritty and rough, contains moments of pure revelation. The sad course of Bobby's life and the shocking but touching affair with the woman whch is both senstive as it is hot and forbidden.. That's unpredictable enough but things escalate, the movie becomes a sombre thriller and anything's possible.
I didn't recognize any of the actors in this movie, although John Sayles plays a kind hearted drug dealer with a crush on the woman. This movie come to think of it is full of hard choices and Rick King the director never makes the material predictable or soapy. In the end, all we can hope is for Bobby to have some kind of life., maybe flying a plane. This is a great film, the kind of film that cries out to be discovered on video and cable.
DG
STAR STAR STAR STAR (out of four)
HARD CHOICES begins in almost documentary fashion. We observe the Tennessee backwoods where Bobby lives. Up until the crime the movie seems painfully routine - I guess that's the idea - and then the murder. The middle text of the movie is with Bobby in prison, and he's a hearbreaker. A female social worker(Margaret Klennck) comes to visit him. Bobby's attracted to her and she to him and then the unpredictable happens.
HARD CHOICES, gritty and rough, contains moments of pure revelation. The sad course of Bobby's life and the shocking but touching affair with the woman whch is both senstive as it is hot and forbidden.. That's unpredictable enough but things escalate, the movie becomes a sombre thriller and anything's possible.
I didn't recognize any of the actors in this movie, although John Sayles plays a kind hearted drug dealer with a crush on the woman. This movie come to think of it is full of hard choices and Rick King the director never makes the material predictable or soapy. In the end, all we can hope is for Bobby to have some kind of life., maybe flying a plane. This is a great film, the kind of film that cries out to be discovered on video and cable.
DG
STAR STAR STAR STAR (out of four)